How climate change is threatening your glass of milk
That's the finding from a comprehensive assessment of how rising global temperatures affect livestock, published this week in Science Advances.
Researchers focused on Israel, considered one of the world's most innovative dairy-producing countries because of its high milk production per cow and use of advanced technologies. Even there, widespread adoption of fans, ventilation and water-spraying systems only mitigated half the losses – and less on the hottest days.
'Even the most high-tech, well-resourced farms are deploying adaptation strategies that may be an insufficient match to climate change,' co-author Eyal Frank said in a release.
What happens to cows during high heat?
The research team tracked more than 130,000 cows over 12 years, using detailed weather records and farm surveys. The threshold for heat stress quickly became clear. When 'wet-bulb' temperatures exceed 26°C, milk yields begin to fall steeply.
Unlike ambient air temperature, wet-bulb readings reflect the humidity present on especially hot days. Cows exposed to these muggy conditions – an effect the researchers compared to a 'steam bath' – can need more than 10 days to recover fully.
While nearly all farms in the study had invested in some form of cooling, the systems proved only partly effective. At a wet-bulb temperature of 20°C, cooling cut losses in half. At 24°C, that figure dropped to 40 per cent.
Still, the cooling equipment paid off. It took just 18 months on average for farmers to pay back the costs of installing the equipment.
Global losses and uneven impacts
Using the Israeli data as a benchmark, the researchers modelled future losses in the world's top 10 dairy-producing countries.
Without cooling, average daily milk yields could decline by 4 per cent by the middle of the 21st century. But India, Pakistan and Brazil are expected to see steeper drops – as much as 4 per cent per cow per day. Even with cooling, these countries could still lose 1.5 to 2.7 per cent of their milk yields.
For low-income farmers and producers in hot climates, the costs of adaptation may be unaffordable.
'Adaptation is costly, and farmers need to carefully balance the benefits they obtain versus the costs. This is why we see some investment in cooling measures, but not a complete insulation of cows from their environment, which would be far too costly to implement,' said Ayal Kimhi, associate professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
And milk itself isn't the only concern. Heat stress affects animalwell-being and behaviour in several ways, fromfertility patterns to their ability tosurvive at all.
Farmers are already on the front lines
Extreme weather is no longer a distant threat for farmers. Around the world, producers are already battling more frequent floods, heatwaves and unpredictable rainfall.
In Europe, rural farmers have voiced support for green policies, citing the impact they have witnessed on crop yields and their daily lives. Some have described themselves as the 'first affected' by climate change.
Climate-linked disruptions have also put some of Europe's favourite crops – including cocoa, coffee and wheat –at risk. Evenbananas, a global kitchen staple, are under pressure, as flooding, heat and degraded soils shrink suitable growing regions.
Milk may be next.
Even though cows are particularly vulnerable to heat, most countries are not adequately preparing for livestock losses or supporting the farmers most at risk, according to the study's authors.
They warn that future-proofing dairy production will depend not just on better cooling systems, but on broader reforms, from improved animal welfare to policy support that helps farmers in hot, low-income regions to adapt.
'Policymakers should look into more strategies to not only cool cows but reduce stressors, like confinement and calf separation,' said lead author Claire Palandri. 'Stressors make cows more sensitive to heat and less resilient.'
Without faster action, the effects of climate change won't just reshape what farmers grow. They could also upend what we eat and drink.
