logo
Plenty to do for J Batt, but Michigan State football is clear priority

Plenty to do for J Batt, but Michigan State football is clear priority

Yahoo10-06-2025
EAST LANSING — Work officially does not start for J Batt until after Michigan State University's Board of Trustees approves his contract June 13.
That doesn't mean the Spartans' new athletic director won't be busy. Taking a holistic overview of what will transform his new home into the top-10 athletic department nationally the 43-year-old believes it can become.
Advertisement
'You've just got to look at all of it,' Batt said Wednesday, June 5. 'Really, my job is to support our coaches. And so what does that look like from a resource perspective? What does that look like from a structure perspective? Staffing, whatever it might be, I'm gonna get in and dig in with our coaches and figure it out and see how exactly I can be helpful.'
Michigan State Athletic Director J Batt, middle, and wife Leah share a laugh with MSU basketball coach Tom Izzo, right, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, before Batt was introduced as the Spartan's new athletic director.
SHAWN WINDSOR: New Michigan State AD J Batt knows the most critical part of his job: 'Football'
At the forefront for Batt, who arrives after leading Georgia Tech since October 2022, will be reinvigorating MSU's football program.
Since winning the last of Mark Dantonio's three Big Ten titles and making the College Football Playoff in 2015, the Spartans are 54-53 overall and just 34-45 in conference play. That includes the final four of 13 seasons under Dantonio and four seasons of Mel Tucker, who was fired midseason in 2023, and his staff.
Advertisement
Jonathan Smith, who took over last fall in the wake of the messy Tucker tenure that has the school under an ongoing NCAA investigation, went 5-7 in his debut season. MSU failed to make a bowl game for the fourth time in five seasons after Dantonio led the Spartans to 12 postseason appearances in 13 years. The program has not finished higher than third in its division of the Big Ten since 2017 under Dantonio and was 12th last season in the first year of an 18-team divisionless format.
'I'm looking forward to seeing what he can do, and I'm excited to work with him,' Smith said. 'Resources matter. … Facilities matter. Revenue share matters. NIL matters. There's a lot there. And we'll tighten up that, the No. 1 and 2 focuses, once he once he gets over here.'
Batt pledged to fully support Smith, whose team has started summer conditioning and will open the season at home against Western Michigan on Aug. 29. As the NCAA case with the House settlement remains in limbo in federal court, which is holding up revenue sharing and a number of other matters that are scheduled to begin July 1, Batt arrives already holding a seat on the NCAA's House Settlement Implementation Committee, which should give Smith plenty of insight and MSU as a major player in shaping the future of college sports.
'Taking these new changes in stride and finding the opportunity in those changes is probably the most important part of my job right now. And all of our colleagues across the country, right?' Batt said. 'We're on the precipice of transformative change in college athletics — and change we need. I think as we move forward, hopefully into the post-House settlement era, we're going to look for a structure that's got new transparency, new levels of consistency across the board. And that's good for college athletics.'
Advertisement
THE PLAN: New Michigan State AD J Batt's priority list: Make connections, build fundraising
That also returns back to Batt's vision for fundraising and seeking new outside revenue streams, as well as potential restructuring within the athletic department to enhance the Spartans' name, image and likeness programs. Though obviously it's far too early for a fully formulated plan, one concept Batt floated was to potentially have someone in a 'player management position' who could help MSU deal with players' agents and strategic use of revenue sharing money.
'Innovation particularly applies in college athletics, so we're gonna look at new and different ways to approach this industry,' he said. 'So whether it's revenue, new opportunities for revenue; we'll look at the way we arrange staff. As we look at new and different requirements to be successful in intercollegiate athletics, you're going to have to find new and different ways to serve our coaches and our student athletes so that they can do their jobs really well.'
Hall of Fame basketball coach Tom Izzo, who served as co-interim athletic director during the search after Alan Haller was pushed out May 1, pointed to Batt's work as an assistant athletic director at Alabama as a blueprint. Not only was his friend, Nick Saban, winning football championships, but the Crimson Tide hired Nate Oats to revive their basketball program and had a number of other success stories in non-revenue sports while building the financial coffers though Batt's work in securing donations.
Michigan State University basketball coach Tom Izzo speaks Wednesday, June 4, 2025, before MSU President Kevin Guskiewicz introduced J Batt (bottom right) as the Spartan's new athletic director.
'I wasn't looking for just a business guy personally, even though if it would have meant more money for my program, if they thought they could do a better job of that,' Izzo said. 'I think there has to be a balance. I think we're past the days of my former football coach becoming the AD, like happened in my high school, like happened at the college I was at. I don't think that's a clean slate anymore, either.'
Advertisement
Batt is MSU's first athletic director hired with no ties to MSU since Merritt Norvell (1995-99). He also is the first person to lead the Spartans who arrives already having worked as an AD since Merrily Dean Baker (1992-95), who hired both Izzo and Saban.
'I don't know that's a good thing or a bad thing,' Batt said of being an MSU outsider. 'But I'll tell you: I've certainly worked at a lot of different institutions where I might not have had a tie before, and we've been able to be pretty successful. So it'll work out.'
Contact Chris Solari: csolari@freepress.com. Follow him @chrissolari.
Subscribe to the "Spartan Speak" podcast for new episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or anywhere you listen to podcasts. And catch all of our podcasts and daily voice briefing at freep.com/podcasts.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Michigan State athletic director J Batt's priority: football
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michigan State baseball commit signs with Los Angels Angels following 2025 MLB Draft
Michigan State baseball commit signs with Los Angels Angels following 2025 MLB Draft

