logo
OPINION: Bayrou's budget has infuriated everyone and may force France into fresh elections

OPINION: Bayrou's budget has infuriated everyone and may force France into fresh elections

Local France16-07-2025
A freeze on all public spending, except on defence; no inflation-linked rise in pensions or welfare payments; a tax on the super wealthy; and - just to make sure the whole country was furious - the
abolition of two public holidays
.
This was an ambitious programme for a powerful prime minister with a large parliamentary majority and several years to impose his will before the next election.
Bayrou is the most unpopular Prime Minister for 60 years. He heads a quarrelsome coalition with a minority of seats in the National Assembly. His chances of surviving the Autumn as France's fourth prime minister in 20 months are small – and smaller after Tuesday's speech.
What was he trying to achieve? To end his 40-year career in French politics guns-blazing as the man who was right but ignored?
Advertisement
Bayrou's office rejects that interpretation. They say Tuesday's speech was aimed over the heads of politicians at an 'ordinary France' which understands that a proud, independent country can no longer afford to add to its Himalaya of €3.3 trillion of public debt.
The Prime Minister believes, they say, that the predictable rejection of his plan by oppositions of both Left and Far Right was just the beginning of a long negotiation. Bayrou plans to take no summer holiday. He believes that public opinion will come to his rescue.
His maximalist plan to cut the 2026 budget by €43.8 billion can be sold in amended form, he believes, to the Socialists if not the Far Right. The abolition of Easter Monday and May 8th as public holidays was intended to concentrate minds but fall away in the final negotiation.
This is the theory. There were no clear statements of support from the parties of the minority Centre and Centre-right coalition, other than Bayrou's own Modem. This is the Prime Minister's strategy alone.
His days are probably numbered and two numbers will decide his fate.
The first number is €43.8 billion. The Prime Minister is right to say that France needs to cut a large chunk from its deficit next year. But how can he or any other Prime Minister hope to correct 50 years of profligacy with no majority in the National Assembly?
The second number is 289. How can Bayrou avoid a censure motion in the Assembly in the autumn – 289 votes out of 577 are needed – when the mutually-detesting opposition groups of Left and Far Right seem determined to bring him down?
Bayrou's predecessor Michel Barnier survived only three months before he was toppled by his attempts to pass a deficit-cutting budget for 2025. Bayrou's career as PM will almost certainly be terminated by his attempts to pass a budget for 2026.
What will President Emmanuel Macron do then? He could call a new parliamentary election but that would solve little. He is more likely, I believe, to appoint a new Prime Minister – the fifth in less than two years – to try to pick a new way through the parliamentary-budgetary morass.
Advertisement
Only if that fails will Macron feel obliged to call a new legislative election late this year or in the spring (disrupting the important, municipal elections due in March).
None of the main players - whatever they may say - wants a new national election before the Presidential poll of April-May 2027.
President Macron was badly burned politically by his calamitous decision to hold a snap election last June and July. He thought he was going to be forced into an election within a couple of months anyway by the manoeuvres of the centre-right group in the National Assembly.
He recovered his power to dissolve the assembly last week after a constitution-imposed 12 months delay. He will be very reluctant to use that power again but may eventually have little choice.
The Left does not want a new election, whatever they may say. It would be difficult for them to reassemble their successful electoral alliance, the New Popular Front. They would risk losing many of the seats that they won last year.
Both Jean-Luc Mélenchon's hard left La France Insoumise and the divided Socialists would rather concentrate on the local elections of 2026 and presidential elections of 2027.
Advertisement
So why risk an election by censuring Bayrou and whoever succeeds him? The hard left is addicted to censure motions and its extreme anti-Macron rhetoric. Compromise is not in their nature.
The Socialists made a temporary deal with Bayrou to allow the 2025 budget to pass in February. Bayrou believes that he can appeal to their patriotism and good sense.
The more radical wing of the party won its leadership election last month. They are not in the mood to rescue Bayrou - and face up to France's profound budgetary problems – again.
Marine Le Pen's Far Right might do well in a new election.
She does not want one all the same. She would be banned from running again for her seat in Hénin-Beaumont near Lille after her five-year suspension from electoral office for embezzling EU funds last March.
She would rather wait for the outcome of her appeal next summer. A parliamentary election before then might tilt the balance of power within the Rassemblement National towards her Number Two, Jordan Bardella.
So why would Le Pen risk an election by censuring Bayrou and whoever succeeds him? She has painted herself into a corner.
She has rejected in advance almost all workable means of cutting France's budget deficit. She wants no freeze in pensions or social spending; no tax rises; no cuts which effect the middle classes. Her parliamentary party and electoral base would be furious if she crossed these red lines.
In sum, no one wants a new parliamentary election so close to 2027. Not the politicians. Not the electors. We may sleep-walk into one all the same.
To solve a budgetary problem which is a half-century in the making needs either a courageous government with a parliamentary majority or an opposition ready to negotiate on the deficit in good faith.
France has neither.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is there a genocide in Gaza? Why legal experts are split
Is there a genocide in Gaza? Why legal experts are split

