
India's Little-Known Role in African Slave Trade
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute Now
The role of African slaves in India and the participation of Indians in slave administration has, until recently, received little attention. Africans were not the first people enslaved in India, but Arab traders trafficked them to the subcontinent as early as the 6th century CE.
One of the first known cases involved an Ethiopian, Jamal ud-Din Yaqut, who became Master of the Royal Stables in Delhi in 1236. By the 14th century, African slave trading grew, as Indian authorities exploited maritime networks linking Africa and India.
Indian goods were highly prized in Africa and were exchanged for gold, ivory and Ethiopian slaves. Trade in slaves was one of several exchanges connecting the Indian subcontinent with East Africa, creating a diverse and interconnected commercial system that thrived for centuries.
Arab dhows crossed the Indian Ocean in regular monsoon-driven voyages, carrying slaves, spices, textiles and metals. These maritime routes helped entrench African presence along India's coastal cities, such as Surat, Calicut and Cochin, which functioned as critical nodes in this transoceanic slave network.
An eyewitness
The diversity of African arrivals also complicates the simplistic binary of slave and free. Some Africans arrived as merchants or seafarers in their own right, contributing to the cosmopolitan character of port cities like Cambay and Bharuch.
The famed Berber traveller Ibn Battuta, who was born in Tangier in 1304, journeyed extensively across vast parts of Asia and Africa in the 14th century. He encountered thousands of African slaves during his travels, observing Abyssinian guards, shipmen, and warriors deployed across the subcontinent.
It was during his second journey that Ibn Battuta made his way across the Indian subcontinent, the Maldives, Sri Lanka and China, before returning to North Africa. During his time in India, he came across Habashis (as the Ethiopian slaves were known) distributed throughout the subcontinent, from northern India to Ceylon. They were employed primarily as guards or men-at-arms on land or at sea. In July 1342, for example, he was south-east of Delhi, in the town of Allapur in Uttar Pradesh:
'The governor of Alabur [Allapur] was the Abyssinian Badr, a slave of the sultan's, a man whose bravery passed into a proverb. He was continually making raids on the infidels alone and single handed, killing and taking captive, so that his fame spread far and wide and the infidels went in fear of him. He was tall and corpulent, and used to eat a whole sheep at a meal, and I was told that after eating he would drink about a pound and a half of ghee, following the custom of the Abyssinians in their own country.'
Ibn Battuta encountered African slaves in the southern Indian city called Qandahar (today the village of Ghandar on the mouth of the Dhandar river in Gujarat), where he describes meeting Ibrahim, the owner of six ships.
'We embarked on a ship belonging to Ibrahim … called al-Jagir. On this ship we put seventy of the horses of the sultan's present …[Ibrahim] sent his son with us on a ship called al-Uqayri, which resembles a galley, but is rather broader; it has sixty oars and is covered with a roof during battle in order to protect the rowers from arrows and stones. I myself went on board al-Jagir, which had a complement of fifty rowers and fifty Abyssinian men-at-arms. These latter are the guarantors of safety on the Indian Ocean; let there be but one of them on a ship and it will be avoided by the Indian pirates and idolaters.'
Ibn Battuta then travelled to Colombo in Ceylon (Sri Lanka), where he again found the ruler guarded by 'about five hundred Abyssinians.' When Ibn Battuta arrived in the Indian port of Calicut he saw a fleet of huge Chinese junks, each with four decks carrying up to 1,000 troops on board. The ships were highly sophisticated, with sailors having their wives and slave-girls living in their cabins, which were complete with latrines. Security was – once more – provided by Africans.
'The owner's factor [or agent] on board ship is like a great amir. When he goes on shore he is preceded by archers and Abyssinians with javelins, swords, drums, bugles and trumpets.'
