China AI chip firm Biren raises new funds, plans Hong Kong IPO
Chinese AI chip startup Biren Technology has raised about 1.5 billion yuan ($207 million) in fresh funding and is preparing for a Hong Kong initial public offering, people familiar with the matter said. The funding round and IPO plan come as China seeks to develop domestic alternatives to U.S. semiconductors amid escalating export restrictions by Washington on advanced chips. Beijing has prioritised building homegrown champions in graphics processing units (GPUs), which are critical for artificial intelligence development. The 1.5 billion yuan funding round was led primarily by state-linked investors, two of the sources said. Participants included a state-backed fund from Guangdong province and another from the Shanghai government, according to one source.
Biren initially filed documents for a mainland China listing last year but has since shifted focus to Hong Kong, partly due to stricter regulatory requirements on the mainland including less tolerance for loss-making companies, two of the sources said.
The company is preparing to file for a Hong Kong listing in the third quarter, potentially as early as August, one source said. It was not immediately clear if Biren had appointed advisers for the IPO.
Biren was valued at approximately 14 billion yuan prior to the latest funding round, two of the sources said.
Biren, and the Guangdong provincial and Shanghai governments, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The sources, who spoke to Reuters, declined to be named as the information is not public.
Developing domestic GPU capabilities has become critical for China as the U.S. has tightened export restrictions on advanced semiconductors. The latest measures, implemented in April, prompted U.S. chip giant
Nvidia
to halt sales of its H20 AI chips to Chinese customers.
The potential market for
Chinese AI chip companies
is substantial. Investment bank Morgan Stanley predicted in a May client note that domestic GPU makers could generate 287 billion yuan in sales by 2027, capturing 70% of the Chinese market compared with 30% last year.
Faced upheaval
Founded in 2019, Biren's cofounders include Zhang Wen, formerly a president at leading AI face-recognition company SenseTime, and Jiao Guofang, who previously worked at Qualcomm and Huawei.
The company initially drew attention from investors and industry observers in 2022 when it unveiled its first batch of products, including the BR100 chip, which it claimed could match the performance of Nvidia's advanced H100 AI processor.
However, the company was added to the U.S. 'Entity List' in 2023, preventing it from using leading global foundries such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing to manufacture its chips.
Biren has since experienced significant upheaval, with some senior executives departing, including co-founder Xu Lingjie.
It continues to operate at a loss and generates limited revenue, recording 400 million yuan in sales in 2024, according to two of the sources.
The company's general-purpose GPU products have been deployed across multiple intelligent computing centers, and its partners include
China Mobile
, China Telecom, ZTE, and the Shanghai AI Laboratory, according to its official website.
Some of these companies have also been targeted by U.S. restrictions, including China Mobile and China Telecom, which the Federal Communications Commission said in March it is investigating for potential evasion of U.S. sanctions.
Biren also faces intense competition from other Chinese AI chip companies, including Huawei and peers such as Tencent-backed Enflame and Metax.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Taiwan slaps anti-dumping duties on Chinese beer and steel to shield local industry
The Ministry of Finance announced that it will impose anti-dumping duties on beer and hot-rolled steel produced in China for four months starting next Thursday, citing "substantial damage" to Taiwan's industry, as reported by the Taipei Times. According to a statement from the finance ministry, both it and the Ministry of Economic Affairs "have tentatively concluded that these products are being dumped and that it has inflicted significant harm on the domestic industry." The finance ministry mentioned that the duties would be applied for four months to "protect our industry from ongoing damage during the investigation," as noted by the Taipei Times. The tariffs on Chinese beer will vary from 13.13 per cent to 64.14 per cent, while those for steel will be either 16.9 per cent or 20.15 per cent, the report indicated. In March, the finance ministry initiated anti-dumping investigations into Chinese beer and selected steel products following allegations of unfair competition. Taiwan currently has anti-dumping duties on ten products, with eight coming from China, its largest trading partner, according to official statistics. The ministry is also assessing whether the low prices of certain Chinese hot-rolled steel products, attributed to "long-standing overcapacity" in production, are negatively impacting domestic businesses, the finance ministry stated. Taiwan has emerged as the largest export market for Chinese beer brewers, who captured over 70 per cent of the local beer market in the first quarter of this year, according to DPP Legislator Hsu Fu-kuei. In the last five years, Chinese beer exporters have shipped over NT$16 billion (US$548.32 million) worth of products to Taiwan, according to Hsu. Live Events Chinese suppliers have harmed local beer producers, and the outcome could be severe if the government fails to implement anti-dumping measures, he cautioned. DPP Legislator Chung Chia-pin reported that local beer firms have experienced a 20 per cent drop in market share, with a 15 per cent decrease in production, leading to a utilisation decline of about 30 per cent. He suggested that this indicates significantly adverse effects on the local beer companies' operations due to Chinese beer suppliers. Approximately 70 per cent of the Taiwanese population reportedly backs the government's decision to impose anti-dumping taxes on Chinese beer manufacturers to maintain market order, as stated by DPP Legislator Kuo Kuo-wen, referencing an unnamed public opinion poll, as cited by the Taipei Times report.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Industry calls for innovation to revive textile sector
