Harvey Weinstein accuser denies suing for money in retrial
Haley strongly rejected the attorney's suggestion as she was cross-examined in a Manhattan courtroom yesterday, saying that she had only spoken out to support and encourage other women who alleged Weinstein attacked them.
'You didn't mention a meeting at Claridge's in London... You didn't mention friendly emails... you told the press only part of the story,' Weinstein's lawyer Jennifer Bonjean said of Haley's media appearances denouncing her client's behaviour.
'I told the part that was relevant to what I was trying to share,' said Haley.
Weinstein's 2020 convictions on charges relating to Haley and aspiring actress Jessica Mann were overturned last year by the New York Court of Appeals, which ruled that the way witnesses were handled in the original trial was unlawful.
Back in a Manhattan courtroom, Haley has this week tearfully recalled the day in July 2006 when she says she accepted an invitation to visit Weinstein's Soho apartment, where the alleged assault happened. At the time, she was a showbiz production assistant looking for work.
'I had [a] press conference to share what happened to me in support of the other women,' Haley said as Weinstein watched on.
Compensation denial
Haley denied that she went to the prosecutor, the Manhattan District Attorney (DA), only after she realised she could not sue Weinstein because of the statute of limitations.
'At no point in that time did I think... there would be an option to get monetary compensation,' she said during the sometimes-heated exchanges with Weinstein's lawyer.
The lawyer alleged that the only way Haley could bring a lawsuit was if prosecutors brought charges.
'I didn't know that,' Haley said.
'Your interest in coming forward to the DA's office only happened after you learned that you could sue him if they brought criminal charges,' Bonjean repeated.
The former Miramax studio boss is charged in the New York retrial with the 2006 sexual assault of Haley and the 2013 rape of Mann. He also faces a new count for an alleged sexual assault of a 19-year-old in 2006.
Weinstein – the producer of a string of box office hits such as Pulp Fiction and Shakespeare in Love – has never acknowledged any wrongdoing.
He is serving a 16-year prison sentence after being convicted in California of raping and assaulting a European actress more than a decade ago.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Destiny's Child reunites for Beyoncé's last tour show
The cameo was the first time the trio has performed together since 2018. Photo / Instagram/beyonce. Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Already a subscriber? Sign in here Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen. The cameo was the first time the trio has performed together since 2018. Photo / Instagram/beyonce. Beyoncé has ended her Cowboy Carter tour with a bang as she brought back 90's girl group Destiny's Child for a cameo performance. It was a Millennials dream as the trio of Beyoncé, Kelly Rowland and Michelle Williams performed some of their biggest hits including 2001 track Bootylicious and 2005 song Lose My Breath to wrap up the 32 show United States and European tour. They also stuck around to take part in the song Energy from Beyoncé's 2022 album Renaissance. The performance was the first time the group has performed since US music festival Coachella in 2018.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Gangs Are Going Global And So Is The Illegal Gun Trade – NZ Can Do More To Fight It
, University of Waikato According to the Global Organised Crime Index, international criminal activity has increased over the past two years. And the politically fractured post-pandemic world has made this even harder for nations to combat. New Zealand is far from immune. According to official advice in late March to Minister of Customs and Associate Minister of Police Casey Costello: The threat posed by organised crime in New Zealand has increased substantially in the last five years. Even with the best of will, New Zealand is losing the fight. New criminal groups are becoming active here – from Burma via Malaysia, to the Comancheros and Mongols gangs. Each brings new networks, violent tactics and the potential to corrupt institutions in New Zealand and throughout the Pacific. As of October 2024, the national gang list contained 9,460 names. While there is debate about the accuracy of the figures, gang membership has grown considerably. This is fuelled by the global trade in illegal drugs, with local criminal profits conservatively estimated at NZ$500–600 million annually. The one relative bright spot is that New Zealand hasn't yet seen the levels of firearms-related violence driven by organised crime overseas. For example, European research shows the illegal trade in guns and drugs becoming increasingly intertwined. But waiting to catch up with those trends should not be an option. New Zealand already has a lot firearms. In the past six years, police conducting routine patrols have reportedly encountered 17,000 guns, or nearly ten every day, nationwide. In 2022, official figures showed, on average, approximately one firearms offence had been committed daily by gang members since 2019. The risk had become apparent much earlier, in 2016, with the discovery of fourteen military assault-grade AK47s and M16s in an Auckland house being used to manufacture methamphetamine. This year, another firearms cache, including assault rifles and semiautomatics, was found in Auckland. Progress and problems On the legal front, the main avenues New Zealand gangs use to obtain illegal firearms are being closed off. Under the Arms Act, members or close affiliates of a gang or an organised criminal group cannot be considered 'fit and proper' to lawfully possess a firearm. These people may have specific firearms prohibition orders added against them, which allow the police additional powers to ensure firearms don't fall into the wrong hands. The firearms registry is key to this. There are now more than 400,000 firearms fully accounted for, making it harder for so-called ' straw buyers ' to onsell them to gangs. Despite the progress, several challenges remain. In particular, the nature of the gun