The African presence in India, particularly in military contexts, also had a psychological and symbolic dimension. Africans were often perceived as loyal, physically strong, and strategically useful because they were outside traditional kinship networks. This made them ideal as bodyguards, palace guards, and elite soldiers, as their loyalty was presumed to lie solely with their patron. Their position within Indian courts and armies was sometimes precarious, but it could also be a pathway to influence and even power. Importantly, African troops played a stabilizing role in many of India's volatile princely states, serving as both protectors and enforcers, their foreign origins ensuring loyalty that transcended local rivalries.
African slaves become rulers
African slaves primarily served as troops. Some gained prominence – Bengal's Rukh-ud-din Barbak reportedly maintained an Ethiopian army of 8,000, his son expanding it to 20,000. Others, like Malik Ambar, rose even further.
Malik Amber. Photo: Wikimedia commons.
Born in Harangue, Ethiopia, Ambar was enslaved and brought to Baghdad, then India. He served under Chengiz Khan, a former Ethiopian slave turned statesman. Freed after his master's death, Ambar joined the military of various Indian rulers. By the 1590s, he led a cavalry force in Ahmednagar and resisted Mughal incursions using guerrilla tactics. He backed a new sultan and married his daughter into the royal family, consolidating his influence. Ambar's military campaigns were often characterized by their strategic use of terrain and speed, making his forces elusive and difficult for the Mughal armies to counter effectively.
As regent, Ambar implemented reforms and infrastructure projects, including a water system still in use today. He repeatedly thwarted Mughal forces – even Emperor Jahangir, who had insulted Ambar racially. Jahangir's frustration with Ambar is evident in his pejorative references, calling him 'the black-faced one' or 'the crafty one..' but these slights ultimately gave way to reluctant admiration.
In his official memoir, the Emperor Jahangir reversed his assessment of his opponent, declaring that although a slave, Ambar was nonetheless 'an able man. In warfare, in command, in sound judgement, and in administration he had no rival or equal…. He maintained his exalted position to the end of his life and closed his career in honour. History records no other instance of an Abyssinian slave arriving at such eminence.'
Ambar's political acumen extended beyond the battlefield. He maintained a complex network of alliances with other regional powers and made use of marriage diplomacy to strengthen his hold over Ahmednagar. He also sought to establish a bureaucratic apparatus that could outlast him, introducing land reforms and encouraging the cultivation of previously unproductive areas.
These measures helped secure resources for his military campaigns and built a stronger economic base for the sultanate. He was equally committed to cultural patronage, commissioning buildings and supporting learning, thereby carving a legacy that extended beyond war.
He was also instrumental in defending Deccan autonomy against the Mughal encroachment. Ambar's tactics of asymmetrical warfare and his ability to mobilise diverse ethnic groups under his command contributed to his enduring reputation as one of India's great military innovators.
Ambar died in 1626. Though his son surrendered Ahmednagar to the Mughals in 1633, Ambar's transformation from slave to kingmaker remains remarkable. Between 1486 and 1493 alone, four Ethiopian commanders rose to rule Indian states.
Their stories highlight how military slavery in India differed from other parts of the world: rather than being a terminal condition, it could provide upward mobility, status, and, in rare cases, sovereignty. The unique context of Indo-African relations, especially within Islamic polities, often facilitated the elevation of capable individuals, regardless of origin.
Indians administer the slave trade
India's involvement in African slavery extended abroad. Indian merchants were key players in the Omani-led East African slave trade. Oman, lacking natural resources, relied on trade and enslaved labour.
From the 1st century CE, Omanis traded along the Swahili coast, importing slaves – especially light-skinned women – for domestic service. Many of these slaves were destined for service in elite households, as concubines, wet nurses, or servants.
The trade was driven by the high demand for African labour and the prestige associated with owning African slaves, especially among the merchant elite.
Indian traders, especially in Muscat and later Zanzibar, dominated commerce in coffee and pearls, served as bankers, and helped administer the slave trade. After the Portuguese were ousted from Muscat in 1650, Oman expanded its African holdings.
Under Sultan Said bin Sultan (r. 1804–1856), Zanzibar became the new capital, centred on clove plantations worked by slaves. The move was a calculated effort to align the Omani economy with the booming global demand for spices.
