Private messages on Tea, the anonymous dating advice app, were exposed in a recent data breach
Last week, the app acknowledged that it had experienced a data breach of about 72,000 images, including users' photos and driver's licenses.
Now, a Tea spokesperson tells Business Insider that the company "recently learned that some direct messages (DMs) were accessed as part of the initial incident."
"Out of an abundance of caution, we have taken the affected system offline," the spokesperson added.
Security researcher Kasra Rahjerdi told BI that he was able to access more than 1.1 million private messages between Tea's users, including "intimate" conversations about topics like divorce, abortion, cheating, and rape. Some chats included details like phone numbers and locations to meet up, Rahjerdi said. The chats were from February 2023 through July 2025.
404 Media first reported on Rahjerdi's findings.
Rahjerdi told BI that he accessed Tea's app data using Firebase, an app development platform. Rahjerdi said he was able to access real-time data until about 4 a.m. ET on July 26th.
It's not clear if others had accessed this data with the intent to leak or otherwise use it.
Rahjerdi said Tea "did do a lot of really good security stuff on the code they wrote themselves," describing the company's own API as "very secure."
The problem was that Tea used Firebase to store its data, Rahjerdi said, adding that Tea "didn't do the same work there."
"We are working to identify any users whose personal information was involved and will be offering free identity protection services to those individuals," the Tea spokesperson said.
Before news of its data breach broke on Friday, the app had soared to the top of the Apple App Store last week, hitting the top spot. On Monday, it was No. 2 on the chart.
On Tea's website, it says it has a "community of over 4,647,000 women."
In addition to anonymously reviewing men with "red" or "green" flags, the app also lets women seek dating advice and access tools like background checks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Tesla must pay over $242M in damages after being found partly at fault for deadly Autopilot crash
In a major blow to Tesla, a Florida federal jury on Friday found Elon Musk's electric car company partly to blame for a 2019 crash that left a 22-year-old woman dead and her boyfriend seriously injured. The jury sided with the plaintiffs, awarding the family of Naibel Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, a combined $329 million in total damages — $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million punitive damages. Jurors awarded $59 million in compensatory damages to Benavides Leon's family and $70 million to Angulo, who suffered a traumatic brain injury and broken bones among other injuries. The verdict marks a substantial setback for Tesla and its Autopilot driver-assistance feature that the attorneys for the plaintiffs said was engaged at the time of the deadly collision and had design flaws. Tesla, in a statement, called the verdict "wrong" and said it plans to appeal "given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial." "Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," said Tesla. The company added, "This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver — from day one — admitted and accepted responsibility." Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . The plaintiff's attorney, Brett Schreiber, said the verdict "represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries, holding Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company's trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives." The verdict follows a three-week civil trial that included testimony from Angulo, Benavides Leon's family members, and the driver of the Tesla that plowed into a parked SUV and struck the couple as they were stargazing outside the vehicle alongside a Key Largo road. The jury found Tesla 33% responsible for the crash, with the driver responsible for the rest. Tesla will have to pay the full punitive damages amount, and a third of the compensatory damages, which equals $42.5 million. The case stems from a wrongful-death lawsuit that the plaintiffs brought against Tesla. The lawsuit argued that the carmaker's vehicles were "defective and unsafe for their intended use." Tesla, the lawsuit said, programmed Autopilot"to allow it to be used on roadways that Tesla knew were not suitable for its use and knew this would result in collisions causing injuries and deaths of innocent people who did not choose to be a part of Tesla's experiments, such as Plaintiffs." "Despite knowing of Autopilot's deficiencies, Tesla advertised Autopilot in a way that greatly exaggerated its capabilities and hid its deficiencies," said the lawsuit, which