Harvard battles Trump administration in court over $2.6bn funding cut
US district judge Allison Burroughs heard arguments from both sides in Boston, Massachusetts, in what is known as a summary judgment in the civil case.
Harvard is arguing that while it acknowledges there have been instances of antisemitism on campus, there is no link between antisemitism and the vital medical and scientific research the university undertakes.
Instead, the Ivy League school says it is being pressured into capitulating to the government's demands, arguing that its First Amendment rights are being violated.
"This case involves the government's efforts to use the withholding of federal funding as leverage to gain control of academic decisionmaking at Harvard," the university said in its complaint.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other universities is clear: allow the government to micromanage your academic institution or jeopardize the institution's ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions."
Meanwhile, the government is arguing that the funding freeze is justified because Harvard has not sufficiently tackled antisemitism on campus.
Whilst Burroughs didn't issue a ruling at Monday's hearing, US President Donald Trump still chose to call her a "TOTAL DISASTER."
Burroughs issued an injunction in June to prevent the government from banning international students from attending the university.
He noted she ruled in favour of Harvard in the past, saying they would appeal any unfavourable outcomes.
"When she rules against us, we will IMMEDIATELY appeal, and WIN," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.
'Real-life consequences'
The lawsuit, originally filed in April to challenge the $2.6bn federal funding freeze, marked an escalation in Harvard's fight to maintain academic autonomy in the face of the Trump administration's demands.
In a letter to the Harvard community at the time, the university's president, Alan M Garber, said the administration's "illegal demands" would impose "unprecedented and improper control over the university".
Garber also said the administration's threats would have "stark real-life consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, researchers, and the standing of American higher education in the world".
What really happened at college campuses according to Jewish students Read More »
In its complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, the university said that within hours of receiving a funding freeze, the university began receiving stop work orders which "put vital medical, scientific, technological, and other research at risk', as well as news that the government was planning to pull an additional $1bn of funding for health research.
The complaint also said the government had threatened to terminate $8.7bn in federal funding to five hospitals in Boston - "independent corporate entities" that are "not under Harvard's control", calling it an arbitrary decision.
More critically, it said that the government "has not - and cannot - identify any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological, and other research it has frozen that aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security, and maintain America's position as a global leader in innovation."
Medical research said to be in jeopardy includes improving the prospects of children who survive cancer, understanding at the molecular level how cancer spreads throughout the body, and predicting the spread of infectious disease outbreaks.
The court case is the latest chapter of the tussle between Harvard University and the government.
The university is also taking the government to court after it revoked the institution's ability to host international students.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Lebanon's Hezbollah rejects US roadmap as ‘surrender'
Hezbollah's first response to the US roadmap for Lebanon came in a speech earlier this month by the group's leader, Naim Qassem, who declared: 'We are a people who do not surrender.' US Special Envoy Tom Barrack has proposed a plan to Lebanon's top officials that would see the full disarmament of Hezbollah within four months. In return, Israel would halt its strikes and withdraw its forces from positions it still occupies in southern Lebanon. In his address, Qassem reiterated Hezbollah's readiness to discuss all matters, including its weapons, but only within the context of a Lebanese national dialogue, and not under American pressure or threats. Last week, Hezbollah MPs said that recent parliamentary hearings have shown there is room for national consensus on key sovereignty-related issues. One of the main concerns increasingly raised by the international community has been the deepening crisis of trust between foreign powers and the Lebanese leadership, particularly the president and the prime minister. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Western diplomatic sources told Middle East Eye that foreign governments remain sceptical about the Lebanese state's ability to implement weapons containment and broader reforms. According to sources close to Hezbollah, the group's recent messaging has been intentional and clear: it rejects the US proposal outright, viewing it not as a basis for negotiation but as a surrender document - and therefore unacceptable. 