State to file review petition against SC verdict on Zudpi land
The review petition will be filed against an apex court's verdict, which directed that zudpi jungle land (shrub forest) in Vidarbha, in eastern Maharashtra, shall be considered forest land in line with an order of the court dated December 12, 1996. The current order was delivered on May 22.
In its 1996 order, the court had held that forest land as defined under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980, would include not only forests as understood in the dictionary sense but any area recorded as forest in government records.
Raising the issue, Congress legislator Nana Patole said this would pose a major problem as it would create hurdles in implementing development projects. 'No such land can be redeveloped after this verdict. The state government has failed to explain it to the Supreme Court, because of which this verdict was delivered,' Patole noted, demanding that the state file a review petition.
Naik appeared to agree with him and said in the lower house, 'The apex court issued the verdict despite the central government taking a different stand. The state government will file a review petition to resolve the matter.'
Interestingly, chief minister Devendra Fadnavis had welcomed the verdict, calling it a 'big relief for the Vidarbha region' that has been lagging in terms of development due to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. 'All the land parcels granted before 1996 were given a kind of exemption by the SC. A process has also been formulated for lands that were granted post-1996, following which the state can get the land from the central government,' Fadnavis said in a statement on May 22.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Fraudulent': Congress slams govt assertion on India being among 'most equal' countries, calls PIB as Press (mis)Information Bureau
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Congress on Monday termed as "fraudulent" and "intellectually dishonest" the government's assertion that India is among the world's most equal countries, and said the Modi government cannot simply wish away the stark reality of deepening inequalities by "doctoring data".The opposition party's attack came after an official release, citing World Bank data, said inequality in India has come down significantly between 2011-12 and 2022-23, making it the fourth-most equal country Congress demanded that the Press Information Bureau (PIB) must clarify as to the origins of this press release and retract it immediately. Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said, "Aap chronology samajhiye. The World Bank released its Poverty and Equity Brief for India in April 2025. Immediately after, the Congress released a statement identifying the several warning signs that the World Bank had flashed for poverty and inequality in India - including warnings about government data underestimating inequality."Three months after its release, on July 5, the Modi government's drumbeaters and cheerleaders in the "Press (mis)Information Bureau" issued a press release making the "staggeringly out-of-touch" claim that India is among the world's most equal societies, Ramesh said in a a press statement issued on July 6, the Congress once again warned that the government's data interpretation was based on the limited availability and the uncertain quality of existing data, as well as to the selection of dated benchmarks to measure poverty, he it emerges that the Modi government was not only "negligent" in its analysis of the World Bank report , it was also outright "intellectually dishonest", Ramesh claimed that to arrive at its conclusion, the Modi government deliberately chose to use two different benchmarks: consumption inequality in India and income inequality in other countries."A comparison between two entities requires us to use the same metric to judge them. This is not just a fundamental principle of economic analysis, but one of common sense" Ramesh choice to measure consumption inequality in India was also deliberate, he pointed out that consumption inequality is always less than income inequality since the rich save a large part of their income."When we compare India's income equality to that of the rest of the world, India performs extremely poorly: India is ranked 176 out of a total of 216 countries in 2019. In other words, India is not the 4th most equal society - it is actually the 40th most unequal society in the world," he claimed."Income inequality in India has grown, and worsened in the last few years under the Modi Raj," Ramesh inequality in India is even higher than income inequality, reflecting the disproportionate gains of the elite in the last 11 years of cronyism, he said."Such fraudulent analysis, being published through the auspices of the PIB, reveals one of two things: a disturbing lack of talent in this government, or an equally disturbing lack of intellectual integrity. The PIB must clarify as to the origins of this press release and retract it immediately," Ramesh said."There has been a dangerous trend of such random ad-hoc statements and declarations coming from the Modi Government's officials," he claimed."In May 2025, we saw a similar flurry of incoherent and diverging statements from NITI Aayog officials on the size of the Indian economy. The political leadership's penchant for distortion and propaganda has clearly trickled down to officials as well," Ramesh "doctoring data", the Modi government cannot simply wish away the stark reality of what is staring us in the face - growing and deepening inequalities, driven by its mindsets and policies, he its release, the government attributed the reduction in inequality to various initiatives and schemes pursued during the last decade."...India's Gini Index stands at 25.5, making it the fourth most equal country in the world, after the Slovak Republic, Slovenia and Belarus," the statement said.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bihar elections: SC agrees to hear pleas challenging EC's electoral roll decision amid political uproar
