WWE vs. AEW: Who's winning 2025's wrestling war?
If there's one thing that titillates wrestling obsessives, it's when one of the major promotions — WWE or AEW — makes an explicit reference to the other. These days the digs and attacks tend to be much rarer than in the past, but that doesn't stop them from being thrilling when they happen.
Witness the social-media flutter this past May when an enterprising journalist used AEW's Double or Nothing press huddle to ask Tony Khan his opinions on WWE's none-too-subtle tactic of booking NXT premium live events against AEW's most important pay-per-view shows — one of the most aggressive competitive moves WWE has made against Khan's company.
Advertisement
That the AEW founder delivered an impeccably diplomatic answer did little to quell the excitement of those who spend their hours musing on the state of competition between WWE and AEW.
Of course, here at Uncrowned, we have much less reason to mince our words on these things. So here's an analysis of the status of the battle between the two big promotions.
The valuation gap
Before making any kind of comparison between the two promotions, you need to acknowledge the 10-ton elephant that squats over this topic. Whatever you make of the rival products, WWE is objectively a much larger company than AEW in terms of money in the bank (no pun intended).
Advertisement
Even the most flattering estimates value AEW at around $2 billion, which is still less than a quarter of what TKO paid for WWE two years ago. And that latter number was before WWE finalized its massive Netflix deal, which has helped add some billions to TKO's overall market cap in the past year.
None of this means there aren't specific areas where the numbers are closer (television viewing figures, for example), but it would be silly to pretend WWE doesn't have a massive edge due to its size and history.
Media rights and viewing figures
For all the focus on live shows, the modern pro-wrestling game is a television business: Both WWE and AEW make most of their money by selling their product to television and streaming networks.
Advertisement
For a rough comparison, WWE's various deals (Netflix, Peacock, NBCUniversal, etc.) bring in somewhere in the region of $1 billion per year. By contrast, AEW's recent media deal with Warner Bros. Discovery is valued at around $185 million per year — so less than a fifth of what WWE brings in.
The big prize here is the Netflix deal, which was rightly hailed as a bit of a game-changer for wrestling when it was confirmed last year. The slight wrinkle on that front is WWE's Netflix viewing figures haven't been as huge as some expected, prompting some whispers about whether the streaming giant paid too much.
As for viewership, AEW's U.S. television audience is around half of WWE's. 'AEW Collision' typically draws around 600,000 viewers in the U.S., compared to 1.2 million for 'WWE SmackDown.' That said, AEW's numbers have dipped over the past year or so, but now appear to be stabilizing. (Hat tip to the excellent Wrestlenomics, who publish detailed numbers on this.)
The verdict: Advantage WWE
John Cena and CM Punk face off during "WWE Raw." (Craig Ambrosio/WWE via Getty Images)
(WWE via Getty Images)
Live shows and ticket gates
As much as we get tired of TKO's obsession with announcing all these record gates at every PLE, there's no denying WWE's audience revenue is seriously impressive at the moment. It just did $3 million for 'WWE Raw' in London, for example.
Advertisement
On top of that, TKO's current focus is persuading cities to pay hefty 'site fees' for the right to host bigger events — like New Jersey paying $7 million to host this year's WWE SummerSlam double-header. That's almost certainly a big factor in why WrestleMania is heading back to Las Vegas in 2026.
On the other hand, AEW's gate revenue is much lower. Double or Nothing made $600,000 last month, for example. That said, their overseas events are still big league: All In at London's Wembley Stadium made $9 million and $6 million in 2023 and 2024, respectively.
Gate revenues are one thing, but what about the crowds? On average, AEW's weekly shows draw around one quarter of the WWE audience (around 3,000 compared to 11,000 fans) — a ratio that has gotten steeper in WWE's favor over the past two years.
AEW's bigger shows are still drawing decent crowds (in the 10,000 range) that are on par with the smaller WWE PLEs. At the end of the day, though, there's one wrestling promotion that can fill giant American stadiums like Allegiant in Las Vegas or MetLife in New Jersey — and it isn't Khan's.
Advertisement
The verdict: Advantage WWE
The talent
Defining a great wrestler is always going to involve subjective judgments. But on a business level, I'd argue that it usually boils down to one particular metric: the strength of the personal brand in terms of drawing viewers.
If we're taking stock of the two promotions, there's no question both have some massive talents. But does AEW really have anyone who matches the Hollywood-level star power of The Rock, John Cena and Rhea Ripley? I'd venture not.
It's that kind of clout that allows WWE to poach talent from its rival when it wants to. Just look at Mariah May and Jade Cargill, for example. Both had plenty of momentum in AEW and were likely making decent wages, but when the bigger brand came knocking, they were happy to make the jump.
Advertisement
That said, we shouldn't fully discount AEW's tagline of being 'where the best wrestle.' It's a good insight into how Khan sees his brand — and plenty of wrestling aficionados would agree that he's doing a great job on that front. Just look at the rave reaction to 2025's Double or Nothing show, for example.
The verdict: Advantage WWE
Kenny Omega's return has bolstered AEW's roster. ()
(Etsuo Hara via Getty Images)
The product
In many ways, this is the big question: Is the product any good? Television deals, gate revenue and site fees might bring in the bacon, but, at the end of the day, they're all downstream from the quality of the product.
So how do the promotions compare right now? Let's start with WWE. Going into 2025, the company was widely regarded to be on fire — particularly with the Netflix deal incoming and the anticipation of John Cena's retirement tour. But there's a growing sense the product has been losing steam over the past few months.
Advertisement
Perhaps the success of the Bloodline/Cody Rhodes era gave us unrealistic expectations, or maybe we're all overreacting to the anticlimactic payoff to this year's WrestleMania. But it doesn't change the fact there's been a significant vibe shift from the fan base.
And what of AEW? It's had some rough moments, for sure, but the most recent shows have begun to turn a corner. Double or Nothing was an absolute slam dunk and seems to be setting things up nicely for their biggest show of the year with July's All In.
On a long-term view, though, the fundamentals haven't changed: WWE is still the granddaddy of pro wrestling. But if we're talking strictly about momentum — i.e. where things are moving right now — then AEW's lines are pointing in the right direction, while WWE's are floundering slightly.
The verdict: (Slight) advantage AEW

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Elle
36 minutes ago
- Elle
4 Reasons Why Fans And Critics Are Divided On 'Squid Game' Season 3's 'Shocking' Ending
*This article contains spoilers Whether you understood the hype of the dystopian survival thriller, Squid Game, upon its release in 2021 or not, what can't be denied is its unprecedented cultural sway. Within 21 days of its release, it became the most popular Netflix series of all time — a record it still holds. Building on that success, the show's second season ranked among Netflix's most-watched series, and with the premiere of season three on June 27 this year, all eyes were on the latest chapter of Seong Gi-hun's story to see if it will live up to the standards of its predecessors. Just three days after the final season's release, however, and the verdict is not looking so certain. Critics and fans appear deeply divided, mainly due to what many are calling an anti-climatic ending, with people seemingly split in their opinions of the season's ending, much of which centres on Seong Gi-hun's demise. While Rotten Tomatoes has awarded the third season a strong 88%, audience ratings have told a different story, as both Popcornmeater and Metacritic dropped their ratings to 66%, showing a sharp divide. Below, we uncover what exactly about Squid Game's third and final left so many viewers feeling let down. When season one began, viewers immediately fell for the heart-warming Gi-hun. A survivor, he continuously picked himself and others up and fought against the system. Rather than the once-hopeful version of Gi-hun bringing down the Games, the character instead sacrificed his own life, given that the cost of survival and winning the game was killing a baby, something that he was not prepared to do. While the symbolism of struggling against the system adds up, many fans have been left feeling as though the show will now be stuck in a cruel loop that begs the question: what was the fight for? One of the weaker aspects of the season is how little development fans received from the story lines of Hwang Jun-ho (Wi Ha-joon) and Kang No-eul (Park Gyu-young). Throughout the third season, both seem to be stuck in the same arc: Jun-ho still looking for the island and No-eul being on the run. As subplots, they add little value and excitement to the current season, even causing the main story to have less airtime. Another reasons fans and critics alike are up in arms about the third series is due to a number of character deaths; from fan favourite Hyun-hu being killed off too early, to less relevant characters such as Player 100 making it to the end of the Games. In addition to this, many fans felt as though Jang Geum-ja's death was premature. Her suicide left no opportunity for her to continue proving herself. Lastly, a major gripe fans with the show was Gi-hun's killing of Kang Dae-hoe, which many believed felt untrue to Gi-hun's nature, despite what Dae-hoe may have done in the past. Another reason that fans have been left divided about the series' ending is its departure from its original tone. What started as a sharp, emotionally grounded story with hard hitting themes that spoke to class, power and desperation ended with the feeling that it is slowly turning into yet another franchise. Rather than providing fans with a solid resolution, it feels as though the ending has lined up an American Squid Game spin-off, which has taken away the show's once loved raison d'etre. ELLE Collective is a new community of fashion, beauty and culture lovers. For access to exclusive content, events, inspiring advice from our Editors and industry experts, as well the opportunity to meet designers, thought-leaders and stylists, become a member today HERE.


Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
Netflix drops major ‘Squid Game' spoiler on social media 72 hours after season 3 debuts — because screw you if you haven't finished it yet, I guess
If you haven't finished, or even started, "Squid Game" season 3, then here's a word of warning: Avoid Netflix's official social media accounts right now. In its infinite wisdom, the streaming service has taken to the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to spoil the finale episode of "Squid Game" season 3 around 72 hours after the popular series returned for its final run of six episodes. As somebody who hasn't binge-watched it yet, I'm pretty unhappy. You can see the post in question below (spoiler warning, obviously), and my colleague, who has already polished off the season, informs me that not only is the surprise cameo from Hollywood titan Cate Blanchett part of the final episode, but it's the very last scene of the very last episode! 30, 2025 Considering the show's third (and final) season only debuted last week, on Friday, June 27, this feels like a huge blunder on Netflix's part. I personally haven't had the chance to start watching yet, as I was on vacation last week, and while I live in the real world, so I knew that spoilers could crop up on social media at any moment, I never expected Netflix itself to do the spoiling. I'm sure it would have been a pretty cool reveal to witness unspoiled, but thanks to Netflix's ridiculously rash social media post, I guess I'll never know how I would have reacted to the moment. I probably need to take a 'sick' day now to quickly binge the whole season because the streaming service might just spoil all the major character deaths next. In my opinion, this social media post speaks to Netflix's approach to its content. Watching six episodes in 72 hours isn't exactly an impossible task (assuming you don't, you know, have weekend plans, or other life commitments), and I'm sure many subscribers have finished "Squid Game" season 3 already, but to post a major spoiler just a few days after the premiere suggests the streaming service views its content as completely disposable — something to be consumed as quickly as possible, never savored, or enjoyed over a longer period. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Has this post made me want to skip "Squid Game" season 3? No, I'm a huge fan of the show, and I'm still looking forward to getting started on the finale season (trust me, I'll be watching it sooner rather than later now). But this has left a pretty sour taste in my mouth. I'm shocked Netflix didn't even give me the chance to watch it with fresh eyes before spoiling what I'm sure is one of the season's most memorable (and sure to be most talked about) moments. Let's just say, later in the year when "Stranger Things" final season drops, I'll be either watching it all on release day, or failing that, at least temporarily unfollowing Netflix across social media to avoid having that much-anticipated finale ruined in a similar fashion. Apparently, Netflix does not care if you have other things going on in your life; you must binge its biggest shows in days. And for those who have already watched 'Squid Game' season 3, check out our comprehensive coverage, which dissects the show's most 'emotional chapter' in full detail. Oh, and don't worry, unlike Netflix, we've marked spoilers so you won't have anything ruined if you're still making your way through the show.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rumor Roundup: Pat McAfee, Liv Morgan plans, Chad Gable injury, SmackDown, more!
Speculating on the rumors surrounding pro wrestling is a favored pastime of many fans, perhaps second only to actually watching the matches. In this daily column, we take a look at the latest rumors being churned out by the pro wrestling rumor mill. Important reminder: Rumors are just that — rumors. None of this has been confirmed as fact, it's just circulating around the pro wrestling rumor mill. We track rumor accuracy in a weekly feature called Rumor Look Back you can find here. Remember, take it all with a grain of salt. Rumors for the Day: Pat McAfee said on his show that he has just been exhausted and that's why he hasn't been on Raw commentary lately. It sounds like he could be back after Night of Champions, however. claims Liv Morgan was originally going to challenge Iyo Sky for the women's world championship at Night of Champions before she was injured. They also say Chad Gable is injured and his getting taken out by Penta was meant as a television write off. Wrestling Observer Radio says it's still unclear what WWE has planned for the July 4 SmackDown show, and whether it will be two or three hours. No one seems to know anything as of yet. They also said no one was allowed to mention anything regarding the conflict in the Middle East on Monday Night Raw this week, and that's why it wasn't brought up at all during the show. Per Fightful, Joe Hendry is 'expected for more WWE dates.' Fightful Select says Kota Ibushi was dealing with a lot of injuries during his absence from AEW but he's doing better physically 'than he has in quite a long time.' Advertisement If you have heard of any interesting rumors that you'd like to add, feel free to post them in the comments section below. Just remember they are rumors and not confirmed as fact, so please take them as such. And check our weekly Rumor Look Back here to keep track of how often rumors turn out to be correct. More from