logo
RAF nuclear jet base protected by 5ft fence

RAF nuclear jet base protected by 5ft fence

Telegraph8 hours ago
Britain's new nuclear-capable fighter jets will be protected by a 5ft-high fence that could be scaled by saboteurs, The Telegraph can reveal.
Following an investigation, The Telegraph found that a number of the Royal Air Force's most important bases are susceptible to potential attacks by determined activists and foreign agents.
Among them are a mooted future home of Britain's F35 fighters and two bases that were named as targets by soon-to-be proscribed Palestine Action last week.
At points, the 'vulnerable' airstrips are protected by hedges, wooden fences or nothing at all – which insiders admitted was 'not perfect'.
The potential security weaknesses are publicly available using Street View software, which experts said Palestine Action and hostile foreign powers would already have been able to use to assess their weaknesses.
A dossier of findings has been shared with the Ministry of Defence. The Telegraph has also chosen not to name the bases visited or to detail precisely where weaknesses are along their perimeters.
Palestine Action has pledged to raid air bases across the country after demonstrators made their way in and out of RAF Brize Norton, in Oxfordshire, last month without being detected.
But the RAF appears to have made few attempts to strengthen the physical perimeters of its bases since the incursion, in which two military planes were vandalised.
At bases visited by The Telegraph, patrols were infrequently observed, barbed wire was absent for large distances, and CCTV did not appear to cover their entire perimeters.
Mark Francois, the Conservative shadow defence minister, said the RAF needed to rapidly review base security following the 'serious revelations'.
He said: 'The MoD has announced a review of security at all military installations, which must be thorough but also conducted at pace. These serious revelations underline just how crucial that security review now is.'
At one site, the RAF's main intelligence and surveillance base, a 700-metre section of perimeter near its runway is made up of hedges and metal and wooden fences that only reach 6ft high.
The area is devoid of barbed wire and offers would-be infiltrators a quick getaway onto the A15.
Nearby, another base is protected only by a 6ft-high, garden-style wooden fence for almost 1.5 miles along its north and eastern perimeter.
The major base is home to RAF Typhoon fighter squadrons.
Reporters also visited another site, which will house the latest generation F35 fighter jets.
It is also under consideration to house new nuclear-capable F35s bought last month. But for one 200-metre stretch of its perimeter, all that stands in the way of would-be infiltrators is a 5ft chain-link fence with no barbed wire.
Perimeters are also vulnerable at two RAF bases named as targets by Palestine Action in a meeting last week that was accessed by the Telegraph.
One of these was the RAF's officer training school. The base's perimeter is relaxed, with one four-mile section consisting of drystone walls, broken wooden fences, hedges or nothing at all.
The base also has a series of weakly defended emergency access points – two of which are left completely open and one protected by movable metal barricades and a sign that reads: 'Keep off'.
The perimeter of another site named by Palestine Action – much of which is hedgerows – contains three unmanned gate barriers, which are not wide enough to cover their respective gaps in the fence.
New, 10ft-high black metal fences appear to have recently been installed to replace three other such gate barriers, however.
Palestine Action has claimed these two bases have links to Elbit Systems UK, a military manufacturer that it has repeatedly targeted before.
It is understood that the two bases are used for cadet and basic flying training.
Ed Arnold, a former British Army officer who was previously in charge of security at a UK base, said the RAF had left itself 'vulnerable' to infiltration by activists and foreign agents.
Mr Arnold, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said: 'Palestine Action has shown just how vulnerable the bases are.
'If more dangerous actors followed their example, it could be a hand grenade thrown into a plane's engine – not just red paint.
'Russia and Iran will be watching closely and thinking that they could sabotage these bases too. Palestine Action has revealed how easy it would be and it is certainly a threat we should worry about.'
Failure of leadership
Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, said the RAF was guilty of a 'clear failure of leadership'.
He said: 'Our bases need to be made fully secure.'
It is understood that enhanced measures are in place following the infiltration at Brize Norton and that security at all bases is under review.
Further 'layered' security measures are also in place inside the bases and other non-visible security measures being used include electronic motion sensors.
Sources also said there were air safety limits on the height of fences that can be erected immediately next to runways.
The majority of the five bases' perimeters consist of barbed wire-topped metal fencing and main gates are guarded by uniformed personnel.
Frequent patrols are conducted by the RAF, police and dog units,and signs warn people to keep out.
The MoD said: 'We take security extremely seriously and operate a multi-layered approach to protect our sites, including fencing, patrols and CCTV monitoring.
'Following the security incident at RAF Brize Norton, we are urgently reviewing security procedures across the Defence estate and have immediately implemented a series of enhanced security measures at all sites.
'After years of hollowing out and underfunding of the Armed Forces, the Strategic Defence Review concluded that we need to invest more in this area, backed by the largest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the Cold War.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It is time to release prisoners trapped by inhuman endless jail terms
It is time to release prisoners trapped by inhuman endless jail terms

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

It is time to release prisoners trapped by inhuman endless jail terms

The Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence, introduced in 2005 under the Labour government, was intended to protect the public from serious offenders deemed too dangerous for a fixed-term release. But nearly two decades on, this law stands as one of the most egregious stains on Britain's criminal justice system. Abolished in 2012 for its inherent flaws, it nonetheless continues to trap thousands of people in a cruel legal limbo, as a debate in the House of Lords today will no doubt highlight. It is long past time that every person still serving an IPP sentence be resentenced. The continued use of this now-defunct punishment is both unjust and, arguably, inhumane. At its core, the IPP sentence allowed judges to hand out indeterminate prison terms for offences that did not justify life imprisonment but were deemed serious enough to warrant extended supervision. Offenders were given a 'tariff' – the minimum time they must serve before being considered for release. Many of these tariffs were shockingly short, some as low as two years. Yet thousands remain in prison long after these tariffs have expired. Why? Because release is dependent not on time served, but on proving to the Parole Board that they are no longer a danger to the public – a nebulous, subjective, and often unreachable standard. This flips the basic presumption of justice on its head. In a fair system, the state must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt to imprison a person. Under IPP, once the tariff is served, the burden of proof shifts unfairly to the prisoner. It is no longer the state's job to justify incarceration; it is the prisoner's burden to earn freedom. This is particularly problematic when access to rehabilitative programmes, often required for parole, is limited or unavailable – especially in overcrowded prisons. The system sets people up to fail and then blames them for not succeeding. Moreover, the psychological toll of such indefinite punishment is catastrophic. Suicide and self-harm rates among IPP prisoners are significantly higher than average. Many live in a state of constant uncertainty and despair, unsure if they will ever be released, even decades after their offence. It is not unusual to find individuals still imprisoned for minor crimes – such as theft or assault – that would today warrant only a few years behind bars, yet they languish without a release date. The punishment no longer fits the crime, if it ever did. The injustice of the IPP system has been widely recognised. The House of Commons justice committee labelled it "irredeemably flawed" and called for all remaining IPP prisoners to be resentenced. The European Court of Human Rights has also condemned aspects of the sentence as incompatible with human rights obligations. Yet the government has so far refused to act decisively, citing public safety and political sensitivity. This is a failure of courage and leadership. Protecting public safety does not require trampling basic rights or holding people indefinitely for crimes long past. Dangerous individuals can be managed through proper risk assessment and robust parole conditions – not through perpetual punishment without end. Resentencing every IPP prisoner is not only fair, it is necessary. It would give judges the opportunity to reconsider the nature and severity of each offence and impose a proportionate, fixed sentence with clear guidance for release. For many, this would mean immediate or imminent freedom; for others, it would offer clarity, rehabilitation goals, and hope – something the current system wholly lacks. Justice demands consistency, proportionality, and transparency. The IPP sentence undermines all three. Some argue that resentencing might release dangerous individuals back into society. But the risk can be responsibly managed without recourse to indeterminate detention. Modern sentencing tools, community supervision, mental health support, and parole frameworks are all capable of mitigating risk. Perpetual incarceration without due process is not a solution – it is a violation. Britain prides itself on the rule of law, but this chapter of penal policy betrays that principle. IPP sentences should not only be consigned to history – they must be actively undone. Every person still caught in this Kafkaesque trap deserves a proper sentence, a path to rehabilitation, and a chance at freedom. Anything less is a continuation of a deep and unforgivable wrong.

Palestine Action claims ban is ‘authoritarian abuse' of power
Palestine Action claims ban is ‘authoritarian abuse' of power

Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Times

Palestine Action claims ban is ‘authoritarian abuse' of power

Palestine Action has labelled the government 'authoritarian' and compared its activists to the Suffragettes as part of an 11th hour bid to avoid being banned as a terrorist organisation. The group's founder, Huda Ammori, has asked the High Court to temporarily block the government from proscribing it under the Terrorism Act. The ban is set to become law at midnight on Saturday after being approved by the House of Commons and the House of Lords. If it goes ahead, membership and support for Palestine Action would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. 'This is the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists,' Raza Husain KC, representing Ammori, said. Husain said his client 'was inspired by the long tradition of direct action in this country', including the Suffragettes and movements against apartheid and the Iraq War, and wished to take action 'to prevent harm before it happens'. Quoting Ammori, the barrister continued that the group had 'never encouraged harm to any person at all' and that its goal 'is to put ourselves in the way of the military machine perpetrating genocide'. • Revealed: Palestine Action's map of UK targets Addressing Mr Justice Chamberlain, Husain said: 'We ask you, in the first instance, to suspend until July 21 what we say is an ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power which is alien to the basic tradition of the common law and is contrary to the Human Rights Act.' The Home Office is opposing both the bid to delay the ban from becoming law, and the potential attempt to launch a legal challenge against the decision. There was a heavy police presence with dozens of officers and several police vans in the street outside the Royal Courts of Justice as several hundred protesters gathered. The group's supporters waved Palestinian flags and held placards as organisers beat drums and chanted slogans. • Chants of 'death to the IDF' as Palestine Action members face court Protesters, ranging from children to the elderly, described the bans as 'erasing resistance' and an 'outrageous' attack on a democratic right to protest. Many protesters said they will still support the cause, even if the proscription comes into force. A minor scuffle unfolded mid-morning after a counterprotester from Our Fight UK, a pro-Israeli group, was removed. No arrests were made as the two protesters were moved away from the Palestine Action protest. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, moved to proscribe the group after activists caused an alleged £7 million worth of damage to two Voyager planes at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. The group has also repeatedly targeted the Elbit Systems UK, which it says makes military hardware for the Israel Defence Forces. In the hearing, Palestine Action argued that the criminal damage it has meted out to its targets does not constitute terrorism, although it conceded its activists caused 'serious damage to property', as defined in the Terrorism Act 2000. Palestine Action said that the government's use of its statutory power needs to be balanced against the group's human rights, including freedom of expression and the right to peaceful association. Chamberlain suggested an assessment on whether to ban Palestine Action under terrorist laws had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Husain replied: 'Yes they did, and that is very relevant to today because it is very relevant to timing.'

Banning Palestine Action ‘considered months before RAF break-in'
Banning Palestine Action ‘considered months before RAF break-in'

Telegraph

time35 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Banning Palestine Action ‘considered months before RAF break-in'

Banning Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation was considered by the Government months before the break-in at RAF Brize Norton, the High Court has heard. Huda Ammori, the group's co-founder, has sought to bring a legal challenge against the Home Office because of Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. Justice Martin Chamberlain was asked at the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday to grant 'interim relief' to Ms Ammori, which would temporarily block the legislation from coming into effect at midnight on Saturday. During the hearing, he noted that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March and 'preceded' the incident at the RAF base. He said: 'The process or assessment on the basis of which that proscription decision was made preceded that, in March.' Another hearing to decide whether Ms Ammori will be allowed to challenge the Home Secretary's decision is expected to be held later in July. If the law comes into effect as planned, it would make membership of or support for the action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The move was announced after two RAF Voyager planes were damaged at Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20. Palestine Action promptly claimed responsibility for the incident, which police said caused around £7 million worth of damage. Arguing on behalf of Palestine Action, Raza Husain KC, said: '[This is] the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists.' He described the decision to proscribe the group as an 'ill-considered, discriminatory authoritarian abuse of statutory power'. Speaking for Ms Ammori, he said she had been inspired to create the organisation by the 'long tradition of direct action' in the UK, 'from the suffragettes to Iraq War activists'. Mr Husain added that while people may disagree with Palestine Action's methods, which include criminal damage, trespass and burglary, but to say they are concerned in terrorism was 'an abuse of language'. 'The Secretary of State has still not sufficiently articulated or evidenced a national security reason that proscription should be brought into effect now,' he continued. Ms Cooper publicly announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, calling the vandalism of the two planes 'disgraceful' and saying the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. MPs in the House of Commons voted 385 to 26 – a majority of 359 – in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday before the House of Lords supported the move without a vote on Thursday. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident. They appeared at Westminster magistrates' court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the UK and conspiracy to commit criminal damage under the Criminal Law Act 1977. They were remanded in custody and will appear at the Old Bailey on July 18. Counter-Terrorism Policing South East said on Wednesday that a 41-year-old woman arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender had been released on bail until Sept 19 and a 23-year-old man who was arrested has been released without charge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store