logo
Trump's massive agenda bill faces headwinds in the Senate after key ruling from chamber's rules referee

Trump's massive agenda bill faces headwinds in the Senate after key ruling from chamber's rules referee

CNN2 days ago

The timeline to pass President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill by July 4 could slip as Republican lawmakers scramble to retool their bill to meet Senate rules and garner enough support in a deeply divided GOP conference.
Senate GOP leaders had hoped to move Trump's massive agenda in their chamber by Saturday morning, giving it to Speaker Mike Johnson to jam it through the House by Tuesday — so the president could sign it by the Fourth of July.
But Thursday morning, the Senate's rules referee, parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, struck down key provisions, saying they don't meet the chamber's strict budget rules that must be followed so the bill can be approved by a simple majority of 51 votes – or just GOP support.
'We don't control the timing of the parliamentarian. That's obviously something that we have to adapt to but we're plowing forward and when we actually get on it still is an open question, but rest assured we will,' Senate Republican Leader John Thune told reporters when asked about bill timing, saying they have 'contingency plans' for such 'speed bumps.'
Chief among the denied provisions is the GOP's proposed changes to taxes that states can impose to help pay for Medicaid coverage – an issue known as the provider tax – which could have raised $200 billion to pay for programs in the bill.
Now, Republican leaders are scrambling to retool the provision so it can both meet Senate rules and pass muster with a divided Senate GOP conference. It's unclear how long that process will take, according to several senior GOP sources.
The parliamentarian has made a number of other notable rulings, but her determination that increases to provider taxes do not comply with budget rules means Republicans will have to find another way to offset the cost of the president's massive domestic policy bill just days before GOP leadership wanted to vote on it.
Thune has previously ruled out trying to overrule the parliamentarian, worried about the precedent that would set for the chamber.
'We'll continue our work and find a solution to achieve the desired results,' a Republican source familiar with the negotiations told CNN Thursday morning.
Potential changes to the Medicaid program have badly divided the Senate GOP, with a number of members – including Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri and Susan Collins of Maine, among others – worried that the new limits would devastate rural hospitals in their states.
Others, still, want deeper Medicaid cuts to help pay for the multi-trillion-dollar tax overhaul in the bill.
Republican leadership is looking to see if they can make changes to the bill's Medicaid provisions to resubmit to the Senate parliamentarian, in the hopes that she'll accept it the second time around.
Hawley said Thursday morning that he prefers the House's model, which froze provider tax rates at current levels, and said he had spoken with Trump Wednesday evening and that the president agreed with him. But the House's approach to provider taxes, which was also included in the Senate bill, was also ruled out of order by the parliamentarian.
'His message was, do what the House did, so I agree with that,' he said, adding, 'If the leadership wants to redraft, my advice would be, why don't you do what the House did.'
Pressed on the fact that the parliamentarian also overruled a freeze on provider taxes, Hawley answered, 'They're gonna have to redraft all of it, but this would be a chance to fix it.'
'This would be a chance for leadership to fix it and actually do something right here that's not gonna hurt rural hospitals,' he continued, without providing more details on what provisions he wants to see in a new draft that he thinks could withstand the parliamentarian's review.
Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, who is up for reelection in 2026, has warned his colleagues for the last week that he won't vote to proceed to full Senate debate on the bill unless he gets state-specific answers.
'I'm still looking at answers to questions, so whether or not we retool that, or go back to the House baseline and build off there, I think those are discussions that the leadership will be having today,' Tillis told CNN.
'If retooling means I can get answers to what I consider to be fundamental questions, I'm open to it. But if retooling means I'm still not going to get the answers I need to understand the impact of the state, I'm opposed to it.'
A number of Republican senators cautioned their timeline for passing the megabill had been upended by the parliamentarian's ruling, venting their frustrations on Capitol Hill in the hours after it came down.
'I'm concerned about the parliamentarian's ability to make these decisions,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin said, suggesting without evidence that 'it seems politically motivated.'
'The parliamentarians are not supposed to be in politics — and I'm not accusing her of that, I haven't heard her explanation of it. I want to see it before I just take this decision. I want to see how she got to the decision,' the Oklahoma Republican said.
Sen. Tommy Tuberville went further, calling for the parliamentarian to be fired.
'The WOKE Senate Parliamentarian, who was appointed by Harry Reid and advised Al Gore, just STRUCK DOWN a provision BANNING illegals from stealing Medicaid from American citizens. This is a perfect example of why Americans hate THE SWAMP,' Tuberville wrote on X.
The Senate parliamentarian is a nonpartisan position that was created in the 1930s. In the role, MacDonough, the first woman to serve as parliamentarian, is tasked with advising the chamber on how its rules, protocols and precedents should be applied. That includes advising senators in a bill-review process known as a 'Byrd Bath' when they are looking to use Senate budget rules to pass a bill with a simple majority.
Senators acknowledged that the parliamentarian's rulings could slow their timeline for passing the bill.
'One option, obviously, would be to go forward without the provider tax provisions, and we could do it pretty quickly,' Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy said, noting that deficit hawks in the GOP conference would 'be screaming like they're part of a prison riot,' if leadership took that path.
'Another option would be to rewrite it, which will delay things. Will [Senate Majority Leader] Thune keep us here until we give them re-written? I don't know,' he continued.
Saying 'it's pretty frustrating,' Florida GOP Sen. Rick Scott insisted he's optimistic his conference can rework the language.
Pressed, however, on whether the legislation could still pass the Senate this weekend, as Republicans had hoped, Scott said: 'Who knows? I'm up here until we get it done.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minnesota Lawmaker and Her Husband Remembered for Their Shared Legacy
Minnesota Lawmaker and Her Husband Remembered for Their Shared Legacy

New York Times

time33 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Minnesota Lawmaker and Her Husband Remembered for Their Shared Legacy

Minnesota State Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, were remembered at their funeral on Saturday as 'extraordinary public servants' who were killed in an inexplicable act of political violence. Their wooden caskets rested side by side inside the Basilica of St. Mary in Minneapolis as hundreds of political colleagues, friends and relatives sat shoulder to shoulder in the pews to say goodbye to the couple, who were assassinated at their suburban Minneapolis home earlier in June. Former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris joined the mourners for the somber Catholic funeral Mass, though neither spoke during the service. Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, his eyes red from crying, delivered the eulogy. He praised Ms. Hortman as a consequential and compassionate political leader and Mr. Hortman as her proudest supporter. He said their shared legacy included improving roads and bridges, and free school lunches and expanded preschool for children. 'Millions of Minnesotans will get to live their lives better because she and Mark chose public service,' Mr. Walz said. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Senators launch a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts
Senators launch a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts

Chicago Tribune

time35 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Senators launch a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts

WASHINGTON — The Senate launched a rare weekend session Saturday as Republicans race to pass President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and bolstered deportation funds by his July Fourth deadline. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday. Senators are expected to grind through the days ahead with procedural vote Saturday to begin considering the legislation, but the timing was uncertain. There would still be a long path ahead, with hours of potentially all-night debate and eventually voting on countless amendments. Senate passage could be days away, and the bill would need to return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, opened the day's session with an impassioned defense of the package that he said has been misrepresented by its critics. 'Here's what American workers get out of 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' Moreno said as he began outlining the provisions. 'Read it for yourself.' The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. Trump is pushing Congress to wrap it up, even as he sometimes gives mixed signals, allowing for more time. At recent events at the White House, including Friday, Trump has admonished the 'grandstanders' among GOP holdouts to fall in line. 'We can get it done,' Trump said in a social media post. 'It will be a wonderful Celebration for our Country.' The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the spending cuts that Republicans are relying on to offset the lost tax revenues are causing dissent within the GOP ranks. Some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he remains concerned about the fundamentals of the package and will not support the procedural motion to begin debate. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pushing for deeper cuts, said he needed to see the final legislative text. With the narrow Republicans majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board to ensure passage. The release of that draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the bill to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate with a 53-47 GOP edge and Democrats unified against Trump's bill. Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals were determined to be out of compliance by the chief arbiter of the Senate's rules. One plan would have shifted some food stamp costs from the federal government to the states; a second would have gutted the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to a Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary objections and opposition from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Most states impose the provider tax as a way to boost federal Medicaid reimbursements. Some Republicans argue that is a scam and should be abolished. