Why Spain is against Trump's 5% Nato spending demands
The European country ended 2024 as the Nato member that dedicated the smallest proportion of its annual economic output to defence, falling short of the two percent target set in 2014.
Faced with Trump's threats to withdraw US security guarantees from member states perceived as not pulling their weight, Spain has announced fresh spending to hit the two percent mark this year.
But Madrid is baulking at suggestions the target should rise to five percent as an aggressive Russia, whose invasion of Ukraine has stretched into a fourth year, menaces Europe.
With Germany and Poland already backing the new benchmark, Spain could find itself isolated among its allies at the June 24-25 Nato summit in The Hague.
"Many countries want five (percent), we respect that... but Spain will fulfil those objectives set for us," Defence Minister Margarita Robles said on the sidelines of a meeting of Nato counterparts in Brussels this month.
"What is really important is that Spain will meet the capacities and objectives" assigned by Nato and "we cannot set ourselves a percentage", she said.
For Félix Arteaga, a defence specialist at Madrid's Elcano Royal Institute, "internal political reasons" are determining the stance of the minority left-wing coalition government.
Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez faces a balancing act of aligning with Nato allies and cajoling his far-left junior coalition partner Sumar, which is hostile to increasing military spending.
He has not submitted to parliament the plans for new defence spending of more than €10 billion, sparking criticism from his parliamentary allies whose support is crucial for the government's viability.
The fragile coalition has wobbled in the past week after a corruption scandal implicating one of Sánchez's inner circle sparked a crisis within his Socialist party.
'Cultural barriers'
In Spain, "high political fragmentation makes it difficult to reach deals similar to those of other countries" such as Germany, said Santiago Calvo, an economics professor at the Universidad de las Hesperides.
Calvo also pointed to "delicate" public finances, with Spain's debt one of the highest in the European Union at 103.5 percent of gross domestic product.
That figure has nonetheless receded in recent years, and continued strong economic performance should give the government "margin" to spend more, said Arteaga, who instead identified "cultural" hindrances.
The Iberian Peninsula's greater distance from Russia than eastern European countries like Poland "reduces concern and urgency... we do not feel threatened, we do not want to enter armed conflicts", Arteaga said.
"The government must explain to Spanish citizens the need to show solidarity" with countries in northern and eastern Europe, he said.
Ambiguity also surrounds the idea of investing five percent of GDP in defence.
Nato chief Mark Rutte has mentioned 3.5 percent of military spending in the traditional definition of the term by 2032, with the remaining 1.5 percent going to security in a broader sense, including border protection and cybersecurity.
At the Nato summit, "everything will come down to details" such as the flexibility of the definition of defence spending and the timeframe to achieve it, Arteaga predicted.
Robles said "Spain will not veto anything" at the summit, calling her country "a constructive ally".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local Spain
a day ago
- Local Spain
How securing rights through citizenship has become 'increasingly fragile'
The first Global State of Citizenship report, by the Global Citizenship Observatory (GLOBALCIT) at the European University Institute (EUI) in Florence, analyses citizenship laws in 191 countries in 2024. Researchers found that "with the growing number of armed conflicts and incidence of terrorism worldwide, many countries have introduced provisions for withdrawing the citizenship of a person on the basis of national security grounds.' Over a third of countries, including many European ones, 'can now strip a person of their citizenship when their actions are seen as disloyal or threatening to state security,' the report says, and the trend has been expanding. The practice is linked to an 'increasing securitisation of citizenship' since the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001 in the USA. Between 2000 and 2020, 18 European countries put in place measures to deprive persons of citizenship because of national security or to counter terrorism. Before 2001, these measures were 'virtually absent', the report says. revocation of citizenship from individuals threatening national security. Germany's coalition parties discussed this option for 'supporters of terrorism, antisemites, and extremists'. Hungary also amended the constitution to allow the temporary suspension of citizenship because of national security. Middle East and North Africa are other regions where these policies have expanded, the report says. Ways to strip citizenship The report identifies four ways in which citizens can be stripped of their status on security grounds. Nearly 80 per cent of countries have rules covering at least one of these situations. In 132 countries around the world, and two thirds of European states, citizenship can be removed for disloyalty or for acts that threaten national security, such treason, espionage, trying to overthrow a government or terrorism. Such rules exist in Belgium, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Turkey and the UK. In 89 countries, however, this rule concerns only to people who naturalised, not those who acquired citizenship by birth. Another reason that can lead to the stripping of citizenship is having committee serious criminal offences, which typically involves having been sentenced to imprisonment for a certain period. These rules exist in 79 countries but only a few in Europe. In 70 countries, citizenship can be removed for serving in a foreign army and in 18 this measure concerns only people who acquired citizenship by naturalisation. In Europe, 40 per cent of countries – including France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Estonia, Turkey, Belarus and Bosnia Herzegovina – can remove citizenship under certain conditions for having served in another army. Latvia, one of the countries that can revoke citizenship for such reasons, changed the law in 2022 to allow its citizens to work with the Ukrainian military forces. Citizenship can also be removed for providing non-military services to another state, such as being elected in a public