Treasurer Jim Chalmers says recognition of Palestine is inevitable as global momentum builds, but warns Hamas must be excluded from governance
His remarks come as Canada joins France and the United Kingdom in declaring their intention to recognise a Palestinian state, provided key conditions are met, including the exclusion of Hamas from any future leadership and the release of Israeli hostages.
Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed Canada would proceed with recognition by September, conditional on agreements from the West Bank's governing authority.
His move follows a wave of diplomatic momentum among Western allies, as global leaders prepare for a high-stakes showdown at the UN General Assembly in September 9.
Mr Chalmers welcomed the international developments and said the Albanese government was in ongoing talks with global counterparts to chart Australia's next steps.
'The Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister will respond in due course, but I welcome this momentum and this progress in the international community,' Mr Chalmers told Sky News.
'From an Australian point of view the recognition of the state of Palestine is a matter of when not if.
'So, in that light, this progress is welcome, but it is also conditional. As Prime Minister Carney said and as Prime Minister Albanese said, we need to make sure that there is no role for Hamas in any future leadership. We need to make sure that the hostages are released too.
'Our support is conditional in overcoming some of those obstacles. So, it's a matter of when not if.'
Despite the clarity of direction, Mr Chalmers echoed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's caution about setting a deadline for recognition, insisting that timing would depend on international conditions and negotiations.
'We'll make our decisions on this matter. I think there were good reasons yesterday why the Prime Minister was reluctant to set a time frame on this,' he said.
'There are obstacles to overcome, but we see the recognition for the state of Palestine as an important step towards a two-state solution.
'It's the best pathway out of this enduring cycle of violence, and most importantly, so that Israeli families and Palestinian families can raise their kids in peace. That's what this is all about.'
Mr Albanese, speaking yesterday, stopped short of confirming a timeline, but reiterated his lifelong support for a two-state solution and hinted that the moment for meaningful change may finally be approaching.
'Sometimes out of a crisis comes a moment of opportunity to actually advance forward in a real way, advance forward for Israelis and Palestinians,' he said.
'I've said for a long time, my entire political life, I support two states: the right of Israel to exist within secure borders and the right of Palestinians to have their legitimate aspirations for their own state realised. That's my objective, not making a statement, not winning a political point, but achieving that.'
Mr Chalmers also addressed criticism that recognising Palestine now would amount to rewarding Hamas, firmly rejecting the suggestion.
'I don't see it that way. We heard it from Prime Minister Carney and Prime Minister Albanese that the hostages are released and there is no role for Hamas in the future of a Palestinian state,' he said.
'That is a key consideration for all the like-minded countries in the world that have been working through these issues in conjunction with us that Hamas is not rewarded and that Hamas has no role.'
The international push remains fraught with geopolitical tension, with US President Donald Trump opposing any move to recognise Palestine.
But Australia's top leaders appear undeterred, determined to shape a diplomatic path that could finally bring a two-state solution back within reach.
'There is a lot of discussion with our counterparts in the international community, and the Prime Minister, the Foreign Minister, and the Cabinet are considering the best way forward,' Mr Chalmers said.
'The Prime Minister didn't put a timeframe on that yesterday, so, I won't be putting a timeframe on it this morning.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
24 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Emissions reduction 'central' to boosting productivity
An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals.


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Australia commits to more food, medical aid for Gaza
Australia has pledged an extra $20 million in humanitarian assistance for women and children in war-torn Gaza after more than 100,000 turned out in protest across the country to spotlight suffering in the besieged enclave. The funding will go to organisations able to deliver desperately needed food, medical supplies and other lifesaving support, the federal government said in a statement on Sunday. The new package of support includes $6 million for the United Nations World Food Programme for the provision and distribution of food supplies and $5 million for UNICEF for nutritional support for children at risk of starvation. The International Committee of the Red Cross will also receive $5 million to help those in Gaza meet essential needs, including access to health care. An additional $2 million for relief support with the UK will be donated through an existing partnership arrangement, while $2 million will go to the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization to provide medical supplies to support the operation of field hospitals in Gaza. Australia has so far committed $130 million in humanitarian assistance to help civilians in Gaza and Lebanon since October 7, 2023. But the Albanese government has been criticised for not doing enough in addressing what the UN has described as worsening famine conditions in Gaza. About 90,000 people turned the Sydney Harbour Bridge into a sea of Palestinian flags on Sunday while tens of thousands more met at similar protests in Melbourne and Adelaide. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australia has "consistently been part of the international call on Israel to allow a full and immediate resumption of aid to Gaza". "The suffering and starvation of civilians in Gaza must end," she said. "Australia will continue to work with the international community to call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, the release of hostages and a two-state solution - the only path to enduring peace and security for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples." Mr Albanese is standing firm against increasing pressure to recognise a Palestinian state after British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the United Kingdom would do so unless Israel moved to secure a ceasefire and increase humanitarian aid into Gaza. The UK move comes after France became the first G7 country to say it would recognise Palestine ahead of a UN meeting in September. Mr Albanese said while the world was horrified at Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which resulted in thousands of deaths and some 200 people being taken hostage, the subsequent war had cost too many innocent lives. Gaza's health ministry says 60,000 people have been killed during Israel's subsequent counteroffensive. Israel has restricted food and medical supplies from entering Gaza, where it controls all entry points, to put pressure on Hamas. International pressure is mounting on the nation state to let in more humanitarian aid, as deaths attributed to malnutrition rise. Israel denies there is starvation in the besieged strip despite international human rights groups branding Israel's offensive in Gaza a genocide and attributing deaths to starvation.


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Emissions reduction 'central' to boosting productivity
An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals.