logo
Trump aims to shut trade loopholes China uses to evade tariffs

Trump aims to shut trade loopholes China uses to evade tariffs

President Donald Trump 's two-tiered trade deal with Vietnam aims squarely at practices China has long used to skirt US tariffs: The widespread legal shifting of production to Southeast Asian factories and the murkier and illegal 'origin washing' of exports through their ports.
The agreement slaps a 20% tariff on Vietnamese exports to the US and a 40% levy on goods deemed to be transshipped through the country. With details still scarce, economists said much will hinge on the framework Washington establishes to determine what it sees as 'Made in Vietnam' and what it sees as transshipments.
Complicating matters is the fact that Chinese businesses have rushed to set up shop across Southeast Asia since Trump launched his first trade war back in 2018. The lion's share of Vietnam's exports to the US are goods like Airpods, phones or other products assembled with Chinese components in a factory in Vietnam and then shipped to America. That's not illegal.
'A lot will depend on how the 40% tariffs are applied. If the Trump administration keeps it targeted, it should be manageable,' said Roland Rajah, lead economist at the Lowy Institute in Sydney. 'If the approach is too broad and blunt, then it could be quite damaging' for China, Vietnam and for the US, which will have to pay higher import prices, he said.
The think tank estimates that 28% of Vietnamese exports to the US were made up of Chinese content in 2022, up from 9% in 2018.
Pham Luu Hung, chief economist at SSI Securities Corp. in Hanoi, said a 40% levy on transshipped goods would have limited impact on Vietnam's economy because they aren't of Vietnamese origin in the first place. Re-routed exports accounted for just 16.5% of Vietnam's shipments to the US in 2021, a share that's likely declined over the past couple of years amid stronger enforcement actions by both governments, Hung said.
'An important caveat is that the rules of origin remain under negotiation,' Hung said. 'In practice, these rules may have a greater impact than the tariff rates themselves.'
Duncan Wrigley, chief China economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said he's skeptical the latest deal will be effective in stamping out Chinese exports via Vietnam to the US.
'The devil is in the details, but I think China's exports will either go via other markets to the US, or some value-added will be done in Vietnam so the product counts as made in Vietnam, rather than a transshipment,' he said.
As officials across Asia rushed to negotiate lower US tariff levels with their US counterparts this year, Chinese businesses have been just as quick to ramp up their exports through alternative channels in order to skirt punitive US levies.
Shipments from China to Southeast Asia have reached record highs in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam this year. And there's been a 'significant increase in correlation' to the region's increase in exports to the US during the same period, Citigroup Inc. economists said in a recent report.
Much of that is likely due to the shifting of legitimate production across the region. Goods destined for the US market may be sent from their factories in Southeast Asia, and what they make in their factories in China will be sent to the rest of the world, said Derrick Kam, Asia economist at Morgan Stanley.
'If you try to represent that in the trade data, it will look exactly like rerouting, but it's not,' Kam said. 'It's essentially the supply chain working itself out.'
But it's transshipment that's been a major concern for Trump's top trade advisers including Peter Navarro, who described Vietnam as 'essentially a colony of communist China' during an April interview with Fox News.
And it's not just been happening in Vietnam.
Not long after Trump unveiled his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on April 2, garment makers in Indonesia started receiving offers from Chinese companies to be 'partners in transshipment,' said Redma Gita Wirawasta, chairman of the Indonesian Filament Yarn and Fiber Producers Association.
Chinese products would be rerouted to Indonesia, undergo minimal processing like repacking or relabeling, then secure a certification that they were made in the Southeast Asian country, Wirawasta said.
When the goods are then exported to the US, they'd be subject to the 10% universal levy that Trump has imposed on nearly all countries, instead of the tariff for China that still equates to an effective level of over 50%, even after a recent 'deal' that lowered levies from a peak of 145%.
With the huge scope for arbitrage, coupled with little policing, that process will prove tough to stamp out.
'Chinese exporters and their affiliates and partners in Southeast Asia are highly skilled at adapting to changing rules, identifying loopholes, and sometimes overstating the extent of value-add by non-China countries,' said Gabriel Wildau, managing director at advisory firm Teneo Holdings LLC in New York.
Some final assembly or transshipment may shift to rival Southeast Asian transshipment hubs like Cambodia, Thailand and Singapore, or farther afield to Turkey, Hungary or Poland, Wildau said.
'Another possibility is that the definitions and enforcement mechanisms are fuzzy, rendering the latest deal cosmetic and toothless,' he said. 'Rigorous enforcement would also require a significant boost of resources to enable US customs to verify compliance with the tougher rules of origin.'
There have been efforts across the region to at least be seen to be making an effort to curb the practice. Indeed, Vietnam has made a big deal about cracking down on trade fraud and illegal activity in recent months.
In April, South Korea said it seized more than $20 million worth of goods with falsified origin labels — the majority of which were destined for the US. The Airfreight Forwarders Association of Malaysia issued a warning in May as Chinese brokers promoted illegal rerouting services on social media.
Malaysia has centralized the issuance of certificates of origin with its Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry, while tapping its customs agency to help curb transshipment. Thailand has expanded its watch list for high-risk products, including solar panels, cars and parts, and is mulling stricter penalties for violators.
Casey Barnett, the president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Cambodia, is already seeing the changes in action. One factory that exports to major US retailers, including Walmart, Home Depot and Lowe's, said that customs officials were very carefully reviewing their products before being sent to the US, he said.
'It's creating some additional paperwork and a little bit of red tape here,' Barnett said.
A senior manager at a logistics company in Cambodia, who asked not to be identified because the matter is sensitive, said export processing time has now stretched to as much as 14 working days — double what it was before.
But in Indonesia, getting a certificate of origin is fairly quick and painless when goods are marked for export, often just requiring a product list and a letter to the provincial trade office, according to Wirawasta. Authorities prioritize checking products that enter the country to ensure they pay the right duties and comply with regulations, he explained. It's rare for them to inspect factories where an export good was supposedly made.
So much so that sometimes, Chinese companies don't even need to muster up some local processing. 'The T-shirt could be finished in China, with a 'Made in Indonesia' label already sewn on,' Wirawasta said.
'Some traders won't even bother to unload the goods from the shipping container,' he added. 'Unloading costs money.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SMCP: Towards a resolution of the 15.5% capital dispute?
SMCP: Towards a resolution of the 15.5% capital dispute?

