Why we need to show Adolescence in schools – before it's too late
But for those of us working with young people every day, there's no shock to be had. We know just how capable young boys can be.
From the real-life murder of Elianne Andam to the killing of Holly Newton, Adolescence portrays not a one-off horror, but a growing pattern of behaviour amongst boys of a younger and younger age. As co-creator and star Stephen Graham says himself, the question the Netflix series explores isn't if this violence is happening – but why?
Jamie is not neglected or abused – he comes from a loving family. His actions are instead the result of extreme online misogyny, targeting boys every time they look at their phone or turn on their computer. Young boys are being radicalised under our noses and Jamie's plight – as well as that of his victim, Katie – shows just how dangerous this can be.
Violence against women and girls (VAWG) has become everyday news, with the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) recently calling it 'a national emergency'. But people are less aware of its severity among children and young people.
According to data from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 16-19 year olds are at the highest risk of abuse from a current or former partner. The age most likely to report rape is just 14 – and, as the NPCC report emphasised, both victims and perpetrators of VAWG are getting younger every year.
Working with Tender (a charity focused on teaching children about healthy relationships) in schools across the country, this is highly evident. I've seen girls as young as 12 being stalked, threatened and attacked by boys from their own school and, even more horrifyingly, I've seen these girls blamed for it by their teachers – held accountable for the threats because they are 'difficult' or not the 'right type of victim'. With pornographic content widely available, violent acts like strangulation are often raised in our workshops – even by primary school children, aged nine or ten.
Adolescence has awoken the world not only to the problem, but the urgent need for a solution. The fact is, we do know how to halt these issues at their root – but it's simply not being put into action.
Through proven interactive, drama-based techniques, we counteract these harmful narratives, giving young people the tools to navigate and challenge online content. I've seen boys with radically misogynist views transform their attitudes within a matter of days and many go on to be advocates for healthy behaviour and gender equality across their schools.
But so many children don't have access to this support. Though relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) is now a compulsory part of the curriculum, its quality varies hugely from school to school, and academies (43.5 per cent of schools) currently have no obligation to follow the curriculum at all.
Teachers aren't receiving the training they need to teach critical concepts like consent and equality, and schools haven't the resources to buy in expertise. When we released a resource on this very issue, we were flooded with requests from schools for more support, more help, more guidance.
We can solve this problem via a three-pronged approach. Our government needs to be bold and brave – with legislation that ensures specialist RSHE in every single school, delivered by either external experts or highly trained teachers, whilst driving online safety measures to support this vital work. Schools need the resource to put this plan into action in a long-term, sustainable way, whilst parents and carers need guidance to help talk to their children about these issues from the very beginning and keep them safe in the home environment.
Tender is working with more and more schools every year, but, as a charity, there's only so much we can do. Bombarded by violent misogyny on a daily basis, so many young people don't have access to this vital education, and are left vulnerable to the radicalisation Adolescence so aptly demonstrates. We can't leave the responsibility in the children's hands – it's our job to be brave, not theirs.
Bringing the series into schools is a key, positive project that capitalises on the incredible awareness the series has raised. But it must be the first step in a comprehensive plan of funding, resource and expertise, implemented as urgently as any other threat to our children's safety.
