
Al Shara's feud with Kurds dims Syria's hopes of stability
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
US accommodates Syria's former 'terrorist' HTS but maintains pressure
The US has stepped closer towards an alliance that could change the Middle East by no longer regarding Hayat Tahrir Al Sham, Syria's post-Assad rulers, as terrorists. The administration of President Donald Trump made public an official revocation of the US's foreign terrorist organisation designation for HTS. The group has been in control of most of Syria since the downfall of the Assad regime in December. Current Syrian President Ahmad Al Shara founded HTS a decade ago after breaking away from Al Qaeda. A senior European source said that by removing the terrorism designation, Washington is telling Mr Al Shara 'and his men that you are under American protection". The two sides "have become allies', the source added. The decision was in part technical because, without it, Mr Trump would not be able to proceed with his decision to lift US sanctions on Syria, observers said. However, it was also necessary to enable international business in Syria, the European source said. 'If you want a commercial agency in Syria, or to sign an infrastructure or any major contract, ultimately you need to have contact with HTS,' the source said. 'They control everything." A Syrian source who has been in contact with American officials about the sanctions said both Washington and Damascus "are taking a baazari approach", consisting of "if you do this, we do that". The source pointed out that Syria remains listed as a state sponsor of terrorism and that senior figures of HTS remain designated terrorists. The US imposed the state-sponsorship of terrorism designation on Syria in the late 1970s, over Hafez's Al Assad's support for radical groups in the region. Mr Al Shara, the militant-turned-politician has made establishing ties with Washington a central pillar of Syria's foreign policy, accommodating demands by Washington to curb extremists and talk to Israel, although both Syrian and Israeli officials have described such talks as indirect. Reassuring responses Urged by Turkey and Saudi Arabia, Mr Al Shara's main international supporters, Mr Trump announced a decision to lift US sanctions on Syria on May 13. He met Mr Al Shara in Riyadh shortly afterwards but the sanctions removal did not become formal until the end of last month. The US measures were toughened considerably after Syrian security forces killed thousands of civilians in a crackdown on a peaceful protest movement that demanded the removal of Bashar Al Assad, which broke out in March 2011. The crushing of the protests by the Alawite regime led to a violent Sunni backlash and the creation of rebel groups that HTS eventually overtook. US officials have said supporting the new government in Damascus was important to stop a meltdown of Syria's economy, a main factor behind the downfall of the former regime, and potentially reigniting the chaos that blighted the country throughout its civil war. Consolidating the new order was also necessary to prevent Iran from establishing itself and its militia allies in Syria, the officials added. A Sunni ascendancy that replaced the Russian and Iranian-sponsored order in Syria has undermined a so-called Shiite crescent, underpinned by sectarian identity and anti-Israeli ideology. The term, describing the Iranian takeover of decision-making in Baghdad, Damascus and Beirut, was coined by Jordan's King Abdullah II after Iraq started falling under Iran's orbit in the 2000s. On Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met Mr Trump in Washington and said the post-Al Assad order "presents opportunities" for eventual peace. Syrian political researcher Waiel Olwan said the Syrian government has signalled to Washington that "it is willing to sit at the table and reach a regional arrangement". However, reaching a deal has been complicated by Israeli incursions into Syria in recent months – beyond the already occupied Golan Heights – and Israel's apparent refusal to meet Syrian demands to return to a 1974 armistice line. Possible Israeli-Syrian ties require solving "a lot of details", said Mr Olwan, senior researcher at the Jusoor Centre for Studies. "The Americans are receiving positive and reassuring responses from the Syrian government," he said from Damascus. However, he expected Washington to "wait before removing all the pressure cards on Syria'.


