Statutory Sick Pay: When it's due and how much you get
Employees should ensure they're receiving a minimum amount when off sick, or their workplace could be infringing on their rights. By law, workers should receive at least £118.75 per week in Statutory Sick Pay, providing a minimum income during periods of illness.
Employers are legally obliged to pay this amount each week for up to 28 weeks. In some instances, employees may receive more if their employer operates a sick pay or occupational scheme.
It is important to note that Sick Pay is only issued for the days employees would normally have worked and are off due to illness. This typically excludes the first three working days, with the exception being if you have received sick pay within the last eight weeks, which must have included a three-day waiting period before your first payment.
Each day that Sick Pay is issued
You qualify for Statutory Sick Pay if you are legally classified as an employee, have performed work for your employer, earn an average of at least £125 per week, and have been ill for more than three consecutive days - including non-working days.
It is worth noting that agency workers are also entitled to Statutory Sick Pay.
Who is eligible for Sick Pay?
If you need to claim Sick Pay, inform your employer that you are unable to work either within seven days or by a deadline set by your employer. You might not qualify for Sick Pay if you have already received the maximum amount or are currently getting Statutory Maternity Pay.
Even if you are a new employee and have not yet earned eight weeks' pay, you could still be eligible for the payment, but you will need to discuss this directly with your employer.
What if your employer refuses to pay
If your employer is denying you Sick Pay despite your eligibility, your first step should be to have a direct conversation with them to resolve the issue. You can also request a written explanation from your employer detailing why they're refusing to provide Sick Pay.
This should formally be done on an SSP1 form, rather than just a note or email. If they decline to provide an SSP1 form or you disagree with their reasoning, you can lodge a complaint directly with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).
The HMRC Statutory Payment Dispute Team can be reached by calling 0300 322 9422.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
8 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Statutory Sick Pay: When it's due and how much you get
There is a legal minimum amount of cash that employees across the UK should be paid when they are off sick, and if you're not getting that then your workplace could be in breach of your rights Employees should ensure they're receiving a minimum amount when off sick, or their workplace could be infringing on their rights. By law, workers should receive at least £118.75 per week in Statutory Sick Pay, providing a minimum income during periods of illness. Employers are legally obliged to pay this amount each week for up to 28 weeks. In some instances, employees may receive more if their employer operates a sick pay or occupational scheme. It is important to note that Sick Pay is only issued for the days employees would normally have worked and are off due to illness. This typically excludes the first three working days, with the exception being if you have received sick pay within the last eight weeks, which must have included a three-day waiting period before your first payment. Each day that Sick Pay is issued You qualify for Statutory Sick Pay if you are legally classified as an employee, have performed work for your employer, earn an average of at least £125 per week, and have been ill for more than three consecutive days - including non-working days. It is worth noting that agency workers are also entitled to Statutory Sick Pay. Who is eligible for Sick Pay? If you need to claim Sick Pay, inform your employer that you are unable to work either within seven days or by a deadline set by your employer. You might not qualify for Sick Pay if you have already received the maximum amount or are currently getting Statutory Maternity Pay. Even if you are a new employee and have not yet earned eight weeks' pay, you could still be eligible for the payment, but you will need to discuss this directly with your employer. What if your employer refuses to pay If your employer is denying you Sick Pay despite your eligibility, your first step should be to have a direct conversation with them to resolve the issue. You can also request a written explanation from your employer detailing why they're refusing to provide Sick Pay. This should formally be done on an SSP1 form, rather than just a note or email. If they decline to provide an SSP1 form or you disagree with their reasoning, you can lodge a complaint directly with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). The HMRC Statutory Payment Dispute Team can be reached by calling 0300 322 9422.