Speaking at a Tender panel, Stephen Graham said: 'So many people could have made a difference to Jamie's life and that's the tragedy of it.' This is the key – violence like this can and must be prevented. We have a proven, impactful solution. If the government wants to fulfil its goal of halving VAWG, it's time for them to put this solution into action.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Ex-Netflix employee sues streaming giant claiming she was fired after filing discrimination complaints
A former labor relations lawyer at Netflix has sued the streaming giant and two executives, claiming they discriminated against her and other employees and retaliated against her after she filed harassment complaints, leading to her wrongful termination. Nhu-Y Phan, who worked at Netflix from May 2021 until her termination in September 2024, states that she and others experienced a hostile work environment while working under senior labor relations lawyer Ted Sinclair and Director of Labor Relations Jonah Cozien. In her lawsuit, Phan, who is Asian American, alleges she and colleagues who are women of color experienced gender and racial discrimination under Sinclair by being consistently passed over for opportunities they were qualified for and left out of meetings. Phan also alleges that Cozien sexually harassed her colleague, according to the lawsuit obtained by KTLA. After Phan filed complaints against Sinclair and Cozien, she alleges the two retaliated against her by writing unusual negative performance reports, which ultimately led to her termination. A spokesperson for Netflix said in a statement, 'These claims lack merit and we intend to defend this matter vigorously.' The Independent has reached out to Sinclair and Cozien for comment. 'Ms. Phan has been devastated both economically and emotionally by her wrongful discharge,' attorneys for Phan wrote in the complaint, filed in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles on July 21. 'Once a highly compensated professional with a sterling reputation, Ms. Phan faces an uphill battle finding comparable employment. The stress and humiliation of her termination, loss of income, and damaged reputation have been profound,' the complaint says. In her lawsuit, Phan says there was a clear change in the way she was treated after she filed the discrimination and sexual harassment complaints against her supervisors. The lawsuit states that Phan was well-paid and received glowing reviews. In her first few months working at the streaming giant, she received a $50k raise and was the lead labor relations person on multiple projects. In her role, Phan became the go-to person for production and business affairs when people were seeking labor advice, such as payment for directors, performers, and below-the-line crew. However, Phan says Sinclair, her then supervisor, began excluding Phan and other women of color from professional opportunities and giving those to other white employees who were less qualified. Phan alleges that at one point, Sinclair excluded her from negotiations between Netflix and the Directors Guild of America, despite Phan having previously worked under multiple executives at the DGA. In her lawsuit, Phan says she raised at least eight verbal or written complaints about Sinclair. Eventually, she moved under Cozien's supervision. But Phan states she later reported Cozien for allegedly sexually harassing her female colleague, after the colleague informed Phan that Cozien had been making her 'uncomfortable' by consistently asking her to get lunch, dinner, and after-work drinks – sometimes outside of work hours, such as when Cozien was on vacation with his family. Phan alleged Cozien then became 'hostile' toward her and revoked opportunities. Her lawsuit states that Cozien 'conspired' with Sinclair to have her fired, in part by writing a critical performance report. Phan is requesting a jury trial and asking for an unknown amount in damages from Netflix, Sinclair, Cozien, and other unnamed Netflix employees. 'Netflix is a corporate bully that will do anything to avoid responsibility for its actions,' said Brian Olney, an attorney at Hadsell, Stormer, Renick, and Dai LLP representing Phan, in a statement obtained by KTLA. The Independent has reached out to HSRD LLP for comment. The law firm told KTLA that 'Netflix repeatedly tried to silence Ms. Phan, first by firing her and then by suing her' by filing a lawsuit against her to compel arbitration. 'Nhu Phan had the courage to blow the whistle about Netflix executives who are discriminating against women of color and sexually harassing a female employee,' Olney said.
Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Teen's face cocooned in tape so she could breathe but not scream before sick murder
*WARNING: GRAPHIC DETAILS* 30 years after Fred & Rose West, even the 'most seasoned detectives' are still haunted by the bizarre and twisted way they killed 15-year-old Shirley The remains of nine women were found in the Fred and Rose West's House of Horrors - each naked, missing body parts, and cut to pieces with a kitchen knife in the family bathtub. Some were buried with their hands and feet still bound. Others had gags and other sex act paraphernalia in their shallow graves. But all shared one tragic fact: They had suffered. Terribly. The nine victims of 25 Cromwell Street hadn't just been killed - they had been tortured, slaughtered and butchered. And today, 30 years on from Rose's conviction for 10 counts of murder and Fred's suicide, one find, in particular, still haunts even the most experienced of crime investigators. For detectives found one of the victims - later discovered to be 15-year-old Shirley Hubbard - had been kept alive, stripped