USA Today

time24 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Michigan State baseball commit signs with Los Angels Angels following 2025 MLB Draft

Michigan State baseball landed a big time commitment from Luke LaCourse, a Bay City (MI) native, in 2023 - expecting the two way services of one of the state's best players. Unfortunately, that wont come to fruition for MSU. LaCourse was selected in the sixth round of the 2025 MLB Draft by the Los Angeles Angels out of Bay City Western High School. Now, he has officially inked his deal with the Angels, getting a deal above slot value. The Angels deal with LaCourse comes in at around $515,000, over one-hundred thousand above the slot value at $393,700. A deal that much over slot value was enough to pry LaCourse away from East Lansing and joining Michigan State and an NIL deal. Contact/Follow us @The SpartansWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Michigan State news, notes and opinion. You can also follow Cory Linsner on X @Cory_Linsner

How much is Florida football's program worth? The Athletic ranks FBS teams by valuation
How much is Florida football's program worth? The Athletic ranks FBS teams by valuation

USA Today

time24 minutes ago

  • USA Today

How much is Florida football's program worth? The Athletic ranks FBS teams by valuation

College football is a big business these days. In fact, the sport is among the biggest cash printers out there when it comes to the entertainment industry, creating billions of dollars of revenue every year. With NIL now here and the collegiate gridiron turned into a de facto professional league, one might wonder how much each school's program is worth as a whole — like how pro sports franchises have a value based on the fiscal aspects of the entity. The Athletic's Matt Baker attempted to answer this query in his rankings of every Power 4 team by how much they'd sell for, in which he put together some numbers based on what we know about the business side of these operations. Of course, he offers the following caveat: "Do not take our numbers to the bank, literally or metaphorically. Instead, consider this a fun attempt at blending back-of-the-envelope math with common sense to price college programs like their professional peers — an exercise that's theoretical for now … but might not be much longer," Baker warns. So, where do the Florida Gators stand in these data? Florida football's valuation, ranking per The Athletic According to Baker's math, the Gators are the 12th most-valuable program in the country and seventh most-valuable in the Southeastern Conference. "The Gators are also pursuing a major stadium upgrade that would significantly change the revenue picture; in January, the chairperson of the university's board of trustees publicly floated a $1 billion price tag for the project," he offers. It is also noted that Florida's average annual football revenue is $98.5 million. However, Baker's counterpoint has been a source of agony for the Orange and Blue faithful. "Florida's downside remains its on-field product. USC is the only other program in our top 12 that has never made the College Football Playoff, and the Gators have suffered through four consecutive seasons without finishing ranked." SEC schools among top-30-ranked program values A full dozen of the conference's 16 member schools cracked the top 30 of The Athletic's college football program valuations, with the Gators sitting near the midpoint at No. 7 among SEC programs. The Texas Longhorns and Georgia Bulldogs occupy the two top spots in the league as well as overall, respectively, while the Alabama Crimson Tide (No. 6 overall, No. 3 in SEC), Oklahoma Sooners (No. 7 overall, No. 4 in SEC), Tennessee Volunteers (No. 9 overall, No. 5 in SEC) and LSU Tigers (No. 10 overall, No. 6 in SEC) round out the top 10. After Florida follow the Auburn Tigers (No. 13 overall, No. 8 in SEC), Texas A&M Aggies (No. 15 overall, No. 9 in SEC), Arkansas Razorbacks (No. 23 overall, No. 10 in SEC), Ole Miss Rebels (No. 25 overall, No. 11 in SEC) and South Carolina Gamecocks (No. 257 overall, No. 12 in SEC). NCAA FBS program valuation projections top 30 rankings Follow us @GatorsWire on X, formerly known as Twitter, as well as Bluesky, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Florida Gators news, notes and opinions.

