Elon Musk's X refuses to comply with French investigation, calls probe politically motivated
On 11 July, the Paris prosecutor's office stated that the investigation targets the platform X, a legal entity associated with it, and several individuals, though it did not disclose the names of those involved, according to a press release issued by prosecutor Laure Beccuau.
The preliminary investigation was launched earlier this year amid suspicions of foreign interference. Musk and other senior figures at X leaders are suspected of deliberately disrupting data processing and engaging in fraudulent data extraction "as part of organised crime", as previously reported by Euractiv.
However, X announced on Monday that it would not comply with the demands of the authorities "as we have a legal right to do so", according to a statement posted on the platform.
X described the investigation as "politically motivated" and denied all allegations.
'X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda, and ultimately restrict free speech,' the statement read, without elaborating on what that agenda might be.
The platform further criticised those involved in the investigation, including individuals who requested access to its recommendation system. It implied that the investigation lacked impartiality and expressed 'serious concerns' about the process.
French authorities are pursuing two probes into the platform. Should those under investigation be found guilty, they could face up to 10 years in prison and a €300,000 fine, according to the French penal code.
Separately, the Commission met with representatives of X last week, following reports that its chatbot, Grok, was spreading hate speech and antisemitic content. However, it remains unclear whether this meeting will lead to a further investigation under the Commission's ongoing probe into X's compliance with the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA).
(aw)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
Germany's ‘butcher' minister told to push for greener diets
Government advisors in Germany are pushing for a shift in food policy to promote plant-based options and discourage excessive meat consumption Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Maria Simon Arboleas Euractiv Jul 23, 2025 16:14 3 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. A government advisory board has urged German Agriculture Minister Alois Rainer to encourage citizens to eat less meat and embrace veggie alternatives, including lab-grown meat. Following his appointment last spring, Rainer, a trained butcher, said that Germans were mature enough to decide for themselves what to put in their shopping baskets. Just a few months later, the board, known as the agri-food advisory board (WBAE), handed him a report advocating for a shift away from his cherished meat products. The WBAE concluded that there is room for 'more sustainable diets' and that reducing consumption of animal products is key. One of its proposals is to slash the 19% VAT on plant-based foods, which it calls "tax discrimination' compared to the 7% rate applied to comparable animal products classified as staples. It also recommends gradually increasing taxes on meat and dairy. 'In terms of GHG emissions, plant-based alternative products such as soy drinks generally have advantages per kg of product over the corresponding animal products' the report states, calling for a 'climate label' to cover both animal and plant-based foods. But Rainer may not be ready to stomach the recommendations. 'It's important to me not to pit one against the other,' said the minister, who has sought to reverse course from his Green predecessor Cem Özdemir. Aware of the sensitivity surrounding food policy, the WBAE has packaged its recommendations in a '3R strategy': citizens should 'Reduce' meat consumption, 'Remix' animal and plant-based components, or 'Replace' meat with plant-based alternatives. The board's push is nothing new to Rainer, as we knew from day one he would be treading a tightrope on food policy matters. The coalition agreement between Rainer's conservative Christian Democrats and the centre-left Social Democrats already includes a pledge to support 'alternative proteins'. The WBAE report specifies that this includes cell-based meat and precision fermentation, which is used to replicate proteins and enzymes found in foods such as eggs and milk without involving animals. The board also hopes that the EU will adopt more 'innovation-friendly' rules. The European Commission is currently considering whether to fast-track the approval of so-called novel foods, many of which have drawn criticism from several EU farm ministers. The report also references another ongoing debate in Brussels: whether traditional meat terms can be used for plant-based products. While the EU executive recently yielded to pressure to tighten labelling rules, the German board is advocating a 'regulatory chill.' Meanwhile, the German government's advisory body endorsed the Nutri-score labelling system and joined criticism of the NOVA classification for ultra-processed foods, warning that it could penalise some plant-based products unfairly. Jeremias Lin contributed reporting. (adm, de)
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
The Brief – Eurofighters leave Europe's soft power in tatters