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear pleas challenging the Election Commission of India's decision to conduct a Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. This decision follows opposition from the INDIA bloc, led by RJD MP Dr. Manoj Jha, who questioned the revision's timing and process. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Bihar's SIR impact Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Amid a political uproar, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a batch of pleas challenging the Election Commission of India 's move to conduct a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar on July move comes as the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and the Trinamool Congress (TMC) approached the apex court, challenging the poll panel's decision to carry out a electoral rolls' revision activity in Bihar just months ahead of the Assembly elections. RJD's Manoj Jha has contended that one of the most affected classes are the migrant workers, many of whom despite remaining listed in the 2003 voter rolls, are unlikely to be able to return to Bihar within the stipulated time frame of 30 days to submit their enumeration forms leading to automatic deletion of their names from the electoral roll in violation of R 21A of the Registration of Electors Rules, had also indicated that they were exploring multiple options, including legal action and a mass agitation, to oppose the SIR in poll-bound Bihar, according to an ET spokesperson Pawan Khera told reporters that the party had 'lost all faith in the ECI brass' after a meeting between Opposition leaders and the Election Commission the previous day. He alleged that the Commission's top officials were behaving like 'bicholia' (middlemen) of the the Election Commission on Friday said that nearly 87 per cent of Bihar's 7.96 crore voters have already been provided with semi-filled enumeration forms as part of the ongoing SIR exercise. The forms were distributed during the first visit of booth-level officers (BLOs) to nearly 1.5 crore households across the to the EC, over 6.86 crore forms have been handed out so far, with nearly 38 lakh already collected by BLOs. The Commission stated that the revision process is guided by the principle of 'Inclusion First' to ensure that no eligible voter is left addition, around 1.55 lakh booth-level agents (BLAs) appointed by political parties are also taking part in the process. Each BLA is allowed to submit up to 50 certified forms per 2025 SIR in Bihar is different on several counts. While an 'intensive' revision mostly involves a 'de novo' exercise, drawing up a fresh electoral roll from the scratch, the Bihar SIR is using the 2002-03 electoral roll as a base to build upon. At the same time, it involves a new pre-printed enumeration form included in the usual house-to-house verification format and document submission, associated with an 'intensive' revision. It is, also, very different from previous intensive revision exercises in terms of has seldom ordered a full state and full-scale intensive revision in a state 4-6 months ahead of scheduled assembly elections, as is the case with Bihar. Bihar saw its last intensive revision in 2002, a good three years away from the assembly polls held in October when the EC, on June 29, 2004 announced an intensive roll revision in eight states, it chose to leave out two states which were pending a similar intensive roll revision. These were Arunachal Pradesh & Maharashtra where assembly polls were due in October EC has, in fact, often conducted 'intensive' revision in certain areas of a state.
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court to hear on July 10 pleas challenging SIR in Bihar
The Supreme Court has scheduled an urgent hearing of petitions challenging the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar on Thursday (July 10, 2025). Almost 2.93 crore voters in Bihar must produce documents establishing the date and place of their own birth as well as of their parents in the case of those born after 1987, as an SIR of the State's electoral rolls began on June 28, 2025. The petitions were mentioned for early hearing before a Bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi by a battery of lawyers, including senior advocates Kapil Sibal, A.M. Singhvi, Gopal Sankaranarayanan and Shadan Farasat. The petitioners included RJD MP Manoj Jha, TMC MP Mahua Moitra, Association for Democratic Reforms activist Yogendra Yadav, among others. The court asked the petitioners to supply the Union government, the Election Commission of India (ECI) and other respondents arraigned with the copies of their petitions in advance. The court also mentioned serving copies of the petitions to the Attorney General of India. Mr. Singhvi said the SIR notification of June 24 imposes stringent deadlines on crores of poor and marginalised voters in Bihar to produce documents, not including Aadhaar and ration card, to prove their domicility. Mr. Sibal said the Bench must issue notice to the ECI and ensure that the poll body explain the hasty timeline to conduct the SIR of electoral rolls in poll-boind Bihar which ran the risk of disenfranchising crores of voters in the State. The ECI said that it has decided to start the SIR exercise across the whole country, starting with Bihar, with schedules for this to be issued separately. The Opposition INDIA bloc recently said it was mulling exploring legal options to challenge the poll body's move. Opposition leaders have underlined that the EC has more or less confirmed that the revision could weed out 20% of the State's population, who migrate for work.
