Meta faces Italian competition investigation over WhatsApp AI chatbot
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
Italy's antitrust authority said on Wednesday it had launched an investigation into Meta Platforms over allegations the company abused its dominant position by installing its artificial intelligence tool on messaging service WhatsApp The watchdog said Meta may have violated European Union competition rules by integrating its Meta AI assistant into WhatsApp without user consent, a move that might harm its competitors.The company said it was cooperating with the Rome-based authority and that its AI service benefited customers."Offering free access to our AI features in WhatsApp gives millions of Italians the choice to use AI in a place they already know, trust and understand," a spokesperson said in an emailed statement.The authority, known as AGCM, said it acted "in close cooperation with the relevant offices of the European Commission".Meta AI, which provides chatbot-style responses and virtual assistant functions, has been part of WhatsApp's interface since March 2025, and was included in the app's search bar, the authority said.The regulator said inclusion could unfairly steer users toward Meta's AI services, potentially harming competitors and locking users into the platform."By pairing Meta AI with WhatsApp, Meta appears to be able to steer its user base into the new market not through merit-based competition, but by 'forcing' users to accept the availability of two distinct services, potentially harming competing services", the authority said.Companies that breach EU competition rules by abusing a dominant position can be fined up to 10% of their worldwide turnover.The authority said its officials carried out investigations at the offices of Meta's Italian subsidiary with the assistance of Italy's tax police special antitrust unit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Turbhe paint factory found misusing govt-subsidised fertiliser
MUMBAI: In a statewide crackdown on the misuse of government-subsidised fertilisers, a large-scale irregularity from a Turbhe-based paint manufacturing company was recently unearthed by the quality control department. The fertilisers, exclusively meant for farmers, were allegedly used by the company after the department found their Benzene Soluble material containing neem oil, a marker of agricultural-grade need-coated urea. Turbhe paint factory found misusing govt-subsidised fertiliser The matter came to light on June 6 after a team from the quality control department carried out a surprise inspection at the company's industrial units in Dombivli and Turbhe, suspecting diversion of subsidised agricultural urea for commercial manufacturing. Around 4,690 bags of urea, each weighing 50kg and labelled 'Technical Grade Urea for Industrial Use Only', were found. To verify its contents, samples were sent to the fertiliser Control Laboratory in Nashik. 'The lab results clearly prove the urea in question was not technical grade as claimed, but subsidised neem-coated fertiliser meant exclusively for farmers. This is a serious breach of law and public trust,' stated Balaji Manchakrao Shinde, district quality control inspector, in his official complaint with the Turbhe police. After the lab results were sent to the department on June 30, the authorities issued a show cause notice on July 3 and placed a sales ban on the remaining 171.271 metric tons of urea, valued at ₹91.47 lakh, that were found on-site. The company's initial documentation was submitted on July 7 and was deemed incomplete. Additional documents submitted on July 11 reportedly failed to justify the procurement and use of stock. 'When we requested documents such as purchase bills, delivery challans, and usage logs, the company representatives reportedly failed to produce them,' said the investigating officer. 'The accused have colluded to misuse government-subsidised fertiliser for personal gain and committed fraud against the government,' Shinde further stated in his complaint. An FIR was registered on July 28 against 14 accused from the company for conspiracy, misuse of government resources, intentional deception for financial gain and other relevant sections of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, and the Fertiliser Movement and Handling Control Order, 1973. The Turbhe police said the matter is currently under investigation.
Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
Farmers told to ensure bank accounts are active
Rajamahendravaram: Another major promise under the Super Six commitments of the Andhra Pradesh government has been fulfilled with the launch of the Annadata Sukhibhava scheme. The first instalment of financial support will be credited to the bank accounts of eligible farmers on Saturday, said Minister for Tourism, Culture, and Cinematography Kandula Durgesh. As part of the first phase, a sum of Rs 7,000 is being deposited into each eligible farmer's account. Of this, Rs 5,000 is contributed by the state government, while Rs 2,000 is from the Central government under the PM-Kisan Yojana, the minister clarified. The scheme is designed to provide a total benefit of 20,000 to each farmer in three instalments. Durgesh stated that following the Chief Minister's directive, inaugural events are being held at Rythu Seva Kendras (Farmers' Service Centres) across the state to mark the release of funds. Fulfilling this commitment to farmers reflects the government's dedication to public welfare and its ability to uphold the trust of the people, he added. Farmers were also advised to ensure their bank accounts are active. For those eligible farmers who may not have received the credited amount yet, the minister urged them not to panic. He advised them to contact the helpline number 155251 or the WhatsApp Governance number 9552300003 for assistance. They may also approach their local Rythu Seva Kendras for support.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
13 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Columbia Sportswear sues Columbia Univ over confusingly similar merchandise
For decades, T-shirts, sweatshirts and other clothing under the Columbia Sportswear brand and clothing emblazoned with the Columbia University name coexisted more or less peacefully without confusion. But now, the Portland-based outdoor retailer has sued the New York-based university over alleged trademark infringement and a breach of contract, among other charges. It claims that the university's merchandise looks too similar to what's being sold at more than 800 retail locations, including more than 150 of its branded stores, as well as its website and third-party marketplaces. In a lawsuit filed July 23 in the US District Court for the District of Oregon, Columbia Sportswear, whose roots date back to 1938, alleges that the university intentionally violated an agreement the parties signed on June 13, 2023. That agreement dictated how the university could use the word Columbia on its own apparel. As part of the pact, the university could feature Columbia on its merchandise provided that the name included a recognisable school insignia or its mascot, the word university, the name of the academic department or the founding year of the university 1754 or a combination. But Columbia Sportswear alleges the university breached the agreement a little more than a year later, with the company noticing several garments without any of the school logos being sold at the Columbia University online store. Many of the garments feature a bright blue colour that is confusingly similar to the blue colour that has long been associated with Columbia Sportswear, the suit alleged. The lawsuit offered photos of some of the Columbia University items that say only Columbia. The likelihood of deception, confusion, and mistake engendered by the university's misappropriation and misuse of the Columbia name is causing irreparable harm to the brand and goodwill symbolised by Columbia Sportswear's registered mark Columbia and the reputation for quality it embodies, the lawsuit alleged. The lawsuit comes at a time when Columbia University has been threatened with the potential loss of billions of dollars in government support. Last week, Columbia University reached a deal with the Trump administration to pay more than $220 million to the federal government to restore federal research money that was cancelled in the name of combating antisemitism on campus. Under the agreement, the Ivy League school will pay a $200 million settlement over three years, the university said. Columbia Sportswear aims to stop all sales of clothing that violate the agreement, recall any products already sold and donate any remaining merchandise to charity. Columbia Sportswear is also seeking three times the amount of actual damages determined by a jury. Neither Columbia Sportswear or Columbia University couldn't be immediately reached for comment. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
