Half of SME housebuilders ‘to be bust by next election', report to warn
Sky News has seen a document to be published on Tuesday - ahead of the government's spending review - which will refer to "a perfect storm of costs" that threatens to wipe out the profits of SME housebuilders.
The bleak forecast is the principal conclusion of a report produced jointly by the public affairs firm WPI Strategy and ChamberlainWalker, an economics consultancy specialising in housing and planning.
It casts a fresh shadow over the government's target of building 1.5m homes during the course of this parliament - one of its most important manifesto commitments ahead of last year's landslide victory.
Money latest:
On Monday, ministers said the use of a new artificial intelligence tool would facilitate the acceleration of planning permissions by reducing the reliance on paper documents.
"For too long, our outdated planning system has held back our country- slowing down the development of vital infrastructure and making it harder to get the homes we need built," Sir Keir Starmer said.
"This government is working hand in hand with business to change that. With [new AI tool] Extract, we're harnessing the power of AI to help planning officers cut red tape, speed up decisions, and unlock the new homes for hard-working people as part of our Plan for Change.
"It's a bold step forward in our mission to build 1.5 million more homes and deliver a planning system that's fit for the 21st century."
The WPI/ChamberlainWalker report will warn, however, that at the current rate of failure among SME builders, as many as 75,000 fewer homes would be built by smaller housebuilders before the next general election is due to be held in 2029.
It will say that recently introduced regulations such as the Building Safety Levy have added close to £5bn of annual costs to housebuilders.
The Future Homes Standard, Biodiversity Net Gain, accessibility rules and electric vehicle charging requirements are among the other incremental costs facing the sector.
Labour and materials costs are also rising, while house prices have flatlined, adding to the pressure on the industry, with smaller players disproportionately affected, the report will add.
Sean Worth, a director at WPI Strategy, said: "A diverse range of housebuilders is important to ensuring the country is able to meet its headline housing target.
"It is also critical to maintaining a competitive market."
"The government has rightly acknowledged the importance of supporting small and medium sized builders.
"However, a perfect storm of costs inherited from the past few years as well as additional regulatory burdens means that without urgent assistance we could see half all of SME builders starting insolvency proceedings by the end of the parliament."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump seeks to use Canada's recognition of Palestinian state as leverage in trade talks
WASHINGTON (AP) — Canada's announcement it will recognize a Palestinian state 'will make it very hard' for the United States to reach a trade agreement with its northern neighbor, President Donald Trump said. Trump's threat, posted early Thursday on his social media platform, is the latest way he has sought to use his trade war to coerce countries on unrelated issues. And when other allies had raised the matter of Palestinian statehood, the Republican president had been ambivalent. He said this week that he did not mind that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was taking the position that the United Kingdom would recognize a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agreed to a ceasefire in Gaza, allowed the United Nations to bring in aid and took other steps toward long-term peace. 'We have no view on that,' he told reporters later on Air Force One. Last week, the Republican president said French President Emmanuel Macron's similar move was "not going to change anything.' But Trump, who has heckled Canada for months and suggested it should become its 51st U.S. state, is now indicating that Prime Minister Mark Carney's similar recognition would become leverage before a looming deadline that the American leader set in U.S.-Canada trade talks. 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine,' Trump said in his Truth Social post. 'That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!' Trump has threatened to impose a 35% tariff on Canada if no deal is reached by Friday, when he's said he will levy tariffs against goods from dozens of countries if they don't reach agreements with the U.S. A spokesperson for Carney declined comment. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said later that Trump "expressed his displeasure and his disagreement with the leaders of France, the United Kingdom and Canada. He feels as though that's rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a ceasefire and to the release of all of the hostages." Some imports from Canada are still protected by the 2020 United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which is up for renegotiation next year. Carney's announcement Wednesday comes amid a broader global shift against Israel's policies in Gaza. Though Trump this week said he was 'not going to take a position' on recognizing a Palestinian state, he later said that such a move would be rewarding Hamas, whose surprise Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel prompted a declaration of war and a massive military retaliation from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump's new cudgel against Canada comes after he sought this week to impose steep tariffs on Brazil because it indicted former President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally who like the U.S. president has faced criminal charges for attempting to overturn the results of his election loss. Citing a personal grievance in trade talks with Brazil and now Canada's symbolic announcement on a Palestinian state adds to the jumble of reasons Trump has pointed to for his trade war, such as stopping human trafficking, stopping the flow of fentanyl, balancing the budget and protecting U.S. manufacturing. ___ Associated Press writer Rob Gillies in Toronto contributed to this report. Michelle L. Price, The Associated Press
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Talk of statehood won't feed the people of Gaza
In a move that seems to have caught Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu by surprise, Sir Keir Starmer has sent a clear message to Israel: end the war in Gaza or the UK will recognise Palestine. It is a symbolic but largely meaningless move by the prime minister. What is needed right now in Gaza is food - and fast. This decision will not alleviate the suffering. Gaza latest: 'Children are passing out from hunger', US doctor says With famine stalking the Strip and international bodies warning of mass death caused by starvation, the international community felt compelled to act. But talk of statehood won't feed the people of Gaza. The threat of recognising Palestine as a sovereign state is aimed solely at Mr Netanyahu with the hope that it will pressure him into wrapping up the war and committing to peace. But the Israeli prime minister's response seemed to suggest the opposite: he is digging in. Nothing, except total victory over Hamas, will see him commit to a ceasefire and military withdrawal. The decision by the UK is, according to Israel, an "appeasement towards jihadist terrorists".There is also no real clarity from the UK as to who the leadership in Gaza will be, what the borders are, and who will rebuild the largely destroyed Strip if the UK recognises Palestine in September and joins the other 150 nations who have already done so. So what could the UK do instead? Sir Keir could implement a full arms embargo. He could turn to Israel and say if by the end of the month there is still not enough food being let in, we will stop sending you ammunition, aid and support. The focus should be on pressuring Israel to accept a ceasefire. Everything else at this point feels too little and too late.
