Republicans scramble to corral support for Trump megabill ahead of House vote
Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., can only afford three defections to pass the legislation through his narrow majority, presuming all members attend and Democrats vote against it. Johnson privately huddled just off Capitol Hill with members of the hardline House Freedom Caucus, who are demanding deeper spending cuts.
At the White House, Trump was holding multiple meetings with holdouts and on-the-fence members, one GOP lawmaker said, including with the moderate members of the Republican Main Street Caucus.
Within hours of it narrowly passing the Senate Tuesday, House Republicans advanced the bill through the Rules Committee by a margin of 7-6, with Reps. Chip Roy, R-Texas, and Ralph Norman, R-S.C., voting "no" due to concerns that it would add to the debt.
Several House conservatives complained that the spending cuts were insufficient after shrinking in the Senate package. They raged against the fact that various provisions were stripped out due to budget rules in the chamber, including immigration-related restrictions they strongly support.
But nearly all of those lawmakers have developed a track record of folding and voting in alignment with Trump when the pressure is on them. GOP leaders are counting on them to do so again.
One House Republican lawmaker said conservatives in the Freedom Caucus used to get political cover from groups like Club for Growth, but Trump has scrambled the calculus on the right. The Club for Growth is backing the bill, and conservative figures like Russell Vought and Stephen Miller are in Trump's inner circle and some of the loudest cheerleaders for the package.
Freedom Caucus members 'have no cover' if they vote no, the lawmaker said Wednesday. 'Who's going to protect them from Trump? Thomas Massie?'
Trump has been in a bitter feud with conservative Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., threatening to recruit a primary challenger against him after he was one of just two Republicans who voted against the House bill in May. Massie, who walks around Capitol Hill wearing a live debt clock, has said the legislation would make the deficit situation worse and has continued to rail against it.
And politically vulnerable Republicans were unhappy with the more aggressive Medicaid cuts in the Senate bill, along with a series of clean energy funding rollbacks that they warned against.
The Senate-passed bill would add $3.3 trillion to the national debt over 10 years, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which found that the loss of revenue from tax cuts would outstrip the spending cuts in the legislation.
The legislation would extend the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017 while boosting funding for immigration enforcement and the military. It would also makes significant cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and clean energy funding, while raising the debt limit by $5 trillion.
On the Capitol steps Wednesday morning, Democrats blasted the legislation as a massive tax cut for the wealthiest Americans, paid for by slashing programs that help the working class.
"It is the cruelest bill that I've ever seen in my tenure in the House of Representatives," said Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., the ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who has served in the House since 1988.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump blasts 'ridiculous' holdout Republicans as clock ticks on July 4 deadline for Big Beautiful Bill
President Donald Trump was left infuriated as the day began on Thursday and five Republican congressmen refused to advance his One Big Beautiful Bill. The massive spending bill narrowly passed the Senate on Tuesday, and House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson worked throughout the night on Wednesday to convert members of his party who opposed the measure. His goal was to get the landmark legislation passed and on Trump's desk before the Independence Day holiday on Friday. But five Republicans have held up the measure to simply advance the bill. They include Rep. Andrew Clyde, of Georgia; Rep. Victoria Spartz, of Indiana; Rep. Keith Self, of Texas; Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, of Pennsylvania; and Rep. Thomas Massie, of Kentucky. As the bill remained stalled, President Trump took to his Truth Social page to hit out at the 'ridiculous' holdouts. He declared that 'THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE' for Republicans. In another post he asked what the five Republicans who voted against advancing the bill were 'waiting for' and what they were 'trying to prove.' In another post he asked what the five Republicans who voted against advancing the bill were 'waiting for' and what they were 'trying to prove' 'MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!' he warned the holdouts as he touted the provisions of his massive spending bill. He claimed it would bring the 'largest tax cuts in history and a booming economy' and that the alternative is the 'biggest tax increase in history and a failed economy.' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also hit out at the Republicans who voted 'no' on advancing the Big Beautiful Bill. 'Anyone who votes AGAINST the One Big Beautiful Bill is voting AGAINST: No Tax on Tips No Tax on Overtime No Tax on Social Security,' she wrote on social media. But the Republicans who voted against the measure have disagreed, with members of the House Freedom Caucus expressing concerns about the bill's increased spending levels, provisions allowing government benefits for some illegal immigrants and funding for Biden-era renewable energy policies. They seemed to have been bolstered by Republican Sen. Rand Paul, who signaled he would stand by their efforts 'to add 'real savings' to Big Not So Beautiful Bill.' He also wrote on social media that he assured his colleagues in the House 'that I can vote to allow a larger increase in debt ceiling if House attaches immediate REAL spending cuts.' Trump had tried to smooth the matter over with some House Republicans ahead of the vote on Wednesday, hosting groups of lawmakers at the White House so that he could convince them to support his policy package. The president specifically met with some moderate Republicans and some far-right conservatives and was able to get some to commit to backing his bill. With that in mind, Trump seemed hopeful about the bill advancing. He wrote on his Truth Social page Wednesday that he 'had GREAT conversations all day, and the Republican House Majority is UNITED, for the Good of our Country, delivering the Biggest Tax Cuts in History and MASSIVE Growth. 'Let's go Republicans, and everyone else - MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN,' the president wrote at the time. But Trump and House Speaker Johnson's efforts apparently hit a snag when the House Freedom Caucus began circulating a three-page memo highlighting their gripes with the Senate version of the bill. In effect, the memo was a laundry list of complaints about how the Senate watered down the House's more conservative bill.
Rhyl Journal
36 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Ex-spending watchdog called in to probe £10 million Lords front door ‘scandal'
The Peers' Entrance project has been branded 'a scandalous waste' of taxpayers' money and led to calls for those responsible to resign. The Lord Speaker has now written to independent crossbencher Lord Morse, who led the National Audit Office for a decade, to look into the £9.6 million debacle. Parliament has previously heard that a security officer had to be permanently stationed at the door to press a button to open it. One peer has calculated this was costing £2,500 per week. It also emerged that the price tag for the work spiralled by nearly 60% from the original estimate of £6.1 million. The fiasco has raised questions over lessons to be learned for the long-delayed restoration of the Palace of Westminster, which is forecast to cost billions of pounds. In his letter to Lord Morse, Lord McFall of Alcluith, who chairs the House of Lords Commission that oversees the running of the site, said: 'The commission identified that it was unclear how many issues were due to manufacturing and installation failures and how many were due to issues with the initial identification of requirements and subsequent need for alterations. 'Additional information will be needed to understand the failures, including information on costs – both how the initial project figure of £6.1 million was arrived at and the increase to the current total of £9.6 million, and any unanticipated additional costs such as increased staffing to manage and operate the entrance. 'It will be important to assess the quality of the decision-making in establishing the project and the ways in which the evidence provided for the specifications of the new entrance were tested to ensure they took account of user requirements.' He added: 'The problems that have arisen around delivery of the new entrance pose larger questions about effective programme delivery, including capability within parliamentary departments.' Speaking at Westminster, senior deputy speaker Lord Gardiner of Kimble, who also sits on the commission, said: 'It is unacceptable that the Peers' Entrance does not operate as it should. The commission has directed urgent work to resolve this.' He added: 'The cost to remedy defects will not be borne by the House and will be met by Parliament's contractors.' Tory former minister Lord Robathan said: 'I do not hold the Senior Deputy Speaker responsible for this scandal, but it is a scandalous waste of public money.' Demanding to know who was responsible 'by name', he said: 'It is now nearly £10 million for a door that does not work. Somebody accountable should be identified and should perhaps resign for this terrible waste of public money.' Conservative peer Lord Hayward said: 'The Senior Deputy Speaker told us the total cost, but the staff manning that door, calculated on the written answer he provided to me, are costing £2,500 per week. That cost has to be borne by someone.' Responding, Lord Gardiner said: 'On the issue of the number of people involved in the manual use of the door while it is being repaired and made usable, I am assured that they are within the existing complement of members of staff.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Now Donald Trump turns to alligators to terrorise migrants
'[If] people get out, there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons. Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide,' said Uthmeier, probably hoping to slither his way to Donald Trump's notice. Trump did notice: earlier this week he jeered that people would have to 'know how to run away from an alligator' to escape it. The Dade-Collier Airstrip isn't so very far from Palm Beach and Mar a Lago, home to Trump and the wealthy elites. Welcome to Florida's version of the Hunger Games. Read more The demise of empathy on one side of US politics is stark and shocking. Undocumented migrants who have lived and worked in the United States for decades – childcare providers, waiting staff, tradespeople, small business owners – supporting the voracious US economy and paying taxes, are going into hiding in fear of deportation raids; in fear of places like Alligator Alcatraz. People who have committed no crime don't go into hiding from the government in healthy democracies. Last month, Donald Trump enacted the next part of the authoritarian playbook by ordering the National Guard into California to crush street demonstrations against his deportations. It was hardly a surprise: he has spoken of dissenters as 'the enemy from within'. Trump's callousness appears to be exactly what a lot of voters love about him. His wall on the southern border, and a much tougher stance against migrants, were key 2016 election pledges. The wall was an expensive failure but potent as a symbol of hostility towards the 'other'. That first presidency resulted in thousands of children of migrants being separated from their families and caged, sometimes with inadequate food, cleaning facilities or care, an image of American disgrace. Children cared for lone toddlers. After a torrent of criticism, the policy was supposedly ended, but last year, six years on, Human Rights Watch reported that more than 1,300 children had still to be reunited with their families. The word 'cruel' isn't working hard here. This is the dictionary definition. It is not just a MAGA phenomenon. There are no borders around ideas and we have seen cruel behaviour playing out here in the UK too. Riot police hold back protesters after disorder broke out on July 30, 2024 in Southport, England (Image: Chris Furlong) Last summer's riots in several English towns, and the vicious attacks on hotels housing asylum seekers, should rid us of any complacency on that score. Last month, an outbreak of violent rioting in Northern Ireland resulted in racially-motivated attacks. A man, woman and their four young children had to escape after their home was targeted in a fire attack. Often unrest is whipped up, sometimes by politicians, sometimes by social media. Social media has provided platform, validation and community for the hate-mongerers. Feel furious about women? Transgender people? Ethnic minorities? There's a place for you in cyberspace. There have always been instances of callous politics here in the UK – remember Theresa May's 'Go Home' vans in 2013 – but the shameless divisiveness really took hold under Boris Johnson. His political rise was fuelled by it and he seemed often to glory in it. It was Boris Johnson who appointed Priti Patel as Home Secretary, the originator of a scheme to turn precarious, overcrowded migrant boats back in the middle of the English Channel, putting lives in very real danger (it was never enacted after Patel seemed finally to accept it was plain illegal). Migrant boats accounted for a tiny proportion of immigrants (three per cent), with ever-rising net migration numbers down to the issuing of visas by the Conservatives themselves, but it was a classic example of scapegoating by a government that was failing on most metrics. The worry is that the more politicians promote inhumane policies, the less shocked we are by them and the more they are tempted to ramp them up further. Suella Braverman shamelessly cranked up the hysteria around those migrant boats, describing them as an 'invasion' and suggesting the answer was to deport all migrants to Rwanda – at enormous expense – a country that the UK's own parliament had declared unsafe. Labour thankfully put paid to that. None of this, by the way, is to suggest that having concerns about immigration is in any way inhumane. Read more The issue is the demonisation of migrants themselves and the promotion of ruthless policy responses. Addressing immigration levels is something politicians must do; characterising migrants and immigrants as the root cause of the deep, broad and thorny social and economic problems facing countries like the US and UK is grotesquely dishonest. We can debate where this is all coming from, but the worrying question is where is it taking us? Down a dangerous path – that much is clear. Cruelty begets cruelty. All this is taking place against a backdrop of a self-confidence crisis among moderate political figures, particularly in the US. They must find their voice, extending empathy to those, like some disillusioned white men, who feel blamed for society's ills and frozen out of the compassion matrix, but at the same time standing absolutely firm against a narrative in which small groups are blamed and demonised. 'Don't run in a straight line, run like this...' Trump said to reporters, zig-zagging his hand, demonstrating how to escape alligators. 'And, you know what? Your chances go up about one per cent.' Mirthless jokes about vulnerable othered minorities trying to escape man-eating animals. This is what happens when empathy dies. Rebecca McQuillan is a journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on Bluesky at @ and on X at @BecMcQ