Indian merchants followed, forming a major commercial presence along the coast. They managed customs, extended loans, and owned slave-run plantations. The Indian community also maintained close ties with the Omani court, and some Indian families wielded significant political influence.
Although Britain abolished slavery in 1833, enforcement was slow. By 1860, over 8,000 slaves owned by Indians were officially freed in Zanzibar – despite British law having banned the practice decades earlier. This underlines the ambivalence of colonial authorities, who were often reluctant to disrupt local economies and elite interests.
In some instances, Indian-owned plantations were larger and more profitable than those of their Arab counterparts. Wealthy Indian families invested heavily in infrastructure and trade networks, further entrenching the institution of slavery in the region.
The Indian community in Zanzibar and East Africa often maintained cultural and commercial links with Gujarat and Bombay, reinforcing the transoceanic dimensions of this trade. Many Indian-run firms operating in East Africa kept detailed records and accounts of their transactions, making it clear that slavery was not a peripheral or incidental activity, but an integral component of their economic strategies.
The entanglement of Indians in the East African slave trade was not limited to merchants alone. Clerks, shipbuilders, and middlemen were all complicit in the system. Some Indians served as slave overseers or worked in ports where captured Africans were processed and sold.
Sir Bartle Frere, the British governor of Bombay who visited Zanzibar in 1873, remarked that 'Throughout the Zanzibar coastline … all banking and mortgage business passes through Indian hands. Hardly a single loan can be negotiated, a mortgage effected, or a bill cashed without Indian agency.'
This complicity is rarely acknowledged today, yet it is essential for understanding the full scope of the Indian Ocean slave trade.
The legacy today
While slavery officially ended, its legacy lingered. In India, the Sidis – descendants of African slaves – were gradually integrated. Janjira and Sachin, princely states ruled by Sidis, existed until Indian independence in 1947.
The rulers of these states, though relatively minor in comparison to larger princely territories, held real power and maintained their autonomy under British indirect rule. Their courts often mirrored Indian traditions, but also retained distinct African elements, such as Sidi drumming and Swahili phrases in ceremonial contexts.
The Sidi community itself is diverse, with roots tracing back to different waves of African migration and enslavement. While some Sidis were brought as slaves, others arrived as soldiers, traders, or musicians.
The integration process varied regionally: in Gujarat, for instance, Sidis maintained a distinct identity, while in other parts of India, they assimilated more fully into local populations. Oral histories, religious rituals, and festivals continue to reflect the syncretic nature of their heritage, blending African, Islamic, and Hindu influences.
Today, around 100,000 Sidis live in Gujarat, Karnataka and other regions of India. Many retain Swahili musical traditions. Sidi drumming and dance performances are popular in some areas and have gained recognition in India's cultural landscape.
In Pakistan, a further 150,000 Sidis reside, often in poverty and facing racial discrimination. Their marginalisation reflects the lasting scars of a long and often overlooked history.
Detail of Jamal-ud-Din Yaqut from a miniature painting of Razia Sultana holding court (durbar) with identifying inscriptions, by Gulam Ali Khan, circa 19th century. Photo: Wikimedia commons.
Media depictions and social stigma frequently reinforce harmful stereotypes, further limiting access to opportunities. Yaqoob Qambrani, President of the Pakistan Sheedi Ittehad, complained that many opportunities are closed to them because of discrimination in education and work.
'In Qambrani's views, the deep-rooted culture of blaming and shaming 'black-face' in Pakistan has held them in chains of associated stereotypes. Sheedis are portrayed as '…the evils, thieves and unwanted. For instance, when anyone from our community boards a public transport bus, everyone else tries to keep their distance. We are not blind to watch how others look and treat us', Qambrani declared.
Despite centuries of presence, many Sidis still struggle with access to education, employment, and healthcare. Activists have called for affirmative action and greater government recognition of their unique heritage.
In recent years, Sidi youth have increasingly used digital platforms to share their stories and celebrate their culture, forging transnational ties with African-descended communities in the diaspora. Projects linking Sidis with African communities in Brazil and East Africa have fostered renewed interest in shared histories and solidarity movements.
Africa's entangled history with South Asia – spanning commerce, migration, and enslavement – deserves greater attention. From the rise of figures like Malik Ambar to the quiet endurance of Sidi communities, the legacy of African presence in India remains potent and deeply human.
As scholarship expands and awareness grows, the contributions and struggles of Africans in South Asia are beginning to receive the recognition they deserve. This history is not merely a footnote – it is a vital part of the global story of movement, power, and resistance.
The shared legacy of the Indian Ocean world – connecting Mombasa, Mumbai, Muscat, and beyond – offers a powerful lens through which to explore themes of agency, adaptation and survival.
Understanding these connections not only enriches our knowledge of the past but also challenges us to confront the enduring legacies of racism, marginalisation, and inequality in our present world.
Martin Plaut is the author of Unbroken Chains: A 5,000-Year History of African Enslavement, to be published by Hurst, August 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Watched movies, read books to learn more about adoption as teen, says Alliance Française's Indian-origin director
As her car halts at Delhi's traffic signals, an oft-repeated encounter always leaves an ache in Patricia Loison's heart. 'Looking at the children selling things at these traffic signals, I often think, 'This could have been me'. So I lock my heart up and pretend that I did not see anything,' she says. Fifty-four years after she left India in July 1971 — she was adopted from a Delhi orphanage by Paris residents Gisèle and Christian Loison when she was just six months old — Loison returned to the national Capital in September last year as the first Indian-origin director of Alliance Française, the French language school. Loison, who is currently working on her third book, which is based on the street children of Delhi, says, 'I never had the chance to work in Delhi earlier. I was not ready then. But now, in my 50s, I feel ready.' Stating that she finds her role at Alliance Française fitting — 'a perfect blend of Indian origin and French identity' — says she hopes to set up a media literacy institute in France upon her return after her three-year tenure at the institute in New Delhi. Having spent her childhood in a Parisian suburb with her adoptive parents and her brother Franck, who was adopted from Lebanon, Loison is a former journalist who has authored two French books, a biographical novel, titled Je cherche encore ton nom (I'm still looking for your name), and a book on her years in Japan, titled Ceinture de soie (Silk belt). Loison, who hopes to trace her birth family some day, said she first discovered that she was adopted when she was 13 years old. 'I was so loved that I never felt the need to look for my biological family. Though we did not have the same skin colour, it took me really long to understand that though my adoptive parents were my parents, they were not the reason why I was on this Earth. Besides strangers, despite my skin colour, my peers never treated me differently,' she says, sitting in her third-floor office inside Alliance Française on Delhi's Max Muller Marg. Soon, a teenage Loison started educating herself about adoption 'by watching movies and reading books'. In 1996, she said she met her husband Gregory Claude Jamet in a night club. 'He invited me to dance with him and asked me out on a date the next day. We hung out in Saint-Malo (a port city near Paris), a very romantic place. Soon, we started dating and eventually got married in 1999,' she says. Though Loison was never at odds with her adoptive status, she said everything changed when she gave birth to her first child, her daughter Luna. 'I finally understood what it means to be a mother and the bond a child shares with their biological parents. My mental state shifted. All I felt for my adoptive mother was rejection,' she says. Confessing that she was 'very harsh' towards her adoptive mother after Luna's birth, Loison says, 'I did not recognise myself… For me, the fairy tales (of a good adoptive family) blew up soon after I gave birth. It is okay when you have a normal family tree. However, when one branch is missing, it reminds you of what is missing — your biological mother.' Though she said she spoke to her adoptive mother about it later, her question — 'Who are my parents?' — always remained unanswered. When her own daughters, Luna and Violette, asked questions about their maternal lineage, Loison said she has never had any answers. 