Ludhiana: The textile industry of Ludhiana, a city long hailed as the powerhouse of India's hosiery and knitwear sector, is facing an urgent need for reinvention amid rising global competition, bureaucratic red tape, and lack of govt support. These concerns, alongside future opportunities, were the focus of an event organised by the Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI) along with ITMA. Titled "Challenges and opportunities in the Ludhiana textile industry," the event saw key industry leaders, experts, and association heads, including representatives from the Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI), United Cycle and Parts Manufacturers Association (UCPMA), and the Knitwear Club. Jagbir Singh Sokhi, president of the Ludhiana Sewing Machine Technology Park Association, said, "We are no longer those self-reliant Indians. We've become copycats, proud to own iPhones and imported brands, but where is the pride in our own innovations? Where is the spirit of 'vocal for local'?" A recurring theme throughout the conference was the alarming lack of innovation. Sokhi pointed out how Punjab once led the world in sewing machine production, but in just two decades, Chinese brands like Zach have taken over 75% of the Indian market share. "They've even handed over machines to local tailors, collecting only a share of their earnings. We are now OE (original equipment) manufacturers for foreign brands, but where is our own brand identity?" he asked. Vinod Thapar, chairman of the Knitwear Club, emphasised challenges in attracting women to the workforce. A survey conducted jointly by UNIDO and the Knitwear Club years ago found that women excelled in the hosiery sector across countries like China, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. Yet, Ludhiana has only 10% female participation in the sector, leaving a 40% vacuum in workforce potential. Thapar also raised concerns about a lack of workplace infrastructure and facilities for women. Avtar Singh Bhogal, senior vice-president of UCPMA, was blunt in his comparison of Indian and Chinese industrial environments. "While we are stuck in red tape just to buy land or get clearances, Chinese companies are already producing and exporting finished goods at the price it costs us to manufacture just the components." He added that Indian bikes weigh 15 kg, while the demand in Europe is for 1.5 kg carbon fibre bikes, which India is ill-equipped to produce due to lack of infrastructure and technology. Rajesh Bansal, another industry figure, focused on the environmental compliance costs that have hamstrung local manufacturers. "We face serious pollution concerns, but where are the subsidies for effluent treatment equipment? Processing of fibre and fabric manufacturing is lagging due to poor support," he said. Chandrika Chatterjee, secretary general of CITI, provided some optimism by speaking about the PM MITRA scheme and the Free Trade Agreement with the UK. She emphasised the untapped potential for increasing Indo-UK textile trade, which currently stands at $10 billion but could expand by an additional $4–5 billion. "The world is looking beyond China and Bangladesh. India has a real opportunity here, if we can address the bottlenecks," she said. Highlighting the urgency to foster innovation and startups in the sector, Suraj Dhawan of ITMA suggested organising hackathons to crowdsource fresh ideas and solutions for industry pain points. Sidharth Khanna, chairman of NITMA, and other senior members pointed out the need for deeper collaboration between govt bodies and the private sector to overcome export barriers and technology gaps.
India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
Pakistan's close friend refuses to give THIS weapon while India is producing them at large scale, weapon is..., friend's name is...
New Delhi: China Denies Hypersonic Missiles to Pakistan: China has rejected Pakistan's demand, in which it had asked for hypersonic missiles and its manufacturing technology (ToT). According to reports, China has clearly said that these missiles are not yet available for export and no such version has been made yet which can be given to other countries. What did Pakistan ask for? Pakistan wanted this missile so that it could compete with India's rapidly growing missile technology and hypersonic systems. India is already testing missiles like HSTDV, which are very fast and advanced. Two main reasons are being given for China's refusal. First, the performance of the Chinese weapons already available with Pakistan has been weaker than expected. Second, China fears that Pakistan may share this technology with Western countries. Although Pakistan has received fighter jets and missile systems from China before, China did not show confidence in sensitive technology like hypersonic missiles. Why was Pakistan denied this weapon? According to a defense website, China makes special export versions for its other weapons like J-10CE fighter aircraft or HQ-9 air defense system, but hypersonic missiles are so advanced and sensitive that it does not want to send them abroad. It is China's policy that very modern and powerful weapons, which can disturb the balance in the world, should not be given to other countries. Will Pakistan develop these weapons at home? Pakistan wanted to buy these missiles and also learn to make them itself, but China's refusal has dealt a big blow to it. This can hamper Pakistan's efforts to compete with India. According to sources, China considers hypersonic technology an important part of its strategic security, especially against the US and its allies. This is the reason why it does not want to give such sensitive missile technology to a close country like Pakistan as it can increase international pressure and political tension. Another reason is that China is currently working towards improving these missiles further and producing them on a large scale. Until this process is completed, it is not ready to transfer it to any other country.
