&w=3840&q=100)
Meet Michael Erik Kurilla, US General known as 'Gorilla', who is handling West Asia crisis
General Michael Erik Kurilla is handling the US' plans for the crisis in West Asia. The four-star general, nicknamed 'Gorilla', for his physique, has been overriding decisions from his seniors at the Pentagon with the backing of US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth read more
Lieutenant General Michael Kurilla is handling the US' response to the West Asia crisis. Reuters
A four-star general nicknamed 'Gorilla' is handling the US' plans for the West Asia crisis.
Though one would expect US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to handle the matter, he has instead delegated power to General Michael Erik Kurilla.
So much so that Kurilla is actually overriding decisions from senior members of the Pentagon.
But who is Kurilla? What do we know about his handling of the crisis in West Asia?
Let's take a closer look:
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Who is he?
Kurilla hails from Minnesota's Elk River.
He is known as 'Gorilla' because of his physique.
Read Israel Iran conflict live updates
Kurilla graduated from West Point's United States Military Academy with a BS in Aerospace Engineering.
He also has an MBA from Regis University and a MS in National Security Studies from the National War College.
Kurilla joined the infantry in 1988.
General Michael 'Erik' Kurilla , Commander of U.S. Central Command. Reuters
He has seen action in several countries including Panama, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Afghanistan and Bosnia.
From 2004 to 2014, Kurilla led conventional and special operations forces in the US Central Command Area of Responsibility.
He has been awarded several honours including Bronze Star in 2005 and the Purple Heart with Oak Leaf Cluster.
Kurilla was awarded the Bronze Star for leading his troops in the battle after being shot thrice.
Kurilla was investigated by the US army last year for allegedly shoving a service member while being on a trip to West Asia.
General Kurilla is married to Mary Paige.
They have two daughters.
How is he directing the US' plans?
Kurilla has been Chief of Staff of CENTCOM, the combatant command in the Middle East and Central Asia, since April 2022.
CENTCOM is the US military's top body in West Asia.
Officials say Kurilla seems to get whatever he wants – from jet fighters to aircraft carriers – from Hegseth.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Pentagon sent a second aircraft carrier, the USS Nimitz, to West Asia this week.
The Pentagon has already deployed F-16s, F-22s, and F-35s to the region.
Kurilla, who is said to be a noted hawk on Iran, is close to Israel.
In fact, Hegseth's deference to Kurilla is raising eyebrows around the Pentagon.
Experts say much of it comes down to the fact that he looks the part – which is particularly important to both Trump and Hegseth.
'He's got the look of the general that both Hegseth and Trump are looking for,' an ex-official told Politico. 'He's a big dude, he's jacked, he's exactly this 'lethality' look they're going for.'
An F-35 fighter jet on the deck of the US nuclear-powered aircraft carrier George Washington. (Photo: AP)
'If the senior military guys come across as tough and warfighters, Hegseth is easily persuaded to their point of view,' the former official added. Kurilla 'has been very good at getting what he wants.'
Kurilla has frequently a rgued against the recommendations of his superiors Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine and Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Both Caine and Colby have urged caution when dealing with the situation in West Asia.
'He's extremely strategic and persuasive about what CENTCOM can do given adequate resources,' Dan Shapiro, who until January was the Pentagon's top West Asia policy official, told the outlet. 'That was certainly true in the Biden administration. It may be more true now.'
Kurilla earlier this month told the US Congress that he offered President Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth a 'wide range' of military options in case talks with Iran don't pan out.