Fashion Network

timean hour ago

  • Fashion Network

SMCP: Towards a resolution of the 15.5% capital dispute?

The incredible imbroglio surrounding the governance of French luxury brand group SMCP is drawing closer to a conclusion. On Friday, the group announced in a press release "that it has been informed that the Singapore High Court has today decided to order Dynamic Treasure Group Ltd (DTG) to return to European Topsoho S.à r.l. (ETS) the 15.5% stake in SMCP that was transferred to it in 2021". This restitution must be carried out within one week of the ruling. The wording may seem complex. But for SMCP's creditors, who have been united under the GLAS trustee since the beginning of this rocky affair pitting them against the family of the group's former Chinese owners, it could mean recovering the missing share of capital that "vanished" four years ago. At the time, European Topsoho, the 53% shareholder owned by Yafu Qiu, former chairman of SMCP's board of directors and head of the Chinese Shandong Ruyi group, had discreetly sold over 15% of the capital in the midst of a financial slump. An investigation revealed that these shares had become the property of a company called Dynamic Treasure Group, a holding company run by Chenran Qiu, daughter of Yafu Qiu. Since then, legal proceedings have multiplied. After a British High Court ruling on the case a year ago, followed by a victory for GLAS on appeal, the proceedings were transferred to Singapore, where the shares are held. This time, the Singapore decision is once again in favor of GLAS. However, DTG still has the option of appealing and thus postponing the return of these shares. Why are these legal issues important for a minority shareholding? Because GLAS brings together European Topsoho's creditors, who have been saying since the beginning of this affair that they don't want to be shareholders in a brand. They intend to sell their stake in the parent company of Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot and Fursac, which generates annual sales of over €1 billion. The return of their 15.5% stake would enable them to move forward with a project to sell their 53% stake, while the group's market capitalization stands at 356 million euros, with a share price of 4.55 euros a few minutes before the close of trading on the Paris Bourse on July 4. While at its peak, the share price had flirted with 25 euros per share in 2019, it was recently closer to 2 euros and has rallied in recent months, up 23% since the start of the year. The end of the legal battle would therefore probably mean the start of a project to sell off the 53% stake. Financial backers, employees and partners of the French group are therefore keeping a close eye on the wording of DTG's potential appeal to Singapore. This article is an automatic translation. Click here to read the original article.

SMCP: Towards a resolution of the 15.5% capital dispute?
SMCP: Towards a resolution of the 15.5% capital dispute?

Fashion Network

timean hour ago

  • Fashion Network

SMCP: Towards a resolution of the 15.5% capital dispute?

The incredible imbroglio surrounding the governance of French luxury brand group SMCP is drawing closer to a conclusion. On Friday, the group announced in a press release "that it has been informed that the Singapore High Court has today decided to order Dynamic Treasure Group Ltd (DTG) to return to European Topsoho S.à r.l. (ETS) the 15.5% stake in SMCP that was transferred to it in 2021". This restitution must be carried out within one week of the ruling. The wording may seem complex. But for SMCP's creditors, who have been united under the GLAS trustee since the beginning of this rocky affair pitting them against the family of the group's former Chinese owners, it could mean recovering the missing share of capital that "vanished" four years ago. At the time, European Topsoho, the 53% shareholder owned by Yafu Qiu, former chairman of SMCP's board of directors and head of the Chinese Shandong Ruyi group, had discreetly sold over 15% of the capital in the midst of a financial slump. An investigation revealed that these shares had become the property of a company called Dynamic Treasure Group, a holding company run by Chenran Qiu, daughter of Yafu Qiu. Since then, legal proceedings have multiplied. After a British High Court ruling on the case a year ago, followed by a victory for GLAS on appeal, the proceedings were transferred to Singapore, where the shares are held. This time, the Singapore decision is once again in favor of GLAS. However, DTG still has the option of appealing and thus postponing the return of these shares. Why are these legal issues important for a minority shareholding? Because GLAS brings together European Topsoho's creditors, who have been saying since the beginning of this affair that they don't want to be shareholders in a brand. They intend to sell their stake in the parent company of Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot and Fursac, which generates annual sales of over €1 billion. The return of their 15.5% stake would enable them to move forward with a project to sell their 53% stake, while the group's market capitalization stands at 356 million euros, with a share price of 4.55 euros a few minutes before the close of trading on the Paris Bourse on July 4. While at its peak, the share price had flirted with 25 euros per share in 2019, it was recently closer to 2 euros and has rallied in recent months, up 23% since the start of the year. The end of the legal battle would therefore probably mean the start of a project to sell off the 53% stake. Financial backers, employees and partners of the French group are therefore keeping a close eye on the wording of DTG's potential appeal to Singapore.

Trump signs 'big, beautiful' bill on US Independence Day
Trump signs 'big, beautiful' bill on US Independence Day

LeMonde

timean hour ago

  • LeMonde

Trump signs 'big, beautiful' bill on US Independence Day

US President Donald Trump signed his flagship tax and spending bill into law on Friday, July 4, capping a pomp-laden White House Independence Day ceremony featuring a stealth bomber fly-by. "America is winning, winning, winning like never before," Trump said at the event where he signed the so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill" flanked by Republican lawmakers. The party fell into line and pushed the bill through a reluctant Congress on Thursday, in time for Trump to sign the bill as he had hoped on the Fourth of July holiday marking America's 249 th birthday. Two B-2 bombers of the type that recently struck Iranian nuclear sites roared over the White House at the start of the ceremony, accompanied by fighter jets on their wingtips. Pilots who carried out the bombing on Iran were among those invited to the White House event. The passage of the unpopular bill caps two weeks of significant wins for Trump, including an Iran-Israel ceasefire that was sealed after what he called the "flawless" US air strikes on Iran. Ever the showman, Trump melded his various victory laps into one piece of political theater at the ceremony marking 249 years of independence from Britain. The sprawling mega-bill honors many of Trump's campaign promises: extending tax cuts from his first term, boosting military spending and providing massive new funding for Trump's migrant deportation drive. Trump glossed over deep concerns from his own party and voters that it will balloon the national debt, while simultaneously gutting health and welfare support. "The largest spending cut," Trump said with First Lady Melania Trump at his side, "and yet you won't even notice it." Republican misgivings Trump forced through the "big beautiful bill" despite deep misgivings in the Republican Party − and the vocal opposition of his billionaire former ally, Elon Musk. It squeezed past a final vote in the House of Representatives 218-214 after Republican Speaker Mike Johnson worked through the night to corral the final group of dissenters. Trump thanked Johnson at the White House event. The legislation is the latest in a series of big wins for Trump that also included a Supreme Court ruling last week that curbed lone federal judges from blocking his policies, and a NATO deal to increase spending. But the bill is expected to pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the US deficit. At the same time it will shrink the federal food assistance program and force through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance scheme for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch. Up to 17 million people could lose their insurance coverage under the bill, according to some estimates. Scores of rural hospitals are expected to close as a result. Democrats hope public opposition to the bill will help them flip the House in the 2026 midterm election, pointing to data showing that it represents a huge redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store