'Among ourselves, we keep the law, but when we are operating in the jungle, we must also use the laws of the jungle.' Such was Robert Cooper's advice for the West – the close adviser to Tony Blair was quoted in Robert Kagan's 2003 book Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. But it's advice that Europeans have failed to heed. Instead, they left the Americans to deal with the jungle, while they continued on their European way – adhering to international law and promoting soft power. Donald Trump's return marked a resurgence of power politics, and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is now exploiting this shift, exposing Europe's weakness. Since Turkey began EU accession negotiations in 2005, the masterminds of the Brussels bubble have been trying to convince us that taxpayers' money – just shy of €20 billion in the past two decades – could change the country. They hoped that by dangling the empty promise of EU membership, Turks would comply with international law and democratise internally. Instead, the sultan made himself indispensable by doubling down on power politics. Turkey has ploughed money into defence, putting an estimated $40–50 billion into the sector over the past two decades. He has imprisoned opponents, while the rule of law in Ankara has become little more than a midsummer night's dream. He blatantly disregards international norms, threatens Greece with war, and occupies Cypriot territory. He has entirely ignored EU calls to sanction Russia, while Brussels meekly swallowed Erdoğan's declaration that Hamas is a liberation group. Erdoğan has also enlisted his new Libyan ally, Khalifa Haftar, to apply migration pressure on the EU, advancing Turkish energy interests in the region by redrawing maritime boundaries – openly challenging EU sovereignty. The result? Europeans have accepted Turkey as part of their new defence architecture, and now Germany has approved the delivery of 40 Eurofighter Typhoon jets to Ankara. Naturally, Europe refuses to acknowledge its failure and continues to gaslight. Migration Commissioner Magnus Brunner claims that Russia is weaponising migrants arriving in Europe from Libya, completely ignoring Turkey's role in the region. Brunner is either blinded by Brussels' Russiamania or is desperately searching for a convenient scapegoat to divert attention from Europe's failure with Turkey. When the Ottoman Empire blocked Europe from Asian markets, Europeans turned to new frontiers with Columbus. Today, they have nowhere to turn – except to bow to the Sultan. Roundup The EU's second-highest court ruled Wednesday that the Commission broke its own staff appointment rules when von der Leyen delegated cabinet interviews to her right-hand man, Björn Seibert. The decision comes amid scrutiny over von der Leyen's management style. Blue jeans and speed machines – Brussels announced Wednesday it will combine two retaliatory packages on US exports, a €21 billion docket on soybeans, motorbikes and jeans and a €72 billion list on aircraft, cars and electrical equipment. The lists would enter effect on 7 August, and seek to strengthen the bloc's position before Trump's 30% tariff threat on EU exports takes effect on the first of next month. Cutting (green) red tape – The EU called for 'feedback on the simplification of future environmental legislation' on Tuesday, in an effort to ease the administrative burden on EU companies. The Commission suggests scrapping the substances of concern in products database. Across Europe Several sources told Reuters Wednesday that the Trump administration preferred to pay for the destruction of over €10 million in still-usable contraceptives rather than sell to NGOs. The contraceptives, currently in Belgium, will be shipped to France and incinerated at an expected cost of $160,000. Premium pills – A survey from the Radboud University Medical Centre found that Dutch citizens are willing to accept higher public spending on a medicine if it provides significant health benefits – though they also noted that companies should reinvest at least 50% of their profits in research and keep prices socially acceptable. The Tusk Shuffle – Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk announced a cabinet reshuffle Tuesday following a presidential election defeat for his party, removing key ministers and consolidating key portfolios. But many Poles believe the move will do little to improve the government's image.
Euractiv
9 hours ago
- Euractiv
€10 million in USAID-funded contraceptives to be incinerated in France
Several sources told Reuters that the Trump administration preferred to pay for the destruction of still-usable contraceptives, worth over €10 million and stored in Belgium, rather than sell them to NGOs. The US-funded supplies have been held in a Belgian warehouse since the suspension of international aid via USAID in January, and are now expected to be destroyed, the sources said. The stock is to be transported to France, where a medical waste facility will handle its incineration. The Trump administration is expected to spend nearly $160,000 to destroy the stockpile of condoms, pills, and other contraceptive methods, which are set to expire between April 2027 and September 2031. To avoid what many consider a senseless waste, several NGOs offered to purchase the supplies from Washington – but to no avail. The NGO MSI Reproductive Choices proposed covering the cost of repackaging the supplies without the USAID logo and shipping them to countries in need, but the offer was rejected. "No viable alternative" The Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed to Reuters that it had held discussions with US authorities and had 'explored all possible options to prevent the destruction, including temporary relocation.' 'Despite these efforts, and with full respect for our partners, no viable alternative could be secured,' the ministry said in a statement sent to the news agency. 'Sexual and reproductive health must not be subject to ideological constraints,' it added. This decision by Washington is part of a broader dismantling of USAID, once the world's largest donor of humanitarian aid, with an annual budget of around $40 billion. A 90-day freeze on USAID operations was declared on 20 January, the day President Trump took office. Two weeks later, Elon Musk, then one of his top advisers, announced the shutdown of the agency's global health programmes. In March, Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that 83% of USAID programmes would be terminated. On 1 July, the agency's remaining operations were folded into the State Department. (bms, aw)