'Climate change will have wide-ranging impacts on what we eat and drink,' said Frank. 'Including that cold glass of milk.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
08-07-2025
- Euronews
How climate change is threatening your glass of milk
A single day of extreme heat can cut milk production by 10 per cent. And it doesn't stop there – the effects of heat stress on dairy cows can linger for more than a week. That's the finding from a comprehensive assessment of how rising global temperatures affect livestock, published this week in Science Advances. Researchers focused on Israel, considered one of the world's most innovative dairy-producing countries because of its high milk production per cow and use of advanced technologies. Even there, widespread adoption of fans, ventilation and water-spraying systems only mitigated half the losses – and less on the hottest days. 'Even the most high-tech, well-resourced farms are deploying adaptation strategies that may be an insufficient match to climate change,' co-author Eyal Frank said in a release. What happens to cows during high heat? The research team tracked more than 130,000 cows over 12 years, using detailed weather records and farm surveys. The threshold for heat stress quickly became clear. When 'wet-bulb' temperatures exceed 26°C, milk yields begin to fall steeply. Unlike ambient air temperature, wet-bulb readings reflect the humidity present on especially hot days. Cows exposed to these muggy conditions – an effect the researchers compared to a 'steam bath' – can need more than 10 days to recover fully. While nearly all farms in the study had invested in some form of cooling, the systems proved only partly effective. At a wet-bulb temperature of 20°C, cooling cut losses in half. At 24°C, that figure dropped to 40 per cent. Still, the cooling equipment paid off. It took just 18 months on average for farmers to pay back the costs of installing the equipment. Global losses and uneven impacts Using the Israeli data as a benchmark, the researchers modelled future losses in the world's top 10 dairy-producing countries. Without cooling, average daily milk yields could decline by 4 per cent by the middle of the 21st century. But India, Pakistan and Brazil are expected to see steeper drops – as much as 4 per cent per cow per day. Even with cooling, these countries could still lose 1.5 to 2.7 per cent of their milk yields. For low-income farmers and producers in hot climates, the costs of adaptation may be unaffordable. 'Adaptation is costly, and farmers need to carefully balance the benefits they obtain versus the costs. This is why we see some investment in cooling measures, but not a complete insulation of cows from their environment, which would be far too costly to implement,' said Ayal Kimhi, associate professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. And milk itself isn't the only concern. Heat stress affects animalwell-being and behaviour in several ways, fromfertility patterns to their ability tosurvive at all. Farmers are already on the front lines Extreme weather is no longer a distant threat for farmers. Around the world, producers are already battling more frequent floods, heatwaves and unpredictable rainfall. In Europe, rural farmers have voiced support for green policies, citing the impact they have witnessed on crop yields and their daily lives. Some have described themselves as the 'first affected' by climate change. Climate-linked disruptions have also put some of Europe's favourite crops – including cocoa, coffee and wheat –at risk. Evenbananas, a global kitchen staple, are under pressure, as flooding, heat and degraded soils shrink suitable growing regions. Milk may be next. Even though cows are particularly vulnerable to heat, most countries are not adequately preparing for livestock losses or supporting the farmers most at risk, according to the study's authors. They warn that future-proofing dairy production will depend not just on better cooling systems, but on broader reforms, from improved animal welfare to policy support that helps farmers in hot, low-income regions to adapt. 'Policymakers should look into more strategies to not only cool cows but reduce stressors, like confinement and calf separation,' said lead author Claire Palandri. 'Stressors make cows more sensitive to heat and less resilient.' Without faster action, the effects of climate change won't just reshape what farmers grow. They could also upend what we eat and drink. 'Climate change will have wide-ranging impacts on what we eat and drink,' said Frank. 'Including that cold glass of milk.'
Sustainability Times
03-07-2025
- Sustainability Times
'Trees Are Poisoning the Air': Shocking New Study Reveals Natural Plant Defenses May Be Making Pollution Worse
IN A NUTSHELL 🌿 Plants release isoprene, a natural chemical, as a defense mechanism against pests. release isoprene, a natural chemical, as a defense mechanism against pests. 🧬 Research shows that isoprene triggers a plant response, increasing Jasmonic acid levels to make proteins hard to digest for insects. levels to make proteins hard to digest for insects. 🌍 Isoprene is a volatile organic compound that contributes to air pollution by forming ground-level ozone . . 🤔 The discovery raises ethical questions about enhancing or limiting isoprene production in plants for environmental and agricultural benefits. Plants have long been celebrated for their ability to purify the air and combat pollution. However, recent discoveries suggest that these green allies might inadvertently contribute to air pollution through their natural defense mechanisms. Researchers have uncovered that plants release a chemical called isoprene, which, while protecting them from pests, may also have adverse environmental effects. This unexpected revelation challenges our understanding of plants and their role in the ecosystem. The Role of Isoprene in Plant Defense For decades, scientists have been intrigued by the production of isoprene in plants but lacked concrete evidence of its purpose. A recent study published in Science Advances has shed light on this mystery, revealing isoprene's critical role in plant defense. Under extreme environmental conditions, such as heat stress, plants produce more isoprene, using up to 2% of their stored carbon to do so. This significant investment of resources underscores isoprene's importance in plant survival. Researchers at Michigan State University conducted lab experiments to understand isoprene's role. They bioengineered tobacco plants to emit isoprene and compared them with non-emitting plants. The results were telling: tobacco hornworms preferred the non-emitting leaves, leaving the isoprene-producing leaves untouched. This indicated that isoprene acts as a natural insecticide, deterring pests from feasting on the plants. 'Scientists Issue Red Alert': Disturbing Discovery in Remote Indian Ocean Reveals Hidden Crisis Spanning the Entire Marine Ecosystem How Isoprene Affects Insect Digestion Interestingly, isoprene does not directly harm insects. Instead, it triggers a defensive response within the plant. When exposed to isoprene, plants increase the production of Jasmonic acid, a compound that makes plant proteins harder for insects to digest. This biochemical reaction stunts the growth of insects feeding on isoprene-emitting plants, providing a robust defense mechanism. Lead researcher Tom Sharkey noted, 'The defense was not the isoprene itself, but the consequence of what isoprene did to the plant.' This highlights the complex interplay between plants and their environment, where even seemingly simple chemical emissions can have profound implications for survival and growth. 'Silent killers in the deep': these massive shipwrecks threaten our oceans with an unprecedented ecological disaster The Environmental Impact of Isoprene Emissions While isoprene serves as an effective natural pesticide, it poses significant environmental challenges. As a volatile organic compound (VOC), isoprene is the second-most emitted hydrocarbon globally, following methane. Once released into the atmosphere, isoprene interacts with sunlight and nitrogen oxides, leading to the formation of ground-level ozone. This pollutant is known to exacerbate respiratory issues and contribute to broader environmental concerns, complicating our view of isoprene as a purely beneficial compound. The dual nature of isoprene emissions presents a conundrum for researchers and policymakers. While it enhances plant resilience against pests, its impact on air quality cannot be ignored. This dilemma raises important questions about how we manage plant emissions and balance ecological benefits with environmental health. 'California's Electric Train Revolution Slashes Toxic Pollution': 89% Drop in Carcinogens Marks Historic Win for Public Health and Climate Future Implications and Ethical Considerations The discovery of isoprene's dual role in plant defense and pollution has sparked a debate among scientists and bioengineers. Should we breed plants to enhance isoprene production, thereby improving pest resistance and food security, or should we limit its production to safeguard air quality? Tom Sharkey aptly summarizes the dilemma: 'Should we add isoprene to crop plants so that they're protected against insects and put up with their effect on the ozone? Or should we genetically engineer plants to turn off the isoprene synthase as much as we can to improve the atmosphere?' These questions reflect the ethical and practical challenges facing future research and agricultural practices. The newfound understanding of isoprene's role in plants opens the door to further inquiries into plant biology and environmental science. As we explore the balance between plant defense mechanisms and their ecological impacts, we must consider the broader implications for sustainability and public health. How can we innovate in plant breeding and biotechnology to address these complex challenges while preserving our environment for future generations? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.5/5 (20)
Euronews
19-06-2025
- Euronews
SpaceX rocket explodes into giant fireball, but no injuries reported
A SpaceX rocket being tested in Texas exploded Wednesday night, sending a dramatic fireball high into the sky. The company said the Starship 'experienced a major anomaly' at about 11 pm local time while on the test stand preparing for the tenth flight test at Starbase, SpaceX's launch site at the southern tip of Texas. 'A safety clear area around the site was maintained throughout the operation and all personnel are safe and accounted for,' SpaceX said in a statement on the social platform X. Elon Musk's company SpaceX said there were no hazards to nearby communities. It asked people not to try to approach the site. The company said it is working with local officials to respond to the explosion. Israel stunned and hobbled Iran last week when it pulled off an intelligence and military operation years in the making that struck high-level targets with precision. Guided by spies and artificial intelligence (AI), the Israeli military unleashed a nighttime fusillade of warplanes and armed drones that it smuggled into Iran to quickly incapacitate many of its air defences and missile systems. With greater freedom to fly over Iran, Israel bombarded key nuclear sites and killed top generals and scientists. By the time Iran mustered a response hours later, its ability to retaliate — already weakened by past Israeli strikes — was greatly diminished. This account is based on conversations with 10 current and former Israeli intelligence and military officials, some of whom spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss clandestine operations. It was not possible to independently verify some of their claims. But the former head of research at Israel's spy agency, the Mossad, confirmed the basic contours of the attack, saying she had inside knowledge of how it was planned and executed. 