Oregon Legislature repeals contested wildfire hazard map
The measure passed the state House with just one vote against Tuesday, after passing the state Senate unanimously in April. Republicans had called for the map's repeal throughout the legislative session and accused Democrats of stalling it. The bill now heads to Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek.
'Despite an incredibly frustrating political process, we appreciate the members who have chosen to do the right thing in repealing these maps,' Republican House Minority Leader Christine Drazan said.
She added in her statement that the maps had created 'chaos' in rural areas.
An updated version of the state-developed maps released earlier this year created new rules for those living in the most fire-prone areas that also border wildlands such as forests or grasslands. The building and so-called defensible space provisions impacted 6% of the state's roughly 1.9 million tax lots, a reduction from an earlier version developed in 2022 but retracted after homeowners raised concerns that it would increase insurance premiums.
The building codes were set to require new construction in high hazard areas in the so-called wildland-urban interface to have fire-resistant features, and to apply to existing homes if certain upgrades were made.
The bill passed by the Legislature revokes those defensible space and building code requirements, instead directing state agencies to create model codes that local governments can choose to adopt.
The two maps showing wildfire hazard levels and the wildland-urban interface were released by the Oregon Department of Forestry and developed by Oregon State University scientists.
Under a state law passed in 2023, insurers cannot use a wildfire hazard map produced by a state agency to cancel or decline to renew a homeowner insurance policy, or to increase premiums. But many who opposed the maps said they were flawed and placed burdens on homeowners.
Experts who worked on the maps said they were an important step in identifying and protecting fire-prone areas as the state continues to contend with record-breaking wildfires. Oregon's wildfire season last year was a record in terms of cost and acres burned, and wind-fueled blazes over Labor Day weekend in 2020 killed nine people and destroyed thousands of homes.
California, Arizona and New Mexico have had wildfire hazard maps for years. Last year, lawmakers in Washington state ordered the creation of a statewide wildfire risk map, and in 2023, Colorado passed a law establishing a wildfire resiliency code board.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Weighing Federal Takeover of Washington, DC
President Donald Trump said his administration is weighing whether to take control of the city of Washington, DC, to help combat crime, in a move that would represent a dramatic upheaval to the capital's half-century of home rule. 'We could run DC. I mean, we're looking at DC,' Trump said during a cabinet meeting Tuesday, where he was holding court at length in front of cameras. 'We're thinking about doing it, to be honest with you. We want a capital that's run flawlessly.' (Source: Bloomberg)
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats see political gift in Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Democrats say Republicans have given them a political gift with President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' They say they can easily sell the bill to the public as a threat to working class voters, given its cuts to Medicaid and food stamps and significant tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy. 'This is a rare policy gift to Democrats in that it was perpetrated by Republicans, harms almost everybody, and it's actually relatively easy to talk about,' said Democratic strategist Christy Setzer. With that in mind, Democratic campaign operatives — with a big assist from liberal advocacy groups — have kicked off a messaging blitz that's likely to continue until Election Day. On Monday, the House Democrats' campaign arm launched its first national digital ad campaign of the year targeting 35 battleground Republicans who voted for Trump's bill despite reservations over Medicaid cuts. The House Democrats' top super PAC is finalizing another slate of ads — a six-figure mix of television and digital — that will launch in the coming weeks. And Unrig the Economy, an outside advocacy group, wasted no time complementing the effort. They've launched a seven-figure ad blitz targeting 12 vulnerable Republicans, with plans to spend an additional $10 million in the coming months. The ads highlight three of the most contentious provisions of the GOP bill: the cuts to health and nutrition programs, combined with a rollback of green-energy subsidies that's expected to spike utility costs across large parts of the country. 'Those are the three arguments that we see as the ones that hurt people the most, and the place that Republicans are most vulnerable to accountability,' a spokesperson for the group said Tuesday. The strategy is reminiscent of the Republican attacks on the Affordable Care Act, another wildly contentious bill that was broadly unpopular when Democrats passed it under President Obama in 2010. Months later, Republicans would pick up 63 House seats and flip control of the chamber — the same goal Democrats have set for next year's midterms. And the campaign extends far beyond Capitol Hill. Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear (D), who says he is weighing a 2028 presidential bid, has already begun using the controversial legislation as a talking point as he looks toward next year's elections. 'Next year, I'll also be the head of the Democratic Governors Association, and especially in these rural states, where Republican governors have not spoken up whatsoever to stop this devastating bill, we're going to have strong candidates, we're going to win a lot of elections,' Beshear said in a CNN interview on Sunday. Republicans are also vowing to go on the offensive, highlighting the tax cuts as a windfall for workers and the immigration crackdown as a boon for public safety. If anyone should be on the defensive, they say, it's Democrats for opposing the legislation. 'National Democrats' desperate and disgusting fear-mongering tactics are nothing more than a lame attempt to distract voters from the fact that they just voted to raise taxes, kill jobs, gut national security, and allow wide open borders,' Mike Marinella, a spokesman for the House Republicans' campaign arm, said Tuesday. 'We will use every tool to show voters that the provisions in this bill are widely popular and that Republicans stood with them while House Democrats sold them out.' But some Republicans have already handed Democrats easy soundbites to put in their ads in the lead-up to 2026 midterms. 