New AI safety group launches ad buy to build right-left alliance to protect humanity
A new advocacy group focused on building a left-right alliance to push for regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) rolled out a six-figure ad campaign Monday targeting the Washington, D.C. area.
In a nod to the deep partisan divides they hope to overcome, the two spots by the Alliance for Secure AI offer different messages for different audiences — at a time when AI regulation is one of the more contentious issues in the passage of Trump's budget bill.
'What are the odds of killer robots annihilating humanity?' Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) asks Elon Musk in a clip from his podcast that airs on the right-targeted ad spot, which is running on FOX News and Newsmax.
'Likely 20 percent,' Musk responds, before a clip where Steve Bannon warns that for tech companies, 'productivity' gains mean 'human beings who are now tech workers eliminated.'
And in the left-of-center spot aimed at MSNBC and CNN, New York Times podcaster Ezra Klein warns that AI will be 'the single most disruptive thing to hit labor markets — ever,' before cutting to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) saying that 'the job you have today ain't going to be here in 10 or 15 years.'
The ads aim to add weight to a growing 'strange bedfellows' left-right consensus worried about the risks of the American tech sector's headlong rush toward ever-more-powerful AIs, founder and chief executive Brendan Steinhauser told The Hill.
Steinhauser, a Texas-based political consultant and former Tea Party organizer who ran Sen. John Cornyn's (R-Texas) 2014 re-election campaign, told The Hill that recent polling shows 'the American people are with us, and they're ahead of the politicians.'
April polling in Pew showed twice as many Americans think AI will harm them as believe it will help them. Those concerns were echoed in a March YouGov poll, which also found that a third of respondents were worried about AI causing 'the end of the human race on Earth.'
The ads come out as AI becomes a yawning fault line in Republican politics. Despite Musk's warnings about the dangers of AI, Cruz remains a major AI booster, and from his position as chair of the powerful Senate Commerce Committee has sought to keep states from regulating it — or, as he describes it, slowing its pace of development.
'We are in a global race for leadership in AI, and the winner will dominate the coming decades, both economically and militarily,' Cruz said in May, arguing that 'light touch' regulation helped springboard the twin revolutions of the Internet and fracking.
In the contentious Trump budget bill, Cruz initially sought to withhold $42 billion in badly needed broadband funding from states that passed bills regulating AI — as states from Tennessee to California have done.
That move spurred a bipartisan wave of opposition. An alliance of 40 attorneys general — many of whom agree on little else — sent Congressional leaders a letter opposing the language, as did more than 260 state lawmakers. Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) released a a June press call to decry a measure that they said would leave Americans 'vulnerable to AI harm.'
Other opponents ranged from Sanders to Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga) — members whose common thread, Steinhauser said, is they're all 'a little weird, a little radical, and principled — who will stand up to their party.'
Over the past weeks, Cruz has walked the AI supremacy language back in the face of that opposition. First, the penalties for states that continued to regulate AI were reduced from losing access to billions in broadband funding to forfeiting their share of a $500 million fund of AI infrastructure money.
Then on Sunday, a deal between Cruz and Blackburn shortened the moratorium from ten to five years, and added carve-outs for state laws targeting deepfakes, child pornography or some forms of fraud.
But the core tension remains. 'You can't say you support working people and then replace us with machines,' Teamsters president Sean O'Brien said last week on X.
In an op-ed in Fox, he warned that Big Tech wants 'driverless trucks crisscrossing our roads without oversight. Delivery drones flying over our neighborhoods without regulation. Fully automated warehouses and ports operated by machine.'
Meanwhile, religious groups like the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) have released statements warning of the dangers of unregulated AI to Americans economic and environmental conditions — as well as to their souls.
'The Fall has adversely affected every aspect of creation, including the development and use of these powerful innovations,' the SBC wrote.
'We call upon civic, industry, and government leaders to develop, maintain, regulate, and use these technologies with the utmost care and discernment, upholding the unique nature of humanity as the crowning achievement of God's creation.'
The threat of AI has the power to unite these groups into a new social movement, Steinhauser argued, because its challenge is so deeply 'metaphysical' — a potential assault on what it means to be human.
That universal quality makes the topic so 'big, existential and multifaceted,' Steinhauser said, that he hopes it will repel easy polarization.
