Australia decides: Where to watch Saturday's election coverage
Once again, Sandra Sully, she of the golden tonsils, has been entrusted to helm Ten's coverage alongside national affairs editor Hugh Riminton and network political editor Ashleigh Raper.
Joining the Ten anchors will be a revolving door of political heavy-hitters, with Ten banking on fireworks between teal independent Kylea Tink MP, Liberal Senator Dave Sharma, Senator Jacqui Lambie and the Nationals' David Littleproud.
Unique selling point: Ten has historically been the free-to-air network that loves The Youth™, so they're smart to rope in The Betoota Advocate' s Errol Parker and Clancy Overell to join the broadcast live from Betoota HQ.
Channel Seven, Australia Decides
We love a confident broadcaster, and before even a vote has been cast, Channel Seven is making a huge call: they're promising to call the election first. According to Seven's press release, they will utilise 'cutting-edge technology' to deliver up-to-the-minute results.
Sadly, this doesn't refer to the Cash Cow in a cupboard tallying ballots. Instead, Seven will use the 7NEWS Power Board, a state-of-the-art, touch-screen technology made famous by CNN's John King during the most recent US presidential election. The Power Board can fast-track pre-poll and postal votes, providing viewers with an early indication of how the public is leaning.
Veteran reporters Michael Usher and Natalie Barr will steer the ship alongside veteran 7NEWS political editor Mark Riley.
Unique selling point: Seven has booked Clive Palmer to appear on air, so someone can ask him on national TV to stop sending so many text messages.
Loading
SBS
While other networks focus on bells and whistles, SBS is doing what it does best: Solid But Sensible. Their coverage will begin at 6.30pm, anchored by World News presenter Janice Petersen, with chief political correspondent Anna Henderson as featured guest.
Unique selling point: NITV coverage will focus on the Northern Territory as Australia's most significant Indigenous constituency and interview First Nations voters at polling booths around the country.
Sky News, Australia Decides
For those who can't get enough of early polling numbers, Sky News has you covered from sun-up to sundown. Things kick off at 6am with Peter Stefanovic hosting First Edition: Australia Decides, then continue to the evening.
Kieran Gilbert will host Sky's evening coverage alongside a panel that includes Peta Credlin, Andrew Clennell, Chris Uhlmann, Murray Watt, Joel Fitzgibbon and Sky News chief election analyst Tom Connell. Expect regular crosses to Sharri Markson and Paul Murray at Liberal HQ and Chris Kenny and Laura Jayes at Labor HQ, providing on-the-ground reactions as results come in.
Unique selling point: Barnaby Joyce is joining Sky's coverage, which means something hilarious is likely.
ABC, Australia Votes
Props to ABC for slightly altering the name of their coverage and opting for Australia Votes instead of Australia Decides. And while Australia will indeed be voting, Australia will also be crying (#AustraliaCries), with analyst Antony Green crunching the numbers for the final time after announcing his retirement from the role following more than three decades of elections.
Primary coverage starts at 6pm, and it's an all-star line-up, like the Avengers of Ultimo.
We're talking David Speers, Sarah Ferguson, Annabel Crabb and Laura Tingle, along with Bridget Brennan, who will interview candidates from across the country. Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Coalition Senator James McGrath will also provide insights throughout the night.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
13 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Elders' legal bid to save homes, culture coming to end
Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai are afraid for the future of their ancestral homelands. Their Country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10 kilometres off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of climate change. The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees. The Uncles have taken the federal government to court in the Australian Climate Case, seeking orders which would require the Commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities. This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science. The Commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets. On Tuesday, the Federal Court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people. Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai launched the action against the federal government in 2021. They are arguing that the Commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm. During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been. "We don't want to be climate refugees," Pabai Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, tells AAP. Paul Kabai remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community. But that has all changed, he says. The beaches on his island - Saibai - have receded, turning to mud and mangroves. Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been impacted by flooding. "Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas," he laments. "We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents. "Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?" he asks. "In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors." Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai. It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters but as the Uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight. Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark High Court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius' asserted by the British at colonisation, Mr Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors. "I'm standing firm on his shoulders," he says. "If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world." As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Mr Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come, in the Torres Strait and further afield, are front of mind. "My main focus is on the new generation," he says. "This is why I'm doing it - for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren." No matter the legal outcome, Mr Kabai says he believes the action he and Mr Pabai have taken will make a difference. "We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose," he says. "The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change." Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai are afraid for the future of their ancestral homelands. Their Country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10 kilometres off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of climate change. The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees. The Uncles have taken the federal government to court in the Australian Climate Case, seeking orders which would require the Commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities. This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science. The Commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets. On Tuesday, the Federal Court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people. Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai launched the action against the federal government in 2021. They are arguing that the Commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm. During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been. "We don't want to be climate refugees," Pabai Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, tells AAP. Paul Kabai remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community. But that has all changed, he says. The beaches on his island - Saibai - have receded, turning to mud and mangroves. Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been impacted by flooding. "Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas," he laments. "We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents. "Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?" he asks. "In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors." Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai. It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters but as the Uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight. Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark High Court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius' asserted by the British at colonisation, Mr Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors. "I'm standing firm on his shoulders," he says. "If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world." As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Mr Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come, in the Torres Strait and further afield, are front of mind. "My main focus is on the new generation," he says. "This is why I'm doing it - for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren." No matter the legal outcome, Mr Kabai says he believes the action he and Mr Pabai have taken will make a difference. "We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose," he says. "The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change." Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai are afraid for the future of their ancestral homelands. Their Country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10 kilometres off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of climate change. The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees. The Uncles have taken the federal government to court in the Australian Climate Case, seeking orders which would require the Commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities. This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science. The Commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets. On Tuesday, the Federal Court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people. Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai launched the action against the federal government in 2021. They are arguing that the Commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm. During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been. "We don't want to be climate refugees," Pabai Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, tells AAP. Paul Kabai remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community. But that has all changed, he says. The beaches on his island - Saibai - have receded, turning to mud and mangroves. Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been impacted by flooding. "Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas," he laments. "We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents. "Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?" he asks. "In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors." Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai. It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters but as the Uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight. Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark High Court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius' asserted by the British at colonisation, Mr Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors. "I'm standing firm on his shoulders," he says. "If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world." As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Mr Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come, in the Torres Strait and further afield, are front of mind. "My main focus is on the new generation," he says. "This is why I'm doing it - for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren." No matter the legal outcome, Mr Kabai says he believes the action he and Mr Pabai have taken will make a difference. "We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose," he says. "The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change." Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai are afraid for the future of their ancestral homelands. Their Country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10 kilometres off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of climate change. The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees. The Uncles have taken the federal government to court in the Australian Climate Case, seeking orders which would require the Commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities. This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science. The Commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets. On Tuesday, the Federal Court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people. Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai launched the action against the federal government in 2021. They are arguing that the Commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm. During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been. "We don't want to be climate refugees," Pabai Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, tells AAP. Paul Kabai remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community. But that has all changed, he says. The beaches on his island - Saibai - have receded, turning to mud and mangroves. Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been impacted by flooding. "Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas," he laments. "We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents. "Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?" he asks. "In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors." Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai. It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters but as the Uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight. Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark High Court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius' asserted by the British at colonisation, Mr Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors. "I'm standing firm on his shoulders," he says. "If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world." As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Mr Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come, in the Torres Strait and further afield, are front of mind. "My main focus is on the new generation," he says. "This is why I'm doing it - for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren." No matter the legal outcome, Mr Kabai says he believes the action he and Mr Pabai have taken will make a difference. "We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose," he says. "The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change."
Perth Now
15 hours ago
- Perth Now
Elders' legal bid to save homes, culture coming to end
Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai are afraid for the future of their ancestral homelands. Their Country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10 kilometres off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of climate change. The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees. The Uncles have taken the federal government to court in the Australian Climate Case, seeking orders which would require the Commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities. This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science. The Commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets. On Tuesday, the Federal Court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people. Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai launched the action against the federal government in 2021. They are arguing that the Commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm. During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been. "We don't want to be climate refugees," Pabai Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, tells AAP. Paul Kabai remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community. But that has all changed, he says. The beaches on his island - Saibai - have receded, turning to mud and mangroves. Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been impacted by flooding. "Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas," he laments. "We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents. "Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?" he asks. "In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors." Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai. It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters but as the Uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight. Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark High Court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius' asserted by the British at colonisation, Mr Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors. "I'm standing firm on his shoulders," he says. "If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world." As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Mr Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come, in the Torres Strait and further afield, are front of mind. "My main focus is on the new generation," he says. "This is why I'm doing it - for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren." No matter the legal outcome, Mr Kabai says he believes the action he and Mr Pabai have taken will make a difference. "We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose," he says. "The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change."