The National
4 days ago
- The National
I was able to travel for surgery for my son thanks to Scottish Child Payment
Michaela King, who lives in Leith, told The National that when her child Rupert had to be taken to Great Ormond Street children's hospital for emergency open heart surgery last year, the only money she had to survive on was the Scottish Child Payment (SCP) and the Best Start Foods card. Two-year-old Rupert was diagnosed with noonan syndrome after he was born and has complicated health needs including cardiac issues. He was given a 50 per cent chance of survival from the crucial surgery, and thankfully recovered well. King, 33, had applied for disability benefits for Rupert before the operation, but it took nine months to come through. 'Even in that nine months, Rupert's going through all these hospital appointments, that tiny bit like a hundred and odd pounds, that can make quite a drastic difference in the family's life, and it did when Rupert was in Great Ormond Street,' King explained. READ MORE: Social Security Scotland is 'shining example of what independence can do' King, who used to be a support worker for children with special needs before leaving her job to look after Rupert full time, said that a mix-up between her previous employer and HMRC over payslips meant there was a period she could not claim Universal Credit for two months. 'That was just before we went to London,' she explained, adding that the NHS asks families to pay for hotels and food up front before reimbursing them at a later point. King added: 'I had no money going down to London. All I had was these little pockets of money that the Scottish Government were giving out, so the Scottish Child Payment and the little money on the card for food. 'I had to survive on that for nearly two months. If I didn't have the Scottish Child Payment that would have changed everything, because I wouldn't have been able to afford it. 'Obviously that has made a massive difference, and it meant that Rupert could get the health care that he needed.' (Image: PA) King added that since having Rupert her financial situation changed completely compared to when she was working full-time. 'When you're a solo parent and when you are in this sort of poverty line that us parents that own this situation are in, you learn to adapt,' she said. 'I budget totally differently now than what I budgeted previously, when I didn't have Rupert and I had a job with a lot of money. My lifestyle has completely changed.' Asked how life with Rupert would look without having access to the Scottish Child Payment, King said: 'I think we probably would lose out on stuff. We wouldn't do as much. 'We probably wouldn't be taking trips out or buying the toys that fit around Rupert's needs. He likes spin toys. READ MORE: I'm still using my baby box – here's how my family benefitted from it 'The Scottish Child payment has probably paid for most of his spinning toys. We would have had to adapt differently.' The SCP is currently £27.15 a week, while the UK Government's Child Benefit, also available for those living in Scotland to claim, is £26.05 a week. King, who is originally from England but had Rupert in Scotland, said that there is better support north of the border. However, she feared that the payment is not keeping up with how fast prices are rising. 'The economy is getting harder and harder to live by. Food prices are going up, fuel prices are going up, transport prices are going up, and the Scottish Child Payment, I think it rose by like two or three pounds this year - that's not going to cover my bananas. 'You are better off up here, but it's still hard. You still have to budget even on the amount that you do get. (Image: Getty) 'I think it's a step in the right direction, and it is brilliant. I think there's just a little bit more that could be done to help families, definitely.' King added that the looming disability cuts in Westminster had given her 'sleepless nights' as she fears of the impact on Rupert's future. She added: 'I keep thinking, maybe it won't affect us because he's just a baby. Surely they wouldn't take money away from children?' While King aims to go back to work, finding affordable specialised childcare for Rupert has proven difficult. 'You get anxious about it, you don't want to claim all these things,' she added. 'I think there is still this stigma of claiming things, and I think could I do it with just going to work? No, I definitely couldn't.' READ MORE: Poverty levels in Scotland below UK for 20 years, graphs show Satwat Rehman, chief executive of One Parent Families Scotland (OPFS) said that the SCP is a 'vital lifeline' for single-parent households, a third of whom are living in poverty. 'But it does not yet go far enough,' she said. 'The Scottish Child Payment and benefit cap mitigation have already provided much needed relief to many struggling families.' Rehman added: 'Yet, with 23% of children in Scotland still living in poverty, and the rate rising to 36% for children in single-parent families, it's clear that further urgent and targeted action is needed to meet the statutory target of 10% of Scotland's children living in relative poverty by 2030.'