registry has been politicised, with the ACT and National parties disagreeing over a review of the system's scope. Arguments over the types of firearms covered and which agency looks after the registry risk undermining its central purpose of preventing criminals getting guns. Theft of firearms from lawful owners needs more attention, too. Making it a specific offence – not just illegal possession – would be an added deterrent. Tighter and targeted policy Accounting for all the estimated 1.5 million firearms in New Zealand will be very difficult – especially with the buy-back and amnesty for prohibited firearms after the Christchurch terror attack likely being far from complete. There are also tens of thousands of non-prohibited firearms in the hands of unlicensed but not necessarily criminal owners. Given all firearms must be registered by the end of August 2028, there should be another buy-back (at market rates) of all guns that should be on the register. This might be expensive, but the cost of opening a large pipeline to criminals would be worse. There needs to be greater investment in staff, education and technology within intelligence services and customs. This will help inform evidence-based policy, and support targeted law enforcement. A recent European Union initiative to track gun violence in real time is an example of how data can help in this way. New Zealand is a party to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime (and its two protocols on people trafficking and migrant smuggling). But it is not a party to a supplementary protocol covering the illicit manufacturing and trafficking of firearms and ammunition. That should change. Amendments to the Arms Act since 2019 mean New Zealand law and policy fit the protocol perfectly. By joining, New Zealand could strengthen regional cooperation and increase public safety, given the scale of the problem and its potential to get worse.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
US prison officials get tips on how to modernise jails during trips to see how they are run abroad
'They treat their maximum-security prisoners like minimum-security prisoners,' Davison marvelled. And yet, Tegel Prison is far less violent than many American prisons. Over the course of a week, officials from Massachusetts, North Dakota, and Oklahoma toured four German prisons where inmates wore street clothes, maintained their right to vote, cooked their own meals, played in soccer leagues, and learned skills like animal husbandry and carpentry. One, called the Open Prison, allowed residents to come and go for work, school, and errands. A growing number of American states are looking abroad for ideas that can be adapted to their state prison systems, most often to Scandinavian countries famous for the IKEA-utopia design of their correctional institutions, but also to places like Germany and New Zealand. In the past two years, California, Arizona, and Oklahoma's prison systems have shifted their focus to rehabilitation rather than punishment. In 2022, Pennsylvania opened a unit known as Little Scandinavia, and last year Missouri began a similar transformation project in four prisons. Six other states have established European-style units for younger prisoners. The efforts are still small, dwarfed by the sheer size of the American prison population, and limited by political and financial roadblocks. Prison conditions are not a priority for voters, polls show, and changes are sometimes unwelcome. In March, thousands of corrections officers in New York state walked off the job to protest against new limitations on the use of solitary confinement, saying the changes would make their jobs more dangerous. In Arizona, a new head of prisons who had sought to make them more humane faced sharp criticism after a prisoner who had been moved out of maximum security killed three fellow inmates. And harsh punishments are part of the American DNA. US President Donald Trump has said he would 'love' to send American convicts to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Still, making prison life more like normal life is catching on in some surprising places. 'I'm amazed by how quickly these ideas are taking off across the US,' said Keramet Reiter, a criminology professor at the University of California, Irvine. Prisoner advocates say the changes make communities safer by better preparing prisoners for their eventual release and create a less stressful environment for prison workers. However, the real catalyst is that US prisons are in crisis, struggling with severe staffing shortages, crumbling facilities and frequent violence. A common room in a ward for Berlin's most dangerous prisoners at Tegel Prison. Photo / Lena Mucha, the New York Times Inmates in US prisons often endure extreme temperatures, vermin-infested food and years, or even decades, in solitary confinement. High-profile cases have brought attention to prolonged shackling, fatal beatings, and sexual abuse. 'It's unsustainable, which is why we have to change the justice system to lock up only those who are a danger to others,' said Tricia Everest, secretary of public safety for Republican-led Oklahoma. The state once had the country's highest incarceration rate. In 2016, voters approved measures to lower the penalties for some crimes and to direct the savings into mental health and substance abuse treatment. Everest has presided over the closure of four prisons. European prisons are far safer than those in the US, experts say, with lower recidivism rates and healthier, happier employees. In Berlin, which has 3.9 million residents and operates a correction system analogous to that of an American state, suicides are rare, and homicides are virtually non-existent. Of course, the US has higher crime than European countries. America's system of prisons and jails is the largest in the world, incarcerating nearly two million people, according to the World Prison Brief, which tracks global data on incarceration. Change on that scale is difficult to accomplish, especially when the American public can be sceptical of spending money on what they regard as prisoners' comfort. Even in states that have been noted for overhauling some aspects of their criminal justice system, like Georgia and Texas, prison conditions can remain abysmal. Georgia was singled out by the Justice Department last year for failing to protect inmates from 'frequent, pervasive violence', and in March a federal judge declared the heat in Texas prisons to be 'plainly unconstitutional'. By contrast, German prison officials say they consider loss of liberty to be punishment enough. The courts have ruled that new prisons must provide single-occupancy cells at least 10sqm in size. Many have kitchens where residents may cook their own meals. One prison for young adults is experimenting with removing bars from some of the windows, on the premise that looking at bars is depressing. Many of the rules were made in response to the shame of the country's Nazi past, when prisons were used to suppress dissent and concentration camps held unspeakable horrors. 'What it all boils down to is the core principle, human dignity,' said Deputy Warden Johanna Schmid as she led the group through Tegel Prison's leafy courtyards. At Heidering Prison, warden Andreas Kratz showed off a visiting room with a kitchenette, bed, crib and balcony. Colby Braun, head of prisons for North Dakota, and Tricia Everest, the secretary of public safety for Oklahoma, view a work area at Heidering Prison, in Grossbeeren, Germany. Photo / Lena Mucha, the New York Times Time with family, German officials said, helps prisoners maintain the ties they will need to stay out of trouble when they are released. In the US, privacy, time outside of cells and family visits are considered risky, and 'overfamiliarity' between correction officers and inmates is prohibited. German prisons take the opposite approach, known as dynamic security. Correction officers are expected to develop relationships with inmates and know when problems may arise. Yvonne Gade, a correction officer in a ward that houses a small number of prisoners deemed particularly dangerous, shrugged off concerns about their access to a gym with free weights. 'It would be a huge potential for violence if you locked them up all the time,' she said. Prisons in Europe are certainly not perfect. The Americans and Germans shared frustrations over gangs and a recent influx of synthetic marijuana. Some of Germany's problems show just how different the system is. In one facility for young adults, a resident set his curtain on fire using a lighter he was permitted to have. In Saxony-Anhalt in April, a prisoner was accused of killing his wife during a five-hour, unsupervised conjugal visit. The idea of showing US policymakers how European prisons work originated with a civil rights lawyer named Don Specter, whose lawsuits have led to changes to the California prison system. In 2011, he accompanied a group of students on a visit to prisons in Germany and Scandinavia and was struck by how it changed the 'hearts and minds' of people with diverse political views. 'It seemed that the magic sauce was actually seeing it in person,' Specter said. When Specter was awarded a large fee in one of his cases, he used it to fund a trip abroad for prison officials in 2013. Out of that grew the Global Justice Exchange Project at the Vera Institute of Justice, which organises regular trips to Germany, and a programme at the University of California, San Francisco called Amend, which has worked with Washington, Oregon, California and other states to change prison culture. Working with Vera, six states have gone on to create special units for 18- to 25-year-olds that allow more frequent visits with family, shared responsibility for resolving conflicts and more out-of-cell time. The effect of these transformations is difficult to measure, in part because many of the units are quite new and in part because doing research in prison is inherently complex. However, a randomised, controlled trial in South Carolina showed that residents who were placed in the special units were 73% less likely to be disciplined for violence and 83% less likely to be sent to restrictive housing. An inmate works with a pony on a small farm at the Neustrelitz Prison in Neustrelitz, Germany. Photo / Lena Mucha, the New York Times Such efforts can also improve staff morale. Guards whose interactions with prisoners go beyond shackling and unshackling them are likely to consider their work more meaningful, said Reiter, the criminology professor. Throughout the German tour, US officials were intrigued but also wrestled with how much of what they saw would work at home. The biggest obstacle was cost, especially increasing staff-to-inmate ratios when states are already struggling to recruit officers. But even simple acts like a guard and inmate sharing a cup of coffee could require an overhaul of long-standing policies designed to prohibit fraternisation. Differing concepts of liability also get in the way. In Germany, prisoners can use the toilet behind a closed door, while in the US toilets are typically installed in open cells, said Colby Braun, director of the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. 'You live in your bathroom,' he said. 'With another person.' When the state was planning a new prison, designers tried for a more dignified arrangement but could not achieve it, Braun said, because of a requirement that officers be able to see prisoners on their rounds. The officials compared notes on how to overcome political resistance in their own states. Braun said he tried to develop relationships with lawmakers so he could fend off proposals he viewed as counterproductive, like a recent one that would have ended the use of rehabilitation programmes and halfway houses. On the other hand, members of the Massachusetts delegation were frustrated because, they said, its liberal legislature did not want to replace their prisons, some of which are more than 100 years old, even though new ones could make incarceration more humane. For her part, Everest said she had learned how to speak the language of her state's legislators and law enforcement officers. 'I don't do criminal justice reform. It's been politicised,' she said. 'We are modernising the system.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Shaila Dewan Photographs by: Lena Mucha ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
