
US Sends Nuclear Submarine to Pacific Fleet Amid China Threat
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The United States redeployed a second nuclear-powered submarine—capable of launching long-range Tomahawk missiles—from the East Coast to Hawaii this month, as it moves to position its most-capable units in the Indo-Pacific in response to China's naval buildup.
Newsweek has reached out to the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment via email.
Why It Matters
China has expanded its military presence—particularly its navy—across the Western Pacific in recent years, raising alarms among the U.S. and its regional allies. It has also built up a large missile arsenal capable of striking Japan, including U.S. military bases located there.
Japan—a key element of the U.S. island chain strategy to contain China in the Western Pacific—has been bolstering its defenses against potential Chinese aggression by upgrading its ship-killing weapons and acquiring advanced warships capable of intercepting missiles.
What To Know
In response to China's growing military threat, the Pentagon has bolstered its force posture in the Western Pacific. This includes the deployment of an aircraft carrier equipped with stealth fighter jets and a land-based missile system capable of conducting long-range strikes.
Some of America's nuclear-powered, conventionally armed fast-attack submarines serve with the Pacific Fleet and are stationed in Washington, California, Hawaii, and Guam—the latter, the closest to China and a key military hub, has hosted five submarines since last November.
The submarine USS Indiana reached its new home port, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, on Tuesday after departing its previous base in Groton, Connecticut. It now serves as the third Virginia-class fast-attack submarine assigned to the Submarine Squadron 7.
The Pearl Harbor-based submarine squadron now provides "training, material, and personnel readiness support" to a total of seven fast-attack submarines—three Virginia-class and four Los Angeles-class—according to a press release from the U.S. Pacific Submarine Force.
Prior to the arrival of the Indiana, the Los Angeles-class submarine USS Toledo completed a change of home port on July 12, arriving in Hawaii. This made the former Connecticut-based vessel the fourth Los Angeles-class submarine assigned to the Submarine Squadron 7.
The United States "Virginia"-class fast-attack submarine USS "Indiana" arrives at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii on July 22, 2025.
The United States "Virginia"-class fast-attack submarine USS "Indiana" arrives at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii on July 22, 2025.
Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Scott Barnes/U.S. Navy
In addition to the Virginia-class and the Los Angeles-class, the U.S. Navy operates three fast-attack submarines of the Seawolf-class, which are based in Bremerton and Bangor, Washington.
Commissioned in 2018, the Indiana is the 16th Virginia-class submarine. Unlike some of its older sister ships, it features two large payload tubes—each capable of firing six Tomahawk cruise missiles with a range of 1,000 miles—in place of 12 individual vertical launch tubes.
The submarine concluded its last overseas mission on March 27, returning from a six-month deployment in the U.S. European Command's area of responsibility—which includes all of Europe, Turkey, Russia, and the South Caucasus—a map provided by the command shows.
The U.S. Navy says fast-attack submarines are tasked with seeking and destroying enemy naval vessels, projecting power from sea to shore using missiles and special operations forces, and conducting intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions.
What People Are Saying
U.S. Navy Rear Admiral Chris Cavanaugh, commander of the Pacific Submarine Force, said in a press release on Tuesday: "Over the past 10 months, Indiana's crew has expertly navigated the challenges of an operational deployment and a homeport shift … I'm excited for Indiana to join the Pacific Submarine Force and to bolster our submarine presence to maintain a secure and prosperous, free, and open Indo-Pacific."
U.S. Navy Commander Kyle Johnson, commanding officer of USS Indiana, said in a press release on Tuesday: "We look forward to working with Submarine Squadron 7 and our Pearl Harbor partners to prepare Indiana—the 'Battle Bass'—for any tasking, at any time, in defense of our nation."
