Fossil-fuel pledge in EU-Trump deal sparks climate fears
BRUSSELS : The EU is promising colossal new US fossil fuel purchases under its trade deal with president Donald Trump, raising concerns for the bloc's climate fight – should the mammoth pledges come true.
As part of the framework agreed Sunday, the EU said its companies would buy US$750 billion of liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels from the US – split equally over three years – to replace Russian energy sources.
Many experts believe the eye-watering figure to be unrealistic – and point out that market dynamics rather than EU policymakers dictate companies' energy choices.
Even on the supply side, Simone Tagliapietra of the Bruegel think-tank noted that the US might not be able to build the additional export capacity within such a short time frame.
Brussels insists the number was not plucked out of thin air to keep Trump happy, but was based on an analysis of energy needs as it phases out Russian imports because of the Ukraine war between now and 2027.
The proposed increase would mean more than tripling annual energy imports from the United States – about US$70 billion last year – and equate to well over half the €378 billion worth of overall EU energy imports last year.
'Submission'
A large part of the EU's additional billions would go to imports of LNG, which is transported in liquid state to European ports before being converted back to gaseous form and injected into the bloc's power network.
The US currently account for about half of the EU's LNG imports, ahead of Russia on 20% – a figure Brussels wants to cut to zero to choke off income that helps fund the war in Ukraine.
But environmental groups warn against a massive switch to American LNG extracted in part though hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which uses explosives to create cracks in rock formations to release oil and gas deposits.
The highly polluting process comes with steep costs to both the climate and local environment, and is banned in a number of European countries.
'The Commission risks replacing one disastrous dependency with another – unplugging Putin's gas and plugging in Trump's,' Greenpeace warned when the EU's phase-out plans were presented.
Francois Gemenne, a policy expert who co-authored the UN's most recent IPCC report on climate change, in 2023, accused the EU of 'submission' to Trump's pro-fossil fuel agenda.
Elected on a promise to 'drill, baby drill,' the US leader is openly hostile to renewable energy efforts and lashed out again at windmills 'ruining' the landscape before meeting with EU chief Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland last weekend.
For Aymeric Kouam of the Strategic Perspectives think-tank, the energy deal with Trump is both 'dangerous and counterproductive' and imperils its goal to become carbon neutral by 2050.
'Tying Europe's energy future to the US as a main supplier undermines the bloc's energy security strategy, anchored in supply diversification, renewable energy development, and energy efficiency increase,' he said.
The EU pushed back at the charge on Tuesday.
'This agreement does not contradict our medium- to long-term decarbonisation objectives or targets at all,' a commission spokesman told reporters of the three-year energy pledge.
The Trump trade deal comes as the EU debates its 2040 emissions-reduction target, a key step towards its net zero goal.
The commission has proposed a target of cutting emissions by 90% compared to 1990 levels, but with new flexibilities to win over reluctant member states.
The EU says it has already cut climate-warming emissions by 37% relative to 1990, but its green agenda faces pushback with a rightward shift and rising climate scepticism in many European countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
26 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Japan's Ishiba signals talks with Trump for early cut to US auto tariff
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba drew criticism from some opposition lawmakers for not having signed an official document with the US. (EPA Images pic) TOKYO : Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said today he will not hesitate to hold talks with President Donald Trump to ensure an agreed cut to US automobile tariffs is implemented soon. In a parliament session today, Ishiba drew criticism from some opposition lawmakers for not having signed an official document with the US. in clinching a trade deal last month. 'Creating a document could have delayed the timing of tariff cuts. That was our biggest fear,' Ishiba said, defending Japan's decision to agree on a deal without creating an official document with the US. 'He is not a typical counterpart and could overturn rules,' Ishiba said of Trump's negotiating style. Ishiba said he had 'absolutely no hesitation' to hold talks with Trump to have Washington execute the tariff cut soon, though he declined to comment on when such talks could take place. 'Both countries will begin executing what was agreed upon, which is harder than agreeing on a deal,' Ishiba said, signaling his intention to stay on as premier to see through the process. Ishiba is under pressure from within his ruling Liberal Democratic Party to step down as prime minister to take responsibility for the party's huge defeat in last month's upper-house election. Japan's trade deal struck with Trump last month lowers US tariffs on imports of goods including automobiles, easing the pain for the export-reliant economy. However, there is no clarity on when US tariffs for automobiles and auto parts will be cut to 15% from the current 25%, clouding the outlook for Japan's fragile recovery. In the same parliament session, Japan's top trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, said it was hard to say how soon the US could actually implement automobile tariffs, though he added it took 'more than a month' in the case of Britain.