LeMonde

time11 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Is there a genocide in Gaza? Why legal experts are split

Historians will provide their interpretation at some point in the future. But what about legal experts? When it comes to the question of whether a genocide is underway or has been committed by Israel against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, nearly all of them have an opinion. They have clashed in opinion pieces published in newspapers and scholarly journal articles. The debate had already been simmering for several months, but with a single sentence, President Emmanuel Macron brought it out into the open in the French public debate. On the evening of May 13, during an interview on broadcaster TF1, journalist Gilles Bouleau abruptly asked the head of state: "Does what is currently happening in Gaza constitute genocide?" Clearly prepared and looking solemn, the president answered without hesitation: "It is not for a political leader to use those terms; that is up to historians, in due time." The president neither endorsed nor condemned the use of the word "genocide." However, by deferring responsibility to historians and the passage of time, he appeared to overlook the fact that several legal proceedings are already underway, both before French courts and before relevant international bodies – the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC), both based in The Hague, Netherlands. Genocide brought up soon after October 7, 2023 The question of genocide and Gaza is not just a matter for historians to address through archival research. Above all, it is the domain of law experts – prosecutors, investigating judges, and lawyers – who are working directly on complaints, lawsuits, and appeals that have already been filed. For instance, the French National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor's Office, which is responsible for investigating cases of torture, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, requested in May that a probe be opened following a complaint for "complicity in genocide" and "direct incitement to genocide." This complaint had been filed against French-Israeli activists who obstructed the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza in 2023, 2024, and 2025. Only the investigation will determine whether there was complicity, and therefore a genocide, but this process could take several years.

Israel intercepts Gaza-bound boat Handala carrying food aid
Israel intercepts Gaza-bound boat Handala carrying food aid