With inputs from agenices
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Russia's bone-chilling World War III threat to this western country after secret 'anti-Putin campaign'
Russia has given a stern ultimatum to the United Kingdom and has demanded a halt to all military training for Ukrainian forces as a prerequisite for ending the ongoing conflict. Russian President Vladimir Putin's foreign ministry special envoy, Rodion Miroshnik, also insisted that arms supplies must cease. The demand of Russia comes at a time amid indications that US President Donald Trump is prepared to levy heavy sanctions on the Kremlin due to its refusal to cease hostilities. Russia bombards Ukraine Over the weekend, Ukraine experienced the most intense aerial bombardment of the conflict with 537 strikes by Putin's forces, including the shooting down of an F-16 warplane, resulting in the death of pilot Lt-Col Maksym Ustymenko. NATO jets were also deployed in response to a massive Russian missile and drone attack on Ukraine. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Just Listed: 2-Bedroom Senior Apartment in St Pauls (The Price Might Surprise You) 2-Bedroom Senior Apartments Read More Undo ALSO READ: 'If he gets in...': Trump vs Zohran Mamdani escalates as US President threatens to pull the plug in fiery clash The fallen pilot was posthumously awarded the Hero of Ukraine honor by Volodymyr Zelensky for "defending our people from yet another massive Russian attack." He was described as "one of our very best," and his loss was deemed "losing people like him is deeply painful." Live Events Today, Moscow explicitly stated its intention to terminate Britain's Operation Interflex training for Ukraine, which has prepared tens of thousands of fighters for combat. Speaking with the pro-Putin news outlet Izvestia, it was reported that: "Currently, two main Western training initiatives are active - the UK's Operation Interflex and the EU's EUMAM mission." The number of individuals trained was estimated to be around 130,000. Miroshnik emphasized that "The participation or complicity of other countries is a key issue that must be stopped in all forms - including weapons deliveries and the training of Ukrainian militants." He added: "All of this amounts to direct complicity in the conflict." He concluded by stating: "Halting these programs would be a signal of willingness to seek a resolution." ALSO READ: Zohran Mamdani to be stripped of US citizenship? Shocking twist as New York's mayoral race heats up UK accused of involved in deaths of Russian troops Recently, Zelensky and UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer inspected Ukrainian troops undergoing training in Britain. This sentiment was echoed by Konstantin Kosachev, the hardline deputy speaker of the Russian senate, the Federation Council. He stated that any aid provided to Ukraine that enables them to continue fighting or preparing for operations is clearly not conducive to resolving the conflict. "It is unequivocally hostile to Russia. That is how we classify it." He claimed that London and Brussels have no interest in finding common ground. ALSO READ: Indian-origin Zohran Mamdani faces shocking threat to US citizenship: Can Trump really deport him? "This is a clear campaign against everything Russian - a full display of militarism. I would also add that it shows a desire to shackle the Kyiv government and Ukrainian citizens into tools for achieving British and, in this case, NATO strategic aims. "Ukrainians no longer have agency. Moscow's dialogue with London and Brussels has been cut off, and the EU and NATO show no intention of resuming it." Britain was also accused of being involved in the deaths of Russian troops. Britain was also accused of being involved in the deaths of Russian troops. "In practice, they are participating in the killing of our citizens while simultaneously coordinating terrorist attacks by the Kyiv regime on Russian territory," said Oleg Karpovich, Vice-Rector of the Diplomatic Academy in Moscow. Russia's objective to "demilitarise" Ukraine stands firm, even as Russia itself remains heavily armed. ALSO READ: Jeff Bezos-Lauren Sanchez secret wedding bombshell: Unexpected mega-million prenup and A-list guests snubbed Meanwhile, Donald Trump has indicated he will consider providing more of the Patriot missiles that Ukraine needs to defend against mounting Russian strikes, adding that Russian leader Vladimir Putin 'really has to end that war'. The US president's remarks came after a 50-minute meeting with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy last week on the sidelines of a Nato summit in The Hague. Both leaders described it as a positive step in a conflict that Trump described as 'more difficult than other wars'. Trump told a press conference the Patriots were 'very hard to get' but that 'we are going to see if we can make some of them available'. Asked if Washington would contribute more funding to Ukraine's defence this year, Trump said: 'As far as money going, we'll see what happens.'
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Dalai Lama turns 90: How will his successor be chosen and who gets to decide?
