Carl Bildt: Sweden should help migrants who wish to leave after integration failures
In an interview in Abu Dhabi on Tuesday, which took place on the sidelines of the Raisina Middle East forum in Abu Dhabi, Mr Bildt also shared his views on the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, the growing importance of artificial intelligence in public policymaking and the role of social media in the western political discourse.
In Sweden, where the government in September announced it plans to offer more than $34,000 to migrants who want to return to their countries of origin, Mr Bildt says there is a growing 'recognition that [immigration] went somewhat too fast'.
'Integration takes time, and we didn't give it the attention that we should have.'
Mr Bildt also attributed a rise in criminality and gangs in Sweden to these policy failures. 'And that has led to a political reaction…You see it in all European countries.'
On Sweden's financial offer to incentivise migrants to return, Mr Bildt says 'there are quite a number of people who want to go back' – particularly Syrians, many of whom he says want to return even in spite of Sweden's foreign ministry advising against travel to Syria.
"I think it is fair enough that we give them some help," he said.
Critics of the plan say it could hinder efforts to encourage integration among immigrants further by sending a message across society that non-native Swedes do not belong.
'The key thing,' Mr Bildt says, is that 'this is a voluntary arrangement'.
'If they don't want [to leave]…then integration is the name of the game.'
Throughout Europe, some far-right politicians have mooted ' remigration ', in which governments ought to try to repatriate immigrants to their country of origin, in some cases even after they have acquired European citizenship. The idea has picked up steam in populist circles, including within Germany's right-wing party Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD).
While Mr Bildt acknowledged far-right 'tendencies' in Europe, he said he was more worried about trends in American society.
'If you look at opinion polls in the US, you have roughly 70 per cent of people who have been saying consistently for years that the country is moving in the wrong direction,' he said. 'If you put the same question to people in Europe, those figures are much lower.
'There is a distinct difference between what we see in Europe and the intense polarisation of American society.'
Last week, American billionaire Elon Musk addressed an AfD campaign event in Germany via video link, where he warned that multiculturalism 'dilutes everything'.
'I'm interested to see how it works out in Germany,' Mr Bildt said. 'Whether Elon Musk's intervention has a positive or negative effect, because there could also be a backlash against it. I mean, Americans coming in and preaching to the German electorate is not necessarily something that is appreciated. Could be. Remains to be seen.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ARN News Center
2 hours ago
- ARN News Center
25 nations condemn Israel over 'inhumane killing' of Palestinians
A group of 25 Western countries including Britain, France and Canada said that Israel must immediately end its war in Gaza and criticised what they called the "inhumane killing" of Palestinians, including hundreds near food distribution sites. The countries in a joint statement condemned what they called the "drip feeding of aid" to Palestinians in Gaza and said it was "horrifying" that more than 800 civilians had been killed while seeking aid. The majority of those killed were in the vicinity of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) sites, which the US and Israel backed to take over aid distribution in Gaza from a network led by the United Nations. "The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity," the countries' foreign ministers said in a joint statement. "The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths." The call by about 20 European countries, as well as Canada, Australia and New Zealand, for an end to the war in Gaza and the delivery of aid comes from many countries which are allied with Israel and its most important backer, the US. Among those calling for an end to the war are four out of five countries in the so-called Five Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance, which includes the US. Israel's foreign ministry said the statement was "disconnected from reality" and it would send the wrong message to Hamas. "The statement fails to focus the pressure on Hamas and fails to recognise Hamas's role and responsibility for the situation," the Israeli statement said. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar later said he spoke with his British counterpart David Lammy on Monday on regional issues, including Gaza. He blamed Hamas "for the suffering of the population and the continuation of the war". The US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, called the statement "disgusting" and said blaming Israel was "irrational" because Hamas rejects every proposal to end the war. The plea from the other Western nations came as Israeli tanks pushed into southern and eastern districts of the Gazan city of Deir al-Balah for the first time on Monday. Much of Gaza has been reduced to a wasteland during more than 21 months of the war on Gaza that began when Hamas fighters stormed into Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages back to Gaza, according to Israeli tallies. Israel's campaign in Gaza has killed more than 59,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, with the latest deaths reported on Monday as Israel began a new incursion in central Gaza. The countries behind the statement said Israel was denying essential humanitarian assistance and called on the country to comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law. They urged Israel to immediately lift restrictions to allow the flow of aid and to enable humanitarian organisations and the UN to operate safely and effectively. They added they were "prepared to take further action to support an immediate ceasefire and a political pathway to security and peace" for Israelis and Palestinians.
