logo
Daniel Kleppner, MIT prize-winning physicist, dies at 92

Daniel Kleppner, MIT prize-winning physicist, dies at 92

Boston Globe2 days ago
Ramsey was intent on developing an atomic clock, a device accurate enough to measure the effect of gravity on time. However, preexisting technologies, such as cesium and ammonia masers, were not precise enough to accomplish this. (A maser is a technology of amplified microwaves.)
Advertisement
Dr. Kleppner's research on hydrogen - the simplest, lightest and most abundant chemical element in the universe - helped Ramsey achieve this goal. Dr. Kleppner successfully devised a method to keep hydrogen atoms locked away in a glass container so their delicate quantum properties could be studied over a longer period of time, thereby making time measurements more precise.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
This hydrogen research allowed Ramsey and Dr. Kleppner to co-invent the hydrogen maser in 1960, one of the most stable atomic clocks built. It's unprecedented precision made it foundational to the development of GPS nearly two decades later, as the world's satellites were synchronized using these atomic clocks.
'Hydrogen masers made it possible for the people who developed GPS to even think about it,' said William Phillips, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 'If you hadn't had clocks that were that good, then you wouldn't have been able to imagine making a system that relied on a network of clocks that are all synchronized and keeping the same time.'
Advertisement
Hydrogen masers are still employed by naval observatories for timekeeping and communication and are coupled with newer technology in modern GPS systems to enable billions of people to navigate the Earth.
'When we first set out to make these atomic clocks, our goals were about the least practical you can think of,' Dr. Kleppner said in an interview with the MIT physics department. 'From being a rather abstract idea that you'd like to somehow witness, it becomes a very urgent thing for the conduct of human affairs.'
On the MIT faculty starting in 1966, Dr. Kleppner conducted some of the first research on Rydberg atoms - a highly excited atom that shares the simple properties that define hydrogen. His seminal paper published in 1976 jump-started interest in the field. Many scientists consider the modern Rydberg quantum computer to be the most promising platform in the burgeoning field of quantum computing.
'He did the groundwork, the basic understanding of what Rydberg atoms can do, and that has eventually in the last 15 years been developed into a new platform, a new approach for quantum computation,' MIT physicist Wolfgang Ketterle said. 'That has led to multimillion-dollar funding in multiple startup companies in Europe and the US.'
In 1976, Dr. Kleppner also became interested in ultracold gases, specifically a strange quantum state of matter that occurs at near absolute zero known as Bose-Einstein condensation.
Advertisement
'We always make discoveries in physics because we take nature beyond the limits where it has been explored,' Ketterle said. 'Bose-Einstein condensation was synonymous with the journey to absolute zero temperature.'
Absolute zero was a proverbial 'white whale' of atomic physics, as it was predicted in the 1920s but had never been realized. However, a new paper suggested that it may actually be achievable in hydrogen.
'Dan had a lifelong love affair with hydrogen,' Phillips said. 'Dan seemed like he wanted to squeeze every bit of information that you could out of this simplest atom.'
Dr. Kleppner approached Tom Greytak, a low-temperature physicist, to collaborate on reaching Bose-Einstein condensation in hydrogen. They tested two revolutionary techniques - magnetic trapping and evaporative cooling.
'This is where the two aspects of Dan Kleppner's work connect,' Ketterle said. 'Kleppner is famous for the hydrogen maser, which was the beginning of practical atomic clocks. But now we have clocks that are 10,000 times more accurate than the hydrogen maser. But those clocks are more accurate because they operate at extremely low temperature, and the techniques developed to reach Bose-Einstein condensation are now applied to atomic clocks.'
Dr. Kleppner and Greytak had trouble getting hydrogen to cooperate but shared their methodology with the scientific community. Ketterle's team implemented Dr. Kleppner's techniques on sodium to achieve Bose-Einstein condensation and earned a Nobel Prize. Ketterle remembers attending a conference shortly after winning where Dr. Kleppner talked about his pursuit of Bose-Einstein condensation in hydrogen.
'He described his own contribution with the following words: 'I feel like Moses, who showed his people the Holy Land, but he never reached it himself,'' Ketterle said. 'This was exactly what Dan did. He showed us the Holy Land of Bose-Einstein condensation. He showed us what is possible. He got us started.'
Advertisement
A year later, in 1998, Dr. Kleppner and his team finally created a Bose-Einstein condensate in hydrogen and announced it at a conference to a standing ovation. When he received the National Medal of Science in 2006, Dr. Kleppner was named 'the godfather of extra-cold atoms.'
Following this success, he helped start the Center for Ultracold Atoms, an MIT-Harvard collaboration funded by the National Science Foundation to research atomic physics.
He also co-chaired a major study by the American Physical Society on boost-phase missile defense, an effort to intercept enemy missiles as they are struggling with liftoff and moving relatively slowly.
Daniel Kleppner, the second of three siblings, was born in Manhattan on Dec. 16, 1932. His father, who founded and chaired an advertising agency, wrote the best-selling book 'Advertising Procedure.' His mother became her husband's amanuensis, helping him with his manuscripts.
A self-described tinkerer who built slot machines and rowboats as a child, Dr. Kleppner said he knew by high school that he was 'destined to spend a life in physics.'
'Physicists were heroes because of the development of the atomic project and because of the development of radar,' Dr. Kleppner said in an interview for the InfiniteMIT archive. 'It was an easy era to become delighted by physics, and I was.'
During his years at Williams College, he became fascinated by Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity: the idea that time moves faster higher up in the atmosphere.
'When I first heard the idea that gravity could change time, it seemed to be totally extraordinary,' Dr. Kleppner told the Franklin Institute, a science museum in Philadelphia that awarded him the 2014 Benjamin Franklin Medal for physics. 'We really don't have that much intuition about time. Time just flows by. We can't do much about it, so there's always something strange and slightly mystical.'
Advertisement
He graduated from Williams in 1953 and was accepted to a fellowship at the University of Cambridge in England. He received a doctorate from Harvard in 1959 and then was a postdoc at Harvard until joining MIT. He retired in 2003.
In 1958, he married Beatrice Spencer. In addition to his wife, he leaves three children, Sofie, Paul, and Andrew; a sister; and four grandchildren.
Dr. Kleppner died while attending his grandson Darwin's high school graduation party. His daughter said that his last words before being rushed to the hospital were a toast to the future of science: 'To Darwin and all youth who will be having new and exciting ideas.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI's great brain-rot experiment
AI's great brain-rot experiment