As the Dalai Lama approaches his 90th birthday this Sunday, the question of who will succeed the Tibetan spiritual leader has taken centre stage: not just among Buddhists, but also in political circles across China, India, and the United States. The Nobel Peace Prize laureate, revered globally for his advocacy of nonviolence and compassion, is also seen as a symbol of resistance against Chinese control of Tibet. With succession potentially reshaping Tibetan religious authority and geopolitical equations, the process is closely watched by world powers. According to Tibetan tradition, the soul of a senior monk is reincarnated after death, and the Dalai Lama is no exception. The current, 14th Dalai Lama — born Lhamo Dhondup in 1935 in northeastern Tibet — was identified at age two after a search party, guided by visions and signs, believed he was the reincarnation of his predecessor. When the child recognised items belonging to the 13th Dalai Lama and declared, 'It's mine, it's mine,' their doubts were settled. He was officially installed at the Potala Palace in Lhasa in 1940. The Dalai Lama, who has lived in exile in India since fleeing Tibet in 1959 after a failed uprising against Chinese rule, has indicated his successor will be born outside China. In his 2025 book Voice for the Voiceless, he wrote that further details about the succession plan would be made public around his 90th birthday. The Tibetan parliament-in-exile, based in Dharamshala, says a framework is already in place to ensure continuity of leadership. A key role in the process will be played by the Gaden Phodrang Foundation, which the Dalai Lama established in 2015 to support his religious and spiritual responsibilities. Senior aides and officers from the foundation are expected to guide the search and recognition of his reincarnation. Beijing, however, claims that its government has the authority to approve the Dalai Lama's successor, citing laws rooted in Qing dynasty-era traditions. Officials have pointed to the golden urn ritual — a lottery system introduced in 1793 — as the official mechanism to determine reincarnations within China's borders. Chinese authorities argue that any reincarnation must occur within China and follow national laws. But many Tibetans see this as a political maneuver designed to control their spiritual leadership. It is inappropriate for Chinese Communists, who reject religion 'to meddle in the system of reincarnation of lamas' the Dalai Lama has said. He has urged Tibetans to reject any candidate 'chosen for political ends… including those in the People's Republic of China.' India hosts the Dalai Lama and over 100,000 Tibetan Buddhists in exile. His presence in the Himalayan town of Dharamshala gives New Delhi a subtle but strategic advantage in its complex relationship with Beijing, reported Reuters. Many Indians hold him in high regard, and he continues to have access to Indian institutions and media. The United States has frequently voiced support for Tibetan autonomy and rights. In 2024, Joe Biden signed a law urging Beijing to negotiate on Tibet's status and reaffirming Washington's opposition to Chinese interference in the Dalai Lama's succession. US lawmakers have also made clear that any future Dalai Lama chosen under Chinese influence would not be recognised. (With inputs from Reuters)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran's nuclear programme wasn't 'obliterated' or 'set back decades', as Trump said
Contrary to Donald Trump's assertions, Iran's nuclear infrastructure was damaged and not destroyed and experts and leaked intelligence assessments indicate the programme could be revived within months read more A satellite image shows airstrike craters over the underground centrifuge halls of the Natanz Enrichment Facility, following US airstrikes amid the Iran-Israel conflict, in Natanz County, Iran. Maxar Technologies/Reuters Despite US President Donald Trump's repeated assertions that Iran's nuclear programme has been 'obliterated' and 'set back decades,' early intelligence assessments suggest otherwise. A preliminary analysis from the US Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), reported in American media, indicated that American and Israeli airstrikes on June 21 only delayed Iran's nuclear activities by a matter of months, not decades, and certainly not eliminated them. The DIA's report, though classified, was cited by multiple sources familiar with internal assessments. These officials suggested that the damage, while significant, did not dismantle the core industrial and technological infrastructure that underpins Iran's nuclear ambitions. The White House has pushed back hard against this narrative, with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt calling the idea that 'unnamed Iranian officials' could know the extent of the damage 'nonsense,' asserting instead that 'their nuclear weapons program is over.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD IAEA director: Damage 'severe but not total' Echoing the cautious tone of US intelligence, Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CBS News that while the strikes had caused severe damage, the destruction was not total. He emphasised that Iran still retained the ability to resume uranium enrichment within a matter of months, noting that the necessary capacities remained in place. He explained that Iran could operate a few cascades of centrifuges to produce enriched uranium, or even less than that. Grossi also warned against assuming that Iran's nuclear program had been eliminated. He said that, frankly, one could not claim that everything had disappeared and that nothing remained. He stressed that Iran's knowledge base and industrial capabilities were still intact, making it possible for enrichment activities to resume once operational challenges were overcome. Intercepted Iranian communications suggest limited damage The Washington Post reported that intercepted communications between senior Iranian officials seemed to show a consensus that the attacks were less devastating than initially feared. The newspaper cited four individuals with knowledge of the intercepted messages, suggesting that Iranian leadership had assessed the damage to their facilities as relatively contained. However, the credibility of these communications remains a subject of debate within intelligence circles. Another source, quoted by Reuters, confirmed their existence but labelled them 'unreliable indicators' of the real state of Iran's nuclear programme. A disputed narrative from the Trump administration Trump has remained unwavering in his version of events. In an interview with Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, he described the operation as a 'spectacular military success,' claiming the nuclear programme was 'obliterated like nobody's ever seen before'. His defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, echoed this, insisting the strikes marked the 'end to their nuclear ambitions'. Yet, during a Pentagon press briefing, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Caine struck a more measured tone. Caine admitted that the full battle damage assessment was still ongoing and said it was 'too early' to determine exactly what capabilities Iran retained. He did, however, note that initial assessments showed 'extremely severe damage and destruction' at the targeted sites in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Enrichment capacity could rebound quickly Despite the high-impact nature of the strikes, experts, including Grossi believed that Iran could resume uranium enrichment relatively quickly. He said if Iran wished to do so, it would be able to start the process again. He said that Iran was a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology, and that its ability to restart centrifuge operations was based on years of accumulated knowledge that could not simply be undone. Grossi also highlighted the absence of IAEA inspectors on the ground as a critical blind spot. Since the strikes, Iran has denied inspectors access to the targeted facilities, citing security and political concerns. Tehran's UN ambassador, Amir Saeid Iravani, insisted inspectors were 'in Iran' but said they could not access specific sites. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Khamenei and mixed Iranian messaging The response from Iran's leadership has been uneven. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei reportedly dismissed the airstrikes as ineffective, saying they achieved 'nothing significant'. Yet Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi acknowledged that the damage was 'excessive and serious'. This inconsistency has fuelled speculation that Iran may be deliberately downplaying the impact while preserving the appearance of resilience. Iran's military leadership, meanwhile, has expressed scepticism over Israel's commitment to the recently declared ceasefire. Armed forces chief Abdolrahim Mousavi said Tehran was prepared to respond 'with all our power' if provoked again. Diplomatic options still on the table Despite the heightened tensions, Grossi reiterated the importance of a diplomatic resolution. He said that the situation, following the military strikes, would ultimately require a long-lasting solution, which could only be a diplomatic one. He also noted that although Iran had consistently asserted its nuclear program was intended for peaceful purposes, the IAEA had been unable to verify those claims because Iran had refused to answer very important questions. Military action, limited impact While the Trump administration has celebrated the June 21 strikes as a decisive blow against Iran's nuclear programme, a growing body of evidence from intelligence assessments and international experts suggests a far more modest result. The damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure was 'severe' but by no means 'total,' and the core capabilities — technological, industrial, and intellectual — remain intact. Iran could, according to the IAEA, begin spinning centrifuges again within months. As Grossi warned, military strikes alone are unlikely to end Iran's nuclear ambitions. With inspectors still barred and the region on edge, the enduring solution appears to lie not in airpower but in diplomacy.