'There was no Angelina Jolie path for me in the 1970s,' she says, referring to the American actor, who famously took her adopted children back to their native countries, taught them their mother tongue and exposed them to their culture. Talking about her adoptive parents, Loison says, 'Initially, my father was a pastry chef. He did many jobs before starting his own company that provided building supplies. My mother worked as an accountant in his company itself. My adoptive family did not have the means to fly me to Delhi and back, or help me stay connected to my roots.' Pointing to a file containing her adoption papers that she takes with her everywhere, Loison says, 'Thankfully, my mother kept all my adoption records and stayed in touch with the orphanage.' Stating that 'being abandoned is very painful', she adds, 'Adoption is a blessing. I was left here (in Delhi) at an orphanage, the lowest strata of society. It might not mean anything personally, but socially it does.' In 2016, during a sabbatical from journalism, Loison moved to Japan with her husband and two daughters. In Japan, she said she started writing about her own life and came out with her debut novel. Invited to New Delhi for 'Bonjour India', a literary festival organised by the French Embassy in the national Capital in 2022, Loison finally stepped foot in New Delhi in September last year as the director of Alliance Française. To a question on whether she feels ambivalent about Indian culture, she replies, 'I am totally French. That is both the most wonderful and the terrible thing about adoption. Being abandoned as a baby, I have no connection with my original culture. I reached France when I was six months old. It's like a sapling being uprooted from its first spot. You are lucky to grow in another place, but you cannot expect to be replanted at your original spot.'


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Where does disciplining end and abuse begin?
In more conservative cultures, corporal punishment is more likely to be heralded as a parenting technique honed and perfected through the passage of time, with each generation passing it down as if it were a family heirloom. 'This is how we were raised, and we turned out completely fine,' continues to be a classic fallback, words that seem perfectly routine to Indian adults and children alike. Some independent surveys conducted in India reflect a pervasiveness of corporal punishment; one nationwide study finds that nearly 77.5% of parents resort to hitting their children to discipline them. The persistence of this parenting practice calls for a re-evaluation of the undisputed cultural legitimacy of physical punishment in India. Corporal punishment has long evaded its classification as abuse because the focus has long been on intent rather than impact. Moreover, the bridge between physical discipline and abuse is often culturally constructed, with some societies more accepting of it than others. But when the paradigm shifts to a focus on impact, the distinction between the two quickly starts to fade. A large body of research, and especially across different country contexts, has established a strong link between corporal punishment and increased behavioural and emotional problems in children — issues that often persist into adulthood as depression and low self-esteem, blurring the line between what is considered discipline and what is, in effect, harm. These effects were further confirmed when researchers observed the brains of affected children: a landmark 2021 study showed that children who were spanked can have unusual brain responses in the same areas affected by more severe types of abuse. At the cost of these detrimental impacts, physical disciplining doesn't even achieve what it sets out to achieve. While it may achieve short term obedience, there are no persistent positive outcomes observed in the longer term. Nevertheless, proponents of moderate and 'reasonable' corporal punishment may still find comfort in the vague causality of various studies. The empirical link between corporal punishment and child outcomes can be difficult to unpack and communicate, as child outcomes — both short- and long-term — can be complex and induced by various social phenomena. But this misses the larger point: even with sheer majority of studies striving for methodological rigour and establishing a highly likely link between corporal punishment and negative child outcomes, is it still defensible to lean on uncertainty as justification? Moreover, the consistent failure of corporal punishment further reinforces the question: are we truly willing to gamble with children's well-being for a practice that is, at best, ineffective? The effects of corporal punishment is also not confined to the child who experiences it but can set off a continuous cycle of inter-generational trauma. Further research shows that adults who were subjected to physical punishment in childhood are more likely to use the same methods when parenting. Crucially, this also the blurs the line between the cultural norms and the transmission of trauma: is corporal punishment truly a widespread and passed-down parenting tradition, or is it trauma masquerading as culture? Given the impact of corporal punishment, it may be tempting to resort to vilification of the parents who turn to such disciplining methods. But such vilification is not only counter-productive but refuses to address the sheer influence of the social and psychological circumstances — be it culture or trauma — that shape an individual's parenting habits. Economic hardship adds yet another layer of complexity. Amidst infinite economic and social burdens, a disciplinary method that appears to offer quick results without immediate