.png%3Fwidth%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
26-06-2025
- The Independent
‘We haven't learned anything': Readers despair over UK's Covid response in 2025
Big disasters often change how we see the world. The Lisbon earthquake in 1755 shook people's faith in religion. After the 1918 flu pandemic, there was growing interest in fresh air, better hygiene, and healthier living spaces – ideas that influenced architecture and public health policy at the time. Covid, though? So far, the public inquiry has focused more on WhatsApp messages and political drama than on the bigger lessons. But many Independent readers believe there were lessons, but we haven't necessarily learned from them. Before the pandemic, there were fears that people wouldn't cope with restrictions – that 'behavioural fatigue' would kick in and we'd all give up. That fear led to delays in lockdown and, in the end, cost tens of thousands of lives. But that view turned out to be wrong. Faced with a shared threat, most people acted with care and responsibility. Communities pulled together. Many went without seeing loved ones, missed work, lost income – all to protect others. Now, readers feel much of that collective effort has vanished. When we asked for your views, you told us that people no longer wear masks on public transport, and sick people are back in offices and schools. The things we learned – about clean air, proper sick pay, the importance of staying home when ill – are being forgotten, even though the virus hasn't gone away. Many of you told us that the return to 'normal' is anything but normal. You're frustrated by the lack of public messaging, the scrapping of protections, and the ongoing risks, especially from long Covid. Here's what you had to say: Covid is more like polio than flu Unfortunately, Covid is still here, still causing ill health and disability. Doing nothing is a false economy: in terms of impact, Covid is more like polio than flu – and we don't ignore polio. We don't need extreme measures, but good ventilation, FFP masks (especially in healthcare), HEPA filters in enclosed spaces like classrooms, wards, clinics and offices would all make a difference and aren't difficult. Reversing the removal of NHS vaccination from most groups, and ensuring access to vaccines and antivirals – the norm in other countries that are doing better – is essential. Multiple Covid infections, even if mild, increase the chance of complications, including cardiac, and damage the immune system, making it harder to shake off other infections. Long covid is now the most common illness in US children, and the UK is on the same trajectory, for the same reason. In children, Covid can cause metabolic dysfunction and lead to diabetes. This is all avoidable. Housemartin We know what to do – we're just not doing it We haven't learned anything. We need clean air in public spaces (especially schools and health settings); proper sick pay; to stop the ridiculous pressure to send infectious children into school; better public information about the benefits of masks and ventilation; use of high-quality masks where appropriate (certainly for people with symptoms, and routinely in healthcare settings and for travel); and vaccines available to anyone who wants one. Affordable tests should also be widely available. We know what to do to reduce the spread of Covid – we're just not doing any of it. Kittensarecute We didn't learn anything No, we didn't learn anything from the Covid pandemic. It was all done through panic. It wasn't handled right at all, money was wasted, and greedy firms faked the prices to make obscene profits. No medical authority had the faintest clue how to handle it. This must never happen again – separating families, causing misery and sheer panic. We have had pandemics before and will again. Lessons must be learned from that last fiasco and handled totally differently. People will catch it regardless of what they do; it cannot be avoided. Time for a total rethink from these so-called medical experts. Annieinthecastle Long Covid is the main danger The main danger with Covid is getting long Covid. The science says no one is immune to suffering from it, and it's likely a lifelong chronic condition that could end your ability to work. 3.2 million English people know that is what they are suffering from, and the number goes up every year. The only defence we really have against Covid now, since most of the vaccines have been withheld, is wearing an FFP2/3 respirator, which is hugely effective at stopping infection. These masks also stop hay fever and most other infections as well. People who have started wearing them haven't been sick in years. Paul Covid could be eradicated – but there's no will Covid-19 could be eradicated pretty easily in this country with ventilation, investment in proper HEPA infrastructure in all public buildings, a functioning vaccination programme, and – most importantly of all – those who can mask to wear FFP2 or FFP3 respirators when indoors anywhere. If the government could be bothered to protect our public health, it should lock down the country – properly – for a couple of weeks. With all that in place, it would disappear. There is no will or impetus among our leaders to protect us from this incredibly disabling illness. Bumblebee Covid is here to stay. There is growing consensus it probably escaped from a lab, and it will carry on rapidly mutating – picking off the vulnerable and elderly – saving governments a bit of cash, somewhat offset by the cost of Long Covid. I mask in shops but rarely see anyone else doing so. Sooner or later, a vicious strain will emerge, and we'll be back to square one. Galileo666 Learn from countries like Japan We should take the findings of other countries ahead of us into account – e.g. Japan on the spread of the virus – and improve ventilation of buildings, trains and buses... even doctors' waiting rooms in the winter! Jennifer Covid is an inconvenient fact Covid is an inconvenient fact that governments and the right-wing press prefer to suppress. Sadly, it's still very much around, and it's still killing the old, the very young and those with a compromised immune system. It's also leaving a trail of devastation in the shape of long-term damage caused by long Covid. And all of this relates just to people – there's also the impact on the economy. Drugs which would have enabled the immunocompromised to live normal lives (hundreds of thousands are still shielding) have been denied by the UK government to cut costs. Drugs like Paxlovid – literally a life-saver for any immunocompromised person unlucky enough to contract Covid – have been made near-impossible to access. The treatment of immunocompromised people by this government and previous ones is shameful. And to cap it all, there are still plenty of clowns around who somehow feel threatened by anyone taking the sensible precaution of wearing a mask, and feel the need to mock or display outright aggression. DavidM The conversation isn't over. To join in, all you need to do is register your details, then you can take part in the discussion. You can also sign up by clicking 'log in' on the top right-hand corner of the screen.