'Total surrender' Barrack, who is also special envoy for Syria, returned to Beirut this week for his third visit in just over a month, continuing discussions around the US-backed roadmap for Lebanon. The plan includes the disarmament of non-state armed groups, long-overdue economic reforms, and improved relations with Damascus. From Hezbollah's perspective, the flurry of visits, meetings, and press conferences led by Barrack "carries no blessing". Sources close to the group say Hezbollah rejects the idea of disarmament while Israeli occupation and threats persist. Nawaf Salam is failing to rebuild Lebanon - while bending to US-Israeli interests Read More » However, it remains open to negotiating the transfer of its weapons to the Lebanese army within the framework of a national defence strategy. For months, Lebanon has requested that the US serve as a security guarantor, ensuring that Israel fully withdraws its forces and stops targeting Hezbollah members - strikes that have persisted despite the ceasefire - should the group begin surrendering its weapons. However, when asked on Monday whether Washington would guarantee the Israeli withdrawal, Barrack responded that the US "has no business in trying to compel Israel to do anything". Barrack also told reporters that the US was not going to force Hezbollah to disarm, or sanction the country if progress is not achieved. While Hezbollah has handed in some weapons from depots in the country's south to the Lebanese army, Israel says the group is violating the ceasefire by attempting to re-establish itself. Hezbollah has opposed Israeli pressure on the Lebanese army to destroy any weapons it receives from the group, viewing it as an attempt to prevent their integration into Lebanon's national defence strategy. The sources cited one incident in which the Lebanese army took possession of a rocket launcher from a Hezbollah depot but did not destroy it. This prompted an immediate warning from the international monitoring committee established after the ceasefire, chaired by a US general. The same sources said an earlier US proposal had been more reasonable than what they described as Barrack's offer of 'total surrender'. Pressure and preconditions Washington has set firm conditions: a clear, written timeline for implementation starting in south Lebanon and expanding northward, swift execution within weeks, and full weapons containment by the end of the year. It also calls for direct international monitoring of every step, including documented access to Hezbollah's weapons depots, photographic evidence of the arms, and a public acknowledgment from Hezbollah endorsing the disarmament mechanism. Can the US push Lebanon to normalise with Israel? Read More » In parallel, Lebanon has outlined its own set of demands: full Israeli compliance with the ceasefire, the activation of the international monitoring committee, and the continued presence and role of the United Nations Interim Force, Unifil, in Lebanon. Beirut has also requested assurances regarding the situation in Syria, reflecting growing concern among Lebanese factions about the fallout from recent developments, particularly in the Druze-majority Sweida province. The sectarian violence in Syria has further complicated the Lebanese security landscape. Observers say that the ongoing violence and Israeli attacks on Syria has reinforced Hezbollah's argument for holding onto its weapons as a means of protecting vulnerable communities. During his previous visit to Beirut earlier in July, Barrack said he was satisfied with the Lebanese government's response to the US proposal. Still, he warned that without a serious commitment from Lebanon, neither the West nor the Gulf appear ready to provide support for the country's recovery. 'Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and now the UAE are coming in and saying, 'If we can get to where everybody can just calm down, we will help redevelop that portion of Lebanon,' which is huge,' Barrack told reporters. 'They are ready to provide [funding]' once Hezbollah is disarmed, he said.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Activists lock gates of Egyptian embassy in The Hague in protest over Gaza
Activists in the Netherlands have chained shut the gates of the Egyptian embassy in protest at the country's closure of its border with Gaza. Egyptian activist Anas Habib filmed himself going to the embassy building in The Hague on Monday, denouncing the "vile, treacherous regime" of President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. Attaching a bicycle lock to the gates of the embassy, he claimed it was symbolic of the Egyptian's government's claims that the Rafah crossing with Gaza had been closed by the Israelis and that they were unable to open it. "The siege is from their side, not mine," he says of the bicycle lock. "I'll stay standing here until the police arrive, because I won't open it until Gaza is opened." New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters On Wednesday, a number of Dutch activists repeated the act. Police cut the locks both times and briefly detained the protesters before releasing them without charge. Israel's siege on Gaza since 2 March has blocked the entry of humanitarian supplies by the UN and its partner organisations to the enclave, bringing the 2.1 million population to the brink of famine. Children will die quickly amid 'genocidal starvation' in Gaza, warns top famine expert Read More » At least 101 Palestinians, including 80 children, have died of starvation since March, including 15 who died of malnutrition on Monday, according to the Palestinian health ministry. The UN's agency for Palestinian refugees (Unrwa), the largest humanitarian provider in Gaza, has had 6,000 trucks loaded with food and medical supplies waiting in Egypt and Jordan for four and a half months, but Israel has yet to let them in. Hundreds of international activists attempting to march to the Gaza Strip through Egypt have been violently attacked, detained and deported since the beginning of the conflict. They were among 4,000 activists from 80 countries who sought to break Israel's total siege.