
Harvard battles Trump administration in court over $2.6bn funding cut
US district judge Allison Burroughs heard arguments from both sides in Boston, Massachusetts, in what is known as a summary judgment in the civil case.
Harvard is arguing that while it acknowledges there have been instances of antisemitism on campus, there is no link between antisemitism and the vital medical and scientific research the university undertakes.
Instead, the Ivy League school says it is being pressured into capitulating to the government's demands, arguing that its First Amendment rights are being violated.
"This case involves the government's efforts to use the withholding of federal funding as leverage to gain control of academic decisionmaking at Harvard," the university said in its complaint.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other universities is clear: allow the government to micromanage your academic institution or jeopardize the institution's ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions."
Meanwhile, the government is arguing that the funding freeze is justified because Harvard has not sufficiently tackled antisemitism on campus.
Whilst Burroughs didn't issue a ruling at Monday's hearing, US President Donald Trump still chose to call her a "TOTAL DISASTER."
Burroughs issued an injunction in June to prevent the government from banning international students from attending the university.
He noted she ruled in favour of Harvard in the past, saying they would appeal any unfavourable outcomes.
"When she rules against us, we will IMMEDIATELY appeal, and WIN," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.
'Real-life consequences'
The lawsuit, originally filed in April to challenge the $2.6bn federal funding freeze, marked an escalation in Harvard's fight to maintain academic autonomy in the face of the Trump administration's demands.
In a letter to the Harvard community at the time, the university's president, Alan M Garber, said the administration's "illegal demands" would impose "unprecedented and improper control over the university".
Garber also said the administration's threats would have "stark real-life consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, researchers, and the standing of American higher education in the world".
What really happened at college campuses according to Jewish students Read More »
In its complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, the university said that within hours of receiving a funding freeze, the university began receiving stop work orders which "put vital medical, scientific, technological, and other research at risk', as well as news that the government was planning to pull an additional $1bn of funding for health research.
The complaint also said the government had threatened to terminate $8.7bn in federal funding to five hospitals in Boston - "independent corporate entities" that are "not under Harvard's control", calling it an arbitrary decision.
More critically, it said that the government "has not - and cannot - identify any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological, and other research it has frozen that aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security, and maintain America's position as a global leader in innovation."
Medical research said to be in jeopardy includes improving the prospects of children who survive cancer, understanding at the molecular level how cancer spreads throughout the body, and predicting the spread of infectious disease outbreaks.
The court case is the latest chapter of the tussle between Harvard University and the government.
The university is also taking the government to court after it revoked the institution's ability to host international students.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
an hour ago
- The National
At least eight injured in suspected car-ramming attack in central Israel
White House says Witkoff heading to Europe for Gaza ceasefire talks 'Clear evidence' that OCHA has Hamas ties, Israeli ambassador to UN says Israel acting 'according to international law', claims Herzog At least 59,219 Palestinians killed and 143,045 wounded since Gaza war began


Filipino Times
3 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Marcos invites Trump to visit Philippines
President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has officially invited U.S. President Donald Trump to visit the Philippines. Marcos confirmed the invitation during their bilateral meeting at the White House. During a press conference held alongside Marcos, the media asked Trump when he plans to visit the Philippines. 'Soon,' Trump replied, turning to Marcos and adding, 'He invited me.' The Philippines is set to host the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Summit in 2026. While the United States is not a member of ASEAN, it participates in the East Asia Summit, which includes the 10 ASEAN countries, the U.S., China, Japan, and other regional partners. Next year, the Philippines and the U.S. will celebrate two diplomatic milestones—80 years of formal relations and 75 years of military alliance. Trump previously visited the Philippines in 2017 for the 31st ASEAN Summit held in Manila during his first term as president.


Al Etihad
4 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Trump says tariff relief possible if EU opens market to US firms
24 July 2025 08:34 WASHINGTON (DPA)US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that the United States is prepared to lower tariffs on European goods if the European Union opens its market further to US companies."If they agree to open up the union to American businesses, then we will let them pay a lower tariff," Trump said at an AI-focused event, referring to the ongoing negotiations with the EU. He added that serious talks were currently US has been negotiating with the EU for weeks on a trade deal to prevent US tariffs of 30% on imports from the bloc from taking effect on August German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and French President Emmanuel Macron presented a united front during talks in Berlin on Wednesday, signalling that the EU is prepared to respond if negotiations with Washington government spokesman Stefan Kornelius said the two leaders agreed to keep the option of additional trade measures on the table should talks with the US fail. He added that Merz and Macron were also prepared to devise new instruments, if necessary. Kornelius said Germany and France also plan to closely coordinate with Italy and the European Commission as the talks with Washington enter their final phase.