Russian drones attack Kyiv, witnesses report explosions and fire
Reuters witnesses reported a series of explosions, with one of them reporting a large fire at a site where one drone had fallen.
"Enemy drones are approaching one after the other on approaches to the capital from different directions and in the city's airspace," Tymur Tkachenko, head of the city's military administration, wrote on the Telegram messaging app.
Tkachenko said drone fragments had been spotted in three districts on opposite sides of the Dnipro River that bisects the city. One drone had fallen on a building, he said.
He said details on damage and possible casualties were being collated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
King Charles to honour 1,000 years of British-French friendship as he welcomes President Macron to Windsor - and warns of threats that 'know no borders' in powerful State Banquet speech
The King will pay tribute to 1,000 years of 'shared history' between Britain and France as he hosts President Macron for a State Visit at Windsor Castle today. Charles will also highlight the 'multitude of complex threats' faced by the two countries which, he will say, we tackle together 'as friends and allies' in his speech at a glittering State Banquet. Intriguingly, the monarch will also reference the challenges both counties are facing that 'know no borders', according to Buckingham Palace. Sources advised it would be wrong to say it that this is reference to the channel crossings and small boats issue, but added that the king he is referring to a 'multitude' of threats to Britain and France's shared values touching on - not not limited to - defence, technology and climate change. Ukraine will also be at the forefront of his mind. In his speech the King will say: 'For centuries our citizens have admired each other, amused each other, and imitated each other'. He will also reference how he personally remains 'in awe of France's extraordinary attributes and achievements.' Charles will also state that this partnership remains vital in facing the many challenges of today, saying that 'our two countries face a multitude of complex threats, emanating from multiple directions. As friends and as allies, we face them together.' 'These challenges know no borders: no fortress can protect us against them this time'. He will emphasise that Britain and France can help lead the way in confronting these issues, because: 'Our two nations share not only values, but also the tireless determination to act on them in the world.' The visit is being held at the request of the British government which is determined to 'reset' the country's relations with its European partners post Brexit. And the king's effusive speech leaves little doubt that President Macron and his wife, First Lady Brigitte Macron, will be welcomed with open arms. The couple will be greeted at RAF Northolt by the Prince and Princess of Wales and enjoy a carriage ride through Windsor before a full ceremonial welcome at the medieval castle. The visit comes after the King called on the nation to remember the 'extraordinary courage and compassion' displayed in the aftermath of the 'senseless evil' of the July 7 terrorist attacks in London. Extreme Islamist suicide bombers struck on three Tube trains and a bus that morning in 2005, killing 52 people and injuring more than 770. In a message to mark today's 20th anniversary of the atrocities, Charles praised those 'who rushed towards danger to help strangers' and said comfort can be taken from the 'spirit of unity' which allowed the nation to heal afterwards. Meanwhile Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, writing in the Sunday Mirror, warned that Islamic extremism remains 'the greatest threat' in Britain. She also praised the work of anti-radicalisation programmes, adding: 'Communities across the nation were determined that hatred would not win. The work done at that time has endured and evolved.' Last night the monarch asked that the country continues to work towards building a society 'of all faiths and backgrounds' in order to stand against 'those who seek to divide us'. He said: 'Today, as we mark 20 years since the tragic events of July 7, 2005, my heartfelt thoughts and prayers remain with all those whose lives were forever changed on that terrible summer's day. 'We remember with profound sadness the 52 innocent people who were killed in senseless acts of evil, and the enduring grief of their loved ones.'
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
UK sanctions Russians over chemical weapons in Ukraine
LONDON, July 7 (Reuters) - Britain on Monday targeted two Russian individuals and one Russian entity as part of its chemical weapons sanctions regime, in its latest effort to punish Moscow for the war in Ukraine. It imposed asset freezes and travel bans on Aleksey Viktorovich Rtishchev and Andrei Marchenko, the head and deputy head of Russia's radiological chemical and biological defence troops, for their role in the transfer and use of chemical weapons in Ukraine, the British government said. It said the Joint Stock Company Federal Scientific and Production Centre Scientific Research Institute of Applied Chemistry was sanctioned for supplying RG-Vo riot control agent grenades to the Russian military. The grenades have been used as a method of warfare against Ukraine in contravention of the Chemical Weapons Convention, the British government said. The Russian embassy in London did not immediately respond to Reuters request for a comment. Moscow has previously called Western sanctions illegal.