New Straits Times
38 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Trump's tariff, trade deals come under fire from experts at home, abroad
NEW YORK: United States (US) President Donald Trump's latest round of sweeping tariff measures and his handling of recent trade negotiations have drawn strong criticism from experts both domestically and internationally, reported Xinhua. Trump has not only signed an executive order to further revise tariff rates for 69 trading partners, but also announced a few high-profile trade deals that critics dismissed as "exaggerated, wrong, and false." "Whatever progress that's ultimately achieved as part of these new trade deals and duty rates will come at the steep price of significant US tariff increases and the erosion of trust with America's key partners," said Jake Colvin, head of the National Foreign Trade Council. "Institutionalising the highest US duties since the Great Depression, coupled with ongoing uncertainty, is a recipe for making American businesses less competitive globally and consumers worse off while harming relationships with close geopolitical allies and trading partners," Colvin was quoted in a recent Wall Street Journal report. "As of today, US tariff rates are at levels not seen in a century, which will result in hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes paid mainly by American companies and consumers," said Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics and trade at the Cato Institute. Trade policy remains uncertain, and the US tariff system has gone from simple and transparent to an impenetrable labyrinth of new requirements that will prove particularly costly for smaller American businesses that can't afford either pricey lawyers and accountants or high tariff bills and fines for noncompliance, The Washington Post reported Friday, quoting Lincicome. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said that the effective US tariff rate, which started this year at just over 2 per cent, looks to settle somewhere between 15 per cent and 20 per cent. "The economic damage from the tariffs is mounting... The damage will soon be obvious as inflation ramps up and businesses conclude that the higher tariffs are here to stay," said Zandi in The Washington Post piece. "While economists don't completely agree, they generally do acknowledge that broad-based tariffs, such as those being implemented, are a bad idea," said Zandi. "Uncertainty is coming down with more trade deals, but tariffs may settle higher than expected, posing risks to our forecasts," said a Friday research note by Claudio Irigoyen and Antonio Gabriel, global economists with Bank of America Global Research. The higher-than-expected tariffs pose upside risks to inflation forecasts and downside risks to growth forecasts, according to the research note. "It's a very high tariff wall," said Deborah Elms, head of trade policy of the Hinrich Foundation. "The cost is going to be significantly higher for American companies and American consumers who will surely respond by buying less," Elms was quoted as saying in a Friday Bloomberg report. "While we haven't returned entirely to a 'law of the jungle' system, we have taken several huge strides back in that direction," said Stephen Olson, visiting senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute and a former US trade negotiator, in a Friday CNBC report. "We've seen numerous changes in the US tariff regime to date, and there could always be more. Companies will be wary of investing and setting plans while uncertainty remains," said Jonathan Kearns, chief economist with Australian investment management firm Challenger Ltd. Kearns, a former high-ranking official with the Reserve Bank of Australia, expected greater pass-through to the US consumer in the months ahead, according to the Bloomberg report.
Focus Malaysia
38 minutes ago
- Focus Malaysia
Glove industry faces long-term margin squeeze as global oversupply persists
THE White House said that Malaysia's exports to the US will be subject to a 19% tariff. Meanwhile, all goods that are considered to have been transshipped to avoid applicable duties will be subject to 40% tariff. To recap, the estimated annual consumption of medical gloves in the US is approximately 113 bil to 132 bil gloves in 2025, accounting for 30-35% of global glove demand. 'Based on our channel checks, Malaysia's estimated market share of medical gloves in the US has increased to approximately 60% in the first half of 2025 (1H25), compared to 44% in Dec-24,' said TA Securities. This is driven by the US tariffs on Chinese-made medical gloves. For glove manufacturers under our coverage, Hartalega's exposure to the US market is the highest at 57%, followed by Kossan (52%), Supermax (28%) and Top Glove (26%). We are mildly negative on the latest tariff updates as Malaysia's pricing advantage has reduced significantly against other neighbouring Southeast Asian countries. Currently, Thailand, Indonesia and Cambodia match Malaysia rate at 19%, while Vietnam is subject to a 20% duty. On the flip side, we expect Malaysia's market share to remain at 60% in 2025 as the tariff rates for competing nations are very similar. However, we expect customers to continue to push back in terms of cost sharing as oversupply remains. Currently, Malaysia companies' utilisation rates are still well below the optimum levels. For instance, Hartalega is running at 69% while Top Glove is at 61%, based on the latest quarterly numbers. Besides that, big China glove manufacturers like Intco and BlueSail will continue to expand into Vietnam, Indonesia and Cambodia, which will result in a higher supply. We note that Intco's Vietnam pricing is expected to be at least 15% higher than their Chinese manufacturing plants. All in all, we believe the trade uncertainty is not over yet as tariff rates/negotiations between China and US are on-going. We would not discount the possibility of further target price cut for stocks under coverage if China is able to get a good tariff deal. Note that China is Malaysia's largest competitor in the glove industry. Maintain our Underweight stance on the glove sector as the global oversupply is expected to persist for at least the next three years amid increasing competition from Thailand, Indonesia and Vietnam. We believe that the margins for the glove industry would not revert to pre-pandemic for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, Malaysian glove players are likely to continue losing market share in the non-US markets to the Chinese manufacturers. —Aug 4, 2025 Main image: The Star