visible harm can seem like a practical, and even necessary, choice. Against these challenges, a flat ban on all forms of corporal punishment — especially within households where it often persists despite existing school bans — may seem like the panacea. With evidence pointing towards the efficacy of bans in other developed and developing countries, this is certainly a critical first step, but far from a sufficient one. The rule of law can only go so far in a country where social norms, beliefs, and informal institutions have the final say, especially within the confines of individual households. Change must occur from within, as much as it needs to be urged externally. Legal reform without a transformation in cultural attitudes and beliefs risks leaving corporal punishment lurking beneath the surface. After all, the inefficacy of coercion in bringing about lasting behavioural change is echoed within the practice of corporal punishment itself. A lasting solution will require a combination of legal reform, public education, and behavioural nudges that work together to shift social norms and equip caregivers with non-violent tools for discipline. Changing rigid cultural patterns associated with corporal punishment is no doubt going to be a difficult task, requiring a range of psychological, social, and institutional interventions. But we can first start by acknowledging that a problem exists in the first place. In the case of corporal punishment, the lasting harm it inflicts far outweighs — and ultimately transcends — cultural preferences. Perhaps the real question is not where the line lies between corporal punishment and abuse, but whether such a line exists at all. getmanickamnow@


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Over 70,000 manuscripts preserved in Bihar'
1 2 The state's ancient manuscripts hold echoes of civilisations, cultures and beliefs that have shaped history. In a conversation with TOI's B K Mishra, former director of the Khuda Bakhsh Oriental Public Library, Shayesta Bedar, speaks about the importance of preserving these treasures. Excerpts: What is the approximate number of manuscripts preserved in Bihar's major libraries? Which types are more common? There are over 70,000 manuscripts preserved across the state archives and various libraries in Bihar. Most of them are paper manuscripts, though palm-leaf manuscripts, especially those in Pali, are still available in considerable numbers. Why is it necessary to preserve these manuscripts? What makes them historically significant? Manuscripts form the cultural foundation of a nation. They are historically significant because they serve as primary sources for understanding past civilisations. Through them, we learn about ancient lives, beliefs, and achievements. Preservation is vital as these documents embody the accumulated wisdom and creativity of great thinkers, scholars and inventors. Moreover, they are crucial for exploring traditional knowledge systems that remain relevant for sustainable development today. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo What preservation efforts are being undertaken at Khuda Bakhsh Library? Has digitisation been completed? Like other major libraries in the country, Khuda Bakhsh has its own preservation and conservation laboratory, managed by trained staff. In recent years, we have accelerated the digitisation of rare manuscripts. Over 15 lakh pages have already been digitised through the National Manuscripts Mission and we are working to digitise the remaining materials. Our aim is to make all 21,000 valuable and rare manuscripts in our collection accessible to scholars globally. So far, around 3.58 lakh folios have been processed for public use. What about miniature manuscripts and historical correspondence? Have they been digitised too? Yes, we have digitised more than 14,000 miniature manuscripts. We have also preserved the original letters of important figures such as Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Rajendra Prasad, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Allama Iqbal, Abid Hussain and Ziauddin Desai. In addition, we have created digital albums that feature miniature paintings of South Indian deities, samples of exquisite calligraphy, and themed works on the life and reign of Firoz Shah Tughlaq. Has the library undertaken translation work to make old manuscripts more accessible across languages? Yes, translation is an important part of our work. We are engaged in translating significant manuscripts and books into various Indian and international languages. For example, Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi by Ziauddin Barani, a noted political thinker from the Delhi Sultanate, is being translated from Persian into English. We have also translated more than 200 manuscripts on Hindu religion, sourced both from our collection and from Aligarh Muslim University—into Hindi. Other ongoing projects include the Hindi translation of Hindu Dharm in Bihar (1846-1927) by Shad Azimabadi, and the translation of Sanskriti Ke Char Adhyaya by Ramdhari Singh Dinkar into Arabic and Persian. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !