Zinke says he's a ‘no' on Senate megabill amid public land sales push
Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke said on Thursday he'll vote against the Senate's version of the GOP megabill over a provision that would mandate the sale of up to 1.2 million acres of public lands.
The Republican's internal disagreements on the public land sales measure poses yet another complication in negotiations over a bill on which House Republicans can only afford to lose three votes.
'I agree with my colleagues that the federal government has mismanaged federal lands for decades. But I don't agree with their solution,' said Zinke, who was Interior Secretary during Trump's first term, in a post on the social media platform X.
'The solution is not to sell public lands,' he added. 'I remain a no on the senate reconciliation bill.'
In a separate interview with CNN that Zinke also posted on social media Thursday, he pushed back on land sale supporters' argument that the land can be used for affordable housing.
'Affordable housing is tens of acres, not millions of acres,' he said.
He's not the only GOP lawmaker to come out against the provision. Rep. Cliff Bentz (R-Ore.) issued a statement dissing the bill on Wednesday.
'I do support and encourage sale or exchange of parcels of federal land when there is a clear economic or social demand for such disposition, and when that disposition follows appropriate procedure and is generally supported by those affected,' he said in a written statement.
'I do not support a mandated disposition of millions of acres of federal land, the amount of which was arbitrarily established, the primary goal not being to respond to demand, but instead being the removal of land from federal ownership,' he added.
It's not clear whether he'd also vote against the bill over the disagreements.
An original proposal — from Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) — would have required the sales of between 2.2 and 3.3 million acres of land owned by the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
After that proposal was rejected by the Senate parliamentarian, Lee drafted a new version that would require the sale of up to 1.2 million acres of BLM land. It's not entirely clear if the parliamentarian will approve the new version.
The intraparty discord on the matter adds further complications to already difficult internal negotiations over Medicaid cuts, federal tax deductions in areas with high local taxes and the phaseout of incentives for low-carbon energy.
Meanwhile, the White House insists it would like to see a deal reached by next Friday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
35 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump is unsuitable for office. But he was right to bomb Iran.
Do you think Trump was right to bomb Iran? Do you think he should have waited for approval from Congress? Are you concerned about the threat of nuclear war? Here's what readers told us. It's been more than a week since the United States entered the conflict between Iran and Israel on June 21, dropping more than a dozen 30,000-pound "bunker buster" bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Iran retaliated on June 23 with an attack on a U.S. military base in Qatar. The days that followed have brought with them a fragile ceasefire, first announced on Truth Social – and seemingly without the approval of Iran and Israel – by President Donald Trump. Since then, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and others in the Trump administration have been engaged in a back-and-forth about how much damage those bombs really did to Iran's nuclear capabilities – and while the world is breathing a little easier than it was nine days ago, tensions in the Middle East remain high. We wanted to know what you thought about all this. So, we asked. Do you think Trump was right to bomb Iran? Do you think he should have waited for approval from Congress? Are you concerned about the threat of nuclear war? Hundreds of readers wrote in for this installment of USA TODAY's Opinion Forum, sharing their opinions from across the country and political spectrum. Here's what they said. Trump is immoral and unsuitable for office. But bombing Iran was right. The air strikes were the right decision. Iran cannot be permitted to develop nuclear weapons. We should believe its leaders when they say 'Death to America." I should also mention that I normally vote Republican, but I've never voted for Donald Trump. I believe him to be an immoral, intemperate man unsuited for any public office. Presidents have been ordering military actions without congressional authorization for some time. However, that doesn't make it right. Still, as divided as Congress is, I don't believe he would have gotten the green light and we very much needed to act. Further retaliation by Iran is always a possibility. One has to know that once the act is completed, the other side may retaliate. Sometimes, however, the risk must be taken. While the U.S. intelligence community said Iran was not close to developing a nuclear weapon, the intelligence community has been wrong before. Trump is going to do whatever he wants to do. He is a bit of a loose cannon. — Kevin O'Grady, Columbus, Ohio Trump said he'd think about it for 2 weeks, then bombs! I do not think Trump made the right decision in bombing three Iranian nuclear sites. There was no emergency and no reason to do it. He said on June 19 he was going to consider it for two weeks and then, two days later, bombs! He has no idea what that little stunt costs – to deploy those types of weapons. He did it to show that he was powerful enough to do it. He has no idea what could result from it. He is an ignoramus! I think the fact that he acted on his own, without authorization from Congress, is a good reason to impeach him. He has already walked all over Congress and the court systems, doing things he does not have the authority to do. He should be impeached. In terms of him saying Iran was close to developing a nuclear weapon, the U.S. intelligence community said otherwise. I think Trump is dumb and has no idea what the truth is. I am slightly concerned about Iran's nuclear capabilities or the possibility of them receiving nuclear weapons from an ally. And I am slightly concerned about the threat of nuclear war. — Diane Whitlock, Waynesville, North Carolina Iran strikes are better than kumbaya attitudes in Congress I absolutely think Trump made the right decision in bombing the Iranian nuclear sites. Iran and many other bad state actors, and their proxies, represent existential threats to the U.S. Bad behavior must not be tolerated. We are neither empire building, nor are we regime changing in our defensive actions. I'm not in the least concerned about Trump ordering the strikes without congressional authorization. He was elected