'There's a latent fear of being replaced,' he said. 'As workers, and also as a species.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
37 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Iowa's civil rights protections no longer include gender identity as new law takes effect
Advertisement When Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed Iowa's new law, she said the state's previous civil rights code 'blurred the biological line between the sexes.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'It's common sense to acknowledge the obvious biological differences between men and women. In fact, it's necessary to secure genuine equal protection for women and girls,' she said in a video statement. Also taking effect Tuesday are provisions in the state's health and human services budget that say Medicaid recipients are no longer covered for gender-affirming surgery or hormone therapy. A national movement Iowa's state Capitol filled with protesters as the law went through the Republican-controlled Legislature and to Reynolds' desk in just one week in February. Iowa Republicans said laws passed in recent years to restrict transgender students' use of bathrooms and locker rooms, and their participation on sports teams, could not coexist with a civil rights code that includes gender identity protections. Advertisement About two dozen other states and the Trump administration have advanced restrictions on transgender people. Republicans say such laws and executive actions protect spaces for women, rejecting the idea that people can transition to another gender. Many face court challenges. About two-thirds of U.S. adults believe that whether a person is a man or woman is determined by biological characteristics at birth, an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted in May found. But there's less consensus on policies that target transgender and nonbinary people. Transgender people say those kinds of policies deny their existence and capitalize on prejudice for political gain. In a major setback for transgender rights nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court last month upheld Tennessee's ban on puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender minors. The court's conservative majority said it doesn't violate the Constitution's equal protection clause, which requires the government to treat similarly situated people the same. Not every state includes gender identity in their civil rights code, but Iowa was the first to remove nondiscrimination protections based on gender identity, according to the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ+ rights think tank. Incidents of discrimination in Iowa, before and after July 1 Iowans will still have time to file a complaint with the state Office of Civil Rights about discrimination based on gender identity that occurred before the law took effect. State law requires a complaint to be submitted within 300 days after the most recent incident of alleged discrimination. That means people have until April 27 to file a complaint about discrimination based on gender identity, according to Kristen Stiffler, the office's executive director. Advertisement Sixty-five such complaints were filed and accepted for investigation from July 2023 through the end of June 2024, according to Stiffler. Forty-three were filed and accepted from July 1, 2024, through June 19 of this year. Iowa state Rep. Aime Wichtendahl, a Democrat and the state's first openly transgender lawmaker, fears the law will lead to an increase in discrimination for transgender Iowans. 'Anytime someone has to check your ID and they see that the gender marker doesn't match the appearance, then that opens up hostility, discrimination as possibilities,' Wichtendahl said, naming examples such as applying for a job, going through the airport, buying beer or getting pulled over in a traffic stop. 'That instantly outs you. That instantly puts you on the spot.' About half of U.S. states include gender identity in their civil rights code to protect against discrimination in housing and public places, such as stores or restaurants, according to the Movement Advancement Project. Some additional states do not explicitly protect against such discrimination, but it is included in legal interpretations of statutes. Five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled LGBTQ people are protected by a landmark federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in the workplace. But Iowa's Supreme Court has expressly rejected the argument that discrimination based on sex includes discrimination based on gender identity. Changing Iowa birth certificates before the law took effect The months between when the bill was signed into law and when it took effect gave transgender Iowans time to pursue amended birth certificates before that option was eliminated. Keenan Crow, with LGBTQ+ advocacy group One Iowa, said the group has long cosponsored legal clinics to assist with that process. 'The last one that we had was by far the biggest,' Crow said. Advertisement Iowa's Department of Transportation still has a process by which people can change the gender designation on their license or identification card but has proposed administrative rules to eliminate that option. Wichtendahl also said she has talked to some families who are looking to move out of state as a result of the new law. 'It's heartbreaking because this is people's lives we're talking about,' Wichtendahl added. 'These are families that have trans loved ones and it's keeping their loved ones away, it's putting their loved ones into uncertain future, putting their health and safety at risk.'