office, working for certain agencies or just in the civil service. Such rules exist in 75 countries around the world and some in Europe too, including France, Greece and Turkey. People naturalised more at risk Luuk van der Baaren, co-author of the report, said at the presentation of the study that 'these developments indeed raise an important question as to what extent is citizenship still a secure legal status'. The data also shows that 'a large share of the citizenship stripping provisions are discriminatory in nature, as they only apply to specific groups, particularly citizens by naturalisation'. This is to prevent that a person remains stateless, but it means that 'citizens by birth have a secure legal status, while those who acquired citizenship later in life do not,' he added. Losing citizenship may not only affect the personal security and life opportunities, but also that of dependants, the report says, as in 40 per cent of countries citizenship deprivation can extend to children. Other ways of losing citizenship There are other ways, intentional or not, to lose citizenship, according to the report. The most common, is to have withdrawn because it was acquired in a fraudulent way. Such rules exist in 157 countries. 156 states have also rules on how to voluntarily renounce citizenship, usually with provisions to ensure that a person does not end up stateless. In 56 countries, people can lose their citizenship if they acquire another nationality, and in 55 this may occur by simply residing abroad. Under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 'everyone has the right to a nationality', but four million people in the world are stateless 'because their citizenship remains denied or unrecognised,' the report continues. On the other hand, 35 countries do not allow people to renounce citizenship, or make this impossible in practice. Unequal rights The report also looks at ways to acquire citizenship and finds 'highly unequal pathways'. The most common naturalisation requirement knowledge. Less common are economic self-sufficiency, civic or cultural integration, language or citizenship tests, and renunciation of other citizenships. On residency requirements, Americas and Western Europe have the more inclusive measures. Citizenship in European countries is also regulated via the European Convention on Nationality, under which the residence requirement cannot exceed 10 years. In 15 countries the wait is longer than 10 years: Equatorial Guinea (40 years), United Arab Emirates (30), Bahrain (25), Qatar (25), Bhutan (20), Brunei (20), Eritrea (20), Oman (20), Chad (15), Gambia (15), Nigeria (15), Rwanda (15), Sierra Leone (15), St. Kitts and Nevis (14), and India (11).
Local Spain
2 days ago
- Local Spain
80 flights cancelled on third day of easyJet strikes in Spain
As of 10am on Friday, the third day of the strike at easyJet, the airline has cancelled 40 flights across its four Spanish bases: Palma de Mallorca, Barcelona, Alicante and Málaga. The 40 cancelled flight routes - 80 total as they are roundtrips - are as follows: 17 in Palma de Mallorca : Geneva (two), Basel (three), Naples, Berlin, Bordeaux, Zurich, Nice, London Gatwick (two), Palermo, Nantes, Toulouse, Leeds Bradford and Paris Charles de Gaulle 11 in Málaga: Geneva (two), London Gatwick (two), Basel, Zurich, Bristol (two), Marrakech, Manchester and Nantes 4 in Alicante : Bristol, Basel, Southend and Lyon 8 in Barcelona : Berlin, Basel, Strasbourg, Naples, Geneva (two), Lisbon and Nice The cabin crew protest began on Wednesday with the intention of ending today (Friday June 27th), although if there is no agreement, they have not ruled out an indefinite strike in August. The previous two days of strikes have resulted in 124 cancelled flights, 62 on each day. Therefore, the total number of grounded flights over the three days numbers 204. Called by Spanish workers' union USO, the purpose of the stoppage is to demand improved pay for easyJet's Spain-based cabin crew, equalling their wages to that of their counterparts across other European countries where the budget airlines has bases. However, the airline's management maintains that "it is not possible to compare working conditions between different countries," since its staff are governed by local contracts. Pier Luigi Copello, the general secretary of USO at easyJet Spain, explained that the workforce is demanding fair and equitable working conditions, "in line with the European standards that easyJet maintains in other countries, given the exorbitant increase in the cost of living in Spain', especially in cities such as Málaga, Palma de Mallorca, Barcelona and Alicante. According to Copello, easyJet flight attendants' salaries in Spain get paid around the minimum wage.
Local Spain
2 days ago
- Local Spain
Spain court shelves Ryanair's €107 million fine for 'abusive practices'
The Madrid court said it accepted their appeals against the respective fines of €107 million ($125 million) and €1.6 million while the basis of the case was still being resolved. The court also justified its decision by the costliness of the fines which would "cause a mismatch and difficulties for the treasury" of the companies. The airlines will meanwhile have to pay guarantees collectively totalling almost €112 million. The consumer ministry announced fines against five companies in November for what it identified as "abusive practices", including charging for hand luggage, providing misleading information and a lack of price transparency. Irish no-frills carrier Ryanair was specifically fined for charging passengers a "disproportionate amount" for printing their boarding passes at terminals when they did not have them. EasyJet and Spanish airlines Volotea and Vueling were also among the punished firms. Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary slammed the "political" fines at the time as "illegal and baseless". Far-left consumer rights minister Pablo Bustinduy, who has become embroiled in a spat with Ryanair over his policies, conceded the practices would continue until the courts decided the affair. The successful appeals were "normal and predictable under the rule of law", but "charging for hand luggage is illegal", he insisted on social network Bluesky. The European Parliament's transport commission has proposed allowing passengers to bring a personal object such as a handbag or backpack on board, as well as another piece of luggage weighing seven kilograms at most. But the sector association Airlines for Europe says the move would increase the cost of tickets for passengers who choose to travel light.