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen whether the U.S. Navy will deploy additional ships and submarines to the Pacific—particularly to Hawaii, Guam, and its forward-deployed fleet in Japan.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
China summons Nvidia over 'backdoor safety risks' in H20 chips
WASHINGTON (AP) — China's cyberspace regulators on Thursday summoned Nvidia over security concerns that its H20 chips can be tracked and turned off remotely, the Cyberspace Administration of China said on its website. In the meeting, Chinese regulators demanded that the U.S. chip company provide explanations on 'backdoor safety risks' of its H20 chips to be sold in China and submit relevant materials, the office said. 'Cybersecurity is critically important to us. NVIDIA does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them,' an Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement to AP. It came just about two weeks after the Trump administration lifted the block on the computing chips and allowed Nvidia to resume sales of H20 chips to the Chinese market. Jensen Huang, chief executive of Nvidia, made the announcement with fanfare when he was in Beijing earlier this month. The latest episode appears to be another turbulence in the tech rivalry between the United States and China, which have left businesses in both countries tussling with governments over market access and national security concerns. Any safety concern by Beijing could jeopardize the sale of H20 chips in China. Citing unnamed U.S. AI experts, the Chinese regulators said Nvidia has developed mature technology to track, locate and remotely disable its computing chips. The regulators summoned Nvidia to 'safeguard the cybersecurity and data security of Chinese users,' in accordance with Chinese laws, the statement said. The statement also referred to a call by U.S. lawmakers to require tracking and locating capabilities on U.S. advanced chips sold overseas. In May, Rep. Bill Huizenga, R.-Michigan, and Rep. Bill Foster, D.-Illinois, introduced the Chip Security Act that would require high-end chips to be equipped with 'security mechanisms' to detect 'smuggling or exploitation.' The bill has not moved through Congress since its introduction. Foster, a trained physicist, then said, 'I know that we have the technical tools to prevent powerful AI technology from getting into the wrong hands.' The U.S. still bans the sale to China of the most advanced chips, which are necessary for developing artificial intelligence. Both countries aim to lead in the artificial intelligence race. The Trump administration in April blocked the sales of H20 chips, which Nvidia developed to specifically comply with U.S. restrictions for exports of AI chips to China. After the ban was lifted, Nvidia expected to sell hundreds of thousands more H20 chips in the Chinese market. But the easing of the ban has raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill. On Monday, a group of top Democratic senators, including Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer, wrote to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to express their 'grave concerns". While chips like the H20 have differing capabilities than the most advanced chips such as Nvidia's H100, 'they give (China) capabilities that its domestically-developed chipsets cannot,' the senators wrote. Shortly after the ban was lifted, Rep. John Moolenaar, R.-Michigan, who chairs the House Select Committee on China, objected. 'The Commerce Department made the right call in banning the H20. Now it must hold the line,' Moolenaar wrote in a letter to Lutnick. 'We can't let the CCP use American chips to train AI models that will power its military, censor its people, and undercut American innovation," Moolenaar wrote, referring to the Chinese Communist Party by its acronym. Didi Tang, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Full List of Senators Who Voted To Block Israel Arms Deal
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A majority of Democratic senators voted in support of Senator Bernie Sanders' resolution to block an arms deal to Israel as public opinion shifts amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. Newsweek reached out to Sanders' office for comment via email. Why It Matters Support for Israel has become a sticking point in the Democratic Party amid growing humanitarian concerns about its military operations in Gaza. Recent polling suggests Democratic voters are becoming more critical of Israel, though many elected Democrats remain supportive of providing more aid. On October 7, 2023, Hamas led an attack against Israel, killing 1,200 and abducting 251 people. Israel has said 58 hostages remain in Gaza, and that only 21 of them are believed to be alive. Israel has since launched an offensive on Gaza, killing more than 60,000 people, according to The Associated Press, citing Gaza's Health Ministry. Critics have sounded the alarm on Israel's military operation, raising concerns about the number of civilians killed or displaced. Senator Bernie Sanders speaks during a rally in Washington on April 29, 2025. Senator Bernie Sanders speaks during a rally in Washington on April 29, To Know Sanders, a Vermont independent who has been critical of Israel, introduced two resolutions the Senate voted on Wednesday. Although both failed to receive majority support, they received record support from Senate Democrats. One resolution that would block the sale of assault rifles to Israel received support from 27 Democrats, while one to block the sale of more than $675 million in arms sales received support from 24 Democrats. These Democrats voted for both of Sanders' resolutions. Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Lisa Blunt Rochester (Delaware) Tammy Duckworth (Illinois) Dick Durbin (Illinois) Martin Heinrich (New Mexico) Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) Tim Kaine (Virginia) Andy Kim (New Jersey) Angus King (Maine, an independent who caucuses with Democrats) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Ben Ray Lujan (New Mexico) Ed Markey (Massachusetts) Jeff Merkley (Oregon) Chris Murphy (Connecticut) Patty Murray (Washington) Bernie Sanders (Vermont) Brian Schatz (Hawaii) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Tina Smith (Minnesota) Chris Van Hollen (Maryland) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts) Peter Welch (Vermont) These three senators voted for the amendment to block the sale of rifles to Israel. Jon Ossoff (Georgia) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) Ossoff, who is up for reelection next year, wrote in a statement that he does "not believe the United States Senate should acquiesce without objection to the extreme mass deprivation of civilians in Gaza, including the intolerable starvation of children" and that he is concerned the rifles would be "allocated to police forces under the control of Itamar Ben-Gvir." Still, he said he voted against the other resolution because he believes the U.S. "must continue to support the Israeli people, who face the persistent threat of rocket and missile attack." The vote comes just days after a new Gallup poll found increasing dissatisfaction toward Israel among Americans and particularly Democrats. Only 32 percent of Americans, and 8 percent of Democrats, supported Israel's actions in Gaza. It surveyed 1,002 adults from July 7-21 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. It also comes amid growing concerns about the potential starvation of civilians in Gaza. The United Nations has said there is "mounting evidence" of starvation, including plummeting food consumption and acute malnutrition. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has denied that civilians are starving in Gaza. Several Democrats who have been more pro-Israel voted in support of the resolutions. Blunt Rochester wrote in a statement that her votes "underscore the importance of finding peace in the region, and a lasting ceasefire in Gaza that puts an end to the civilian casualties is the best way to achieve that." What People Are Saying Senator Bernie Sanders, in a statement: "By a vote of 27-17, Senate Democrats voted to stop sending arms shipments to a Netanyahu government which has waged a horrific, immoral and illegal war against the Palestinian people. The tide is turning. Americans don't want to spend billions to starve children in Gaza." Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester, in a statement: "Until Israel significantly shifts its military posture to end the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the West Bank, I cannot in good conscience support further military aid and arms sales to Israel. It is critical that the Israeli government resume the adequate flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza, stop the senseless bombing, and work with the United States and our international partners to secure a lasting ceasefire and end this war." Senator Rafael Warnock, in a statement: "It is wrong to starve children and other innocent civilians to death. Yet, whether through gross incompetence, woeful indifference, or some combination thereof, that is exactly what is happening right now in Gaza under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu and his government. It is a moral atrocity that cannot abide the conscience of those who believe in human dignity, freedom, and human thriving. That is why I will vote to support the Joint Resolution of Disapproval put before the Senate tonight." What Happens Next Polling suggests Americans are becoming more critical of Israel, which will likely continue facing international pressure over its actions in Gaza.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump Reacts To $50 Million Brown University Settlement
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has celebrated the $50 million settlement deal his administration reached with Brown University to restore its funding. "There will be no more Anti-Semitism, or Anti-Christian, or Anti-Anything Else!" Trump said in a Thursday post on Truth Social about the deal. "Woke is officially DEAD at Brown." In exchange for the restoration of government funding, Brown has agreed to several policy changes, including to dismantle its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs. The Ivy League school will also pay $50 million in grants over 10 years to Rhode Island workforce development organizations. This is a breaking news story, updates to follow.