The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate defeats Collins proposal to raise taxes on highest earners to help rural hospitals
The Senate voted early Tuesday morning to defeat an amendment sponsored by Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) to create a new top marginal tax rate for the nation's wealthiest income earners and use the money to double the size of a proposed rural hospital relief fund from $25 billion to $50 billion. Senators voted 22 to 78 against a motion to waive a 60-vote budget point of order against the amendment. Collins's amendment to President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' would have established a 39.6 percent top marginal rate for individuals with income above $25 million and for married couples with income above $50 million. The amount raised would have fully offset the cost of expanding the relief fund that Senate GOP leaders have proposed to help rural and smaller hospitals around the country that are at risk of bankruptcy because of the steep Medicaid funding cuts in the GOP megabill. 'Rural providers, especially our rural hospitals and nursing homes, are under great financial strain right now, with many having recently closed and others at risk of closing,' Collins said on the Senate floor before the vote. 'When these facilities close their doors, the people they serve are often left behind without access to health care,' she said. Eighteen Republican senators voted in support of the amendment. They were Collins and Sens. Jerry Moran (Kan.), Roger Marshall (Kan.), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Dan Sullivan (Alaska), Shelley Moore Capito ( Bill Cassidy (La.), John Kennedy (La.), John Curtis (Utah), Deb Fischer (Neb.), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), Josh Hawley (Mo.), Jon Husted (Ohio), Bernie Moreno (Ohio), Mitch McConnell (Ky.), Roger Wicker (Miss.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (Miss.) and Todd Young (Ind.). A handful of members of the Democratic caucus also voted for it, including Sens. Angus King (I-Maine), Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.). Most Republican and Democratic senators voted against the amendment, however. Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) called it a 'Band-Aid on an amputation.' 'It provides just a tiny fraction of the nearly $1 trillion in cuts the bill will make to Medicaid. It would be much more logical to simply not cut $1 trillion from Medicaid in the first place,' he said.
Business Journals
39 minutes ago
- Business Journals
The U.S. economy in 2025: Embracing the 'new normal'
We've all felt it: grocery bills that seem to climb with every trip, dinner tabs that make us blink twice and home prices that may seem out of reach. As we move through 2025, these aren't just passing frustrations — they're signs of a broader shift in our economic environment. Welcome to what many are calling the 'new normal.' This new phase in our economy, shaped by persistent inflation, evolving housing dynamics, fluctuating energy prices and shifting global trade policies, marks a clear departure from the rapid growth and low inflation we knew before the pandemic. And, while it may take some time for all of us to mentally adjust to this new reality, we must adapt — for our families, our businesses and our futures. Inflation and interest rates: Walking a tightrope Inflation continues to be a top concern. Despite the Federal Reserve's efforts to ease monetary policy — cutting interest rates to a range of 4.25% to 4.5% — inflationary pressures remain stubborn. The core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index, the Fed's preferred metric, sat at 2.8% as of early 2025 — still above target. Geopolitical tensions, such as the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran, threaten to push energy prices higher, adding complexity to the Fed's decision-making and making the road ahead less predictable. The housing market: A slower climb After years of red-hot growth, the housing market is finally showing signs of leveling off. Experts expect home values to increase between 2% and 5% this year, according to KPMG — a much more manageable pace. This cooling trend comes thanks to slowing demand and a noticeable uptick in multifamily housing developments, helping to rebalance supply and demand. Energy prices: Uncertain terrain Energy prices remain a wild card. While a recent easing of tensions in the Middle East has caused a temporary dip in oil prices, the situation remains fragile. Any resurgence in conflict could send prices soaring again — with ripple effects across inflation, consumer spending and broader economic stability. Trade policies: Protectionism comes at a price In an effort to reduce trade deficits and promote domestic manufacturing, the U.S. has adopted a more protectionist stance. By April 2025, the effective tariff rate climbed to 27%. While this approach aims to strengthen American industry, it has also triggered retaliatory measures from global partners, adding pressure to supply chains and costs for both consumers and businesses. Jobs and the Fed: A delicate balance The labor market remains relatively healthy, with unemployment around 4%. But, wage growth is beginning to slow — a sign that things may be cooling off. The Federal Reserve is proceeding cautiously with further rate cuts, trying to strike the right balance between supporting growth and keeping inflation in check. Looking ahead: A slower, steadier path What's next? Economists predict real GDP growth of 1.9% for 2025 and 1.6% for 2026. Inflation is expected to gradually decline and potentially reach the Fed's 2% target by 2026. The housing market will likely stay stable, while energy prices and global trade developments remain key variables. The job market may see modest softening — but overall, the outlook points to a slower, more sustainable pace of growth. Finding opportunity in uncertainty Change — even when challenging — also brings opportunity. Whether you're running a local business, investing in your future or making everyday financial decisions, choosing the right partner can make all the difference. At Independence Bank, we understand the challenges that come with economic transitions. As Kentucky's largest privately held bank, we're committed to helping individuals and businesses grow — not just survive — in this new environment.