and likely suspended from the cellar beam with her arms and legs outstretched.... all while her face was entirely cocooned. Her whole head had been covered in parcel tape, save for one small breathing tube inserted in her nostril. It would have been just enough to keep her alive for their sick sexual acts yet she would have been unable to either see or scream. "You can't understand the West case and understand how truly wicked Fred and Rose were until you understand what was actually done to these girls," says the leading expert, Howard Sounes. "This isn't Agatha Christie where girls get bumped over the head and they die. It's torture - sexual torture to death. Imagine the anguish of this girl, she can breathe but can't scream." Shirley's remains were found during the excavation of the cellar at Gloucester's 25 Cromwell Street following the police tip off and raid in 1994. The first body found had been that of Fred and Rose's own 16-year-old daughter Heather, who was in several pieces under the patio. She had disappeared in 1987, with the Wests telling their other children she had run away and cut contact. After police unearthed Heather's remains, they soon realised her murder was just the latest of many. The deaths at Cromwell Street dated back two decades to 1973. All the victims were vulnerable young women, either "lodgers or runaways". It's thought Fred and Rose often hunted the local bus stops looking for prey - and would lure girls with a promise of a safe ride home. Instead they became their "sexual playthings" - until they got bored. Howard Sounes covered the original story for the Mirror in 1994 and 1995 and went on to become a leading expert in the case, interviewing dozens of people connected to the case, and becoming the senior producer of this year's Netflix hit Fred & Rose West: A British Horror Story. He recently gained access to more than 100 hours of police interview tapes from West's initial 1994 interrogations for his new book The Fred West Tapes, which is released this week and is being serialised in The Mirror. Of all the gruesome details of the Fred and Rose case he's heard and seen, it's the shocking crime scene photo of Shirley Hubbard's skull that remains one of the most horrifying. "I've seen the picture as the skull came out of the ground," he explains. "There was just a skull, hair and teeth left in a cocoon of parcel tape. Inserted into the parcel tape, up in to the nostril of this poor girl - or where the nose would have been - was a plastic tube. Like a home brewing tube." Fred actually admitted in the police interviews: "We had to keep them quiet so I wrapped them up in parcel tape", but he was less forthcoming about the details. According to Howard, however, the sight was enough to make "even the most seasoned detectives wince". "So he wrapped this poor girl's face in tape - which, by the way, he stole from work, because he was a habitual thief - and she was left naked, hands bound, feet bound, and probably hanging from the cellar beams," explains Howard. "Then this tube was inserted. So she can breathe and that prolongs the ordeal but she can't scream. And that's how she's found." No one can know how long the 15-year-old was kept alive. Once dead, she was decapitated and placed in a well in the floor under the fireplace, which was then covered in concrete. The Wests used the same technique for all five girls in the cellar. The youngest West children would later remember sleeping in that same cellar, which Fred also refers to as his "dungeon" on the interview tapes. They had to use a bucket for the toilet at night and empty it each morning. One child claimed they had been locked in the cupboard under the stairs one day when they heard screams before later seeing freshly-laid cement. It took weeks to identify Shirley using skull analysis. Experts painstakingly tried to recreate her likely facial features from the remaining bone structure and cross referenced them with missing girls from the time. Shirley had been born in Birmingham and was known as Shirley Lloyd, and Shirley Owen. Her parents split up when she was just two and she had ended up in care. But she had been trying to make the most of her life. She had changed her name to Hubbard was on school work experience placement at Debenhams in Worcester when she vanished on her way home on November 14, 1974. She was reported missing but police could find no trace - until their grisly find 20 years later. It is thought they lured her into their car while she was waiting at the bus stop. Shirley was the youngest for the victims found in Cromwell Street. (Fred's eight-year-old stepdaughter Charmaine was discovered under the floor of their previous address). While others may have escaped the exact same fate, almost all show signs of possible torture. Each set of dismembered remains was missing several body parts. "It was fingers and toes, but also large bones like kneecaps, sections of vertebrae," explains Howard. "There were dozens of body parts missing and no one really knows why. "The pathologist said you don't lose these body parts. They are being cut off. Yet we don't know if that's before or after death. Is he cutting them off as mementos? Or for torture? And where are they? Because there's dozens of missing bones and they have never been found." In another shocking case, it's believed the Wests may have kept one victim - 21-year-old Exeter University student Lucy Partington - alive for up to six days. She had disappeared on December 27 and on January 3 Fred went to A&E with a fresh knife cut to his hand. A knife was later discovered in Lucy's grave, suggesting he had accidentally dropped it in there after he cut himself. Given the timing of his hospital trip, police