Melania joins Trump in welcoming Gaza hostage Edan Alexander
The president thanked him and welcomed him to the Oval Office. He noted Melania Trump, in particular, was worried about Alexander. 'The first lady, it was very important to her,' Trump said. The president also said he was concerned that Alexander had been killed in an air strike on a Hamas tunnel where he was being held, Axios reported.
Alexander, 21, is an American-Israeli from New Jersey . He was among 251 people taken hostage by Hamas in the Oct. 7, 2023 attack that sparked Israel's war with Hamas. Alexander moved to Israel in 2022 after finishing high school and enlisted in the military. He was 19 when militants stormed his base in Israel and dragged him into the Gaza Strip.
He was released on May 12 by the militant group Hamas after 584 days in captivity. Alexander had been in Israel since he was freed until he traveled last month home to New Jersey, where his family still lives. Alexander told President Trump there are other hostages still in Gaza who need to be released and the president agreed with him. The meeting comes ahead of Trump's scheduled sit-down on Monday with Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Trump is pushing Netanyahu and Hamas to come to an agreement to end the war in Gaza. The president asked Iran-backed Hamas militants on Tuesday to agree to what he called a 'final proposal' for a 60-day ceasefire with Israel in Gaza that will be delivered by mediating officials from Qatar and Egypt.
In a social media post, Trump said his representatives had a 'long and productive' meeting with Israeli officials about Gaza. Trump said Israel has agreed to the conditions to finalize a 60-day ceasefire, 'during which time we will work with all parties to end the War.' He said representatives for Qatar and Egypt will deliver 'this final proposal' to Hamas.
'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE,' he wrote. Along with the first lady, several other senior officials were in the meeting with Alexander, Axios reported, including Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.
Alexander's homecoming to Tenafly, New Jersey, was met with celebration, as hundreds stood in the rain to see him. Trump in early March met at the White House with a group of eight former hostages who had been released by Hamas: Iair Horn, Omer Shem Tov, Eli Sharabi, Keith Siegel, Aviva Siegel, Naama Levy, Doron Steinbrecher and Noa Argamani.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Twisted arms and late-night deals: how Trump's sweeping policy bill was passed
Just a few months ago, analysts predicted that Republicans in Congress – with their narrow majorities and fractured internal dynamics – would not be able to pass Donald Trump's landmark legislation. On Thursday, the president's commanding influence over his party was apparent once again: the bill passed just in time for Trump's Fourth of July deadline. But while the GOP may call the budget bill big and beautiful, the road to passing the final legislation has been particularly ugly. Arm-twisting from Trump and last-minute benefits targeting specific states cajoled holdouts, despite conservative misgivings over transformative cuts to Medicaid and the ballooning deficit. Here's the journey of the sprawling tax-and-spending bill. The initial version of the mega-bill passed by the House in May extended tax cuts from 2017. It also increased the debt limit by about $4tn, and added billions in spending on immigration enforcement while adding work requirements to Medicaid and requiring states to contribute more to Snap nutrition assistance. The Budget Lab at Yale estimated the House bill would add $2.4tn to the debt over the 2025-34 period. Several conservative Republicans balked at several aspects of the bill during long debate sessions. Mike Lawler, a congressman representing New York, wanted a larger Salt deduction – which concerns offsetting state and local taxes – while the California congressman David Valadao was concerned about the Medicaid cuts, which his district heavily relies on for healthcare. Then Trump traveled to Capitol Hill in late May to help assuage the holdouts. At his meeting with lawmakers, 'he was emphatic [that] we need to quit screwing around. That was the clear message. You all have tinkered enough – it is time to land the plane,' the South Dakota congressman Dusty Johnson told reporters. 'Ninety-eight per cent of that conference is ready to go. They were enthused. They were pumped up by the president, and I think with the holdouts, he did move them. I don't know that we are there yet, but that was a hugely impactful meeting.' In the end, there were only two House Republicans who voted against the bill: Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Warren Davidson of Ohio, both of whom are fiscal hawks concerned about the federal deficit. The bill moved on to the Senate. The Senate version of the budget bill passed on a 50-50 vote with JD Vance, the vice-president, breaking the tie. Until the final stages, however, all eyes were on the Republican senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, both noted moderates, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Rand Paul of Kentucky, both noted fiscal conservatives. The bill's authors added tax provisions to benefit Alaska's whaling industry to win the support of Murkowski. They also tried to add provisions protecting rural hospitals from Medicaid cuts in 'non-contiguous states', but the Senate parliamentarian ruled that the amendments would violate restrictions on what the bill could contain without triggering the 60-vote filibuster. Murkowski acquiesced after winning new tax revenues from oil and gas drilling leases for Alaska, provisions protecting clean energy tax credits, and delays on Snap changes. 'Do I like this bill? No,' Murkowski said as she stared down an NBC reporter who had just relayed a comment by the Kentucky Republican Rand Paul describing her vote as 'a bailout for Alaska at the expense of the rest of the country'. Other changes to the Senate bill were made in the final days of negotiations, including the striking of a 10-year federal ban on state regulation of AI. A record number of amendments were proposed. Tillis, who announced he would not run again in his politically competitive state, gave a rousing speech about the perils of Medicaid cuts and voted against the bill. Collins and Paul remained in opposition. With few other options, Democrats tried to delay the vote by requiring the entire bill to be read out loud on the floor the night before the vote. But in the end, with Murkowski's vote, the Senate had a tie, allowing Vance to cast the deciding vote. Given the total opposition of Democrats to the bill's passage, Republicans in the House could lose no more than three of their own to get the bill to the finish line. On Wednesday, the last push still felt dubious. Even the procedural vote that is required to move to an actual vote was delayed for hours, as some Republicans considering holding their vote. Ralph Norman of South Carolina told C-Span after voting against the bill in committee that he opposed the Senate version's inclusion of tax credits for renewable energy and its failure to restrict Chinese investment in American property. 'We have one chance, one moment to curb the spending that has plagued this country and will take this country down if we don't get it under control,' he said. 'What I see right now, I don't like.' Victoria Spartz of Indiana had withheld support over concerns about increases in the federal debt. 'I'll vote for the bill, since we need to make it happen for our economy & there are some good provisions in it. However, I will vote against the rule due to broken commitments by Speaker Johnson to his own members,' she wrote on X on Wednesday. 'I'm on Plan C now to deal with the looming fiscal catastrophe.' Spartz referred to a promise Johnson made to fiscal conservatives that he would not bring a budget bill to a vote if it increased the debt beyond a certain amount. Spartz said this bill exceeded the agreed-upon amount by about $500bn. Shortly before midnight there were five Republicans voting no on the procedural rule. But deals were still being made – executive orders promised and other negotiations done on the floor. Once again Trump stepped in, joining the speaker, Mike Johnson, in coaxing the party members to cast their final approval. The president called several House members and posted on his Truth Social account. 'What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove??? MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!' he wrote early on Thursday morning. Johnson held the vote open for seven hours, the longest vote recorded. And it worked. On Thursday morning, Norman voted yes to advance the bill. So did Andrew Clyde of Georgia, a notable second amendment rights activist in Congress, who failed in his push for an amendment to the bill to remove the registration requirement for firearms suppressors, short-barreled rifles and short-barreled shotguns from the National Firearms Act, creating a path for legal civilian use without registration and paying a federal tax. The holdouts fell into line, and the House voted early on Thursday morning 219-213 in a procedural vote to move forward. There was still a way to go. Johnson had expected to open the vote at 8am. But the House minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, commandeered the dais for more than eight hours – setting a record previously held by the Republican Kevin McCarthy – in a marathon stemwinder of a speech attacking the perils of the legislation and delaying the vote. But Johnson remained confident after a night of promises and threats. Massie remained the face of conservative holdouts on the bill. He has faced withering personal attacks from Trump on social media, the creation of a Super Pac to fund a primary challenge and local advertisements attacking his stance on the bill. In the end it was only Massie and Brian Fitzpatrick, a congressman in Pennsylvania who voted for Kamala Harris last year, who voted against a bill that will now rewrite the American political landscape.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Gaza aid group reacts to claims American contractors fired at starving Palestinians
Israeli-backed American contractors guarding aid centres in Gaza are using live ammunition and stun grenades as starving Palestinians scramble for food, an investigation has claimed. The Associated Press has reported the accounts by two contractors from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), although the organisation has strongly denied the allegations, describing them as "categorically false". GHF was established in February to deliver desperately needed aid to people in the besieged enclave, but its work has been heavily criticised by international aid groups. It has also been subject to intense scrutiny about its operations, which Sky News previously reported are associated with a significant increase in deaths. AP's claims, which have not been independently verified by Sky News, came from GHF contractors who spoke on condition of anonymity as they were revealing their employer's internal operations. Image: Palestinians are shown scrambling for aid in the footage provided to AP. Pic: AP They said they were motivated to speak out as they were disturbed by what they considered dangerous practices by security staff who were often heavily armed. AP reported the contractors had claimed "their colleagues regularly lobbed stun grenades and pepper spray in the direction of the Palestinians" and "bullets were fired in all directions - in the air, into the ground and at times toward the Palestinians, recalling at least one instance where he thought someone had been hit". Contractor: 'Innocent people being hurt' "There are innocent people being hurt. Badly. Needlessly," the contractor told AP. Videos reportedly provided by one contractor show aid sites, located in Israeli military-controlled zones, with hundreds of Palestinians crammed between metal gates, scrambling to reach aid. In the background, gunfire can be heard, and stun grenades are allegedly fired into crowds. Image: Footage provided to the AP news agency allegedly shows tear gas being fired at an aid distribution site in Gaza. Pic: AP The footage does not show who was shooting or what was being shot at, but another video shows contractors in a compound, when bursts of gunfire can be heard. One man is then heard shouting in celebration: "Whoo! Whoo!". "I think you hit one," another says, followed by the comment: "Hell, yeah, boy!" The contractor who took the video told AP that colleagues were shooting in the direction of Palestinians. Read more: Gaza ceasefire proposal a significant moment 'More than 90 killed' in Israeli strikes in Gaza Why Netanyahu wants 90-day ceasefire - analysis According to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry and witnesses, several hundred people have been killed and hundreds more wounded since the GHF sites started operating more than a month ago, amid claims by Palestinians of Israeli troops opening fire almost every day at crowds seeking to reach the aid. In response, Israel's military says it fires only warning shots and is investigating reports of civilian harm. It denies deliberately shooting at any innocent civilians and says it's examining how to reduce "friction with the population" in the areas surrounding the distribution centres. Image: Bursts of gunfire can be heard in the footage as Palestinians run towards aid being distributed. Pic: AP GHF attacks 'false claims' GHF has vehemently denied the accusations, adding that it has investigated AP's allegations. In a statement on X, GHF wrote: "Based on time-stamped video footage and sworn witness statements, we have concluded that the claims in the AP's story are categorically false. At no point were civilians under fire at a GHF distribution site. "The gunfire heard in the video was confirmed to have originated from the IDF, who was outside the immediate vicinity of the GHF distribution site. "It was not directed at individuals, and no one was shot or injured. What is most troubling is that the AP refused to share the full video with us prior to publication, despite the seriousness of the allegations." Follow The World Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday Tap to follow Safe Reach Solutions, the logistics company subcontracted by GHF, told the AP there have been no serious injuries at any of their sites to date. But the organisation admitted that, in isolated incidents, security professionals fired live rounds into the ground and away from civilians to get their attention. A Safe Reach Solutions spokesperson told AP this happened at the start of their operations at "the height of desperation where crowd control measures were necessary for the safety and security of civilians".
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Popular fast food chain leaves fans spitting in fury with 'tone deaf' ad
Steak 'n Shake's latest 'marketing tactic' has left social media users with a sour taste in their mouths. Customers slammed the small restaurant chain as 'so tone deaf' after it posted a photo of a hat that says 'Make Frying Oil Tallow Again.' The red hat is similar to the 'Make America Great Again' baseball cap, a sign of support for President Donald Trump, while the reference to tallow aligns the company with Trump's top health official, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Steak 'n Shake posted a photo of the hat to advertise ' Tesla Tallow Twofer Tuesday,' an event that took place this week at all of its restaurants. Each location rewarded its first Tesla-owning customers with free grass-fed beef tallow to use at home, along with what some Reddit users called an 'ugly hat.' 'This is just gross and forces your political ideology onto your workers, comedic or not. Steak n' Shake should stay focused on being Steak n' Shake, not some political vehicle,' a post creator wrote on Reddit. The promotion came after Steak 'n Shake backed up RFK Jr.'s plan to switch from vegetable oil to beef tallow in its fries. 'It's just a dying chain latching onto anything they can for relevance. The sad part is the fries don't even taste better in the tallow,' a social media user wrote. Several social media users believe Steak 'n Shake chain began its fall from grace long before the latest promotion. 'They've been going downhill for a while and for the few that remain this just gives me another reason not to go there. Better options like Culvers, Freddy's, etc. exist,' a Reddit user wrote. 'They used to be one of the best places to go get a cheap greasy meal and still have a couple bucks left at the end of the night,' a customer responded. 'Around the time the pandemic started they just lost control. Especially being a restaurant that tried to have an emphasis on being a sit down restaurant with fast service.' A few customers admitted to liking the promotion, and didn't understand why customers found the items controversial. 'Literally every other fast food company pushes left wing agendas in advertising and social media. But this one you have a problem with?,' a commenter responded. The restaurant chain has grown to operate over 400 restaurants since it was founded more than 85 years ago. However, one of its parent organizations, Biglari Holdings, has been struggling financially, and suffered over $40 million in revenue loss last year, according to San Antonio Express News. RFK Jr. visited a Florida Steak 'n Shake after the company announced that it was officially switching from seed oil to beef tallow at all of their 400+ locations The company managed to increase its first quarter revenue by 6.2 percent compared to last year's total. It's unclear how much money Steak 'n Shake contributed to its $95 million in revenue. Steak 'n Shake is not the only restaurant chain on board with RFK Jr.'s initiative - although other companies adopted the alternative before Trump's second presidency. Popeyes has been using beef tallow when cooking chicken and fries for many years. While Outback Steakhouse, one of America's favorite restaurant chains, has been using beef tallow since 1988. Other brands that include beef tallow in its food include Buffalo Wild Wings, Sweetgreen, and Smashburger. McDonald's, however, has not changed its vegetable oil-using ways.