pointed to multiple comments from Musk touting the safety and reliability of the software. Tesla driver George McGee had Autopilot on when his 2019 Model S blew past a stop sign and a flashing red light at a three-way intersection and plowed into Angulo's mother's Chevrolet Tahoe at more than 60-miles-per-hour, the lawsuit said. McGee — who previously settled a separate lawsuit with the plaintiffs for an undisclosed amount — said he had dropped his cellphone during a call and bent down to pick it up moments before his Tesla, without warning, T-boned the Tahoe. He testified during the trial that he thought of Autopilot, which allows the vehicle to steer itself, switch lanes, brake, and accelerate on its own, as a "copilot." "My concept was it would assist me should I have a failure" or "should I make a mistake," McGee said in testimony, adding, "I do feel like it failed me." "I believe it didn't warn me of the car and the individuals and nor did it apply brakes," McGee testified. Attorneys for Tesla have argued that McGee was solely responsible for the April 25, 2019, crash. In the trial's opening statements, Tesla attorney Joel Smith said the case was about a driver, not a "defective vehicle," and had "nothing to do with Autopilot." "It's about an aggressive driver, not a complacent driver, a distracted driver who was fumbling around for his cellphone," Smith said. "It's about a driver pressing an accelerator pedal and driving straight through an intersection." Tesla's attorneys said that just before the crash, McGee hit the accelerator, overriding the vehicle's set cruising speed of 45 miles per hour and its ability to brake on its own. Autopilot mode, Tesla says on its website, is "intended for use with a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment."
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
This 21-year-old founder cut open his leg to show off his biotech. Then he raised $4.3 million from Peter Thiel and others.
If you think you're moving fast and breaking things, you haven't met Jake Adler, who poured his actual blood into his startup. Adler, the founder of Pilgrim, a biotech and defense startup building medical devices for the battlefield, tested his flagship product — a hemostatic dressing he calls Kingsfoil — by cutting open both of his thighs. Business Insider will spare you the details (and the video), but we watched it. (Adler, who is 21, assured us that he told his mom before filming: "I was very cautious," he said to BI in an interview. He does not encourage other founders to pursue similarly daring — and potentially dangerous — testing on themselves.) In a video sent to investors and viewed by BI, Adler numbed his legs with lidocaine and used a punch biopsy tool to create two scientifically precise wounds. One was slathered with Kingsfoil, which seemed to stall the bleeding, and the other was a control. When Kingsfoil touches the skin, Adler said, the gauze morphs into a gel-like consistency. He added that this can help seal wounds, clot blood flow, and aid in healing. Adler claims there are no known side effects to Kingsfoil, a clay-based hemostatic, other than possibly some minor skin irritation. Adler named Kingsfoil after the healing herb in J.R.R. Tolkien's book "The Lord of the Rings." (LotR names are popular among defense tech founders; Palmer Luckey's Anduril and Erebor and Alex Karp's Palantir all come from the book.) No investors held Adler's feet to the fire for the video: It was totally his idea, and he hopes to build on the demonstration by testing Kingsfoil in more controlled settings. "It is intended to undergo proper and rigorous clinical investigations," Adler said of Kingsfoil before sterilizing his thigh in the video. "This is just a precursor to that." "When I looked through the laws, there was nothing that inherently said I couldn't do a test on myself," he added in an interview. "In the same way you can get a tattoo, I'm allowed to do anything to my own body." Following the video, the Redwood, Calif.-based startup raised $4.3 million in seed funding. Frontier tech-focused firm Cantos VC led the round. Thiel Capital, Day One Ventures, and Refactor Capital participated alongside angel investors including Joshua Browder, Cory Levy, and Adrian Fenty. There are some established incumbents and newer startups in the wound care space. QuikClot also makes hemostatic dressings; its original formula used a mineral called zeolite, which triggered a heat-releasing reaction upon contact with blood, potentially causing burns. The company now uses a clay-based formula, and its website claims that the US Defense Department uses QuikClot products. HemCon makes hemostatic dressings using chitosan, a shellfish derivative. There's also Sealonix, a startup that makes hemostatic sealants