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Dozens of former UK diplomats call on Keir Starmer to recognise Palestine
Dozens of former UK ambassadors and diplomats have called on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to recognise a Palestinian state, The Guardian reported on Wednesday. In a joint letter, more than 30 former UK ambassadors and 20 former senior British diplomats at the UN said that the 'deadly status quo' in Gaza, amid Israel's two-year war on the enclave, could be broken by the recognition of Palestine. 'The risks of inaction have profound, historic and catastrophic implications,' the letter said, adding that Israel 'cannot be secure from threats in the future if the question of Palestine is not taken forward to a political settlement'. 'In the face of the current horror and impunity, words are not enough … A partial suspension of arms sales, delays on trade talks and limited sanctions are far from the full extent of the pressure the UK can bring to bear on Israel,' the letter added. It called recognising a Palestinian state a 'foundational first step towards breaking the deadly status quo'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The signatories of the joint statement included ex-UK ambassadors to Afghanistan, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Pakistan, Qatar, Syria and Turkey. Foreign Secretary David Lammy has publicly opposed unilateral recognition, insisting earlier this year that the UK would only recognise a Palestinian state "when we know it's going to happen and it's in sight". 'Grave' sin Last month, France was preparing to unilaterally recognise a Palestinian state at a major UN conference on the two-state solution beginning on 17 June in New York, which it was set to co-host with Saudi Arabia. At the time, sources told Middle East Eye the proposed move had "unsettled" Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'In Gaza, the violence, starvation and dehumanisation being inflicted on the civilian population by the government of Israel becomes more depraved and unconscionable' - Steve Cottrell, Archbishop of York MEE understands that France was lobbying Britain to recognise a Palestinian state at the conference, alongside it. In late May, Ron Dermer, Israel's strategic affairs minister, threatened Britain and France that Israel may annex parts of the West Bank if they recognised a Palestinian state. And the US privately warned the two European countries against unilaterally recognising Palestine, sources in the British Foreign Office with knowledge of the matter told MEE. Shortly afterwards, both countries reportedly decided against recognising Palestine. The planned UN conference was then postponed in mid-June amid hostilities between Israel and Iran. The letter from the diplomats came as Archbishop of York, Steve Cottrell, the de facto leader of the Church of England, said Israel's 'war of aggression' was a 'grave sin'. 'With each passing day in Gaza, the violence, starvation and dehumanisation being inflicted on the civilian population by the government of Israel becomes more depraved and unconscionable,' he said. 'In the name of God, I cry out against this barbaric assault on human life and dignity. It is a stain on the conscience of the international community, and a flagrant breach of international humanitarian law.' Benedict Cumberbatch among more than 300 artists urging Starmer to end UK arms sales to Israel Read More » Cottrell added: 'I have condemned many times the horrific Hamas attacks on 7 October, and I continue to call for the release of those still cruelly held hostage. We deplore every assault on the innocent. But … this war is now one of aggression – it is a grave sin and it must stop.' Earlier this week, nearly 60 British MPs and peers called for a full embargo on arms exports to Israel and for the government to be more transparent about the licences it grants for military exports. More than 100 Palestinians, including 80 children, have died of starvation since Israel's total blockade of the Gaza Strip resumed in March, including 15 who died of malnutrition on Monday, according to the Palestinian health ministry. Meanwhile, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid at distribution sites run by the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in place since May and manned by Israeli soldiers and US security contractors. More than 59,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed by Israeli forces since October 2023, and more than 142,000 others have been wounded.