Axios

time8 hours ago

  • Axios

AI's great brain-rot experiment

Generative AI critics and advocates are both racing to gather evidence that the new technology stunts (or boosts) human thinking powers — but the data simply isn't there yet. Why it matters: For every utopian who predicts a golden era of AI-powered learning, there's a skeptic who's convinced AI will usher in a new dark age. Driving the news: A study titled "Your Brain on ChatGPT" out of MIT last month raised hopes that we might be able to stop guessing which side of this debate is right. The study aimed to measure the "cognitive cost" of using genAI by looking at three groups tasked with writing brief essays — either on their own, using Google search or using ChatGPT. It found, very roughly speaking, that the more help subjects had with their writing, the less brain activity, or "neural connectivity," they experienced as they worked. Yes, but: This is a preprint study, meaning it hasn't been peer-reviewed. It has faced criticism for its design, small size, and its reliance on electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis. And its conclusions are laced with cautions and caveats. On their own website, the MIT authors beg journalists not to say that their study demonstrates AI is "making us dumber": "Please do not use words like 'stupid', 'dumb', 'brain rot', 'harm', 'damage'.... It does a huge disservice to this work, as we did not use this vocabulary in the paper." Between the lines: Students who learn to write well typically also learn to think more sharply. So it seems like common sense to assume that letting students outsource their writing to a chatbot will dull their minds. Sometimes good research will confirm this sort of assumption! But sometimes we get surprised. Other recent studies have taken narrow or inconclusive stabs at teasing out other dimensions of the "AI rots our brains" thesis — like whether using AI leads to cultural homogeneity, or how AI-assisted learning compares with human teaching. Earlier this year, a University of Pennsylvania/Wharton School study found that people researching a topic by asking an AI chatbot "tend to develop shallower knowledge than when they learn through standard web search." The big picture: As AI is rushed into service across society, the world is hungry for scientists to explain how a tool that transforms learning and creation will affect the human brain. High-speed change makes us crave high-speed answers. But good research takes time — and costs money. Generative AI is simply too new for us to have any sort of useful or trustworthy scientific data on its impact on cognition, learning, memory, problem-solving or creativity. (Forget "intelligence," which lacks any scientific clarity.) Society is nevertheless charging ahead with a vast uncontrolled experiment on human subjects — as we have almost always done with previous new waves of technology, from railroads and automobiles to the internet and social media. Our thought bubble: As tantalizing but risky new tools have come into view, our species has always chosen the "f--k around and find out" door. Since even fears that AI might destroy humanity haven't been enough to slow down its research and deployment, it seems absurd to think we would tap the brakes just to curtail cognitive debt. Flashback: Readers with still-functional memories may recall the furor around an Atlantic cover story by Nicholas Carr from 2008 titled "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" Back then, the fear was that over-reliance on screens and search engines to provide us with quick answers might stunt our ability to acquire and retain knowledge. But now, in the ChatGPT era, reliance on Google search is being framed by studies like MIT's and Wharton's as a superior alternative to AI's convenient — and sometimes made-up — answers.

Daniel Kleppner, MIT prize-winning physicist, dies at 92
Daniel Kleppner, MIT prize-winning physicist, dies at 92

Boston Globe

time2 days ago

  • Boston Globe

Daniel Kleppner, MIT prize-winning physicist, dies at 92

Ramsey was intent on developing an atomic clock, a device accurate enough to measure the effect of gravity on time. However, preexisting technologies, such as cesium and ammonia masers, were not precise enough to accomplish this. (A maser is a technology of amplified microwaves.) Advertisement Dr. Kleppner's research on hydrogen - the simplest, lightest and most abundant chemical element in the universe - helped Ramsey achieve this goal. Dr. Kleppner successfully devised a method to keep hydrogen atoms locked away in a glass container so their delicate quantum properties could be studied over a longer period of time, thereby making time measurements more precise. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up This hydrogen research allowed Ramsey and Dr. Kleppner to co-invent the hydrogen maser in 1960, one of the most stable atomic clocks built. It's unprecedented precision made it foundational to the development of GPS nearly two decades later, as the world's satellites were synchronized using these atomic clocks. 'Hydrogen masers made it possible for the people who developed GPS to even think about it,' said William Phillips, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 'If you hadn't had clocks that were that good, then you wouldn't have been able to imagine making a system that relied on a network of clocks that are all synchronized and keeping the same time.' Advertisement Hydrogen masers are still employed by naval observatories for timekeeping and communication and are coupled with newer technology in modern GPS systems to enable billions of people to navigate the Earth. 'When we first set out to make these atomic clocks, our goals were about the least practical you can think of,' Dr. Kleppner said in an interview with the MIT physics department. 'From being a rather abstract idea that you'd like to somehow witness, it becomes a very urgent thing for the conduct of human affairs.' On the MIT faculty starting in 1966, Dr. Kleppner conducted some of the first research on Rydberg atoms - a highly excited atom that shares the simple properties that define hydrogen. His seminal paper published in 1976 jump-started interest in the field. Many scientists consider the modern Rydberg quantum computer to be the most promising platform in the burgeoning field of quantum computing. 'He did the groundwork, the basic understanding of what Rydberg atoms can do, and that has eventually in the last 15 years been developed into a new platform, a new approach for quantum computation,' MIT physicist Wolfgang Ketterle said. 'That has led to multimillion-dollar funding in multiple startup companies in Europe and the US.' In 1976, Dr. Kleppner also became interested in ultracold gases, specifically a strange quantum state of matter that occurs at near absolute zero known as Bose-Einstein condensation. Advertisement 'We always make discoveries in physics because we take nature beyond the limits where it has been explored,' Ketterle said. 'Bose-Einstein condensation was synonymous with the journey to absolute zero temperature.' Absolute zero was a proverbial 'white whale' of atomic physics, as it was predicted in the 1920s but had never been realized. However, a new paper suggested that it may actually be achievable in hydrogen. 'Dan had a lifelong love affair with hydrogen,' Phillips said. 'Dan seemed like he wanted to squeeze every bit of information that you could out of this simplest atom.' Dr. Kleppner approached Tom Greytak, a low-temperature physicist, to collaborate on reaching Bose-Einstein condensation in hydrogen. They tested two revolutionary techniques - magnetic trapping and evaporative cooling. 'This is where the two aspects of Dan Kleppner's work connect,' Ketterle said. 'Kleppner is famous for the hydrogen maser, which was the beginning of practical atomic clocks. But now we have clocks that are 10,000 times more accurate than the hydrogen maser. But those clocks are more accurate because they operate at extremely low temperature, and the techniques developed to reach Bose-Einstein condensation are now applied to atomic clocks.' Dr. Kleppner and Greytak had trouble getting hydrogen to cooperate but shared their methodology with the scientific community. Ketterle's team implemented Dr. Kleppner's techniques on sodium to achieve Bose-Einstein condensation and earned a Nobel Prize. Ketterle remembers attending a conference shortly after winning where Dr. Kleppner talked about his pursuit of Bose-Einstein condensation in hydrogen. 'He described his own contribution with the following words: 'I feel like Moses, who showed his people the Holy Land, but he never reached it himself,'' Ketterle said. 'This was exactly what Dan did. He showed us the Holy Land of Bose-Einstein condensation. He showed us what is possible. He got us started.' Advertisement A year later, in 1998, Dr. Kleppner and his team finally created a Bose-Einstein condensate in hydrogen and announced it at a conference to a standing ovation. When he received the National Medal of Science in 2006, Dr. Kleppner was named 'the godfather of extra-cold atoms.' Following this success, he helped start the Center for Ultracold Atoms, an MIT-Harvard collaboration funded by the National Science Foundation to research atomic physics. He also co-chaired a major study by the American Physical Society on boost-phase missile defense, an effort to intercept enemy missiles as they are struggling with liftoff and moving relatively slowly. Daniel Kleppner, the second of three siblings, was born in Manhattan on Dec. 16, 1932. His father, who founded and chaired an advertising agency, wrote the best-selling book 'Advertising Procedure.' His mother became her husband's amanuensis, helping him with his manuscripts. A self-described tinkerer who built slot machines and rowboats as a child, Dr. Kleppner said he knew by high school that he was 'destined to spend a life in physics.' 'Physicists were heroes because of the development of the atomic project and because of the development of radar,' Dr. Kleppner said in an interview for the InfiniteMIT archive. 'It was an easy era to become delighted by physics, and I was.' During his years at Williams College, he became fascinated by Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity: the idea that time moves faster higher up in the atmosphere. 'When I first heard the idea that gravity could change time, it seemed to be totally extraordinary,' Dr. Kleppner told the Franklin Institute, a science museum in Philadelphia that awarded him the 2014 Benjamin Franklin Medal for physics. 'We really don't have that much intuition about time. Time just flows by. We can't do much about it, so there's always something strange and slightly mystical.' Advertisement He graduated from Williams in 1953 and was accepted to a fellowship at the University of Cambridge in England. He received a doctorate from Harvard in 1959 and then was a postdoc at Harvard until joining MIT. He retired in 2003. In 1958, he married Beatrice Spencer. In addition to his wife, he leaves three children, Sofie, Paul, and Andrew; a sister; and four grandchildren. Dr. Kleppner died while attending his grandson Darwin's high school graduation party. His daughter said that his last words before being rushed to the hospital were a toast to the future of science: 'To Darwin and all youth who will be having new and exciting ideas.'

New MIT tech turns desert air into safe drinking water
New MIT tech turns desert air into safe drinking water

Fast Company

time2 days ago

  • Fast Company

New MIT tech turns desert air into safe drinking water

An innovative and potentially impactful new device can turn air into drinkable water, even in the driest climates. The tool, which comes from researchers at MIT, could be a huge step towards making safe drinking water worldwide a reality. Lack thereof impacts 2.2 billion people, per a study on the invention, which was recently published in journal Nature Water. The device was developed by Professor Xuanhe Zhao, the Uncas and Helen Whitaker Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Civil and Environmental Engineering at MIT, and his colleagues. According to the study, the contraption is made from hydrogel, a material that absorbs water, and lithium salts that can store water molecules. The substance is enclosed between two layers of glass, and at night, pulls water vapor from the atmosphere. During the day, the water condenses and drips into tubes. It's is about the size of a standard window, but even in environments that are hot and dry, it's able to capture water. Zhao's team tested the tool in the driest environment in the U.S. — Death Valley, California. Even in the ultra-dry conditions, the tool was able to capture 160 milliliters per day (about two-thirds of a cup). The success of the model has the scientists thinking on a bigger scale. 'We have built a meter-scale device that we hope to deploy in resource-limited regions, where even a solar cell is not very accessible,' says Xuanhe Zhao, per MIT News. Zhao continued, 'It's a test of feasibility in scaling up this water harvesting technology. Now people can build it even larger, or make it into parallel panels, to supply drinking water to people and achieve real impact.' The new design addresses several issues that past similar devices have come up against. It's better at absorbing water than metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) that can also capture water from air. The new design, which has a sophisticated composition and added materials, is also better at limiting salt leakage. During the experiment, that meant that the water collected met criteria for safe drinking water. 'We imagine that you could one day deploy an array of these panels, and the footprint is very small because they are all vertical,' says Zhao. 'Then you could have many panels together, collecting water all the time, at household scale.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store