USOPC asks for tweak of college sports bill to set minimum spending limits for Olympic programs
USOPC asks for tweak of college sports bill to set minimum spending limits for Olympic programs

Fox Sports

timean hour ago

  • Fox Sports

USOPC asks for tweak of college sports bill to set minimum spending limits for Olympic programs

Associated Press U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee leaders are pushing lawmakers for tweaks to legislation that would regulate college sports by adding guarantees that schools will spend the same percentage on Olympic programs in the future as they do now. USOPC CEO Sarah Hirshland told The Associated Press on Monday that a letter she and chair Gene Sykes sent to members of Congress last week was intended to restart a conversation about the SCORE Act, which currently calls for schools to sponsor at least 16 teams. That's a number that conforms with current NCAA rules for Power Four schools, and one that Hirshland worries would give schools no incentive to fund non-revenue sports that power the Olympic pipeline. 'You look and you say, 'Is that effectively going to thwart the issue of allocating too many resources to football and not enough to other things?' And my assessment is, no, it's not going to do that,' Hirshland said. The USOPC says all but three of the 67 Power Four schools sponsor more than 16 sports and the average school in that group has more than 21. At last year's Paris Olympics, 75% of U.S. Olympians and 53% of Paralympians had a connection with U.S. college sports. The SCORE Act recently passed a House subcommittee and is set for markup this week, a process in which lawmakers amend certain facets of the bill. Hirshland said USOPC leadership has long been in discussions about adding provisions that would compel schools to spend at least the same percentage on Olympic sports as they do now. 'The bill, as it's written, would make it too easy for a school to starve 15 programs and invest in one,' Hirshland said. 'It's important schools have the latitude to make decisions that are most effective for the school, but while also creating an environment that says 'You don't just need to be a football school.'' She said she was encouraged that lawmakers were including provisions for protecting Olympic sports in a bill that would regulate the shifting college landscape. The SCORE Act proposes to provide limited antitrust protection for the NCAA and would place the college sports' name, image, likeness system under one federal law instead of a mishmash of state regulations. Starting this month, schools are allowed to pay up to $20.5 million to athletes in NIL deals. Most of that money will be funneled to football and basketball players, whose sports generate the bulk of college athletics revenue. It has left many to wonder about the future of the Olympic programs. The act also includes a section that purports to protect Olympic sports with the 16-team minimum, but in the letter to House leaders, Sykes and Hirshland were skeptical of that. 'The USOPC is committed to being a partner in this process and would welcome the opportunity to share further insights, data, and recommendations,' they wrote. It also mandates that athletes not be turned into employees of their schools, a sticking point for some Democrats that figures to keep the bill from moving along in the Senate, where it would need 60 votes to pass. Hirshland said the USOPC hasn't taken a 'strong position' on the employment issue, and is mostly concerned that any legislation includes strong protection for Olympic sports. She says the USOPC-backed idea of keeping spending at certain percentages isn't the only answer to the issue, but might be the simplest and best. 'We don't want schools to starve Olympic sports by cutting them or starving them,' she said. 'We want them to continue to provide investment in the growth of these sports.' ___ AP college sports: in this topic

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store