West Australian
a day ago
- West Australian
Indigenous truth-telling efforts ‘not going away' as key figures call for inquiries after Yoorrook Commission bombshell
More than two centuries after colonisation, a truth-telling commission has delivered its verdict that systemic racism still shapes the lives of First Nations people in Victoria. The recently tabled Yoorrook for Transformation report is the result of a multi-year 'truth-telling' process, which found systemic discrimination across Victoria's policing, custodial, childcare and education systems. In the aftermath of the Report's release, key figures from around the country have spoken about the national appetite for authentic, authoritative First Nations voices at the heart of the truth-telling process, and what that process may eventually look like in each state and territory. What is Truth Telling? Truth-telling is the process by which historical and ongoing injustices committed against First Nations people are catalogued for public record, particularly in circumstances where those records have largely been left out of common discourse. Truth-telling in Australia typically involves the gathering of evidence through a Royal Commission or similar authoritative body. Queensland In Queensland, a 'Truth-telling and Healing Inquiry' was established with bipartisan support in 2023 after years of preparation. In May 2023, then-Opposition Leader David Crisafulli addressed Queensland Parliament to express his enthusiasm for the 'Path to Treaty Bill,' which would enact legislation for the creation of the Truth-telling and Healing Inquiry. 'Path to Treaty is a genuine opportunity for our state to improve the lives of Indigenous Australians,' Mr Crisafulli said. 'It is an opportunity I believe Queensland should embrace wholeheartedly.' Just five months later, in the wake of the failed Voice referendum, Mr Crisafulli changed his tune, claiming the pursuit of treaty and truth-telling would lead to 'more division and uncertainty' and promising the LNP government would repeal the Path to Treaty Act if elected. After the LNP won Queenslanders over in October 2024, Mr Crisafulli made good on his promise, undoing six years of careful preparation in less than a month in government. Waanyi and Kalkadoon man, barrister-at-law Joshua Creamer, was the Chair of the Truth-telling and Healing Inquiry at the time it was abandoned. 'There was a six-year consultation and engagement process that led to the inquiry. It was conducted in consultation with the community and government, and then the implementation of very specific legislation,' Mr Creamer said. 'We were up and running. We had started hearing evidence, we'd started accepting submissions. We heard evidence from Aboriginal witnesses and director-generals and the Commissioner of Police, and we had even produced our first report. 'There was certainly a lot happening at the time that we were abolished.' Mr Creamer said the LNP's decision came abruptly and took those working on the Inquiry almost completely by surprise. 'Certainly, those last three or four weeks were challenging but also surprising in terms of the lack of engagement and the level of contempt the Premier and the ministers showed towards the Inquiry,' he said. 'I still have not spoken to the Premier or the Minister about why those events occurred in the way they did. There was just a real disregard – not just for the inquiry but the six-year process that led to its establishment.' Despite this, Mr Creamer remains optimistic. 'Even towards the end of the Inquiry, I was really surprised by how many non-Indigenous organisations and institutions spoke up in support of the need for the truth-telling process,' he said. 'There will always continue to be a desire for this process to happen. It might just mean we'll be waiting for a change in government for that change to occur. 'The fact that Yoorrook has been successful now is a good demonstration of the importance of the process. It's not going to go away.' New South Wales In New South Wales, truth-telling has taken a back seat to make way for immediate treaty consultations. Three treaty commissioners were appointed in September 2024 by the Minns Government to undertake a year-long consultation process with First Nations communities across the state, to understand whether an appetite for a treaty exists and whether truth-telling will be incorporated into the process. At the time, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Treaty David Harris said the appointment of the Commissioners was 'central to the process of listening to Aboriginal people on treaty and agreement-making'. 'We get better outcomes when we listen to the needs of Aboriginal people and communities. We must ensure Aboriginal people have a direct say on matters that affect them,' he said. NSW Legislative Council member Sue Higgins manages the state Greens' First Nations Justice and Heritage portfolio. She said 'all eyes have paid attention' to Yoorrook and how it established the blueprint for truth-telling in the states and territories. 'It arguably has been one of the best processes to date,' Ms Higgins said. 'The First Nations leadership around Yoorrook has been incredible, and the self-determined way in which the power of that process has operated has been very compelling.' Despite the successes witnessed in Victoria, Ms Higgins said NSW was 'incredibly slow' in getting any form of truth-telling or treaty process up and running. 'The Minns Labor Government came to power in 2023 on the promise they would start the treaty process in New South Wales, and when the Voice referendum failed … there was politicisation and backtracking,' she said. 'That was a frightening period in NSW history, and I think it must have been quite shocking for people.' Ms Higgins said the steps taken to appoint Treaty Commissioners were positive, but it was ultimately unclear – at least until consultations reach a conclusion – where truth-telling sits on the agenda. 'Where exactly a truth process sits within this is interesting, because the NSW government narrative doesn't really talk about truth-telling … for some that may be concerning, but obviously you can't predetermine an outcome,' she said. 'Where the truth-telling will sit at the end of this consultation is really still the open question.' The Territories The Northern Territory underwent a significant period of consultation between 2019 and 2023 to establish a path to treaty, part of which included a commitment to a truth-telling process. In early 2023, the NT government announced the Aboriginal Interpreter Service (AIS) would begin recording testimony for the purpose of truth-telling, and in 2024 the government began distributing hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of grants for the facilitation of truth-telling. In 2025, the Country Liberal Party (CLP) abandoned the path to treaty and, by proxy, truth-telling. The Australian Capital Territory does not currently have a formalised truth-telling process. South Australia, WA and Tasmania South Australia has legislated a First Nations Voice to Parliament, but no explicit mentions of a truth-telling process have yet been made. While there is no formal truth-telling process in WA, a joint project between First Nations communities and the WA Government known as the 'Wadjemup Project' was launched in 2020. The project uncovered the history of Aboriginal incarceration and forced childhood removal in WA. Tasmania has elected to undergo a process similar to NSW by appointing a body of 'truth-telling and healing commissioners,' which will undertake a similar process to the NSW commissioners but with a focus on truth-telling rather than treaty.