for surgical use, which raised a $20 million Series A in 2023. While many defense startups are more focused on autonomous tech that can operate with humans off the physical battlefield, Pilgrim hopes to address critical medical needs of the soldiers who will remain on the battlefield despite advancements in drone tech. Adler sees the Defense Department as an "initial and first market" for his tech because "their operational needs are roughly five to 10 years ahead of the general operating or emergency room," he said. "My goal is to translate technologies to the everyday civilian," Adler continued, adding that the company also hopes to one day sell the product commercially. This would make Pilgrim a dual-use startup, an increasingly common business model for companies hoping to diversify their customer base by selling to both the government and consumers. "We look for people who stand out and are a little weird," Ian Rountree, general partner at Cantos, told BI about Adler. "Jake is exceptional," He added," It's one of those problems hiding in plain sight." Kingsfoil hasn't yet hit shelves. Since hemostatic agents already exist, Adler said the company can pursue an "expedited pathway" toward FDA approval, which he thinks could take six months. If the FDA deems Kingsfoil as novel, though, the company could face a timeline of one to one and a half years for approval. Adler said Pilgrim has already done a few "pre-submissions" to the FDA. The company is also working on two other products: Voyager, an inhaled mist that Pilgrim hopes will help the body neutralize chemical threats, like nerve agents, before they reach the bloodstream, and ARGUS, a surveillance platform that Adler says will be able to detect chemicals and other biological threats in high-risk areas like ports, hospitals, and farms. Both are still in the prototyping and testing phases. The five-person Pilgrim team develops these products and Kingsfoil from a hybrid office-lab in California. In 2023, a year after graduating from high school, Adler became a Thiel Fellow to work on a wearable device startup that aimed to induce and improve sleep. "I was really compelled by this belief that we can move beyond that paradigm toward being able to leverage data in real time to augment the body," Adler said. This idea still underpins his work at Pilgrim, Adler added: "I'm interested in creating an enduring institution that can become a biotech prime and go beyond that and actually translate technologies back to the civilian."
Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Apple saw an 'unusual buying pattern' among US shoppers this year. Tim Cook explains what happened.
All the talk of tariffs might be paying off for Apple. CEO Tim Cook told investors on Thursday that an "unusual buying pattern" for iPhones and Macs in the US that started in April led to an "incredible" quarter of sales for Apple. Consumers rushed to upgrade their devices ahead of potential price hikes they feared could come from tariffs. Sales of the newest iPhone 16 lineup grew by double digits compared to the iPhone 15 model from the quarter a year ago, while Mac updates "set records," Cook said as the company reported earnings. "People buying because of discussions about tariffs" drove one percentage point of Apple's 10% year-over-year growth during its third quarter, he said. The tech giant reported $94 billion in revenue for the period, including a stronger-than-expected $45 billion in iPhone sales. Wall Street was pleased by Apple's Q3 growth during a lackluster year in which the stock has slid 16% on concerns about tariff costs, manufacturing pressures, and the tech giant's positioning in the AI wars. The threat of President Donald Trump's tariff war loomed large in April. Tariff rates on goods from China, where Apple manufactures many of its phones, spiked amid the escalating trade war and prompted concerns that the company could raise prices. Some people went to their local Apple store for an upgrade to avoid potentially paying more later. The result was "tariff-related pull ahead and demand" for iPhone 16 models and Macs, CFO Kevan Parekh told investors Thursday. One shopper, Joseph Donnelly, planned to hold onto his iPhone 13 until the iPhone 17 is released, but told Business Insider in April that talk of tariffs changed his mind. "It's not innovation or a broken phone that brought me to the store," he said. Donnelly might've been onto something. Jefferies analysts said Wednesday that they expect some of the coming iPhone 17 models to cost $50 more to offset the impact of tariffs. However, the company didn't share any plans for price hikes on Thursday's earnings call. As Apple faces pressure to move manufacturing to the US, the price of its golden goose will remain a topic of conversation.