'This attack is the culmination of years of work by the Mossad to target Iran's nuclear programme,' said Sima Shine, the former Mossad research director who is now an analyst at the Institute for National Security Studies. Israel's element of surprise was enhanced by Iranian officials' apparent assumption that Israel wouldn't attack while talks over its rapidly advancing nuclear programme were ongoing with the United States. A sixth round of talks had been planned for last Sunday in Oman, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu activated 'Operation Rising Lion' on Friday – after his country first notified US President Donald Trump. Netanyahu has for years said neutralising Iran's nuclear programme was vital for Israel's security, and Israel had previously taken steps to set back Iran's ability to enrich uranium to weapons grade. But Netanyahu said a more aggressive attack proved necessary, as Iran kept advancing its enrichment programme despite US diplomatic efforts and warnings from UN watchdogs. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has repeatedly called for Israel's destruction. Iran's political leaders say their nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, though it was the only country without the bomb to enrich uranium close to weapons-grade levels. The Mossad and the military worked together for at least three years to lay the operational groundwork, according to a former intelligence officer who said he had knowledge of the attack. This person spoke on condition of anonymity, given the sensitivity of the subject. The attack built on knowledge Israel gained during a wave of airstrikes last October, which 'highlighted the weakness of Iranian air defences,' said Naysan Rafati, an Iran analyst at the International Crisis Group. To further diminish Iranian air defences and missile systems at the start of last week's attack, Mossad agents had smuggled precision weapons into Iran that were prepositioned to strike from close range, according to two current security officials who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the missions. Those weapons included small, armed drones, which agents snuck into the country in vehicles, according to the former intelligence officer. Mossad agents stationed weapons close to Iranian surface-to-air missile sites, Shine said. The agency works with a mix of people, both locals and Israelis, she said. To analyse information it gathered, Israel used the latest AI, said an intelligence officer involved with selecting individuals and sites to target. He said AI was used to help Israelis quickly sift through troves of data they had obtained. That effort began last October, according to the officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to talk to the media. It was one month before Netanyahu said he had ordered the attack plans. An investigation by The Associated Press earlier this year uncovered that the Israeli military uses US-made AI models in war to sift through intelligence and intercept communications to learn the movements of its enemies. It's been used in the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza and conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon. The intelligence officer involved in identifying potential targets said that options were first grouped into various categories, including leadership, military, civilian and infrastructure. Targets were chosen if they were determined to be a threat to Israel, such as being deeply associated with Iran's Revolutionary Guard — a paramilitary force that controls Iran's ballistic missiles. The officer was tasked with putting together a list of Iranian generals, including details on where they worked and spent their free time. Among the high-level military officials killed since Friday's attack were General Hossein Salami, the head of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, and General Mohammed Bagheri, the chief of staff of Iran's armed forces. In addition to AI, the Mossad relied on spies to identify top nuclear scientists and members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, according to one security official. At least eight members of the Guard, including the head of its missile programme, were killed in a single Israeli strike on an underground bunker. Another facet of the attack was to strike Iranian vehicles used to transport and launch missiles. Shine said the strategy was similar to a Ukrainian operation earlier this month in Russia. In that operation, nearly a third of Moscow's strategic bomber fleet was destroyed or damaged with cheaply made drones sneaked into Russian territory, according to Ukrainian officials. In an interview with Iranian state-run television, the country's police chief, General Ahmadreza Radan, said 'several vehicles carrying mini-drones and some tactical drones have been discovered.' He added: 'a number of traitors are trying to engage the country's air defence by flying some mini-drones.' The Mossad is believed to have carried out numerous covert attacks on the Iranian nuclear programme over the years, including cyberattacks and the killing of Iranian nuclear scientists. But it rarely acknowledges such operations. In the 2000s, Iranian centrifuges used for enriching uranium were destroyed by the so-called Stuxnet computer virus, believed to be an Israeli and American creation. In 2018, Israel stole an archive of Iranian nuclear research that included tens of thousands of pages of records, said Yossi Kuperwasser, a retired general and former military intelligence researcher who now directs the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security. In July 2024, Israel killed a senior leader of Hamas, Ismail Haniyeh, with a bomb in a bedroom of a government guesthouse in Tehran. Israel's blistering attack last week on the heart of Iran's nuclear and military structure didn't come out of nowhere, said retired Israeli Brigadier General Amir Avivi, who heads the Israel Defence and Security Forum think tank. It was the result of 'Israeli intelligence working extensively for years in Iran and establishing a very strong robust presence,' he said.