by a majority of American voters to stop the passive, kumbaya attitudes prevailing in the White House and Congress. Congress needs term limits, because the polarization is cause and effect of lobbyists being catalysts for wealth and power acquisition through longer seniority. As for the intelligence community's different assessment than Trump about how close Iran was to developing a nuclear weapon, who cares? When your public posture and oft-stated goals are the destruction of America, the degree of 'close to having' is a euphemism for panty waists to wring their hands and experience angst until it's not close, but NOW. — Robert Jarrard, Shrewsbury, Massachusetts Israel goaded Trump into military action This administration is the least equipped to make complex foreign policy decisions than any other one in this history of the U.S. At least in the first Trump administration there were some competent Cabinet officers and advisers, but now there is nobody to stop him from his worst impulses. Israel very effectively goaded Trump into this war action and it helped Trump domestically, at least in the short run, by taking attention away from his low approval ratings, the unlawful immigration raids, the protests and the lack of any tariff deals. It concerns me that Trump did not get congressional approval before the strikes. There was no urgency or exigency to having to make this decision. Even though the GOP Congress might well have rubber-stamped his decision, Trump is taking every avenue to consolidate his executive power, and Congress is aiding and abetting this by not asserting its constitutional rights. Iran has already performatively fired missiles at U.S. military installations in Qatar, with pre-warning. The supreme leader of Iran has to save face, and this might well be enough for him. I am more concerned that Trump is a loose cannon, and if he feels that his power is slipping he will escalate this to try to get a "rally round the flag" approval bump. In short, I simply do not trust him to act in the best interest of anyone but himself, certainly not in the interest of the American people. Israel has a vested interest in making it seem like a nuclear weapon is imminent. I believe the U.S. intelligence community on this. Trump notoriously refuses to hear briefings or pay any attention to actual facts, but instead relies on "his instincts," which are basically messages from Fox News. — Patricia Gotschalk, Wailuku, Hawaii Limits on bombing helped make it acceptable I do think President Trump made the right decision in bombing the three Iranian nuclear sites. It seems like it was limited in scope to only neutralizing the nuclear threats. And I'm not concerned about him acting on his own presidential authority, without authorization from Congress. There's a long history of presidents launching attacks like this one. As for additional retaliation by Iran, I'm not concerned because it's too far away and it's not a military power. With Trump's disagreement with the the U.S. intelligence community about whether Iran was close to developing a nuclear weapon, I think its nuclear program exceeds civilian use. Why have it secluded in the mountains unless it's to weaponize it? And while I'm slightly concerned about Iran's nuclear capabilities and the possibility it could receive nuclear weapons from an ally, I'm not at all concerned about the threat of nuclear war. — Scott Forrester, Phoenix, Arizona
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Heckler shouts over Senate debate on Trump's ‘beautiful' megabill: ‘You people are awful'
A heckler interrupted a Senate debate on President Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill', yelling out 'you people are awful'. Representatives were holding a heated debate Sunday night that discussed Trump's megabill, which proposes tax cuts, new Medicaid requirements, and SALT tax deductions, in a bid to inject cash into Trump's rigorous immigration agenda and revised military budget. The unidentified interrupter burst onto the Senate floor just after 7 p.m., just as Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders had concluded his speech opposing the bill. 'This bill is not what the American people want, and I hope very much we can defeat it,' Sanders was heard saying in his concluding speech moments before. 'Thank you very much.' Sanders has branded the bill 'probably the worst piece of legislation in modern history,' claiming 'it attacks the most vulnerable people while giving massive tax breaks to billionaires.' Just as he finished, a livestream of the debate caught a muffled voice in the background. 'You people are awful,' the heckler yelled. 'You're awful. You're awful.' Presiding officer Sen. Dave McCormick quickly interjected and told the sergeant at arms to 'restore order in the gallery.' However, the heckler continued to yell out as officials raced to restore calm. The protester was then heard saying, 'You're horrible,' just before the chamber returned to silence. The heckler has yet to be identified. The 940 page megabill has been redrafted several times. On Saturday, Republicans narrowly voted 51-49 to advance it despite the opposition of two GOP lawmakers. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer told Democratic senators Saturday he would demand a full reading of the megabill on the Senate floor once Republicans vote to proceed to the legislation. The act could take hours and delay a final passage of President Trump's agenda by half a day, at least. "Republicans won't tell America what's in the bill. So Democrats are forcing it to be read start to finish on the floor,' Schumer said Saturday. Meanwhile, Trump's former 'first buddy' Elon Musk branded the bill as 'utterly insane and destructive' in a post on X ahead of the vote. Trump placed a 4 July deadline for representatives to pass the bill. Following the narrow victory Saturday, he took to Truth Social to declare 'a GREAT VICTORY in the Senate with the 'GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL.'
Bloomberg
44 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
The Independent Federal Reserve Is on Death Row
President Donald Trump and his Republican-controlled Congress have already repudiated two of the three commandments that guided US economic policy for decades: Promote international trade; maintain at least some semblance of fiscal control. The third — de—legate monetary policy to an operationally independent central bank — is also now marked for deletion. Each departure from the pre-Trump consensus on trade, budgets and monetary policy would be damaging in its own right, but the combination of all three involves a quite different order of risk. Disempowering the Federal Reserve just as concerns are mounting about tariff-driven inflation and surging public debt threatens, sooner or later, a perfect economic storm.