Euronews

time15 hours ago

  • Euronews

Israel intercepts Gaza-bound boat Handala carrying food aid

The Israeli military intercepted a Gaza-bound aid ship seeking to provide aid to the Palestinian enclave, detaining 21 international activists and journalists, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition said on Sunday. The Flotilla Coalition said the Israeli military 'violently intercepted' the ship in international waters about 40 nautical miles from Gaza, cutting the cameras and communication just before midnight Saturday. 'All cargo was non-military, civilian, and intended for direct distribution to a population facing deliberate starvation and medical collapse under Israel's illegal blockade,'' the group said in a statement. According to the operators of the Handala vessel, the aid ship's cargo, intercepted by the Israeli military, contained baby formula, food, and medicine, and it sailed towards the port of Ashdod on Sunday, accompanied by an Israeli navy vessel. The cargo 'was non-military... and intended for direct distribution to a population facing deliberate starvation... under Israel's illegal blockade,'' it added. The Israeli military had no immediate comment, but Israel's Foreign Ministry posted that the navy stopped the vessel and was bringing it to shore. The Handala is the second ship operated by the coalition that Israel has prevented in recent months from delivering aid to Gaza. Greta Thunberg was among 12 activists on board the ship Madleen when the Israeli military seized it in June. The Swedish climate activist, alongside others, was later deported. French left-wing lawmakers among crew This time around, the ship carried what the Freedom Flotilla Coalition called a "diverse crew of activists, scholars, workers, artists, members of parliament, elected officials, and journalists from 12 countries." Among them are Gabrielle Cathala, a French MP representing Val-de-Marne and Emma Fourreau, a French-Swedish Member of the European Parliament (MEP), environmentalist, and pro-Palestinian activist. "They carry the dreams of millions of people across the world and bring with them a powerful message of international solidarity—that we will break Israel's illegal siege of Gaza," the group said. The latest interception comes as Israel faces mounting international criticism over the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza, with concern growing over rising hunger deaths in the Palestinian enclave. Italian and Spanish governments react Reacting to the development, Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said he had spoken this morning (Sunday) with Israeli Minister Gideon Sa'ar. The Handala had two Italian activists aboard before it was intercepted. They were detained on the Freedom Flotilla ship and have arrived in the port of Ashdod, where they will be assisted by staff from the Italian Embassy in Tel Aviv, an Italian government statement said. With one of its citizens aboard the intercepted Handala vessel, Spain's foreign affairs ministry said it had tasked its cooperation agency, the Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation, "to send everything needed to Gaza." The Spanish government said it planned to advocate for the State of Palestine and the 2-state solution at the UN General Assembly on Monday, describing what it called the "induced famine" in Gaza as "a disgrace". "Daily starvation deaths: 100,000 children and 40,000 babies are at risk of death. Israel must allow permanent, uninterrupted, and free passage of all necessary humanitarian aid", the Spanish government statement said. Meanwhile, a regional human rights group, Adalah, denounced Israel's interception of the Handala ship, saying the raid on the vessel violated international law. 'The flotilla never entered Israeli territorial waters, nor was it intended to do so; it was headed toward the territorial waters of the State of Palestine, as recognised under international law,' Adalah said in a statement. 'Israel has no legal jurisdiction or authority over the international waters in which the vessel was sailing,' its statement added. On Sunday, the Israeli military announced it had begun a limited pause in fighting in three populated areas of Gaza for 10 hours a day, after its announcement Saturday night that airdrops of aid would begin in Gaza, with humanitarian corridors opened for United Nations convoys.

Vichy's antisemitism: A dispute between historians heads to court
Vichy's antisemitism: A dispute between historians heads to court

LeMonde

timea day ago

  • LeMonde

Vichy's antisemitism: A dispute between historians heads to court

On July 17, 2022, French President Emmanuel Macron gave a speech to mark the 80 th anniversary of the Vel' d'Hiv roundup, the mass arrest of Jews by French police in Paris in July 1942. Without mentioning the obvious context of the German occupation, he underscored, emphasizing French responsibility, that "not a single soldier of Nazi Germany took part in the roundup of July 16 and 17, 1942. All of this stemmed from a will and a policy poisoned by antisemitism, initiated as early as July 1940." Faced with what they called the "silence" of the "official historians" in the face of this "manipulation of history," three historians, including two amateurs, decided to use this speech as the starting point for a book published the following year. Written by Jean-Marc Berlière, a respected historian of the French police, along with René Fiévet, an economist, and Emmanuel de Chambost, an engineer, Histoire d'une falsification: Vichy et la Shoah dans l'histoire officielle et le discours commémoratif ("History of a Falsification: Vichy and the Holocaust in Official History and Commemorative Discourse") took aim at "these 'court historians' and presidents of the Republic, all busy making the French feel guilty," and aimed to "restore the complexity to a question that cannot be reduced to a purely Vichyite initiative." In July 2023, historian Laurent Joly, a specialist in the Vichy regime who also found the memorial discourse riddled with approximations and anachronisms, published a lengthy, detailed critique of the book in the Revue d'histoire Moderne et Contemporaine, tracing its "intellectual genealogy." "(...) Such a book does not come out of nowhere. It is part of a history of the historiography of Vichy and the crimes of collaboration, which for decades have inspired a whole literature seeking to minimize their gravity, up to the recent provocations of [far-right politician] Eric Zemmour." The Comité de vigilance face aux usages publics de l'histoire (CVUH), a non-profit organization fighting against the misuse of history in the public sphere, also published a note signed by feminist historian Michèle Riot-Sarcey, which referenced Joly's article.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store