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said that under the House-passed version of the bill, some 10.9 million more people would go without health care and at least 3 million fewer would qualify for food aid. The CBO has not yet publicly assessed the Senate draft, which proposes steeper reductions. Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the package would cost the poorest Americans $1,600, the CBO said. The Senate included a compromise over the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states, but the issue remains unsettled. The current SALT cap is $10,000 a year, and a handful of Republicans wanted to boost it to $40,000 a year. The final draft includes a $40,000 cap, but for five years instead of 10. Many Republican senators say that is still too generous. At least one House GOP holdout, Rep. Nick LaLota of New York, had said that would be insufficient. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans dropped the bill 'in the dead of night' and are rushing to finish the bill before the public fully knows what's in it. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington, had said they are 'very close' to finishing up. 'We would still like to meet that July Fourth, self-imposed deadline,' said Johnson, R-La. Johnson and Thune have stayed close to the White House, relying on Trump to pressure holdout lawmakers.

Jesse Watters' New Nickname For Zohran Mamdani Makes Him Sound Ridiculously Cool
Jesse Watters' New Nickname For Zohran Mamdani Makes Him Sound Ridiculously Cool

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jesse Watters' New Nickname For Zohran Mamdani Makes Him Sound Ridiculously Cool

Fox News host Jesse Watters has unveiled a new nickname for New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani — and people can't help but notice it makes him sound really, really cool. Over the past few days, the commentator has referred to the progressive rising star as 'Zohran the Destroyer,' or simply 'the destroyer,' multiple times. In a viral screenshot from Thursday's episode of 'Jesse Watters Primetime,' a chyron reads, 'ZOHRAN THE DESTROYER WRECKS DEM PARTY.' The segment touched on angst from some Democrats over Mamdani threatening the status quo. The democratic socialist beat former New York Gov. and accused sexual harasser Andrew Cuomo in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary on Tuesday in a stunning upset. 'What's Zohran the Destroyer got going for him?' Watters asked in a monologue that trashed Mamdani's policy proposals and mocked his supporters. He also called him a 'smooth-talking assassin.' On 'The Five' on Friday, Watters mused, 'Zohran the Destroyer is about to give Karl Marx a woke makeover, if Democrats can't stop him from becoming the next mayor of New York City.' On social media, people joked about how awesome the moniker made Mamdani sound. They're giving him cool nicknames now — pokey pup (@Whatapityonyou) June 27, 2025 Problem? — Austin MacNamara - Gremloe (@gremloe) June 28, 2025 omw to Join the Praetorian Guard of Zohran the Destroyer — Estrie⚢🔆 (@AdorableEstrie) June 28, 2025 I'm sorry @ZohranKMamdani, but I will only be referring to you by your full name from now on: Zohran The Destroyer. — Deliver The Food (@deliverthefred) June 27, 2025 They try to make him sound scary and just make him sound like a hero."Hither came Zohran, black-haired, bright-eyed, sword in hand, a reaver, a billionaire-slayer, with gigantic melancholies and gigantic mirth, to tread the jeweled thrones of the Earth under his sandaled feet." — Josiah Hawthorne (@JosiahHawthorne) June 27, 2025 Zohran Mamdani Stuns Andrew Cuomo In NYC Mayoral Primary Marjorie Taylor Greene And Tucker Carlson Offer Surprising Praise For Rising Dem Star Democrats Hope They Can Replicate Zohran Mamdani, Just Without The Socialism

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store