Middle East Eye
7 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Harvard battles Trump administration in court over $2.6bn funding cut
Harvard University took its fight against the Trump administration to a federal court on Monday, arguing that its decision to cut $2.6bn in funding was illegal. US district judge Allison Burroughs heard arguments from both sides in Boston, Massachusetts, in what is known as a summary judgment in the civil case. Harvard is arguing that while it acknowledges there have been instances of antisemitism on campus, there is no link between antisemitism and the vital medical and scientific research the university undertakes. Instead, the Ivy League school says it is being pressured into capitulating to the government's demands, arguing that its First Amendment rights are being violated. "This case involves the government's efforts to use the withholding of federal funding as leverage to gain control of academic decisionmaking at Harvard," the university said in its complaint. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other universities is clear: allow the government to micromanage your academic institution or jeopardize the institution's ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions." Meanwhile, the government is arguing that the funding freeze is justified because Harvard has not sufficiently tackled antisemitism on campus. Whilst Burroughs didn't issue a ruling at Monday's hearing, US President Donald Trump still chose to call her a "TOTAL DISASTER." Burroughs issued an injunction in June to prevent the government from banning international students from attending the university. He noted she ruled in favour of Harvard in the past, saying they would appeal any unfavourable outcomes. "When she rules against us, we will IMMEDIATELY appeal, and WIN," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. 'Real-life consequences' The lawsuit, originally filed in April to challenge the $2.6bn federal funding freeze, marked an escalation in Harvard's fight to maintain academic autonomy in the face of the Trump administration's demands. In a letter to the Harvard community at the time, the university's president, Alan M Garber, said the administration's "illegal demands" would impose "unprecedented and improper control over the university". Garber also said the administration's threats would have "stark real-life consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, researchers, and the standing of American higher education in the world". What really happened at college campuses according to Jewish students Read More » In its complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, the university said that within hours of receiving a funding freeze, the university began receiving stop work orders which "put vital medical, scientific, technological, and other research at risk', as well as news that the government was planning to pull an additional $1bn of funding for health research. The complaint also said the government had threatened to terminate $8.7bn in federal funding to five hospitals in Boston - "independent corporate entities" that are "not under Harvard's control", calling it an arbitrary decision. More critically, it said that the government "has not - and cannot - identify any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological, and other research it has frozen that aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security, and maintain America's position as a global leader in innovation." Medical research said to be in jeopardy includes improving the prospects of children who survive cancer, understanding at the molecular level how cancer spreads throughout the body, and predicting the spread of infectious disease outbreaks. The court case is the latest chapter of the tussle between Harvard University and the government. The university is also taking the government to court after it revoked the institution's ability to host international students.
Middle East Eye
12 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US ambassador to Israel says he has resolved visa issue for Evangelical Christians
US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said on Monday that he has finally resolved a visa issue that led to hurdles for American Evangelical Christian groups coming to Israel. "Starting in January, a change in the manner which visas for Christian organizations had been processed for decades led to serious challenges bureaucratically and financially for the groups," Huckabee said in a statement posted to his X account. "Upon arriving in Israel as Ambassador, I learned that the changes in the process were creating delays, costs, and significant burdens with paperwork. After a meeting with the Minister of Interior, we thought the problem was settled but organizations continued to have issues. I informed the Prime Minister's Office of the problem and pointed out how detrimental it was to the relationship of the State of Israel with the American evangelical community," he explained. "The Christian organizations did not at any time ask for different or special treatment, but merely a return to what has been an efficient and satisfactory process for many years," Huckabee added. "Attorney Calev Myers, an Israeli attorney who represents some 150 Christian groups in Israel, was instrumental in outlining the request and the Prime Minister's Office was supportive and involved in the resolution along with the Minister of the Interior," he said. Evangelical Christians outnumber Jewish Americans in their staunch support for Israel in the US, and are represented by groups such as Christians United For Israel, among others, with influence on lawmakers in Washington.