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Europe does not have to choose between guns and butter. There is another way
European governments are once again haunted by a tough choice between financing the military or spending on social programmes. That, at any rate, is the narrative that has taken hold since Donald Trump's retreat from the postwar global security order and the urgent pressure to rearm Europe. But to frame the dilemma facing Europe in this way is a big mistake. History teaches us that the political choice has never been about guns or butter, but rather guns or taxes. The collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s seemed to close almost a century of global ideological conflict, but it was also supposed to make us all richer. With the end of the cold war, Europeans would no longer need to uphold an expensive military apparatus for territorial defence. Governments ditched conscription and walked back defence outlays. Cashing in on that so-called 'peace dividend', governments could spend on the domestic priorities of their liking, boosting non-military investment. Last month's Nato summit in The Hague showed how this tide has been dramatically reversed. Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and Trump's uncertain commitment to Nato means that European governments have no choice but to invest more in their own mutual defence. The peace dividend, as Kristalina Georgieva, the head of the IMF, stated, 'is gone'. Europe's Nato members pledged to increase spending on 'hard defence', such as tanks and military salaries, from 2% to 3.5% of GDP by 2035. The question now is how to finance it. For some experts, the only way to build a warfare state that can deter Russia is to slash social spending. After all, goes the misleading argument, governments in the 1990s splashed the savings from defence on expensive welfare promises. Even before the Nato agreement in The Hague, the public were being softened up for the new reality. In a TV address in March, the French president, Emmanuel Macron, warned citizens that in a 'more brutal' world, they would have to make budget sacrifices. Macron ruled out higher taxes. Denmark's prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, decided to scrap a public holiday to finance higher defence spending. The UK has cut savagely into its international development aid budget for the same reason. But Europe would be drawing the entirely wrong lessons from history if it weakened the welfare state to build up the military state. There is another way: instead of slashing social spending, Europe's governments should raise taxes on corporations and capital to finance deterrence. Let's look at what actually happened in the 1990s. While cutting defence spending after the collapse of the Soviet Union allowed governments to increase social spending, it mostly gave them room to cut taxes and budget deficits, which they did with great zeal, as the 1990s neoliberal consensus took hold and tax competition intensified. Yes, the 'peace dividend' helped to finance big increases in social spending, but with ageing societies it was mostly devoted to pensions, health and longterm care. Social protection for the working age population has fallen across Europe since the end of the cold war. But from the mid 1980s to 2023, corporate income tax rates fell by around half within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Capital gains tax rates also dropped significantly: from up to 53% in the early 1990s to 26% today in Germany, or from up to 30% to up to 24% today in the UK for the same period. The 'peace dividend' was in fact a boon for the wealthiest in Europe. Savings in defence not only went to the private sector via tax cuts, but also via reduced fiscal deficits. Germany's adoption of its contentious constitutional 'debt brake' in 2009 helped it to achieve a balanced budget; something that would have been impossible without cutting defence spending to the bone. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion In the years ahead, Europe cannot afford politically to place the burden of the defence buildup on the most disadvantaged groups. More public debt, as Germany has now committed itself to, will be necessary. But debt is often a regressive tax, weighing more on the poorest, as the wealthy own a large share of the debt. Moreover, if EU members don't agree to common borrowing to finance the defence surge, as happened during the pandemic, financial markets may not let EU countries with a high debt load, such as Italy or France, increase deficit-spending on defence. The 'new normal' of higher defence spending should thus also be funded by increasing taxes, especially on corporate income, high wealth and capital gains. This won't be possible without limiting tax competition at a Europe-wide level. Indeed, the idea that some European tax havens continue to suck up corporate tax resources from others while they free-ride on their defence spending will become increasingly difficult to sustain. France and Germany have long pushed for the harmonisation of corporate taxes across the EU's 27 members. The EU must now rein in tax-dumping countries such as neutral Ireland. Europe cannot achieve better defence without better tax revenues. And only a defence buildup that is supported by the wider public across Europe can run beyond the short-term momentum and thus develop into a credible deterrence. The experience of 'military Keynesianism' globally, and across history, has never been about guns or butter, but guns and butter. In a war, you not only need weapons, but also a supportive population to operate them. Keeping the peace on the home front is just as important as holding the line in the trenches. Rather than slashing the welfare state to build up the military state, Europe's leaders should think about how to improve and modernise social spending. Only the prospect of a better and fairer world will keep our societies united and capable of fighting. Shahin Vallée is a senior research fellow at the German Council for Foreign Relations. Joseph de Weck is a fellow with the Foreign Policy Research Institute