Zawya
5 hours ago
- Zawya
South Africa says Trump's 30% tariff based on inaccurate view of their trade relations
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa pushed back against U.S. President Donald Trump's imposition of a 30% tariff, saying that it was based on an inaccurate understanding of the two countries' trade and that negotiations with the U.S. would continue. Trump ramped up the trade war he started in April by telling 14 countries including South Africa on Monday that they face sharply higher "reciprocal" tariffs from August 1. South Africa has been trying to negotiate a trade deal with the U.S. since May, but it has yet to agree terms. "South Africa maintains that the 30% reciprocal tariff is not an accurate representation of available trade data," Ramaphosa said in a statement late on Monday. He said South Africa's interpretation was that its average tariff on imported goods was 7.6% and that 77% of U.S. goods face no tariffs in his country. Ramaphosa said it was positive that Trump had said the 30% tariff could be modified depending on the outcome of trade talks, and he urged South African companies to seek new export markets in the meantime. The 30% tariff will not combine with previously announced sectoral tariffs, such as those on automobiles, steel and aluminium. South Africa first proposed a trade deal in May when Trump hosted Ramaphosa in the White House and presented him with false claims of a "genocide" against whites in South Africa. The U.S. is South Africa's second-largest bilateral trading partner after China. As well as car parts and other manufactured goods, South Africa exports agricultural products to the U.S. and stands to lose about 35,000 jobs in its citrus industry if the higher tariff takes effect. South Africa's Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen said on Tuesday that the country needed to use the next few weeks to try to stop the 30% tariff from happening. (Reporting by Sfundo Parakozov; Additional reporting by Rhea Rose Abraham in Bengaluru; Writing by Alexander Winning; Editing by Hugh Lawson)

Zawya
6 hours ago
- Zawya
30% US Tariff Will Be a Blow to Economic Growth, Jobs and Trade Certainty
The Chairperson of the Select Committee on Economic Development and Trade, Ms Sonja Boshoff, has expressed grave concern over the impending 30% tariff imposed by the United States government on key South African exports, as the tariffs will have far-reaching consequences for exporters and on the broader ailing South African economy. Ms Boshoff said the US tariff order, which was signed yesterday and is set to come into effect on 1 August 2025, undermines the historical US–SA trade cooperation and poses a serious threat to strategic sectors such as citrus, macadamia, automotive components, steel and aluminium. 'These industries are not abstract economic indicators; they are lifelines for tens of thousands of workers, particularly in rural and small-town South Africa,' emphasised Ms Boshoff. She said South Africa's citrus industry alone supports more than 35 000 jobs and contributes over R38 billion annually to the economy. 'A tariff of this magnitude threatens not only the profitability of our exporters, but the livelihoods of workers and the economic stability of entire agricultural regions,' stressed Ms Boshoff. She said the tariff order also casts a dark shadow over the future of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which has long facilitated preferential access to US markets. With the new duty effectively neutralising those preferences, there is growing uncertainty for producers who depend on predictable market access to plan, invest and grow. 'It is critical that trade agreements are honoured in good faith. No country can plan its industrial or export strategy under a cloud of sudden and unilateral tariff hikes' said Ms Boshoff. The committee recognises that the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) is pursuing negotiations with its US counterparts, reportedly offering strategic Liquefied Natural Gas procurement in exchange for a more reasonable tariff ceiling. However, such engagements must be swift, transparent and rooted in the national interest. 'We cannot afford diplomatic dithering. Every delay will deepen the uncertainty in our export industries. The government must urgently finalise a sustainable trade path with the United States and, simultaneously, accelerate diversification into new markets across the EU, Asia and Africa,' stressed Ms Boshoff. The committee calls on the DTIC and the Department of Agriculture to provide support packages and market reorientation strategies for the most affected industries. This must include logistics relief, export finance support, and new market facilitation, particularly for emerging farmers and SMEs. 'At a time when South Africa is battling record unemployment and low growth, punitive tariffs by our biggest trading partners are not just economic risks, they are catalysts for deeper inequality. We must respond with urgency, precision and policy agility,' Ms Boshoff noted. This unprecedent development cannot be approached with a 'let it go' attitude, Ms Boshoff said. She called on the South African government to urgently send a high-level delegation to Washington to undertake repair of diplomatic ties and to reaffirm South Africa's commitment to constructive engagement. President Trump signed the tariff order on Monday, 7 July, after the withdrawal of US grant funding for critical programmes in South Africa. The tariff order, which will apply to all South African products entering the US market, will come into effect from 1 August 2025. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Republic of South Africa: The Parliament.