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Trump Wants Everyone To Stop Talking About Epstein. So Why Doesn't He?
When CNN senior White House correspondent Kaitlan Collins asked President Trump about comments he'd just made on Air Force One about Jeffrey Epstein having 'stolen' women from him by poaching staff from Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort, the frustrated president told Collins to 'be quiet.' "Mr. President, you said Jeffrey Epstein was stealing young women from your spa. Did that raise alarm bells for you?" Collins asked--an entirely reasonable question based on the president's own words. He brought it on himself. In Scotland, Trump--sitting alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for a press availability intended to focus on Trump's tariffs and trade-- the president had been asked by reporters about his relationship with Epstein. 'That's such old history, very easy to explain,' he responded. 'But I don't want to waste your time by explaining it.' 'I don't want to waste your time by explaining it' A politician gifted enough to be elected president of the United States twice would have no problem deflecting a question like this and getting back onto more favorable political ground, like talking about the subject he'd come to talk about. Instead, Trump decided he did, after all, 'want to waste your time by explaining it,' and more than that, he wanted to throw more fuel on the fire by saying something newsworthy enough to driven an entire night of prime time cable news debate and ensure that Epstein would dominate news coverage for yet another day. 'He did something that was inappropriate,' Trump said of Epstein, and not referring to the sexual trafficking or abuse of under-age girls. 'He hired help and I said, 'Don't ever do that again,'' Trump said of Epstein and his interest in apparently under-age staff at Mar-a-Lago. 'He stole people that worked for me. I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He did it again, and I threw him out of the place, persona non grata.' 'I threw him out and that was it. I'm glad I did, if you want to know the truth,' Trump added. 'This is primarily a self-inflicted story, and a self-inflicted wound' Is Trump really tired of talking about his well-documented and years-long relationship with Epstein, or not? And if not, why not? On CNN's The Source Wednesday night, host Kaitlan Collins said Trump allies felt 'surprise that they had not been able to get a handle on (the Epstein story), that this has been over a month of something that has been dogging the president.' 'This is primarily a self-inflicted story, and a self-inflicted wound, that they are dealing with, and they are struggling to get out of it,' said CNN political analyst Maggie Haberman, describing 'fatigue' among people close to the president. 'But not just fatigue with Democrats talking about it, or podcasters talking about it, or Joe Rogan talking about it, the president himself keeps talking about it,' noting that, amazingly, Trump had responded to a question about Russia by shifting to Epstein--and not in a small way, but by providing "new information that had not been heard before. Is Trump finally 'unraveling'? The more Trump talks, the more he gives journalists new leads to pursue, and makes it justifiable for reporters to produce new stories about Epstein. He is literally driving a story he wants to go away. In the process, he's contradicting himself, changing elements of a story he's talked about for years, and creating new questions to be answered. He's also using language that itself is newsworthy just by being strange or unsettling, like saying he'd never had 'the privilege' of visiting Epstein's private island. To some, the inability of the president to simply find something else to talk about suggests a mental decline, in the same way he simply cannot stop long-winded diatribes about the dangers of windmills. Weeks earlier, Trump shocked his supporters by turning on them, accusing them of falling "for the "bulls--t" of the Epstein files story and insisting he no longer wanted the backing of these "weaklings." That accusation led former Trump ally Lev Parnas, a Florida businessman and former associate of Rudy Giuliani, to conclude that Trump was 'unraveling.'
