Trump's ‘both sides' approach to Israel, Iran comes into question
The president was so frustrated Tuesday morning he dropped an expletive on the White House lawn on his way to the NATO summit, contending that the two adversaries 'don't know what the f—k they're doing.'
He also offered a window into his handling of the situation in which he stressed criticism mostly for Israel but also Iran in his quest to end the fighting: 'All I do is play both sides.'
Whether Trump's strategy to have a foot in each camp will be successful depends on if Israel and Iran will abide by his desire to stop fighting longterm, but some foreign policy experts think it will take more disciplined diplomacy to reach a peaceful end.
Elliott Abrams, U.S. Special Representative for Iran during Trump's first term, argued that if the administration took a more subdued approach and called on Israel to de-escalate instead of retaliate when Iran continued strikes, Trump would have likely not gone on his 'tirade' on Tuesday.
'With the announcement of the ceasefire and the Iranians cheating, the Israelis were going to respond. They did respond. And I think that had he or [Secretary of State Marco] Rubio called Netanyahu and said, 'we don't want to lose the ceasefire. So how do you plan to respond? And, don't blow up Tehran, do something moderate.' That would have worked,' Abrams said. 'There was no need for a public and private tirade.'
Abrams contended that while Trump may have been posturing toward both countries, his public outburst did the situation few favors.
'You never know with Trump how much is performative, but I think there was no need for what he did,' added Abrams, senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Trump allies have argued that the president's flexibility and willingness to pivot on a dime is an asset, particularly when it comes to foreign policy. Where critics see Trump as having few strongly held beliefs and a lack of commitment to long-standing allies, the president's supporters see him as able to shift his tone and approach to get whatever result he desires.
White House officials this week have trumpeted that 'only' Trump could have produced the results he did with Iran, a nod to his unorthodox approach that can change from day-to-day or hour-to-hour depending on the situation.
Fred Fleitz, vice chair of the America First Policy Institute's Center for American Security, argued some tension between Trump and Netanyahu is to be expected, but that Trump is unwaveringly pro-Israel despite his public frustrations.
'Netanyahu is not Trump's puppet, and he has to look out for the interests of his nation, not simply do what Trump tells him to do,' Fleitz said. 'And I think that creates conflict from time to time.'
One Trump ally noted that the Iran-Israel conflict was far from the first time the president has deployed an 'all sides' approach. They argued Trump has used it at times when addressing the war in Ukraine, alternately attacking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and bellowing that he is unhappy with Russian President Vladimir Putin as he attempts to bring the two sides to the negotiating table.
A version of that was also on full display Tuesday as Trump posted a cascade of Truth Social posts as he was flying to the Netherlands for the NATO summit this week. While he left the White House just after sunrise in a huff, his Truth Social posts soon began suggesting that the ceasefire was holding and that he was telling Israel to turn their planes around.
By the time Trump spoke to reporters on Air Force One, he relayed that he spoke to Netanyahu and that he was optimistic a truce would hold.
'The ceasefire is very much in effect, and I think we're going to keep it there for a long time,' he said.
'I said, 'you got to turn back the planes.'' Trump said. 'And there was going to be a retaliation this morning by Israel and I said, 'you gotta call back the planes. It's enough, it's enough.' And they did, which I respect very greatly.'
By late Tuesday, the ceasefire appeared to hold by both Israel and Iran with few if any reports of Tehran striking Israel after Trump's earlier remarks. Trump said there wouldn't be consequences for the fighting that occurred overnight when the ceasefire was supposed to initially begin.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), one of the most hawkish Trump allies in Congress, argued in response to Trump's unleashing that Israel and Iran can't be lumped together.
'I can understand his frustration but there's no moral equivalency between Iran and Israel,' Graham said on Fox News. 'Israel is our friend, Iran is our enemy.'
The U.S. had been pulled into a dayslong conflict between Israel and Iran when it struck three Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday with some of the most powerful ammunition in the U.S. arsenal.
Iran struck back Monday with several missiles over Qatar where a large U.S. military base is located, but gave fair warning to the U.S. before doing so, which prevented casualties, according to Trump.
Trump announced the parameters of a ceasefire deal later Monday, but fighting between Iran and Israel continued overnight, much to the president's chagrin Tuesday morning.
Abrams said he was surprised that Trump was upset with Israel and Iran, but added, 'another thing you never know… what is the factual basis for his comment.'
He added, 'God knows what someone said to him over the phone or what tweet he read that set him off. He may actually not have understood the situation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
14 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Announces Preliminary Trade Pact With Vietnam
President Trump said on Wednesday that the United States had reached a trade deal with Vietnam, one that would roll back some of the punishing tariffs he had issued on Vietnamese products in return for that nation agreeing to open its market to American goods. The preliminary deal will also indirectly affect China, an important trading partner of Vietnam. 'It will be a Great Deal of Cooperation between our two Countries,' Mr. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social announcing the deal. According to Mr. Trump, the deal imposes a 20 percent tariff on all imports from Vietnam and a 40 percent tariff on any 'transshipping.' That provision is aimed at addressing Trump administration criticisms that countries like Vietnam have become a channel for Chinese manufacturers to bypass U.S. tariffs and funnel goods into the United States. Which products would fall under the higher tariff rate is unclear. It could refer to goods imported to the United States from Vietnam that actually originated in China. But it could also apply to Vietnamese products that use a certain amount of Chinese parts. The deal could include a lower tariff on goods that are made in Vietnam with fewer Chinese parts and materials, and a higher tariff rate for Vietnamese goods that contain many Chinese components. Vietnam was soon scheduled to face a 46 percent tariff rate as part of the 'reciprocal' tariffs that the Trump administration unveiled on April 2. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Visits $450 Million 'Alligator Alcatraz,' Suggests Taxpayers Should Fund More of Them
Only eight days after construction began, and 12 days after Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier released a video on X announcing plans for an immigration detention center in the Everglades, "Alligator Alcatraz" will officially open this week. The site, which was visited by President Donald Trump and Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday, puts Florida at the forefront of the federal government's mass deportation campaign. The state-run immigration detention facility is planned to eventually hold up to 5,000 detainees and will be capable of processing and deporting migrants to speed up deportations amid the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. The 30-square-mile parcel of land was chosen in part for its unused airstrip—and for its alligator- and python-laden surroundings serving as cheap security and deterrence. "They ain't going anywhere once they are there…because good luck getting to civilization," DeSantis said during a news conference on Monday. "The security is amazing. Natural and otherwise." During the tour of the facility, DeSantis added that Florida should not be the only state but should serve as a model. "We need other states to step up," he said. Trump called out California Gov. Gavin Newsom specifically, saying the Democratic governor could "learn something" about curbing illegal immigration. DeSantis pointed out that California is home to the original Alcatraz, implying that it, too, could be outfitted as an immigration detention center. Although both the president and DeSantis were quick to say Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem would be able to find funding for additional immigration detention centers, the cost and source of funding for these facilities merit further scrutiny, particularly since ultimately taxpayers are footing the bill. While touted as an "efficient, low-cost opportunity to build a temporary detention facility" in Uthmeier's original video about the facility, Florida's new facility is expected to cost $450 million to operate for a single year. A DHS official told CNN that Florida will fund the operation of the facility and then "submit reimbursement requests" through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and DHS. Secretary Noem said that Alligator Alcatraz and other approved detention facilities in the state will be funded "in large part" by $625 million set aside by the FEMA Shelter and Services Program. The project has faced objections from local residents and government officials, including Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava, who opposed using county-owned land for the project. After Levine Cava requested an environmental impact report and updated land appraisal, DeSantis seized the land under emergency powers in place since 2023. The post Trump Visits $450 Million 'Alligator Alcatraz,' Suggests Taxpayers Should Fund More of Them appeared first on
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US open to 'creative solutions' on pharma trade with EU, Irish minister says
By Conor Humphries DUBLIN (Reuters) -U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer made clear in a meeting with Irish Trade Minster Simon Harris last month that Washington was open to "creative solutions" on pharmaceutical trade between the U.S. and European Union, Harris said on Wednesday. "He made it clear that he was open to creative solutions when it comes to pharma and I think that's an important recognition that actually pharma between the U.S. and the EU, the U.S. and Ireland, is much more interdependent than perhaps people were led to believe in certain quarters at the start of this process," Harris told reporters. The European Union wants immediate relief from tariffs in key sectors as part of any trade deal with the U.S. due by a July 9 deadline, EU diplomats have told Reuters, even as they accept the U.S. baseline tariff of 10% as unavoidable. The EU also wants a deal to cover commercial aircraft and parts, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, sectors the U.S. is investigating, but has not yet imposed extra duties on. Trump said in June the pharma duties would be announced "very soon". "I think it's important to be truthful with people, the EU is negotiating with an administration that believes in tariffs and clearly I think 10% seems to be the baseline in any agreement they (the U.S.) have reached so far," Harris said. "But we will be seeking at an EU level to maximise the number of sectors where there is zero-for-zero (tariffs)." Harris highlighted pharma, aviation and agriculture as areas Dublin would like trade between the EU and U.S. to flow freely. He added that there was a welcome intensity to the talks between the EU and U.S. and that while a brief extension to the July 9 deadline is something that can considered, it would be preferable to at the very least deliver a framework agreement and set forward a roadmap for further engagement on key sectors.