believe the Medieval English student may have been held hostage over the New Year holidays. "It's an aspect of the case that is seldom discussed because it is so chilling," says Howard. Lucy was from a middle-class family and had been to see her friend in Cheltenham the night she went missing. Lucy was "renowned for being sensible" according to friends. But her family later realised that she would likely have been waiting for a bus at a stop where the streetlights were out because of a miners' strike. It was also sleeting that night. So when the Wests pulled up in their grey Ford Popular with 'Vote Conservative' stickers on the back, they may have seemed respectable. Howard says in his new book: "Their son Steve West was a baby at this time and it is unlikely that he would have been left at home. The offer of a lift from a young family with a babe in arms may have seemed safe." It's a tactic the husband and wife are believed to have used multiple times. It's thought they then attacked their victims and took them to their "dungeon". Shirley Hubbard's makeshift cellar grave even had an extra grim nod to what was likely her fatal mistake. The fireplace in which she was buried had been covered with Marilyn Monroe wallpaper. It had the names of her films next to pictures from the movies. The words "Bus Stop" were positioned just above where her skull was found encased in concrete. Some of the other West victims had been closer to home - in fact they had rented one of their cut-price rooms on the top floor of their three-storey home. Fred and Rose had only been married less that year when they made their first kill - Lynda Gough, 18, a local fire officer's daughter and lodger, in April 1973. Another lodger was Shirley Anne Robinson, 18. She was missing two vertebrae, two ribs, 28 ankle bones and 42 of the 76 finger and toe bones. Nearby however were the remains of something else - her unborn child, believed to be Fred's and just a few weeks from full term. West was asked during the police interview about whether he derived pleasure from hurting his victims. While he had already confessed to multiple women dying at his home, he tried to maintain many of them were accidents. At one point he asked: "Are these people still alive when you remove [the body parts]?" To which he icily replies: "No comment on that." At another point in the interviews, he was asked the same question by another officer. Even though he admitted dismembering the bodies - in the family bathroom with a kitchen knife so as not to scratch the bath enamel - West seemed to find the suggestion he would deliberately torture someone as simply outrageous. "No, no. I couldn't hurt anybody like that," Fred told police. "I don't believe in suffering anyway. I mean, I couldn't torture anybody." He added: "Well, I mean ... If they were cut up, it was just their heads and legs. Nothing else took off." "That was Fred. He said these things in such a matter of fact manner," said Howard. "The Wests were never a normal couple. But they lived in a house, in the street, next to Marks and Spencer and a Seven-Day Adventist Church. Fred was that funny bloke who said hello to everyone. Rose was the slightly odd wife people avoided. But no one would ever have imagined they were mass murderers."
The National
18 hours ago
- The National
1 in 3 boys say revealing outfits are ‘asking for trouble'
A THIRD of Scottish secondary school boys believe girls who wear revealing clothing are 'asking for trouble'. A survey conducted by the University of Glasgow, which involved more than 13,000 pupils aged 11 to 18 across Scotland, has prompted calls for action to address misogynistic attitudes amongst teens and young adults. The research, conducted across 37 secondary schools, revealed a significant divide between male and female pupils' views on gender, harassment and equality. READ MORE: Police probe 'assault' after Tommy Robinson 'filmed next to unconscious man' One in four boys said the term 'sexual harassment' didn't apply if their behaviour was meant as a joke – a view shared by just seven per cent of girls. Half of the boys surveyed believed that 'overall, there are more things that boys are better at than girls,' despite 93 per cent saying they expected equal opportunities in life. The study's five authors said their findings should be discussed in classrooms, much like the Netflix drama Adolescence, which highlights the harmful effects of social media on teenage relationships. In a letter published in The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, they wrote: 'Most boys do not hold these negative views, but there is an urgent need to address the fact that a sizeable minority do.' Professor Kirstin Mitchell, who led the research, told The Times that the scale of the survey offers a 'general culture' snapshot behind more serious violence against women and girls. She described the belief held by a third of boys that revealing clothing meant girls were 'asking for trouble' as 'particularly troubling'. READ MORE: Labour minister claims Nigel Farage 'on Jimmy Savile's side' 'That is the kind of attitude which is underlying when incidents of sexual harassment do happen,' she said. The study also found 32 per cent of boys would judge a girl more harshly than a boy for having multiple sexual partners, compared to 12 per cent of girls. More than four in ten boys agreed that 'boys who behave like girls are weak,' a view held by just 13 per cent of girls. The study was carried out as part of Equally Safe in Schools, a Rape Crisis Scotland programme aimed at tackling gender-based violence. It found that the results were similar across all of the institutions involved, regardless of location or socioeconomic backgrounds.