'What do I tell 663,000 people in two years or three years when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding isn't there anymore?' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), one of the three GOP senators to oppose the bill, said last week on the chamber floor. The criticisms were not overlooked by Democrats, who see Tillis as an asset to their messaging efforts. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) cited Tillis in arguing against the bill last week, and Tillis himself warned his colleagues about an Obamacare-style backlash to the bill. 'When you have even Republicans saying it on the record, it kind of rebuts any argument that the NRCC's gonna try to make,' said a Democratic operative. 'I think you will definitely see Thom Tillis in campaign ads — or his words, at minimum.' On the heels of the bill's passage, Democrats are already pointing to polling foreshadowing favorable outcomes in 2026. A Quinnipiac University poll out in late June revealed that 55 percent of voters oppose the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' and a Fox News poll out last month showed 59 percent of voters oppose it. But some Democrats worry that merely defining Republicans with the bill may not be enough, saying that the party needs to coalesce around an agenda of their own for voters to turn to. 'Democrats have done a good job defining the bill as being bad for regular people. The Democrats have to do better at making an argument that they have an agenda that will challenge the status quo on behalf of working people to make their lives better,' said Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons. 'It's something Democrats need to start doing now because it's a long term problem that needs a long term solution.' A further challenge facing Democrats involves the timing of some of the law's provisions. While benefits like the tax cuts take effect long before the midterms, the cuts to Medicaid and food stamps are delayed until January of 2027 — after voters go to the polls. 'It will be harder to show someone who has lost his or her health care. Instead, they'll have to talk about who's at risk,' said Simmons. 'From a messaging perspective, it's more compelling to show someone who has…already lost their benefits than to discuss someone in jeopardy of losing their benefits.' Regardless, Democrats agree that the bill's impacts must be told at the local level with the stories of voters who are at risk or already affected. They're already pointing, for instance, at a rural hospital in Nebraska that's closing its doors as a direct result of the coming Medicaid cuts. 'You might see rural hospitals closing a little bit sooner. It's got to be about rural hospitals that were open and this month they're closed because of what Donald Trump and Republicans did,' said Democratic strategist Joel Payne. 'It's got to be an effect. It's got to be stories. It's got to be individuals and real people.' '…This can't be a Washington, inside-the-Beltway story. This has to be a story that's told all around the country,' Payne added. In recent years, political observers say Democrats have struggled to reach broader audiences, the latest example being their inability to connect with middle-income voters in the 2024 presidential election. But they say the time is ripe for Democrats to push beyond their 'very same tried and true tactics,' as Setzer put it. 'We have a messengers problem. We have a message problem. We don't actually have a substance problem right now,' Setzer said. 'We have a very important piece of legislation to run against right now that is very wide-ranging in its impact. So they need to expand who they are talking to…and expand the platforms on which we are talking to people.' 'In every electoral victory that we've seen lately, whether it is Donald Trump or Mamdani, you see someone who is willing to branch out in the platforms that they're going to,' Setzer added.
New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
Mayor and Police Chiefs Let Corruption Fester at N.Y.P.D., Suits Charge
Four former high-ranking police officers are suing Mayor Eric Adams of New York, accusing him of enabling corruption in the Police Department, an agency where they said anyone who spoke out faced retaliation and humiliation. The separate lawsuits filed on Monday in New York Supreme Court come as Mr. Adams, a former police captain, is running for re-election and using falling crime numbers to bolster his campaign. But the allegations from the former officers, who each spent decades in the department and helped lead bureaus like Internal Affairs and Professional Standards, could revive accusations that he presided over a law enforcement agency where chaos and cronyism reigned. One of the former officers, James Essig, who served more than 40 years, was chief of detectives until August 2023. He said in the suit that Edward Caban, the commissioner at the time, had forced him to resign after he objected to the promotions of unqualified officers to elite detective roles and specialized units. Mr. Essig's lawsuit, which names Mr. Caban, Mr. Adams and Jeffrey Maddrey, the former chief of department, accused Mr. Caban of selling promotions in exchange for $15,000. Instead of relying on a list of candidates recommended by supervisors, Mr. Caban and Mr. Maddrey often picked 'friends and cronies' of theirs and Mr. Adams, according to the suit. In an interview, Mr. Essig, 63, said he wanted 'accountability' for former leaders whose decisions 'killed morale' and hurt the careers of dozens of police officers who were forced out or left the department because they were troubled about its direction. The lawsuits are about exposing the wrongdoing of 'people who were in there who didn't do the right thing,' he said. 'They used the Police Department as their own little playground.' Kayla Mamelak Altus, a spokeswoman for Mr. Adams, said the administration would review the lawsuits. 'The Adams administration holds all city employees — including leadership at the N.Y.P.D. — to the highest standards,' she said in a statement. 'Our work at the department speaks for itself: Crime continues to topple month after month both above and below ground.' 'That is no coincidence,' Ms. Mamelak Altus added. 'It's thanks to the Adams administration's laser focus on public safety.' The Police Department declined to comment. Lawyers for Mr. Caban, who resigned amid a federal probe into several members of the Adams administration, said he would 'vigorously defend' himself. 'There is no merit to the allegations raised in these complaints, including the unsupported and reckless suggestion that former Commissioner Caban accepted anything of value in connection with promotions,' said his lawyers, Russell Capone and Rebekah Donaleski. Benjamin Brafman, a lawyer for Philip Banks III, the former deputy mayor for public safety who is named as a co-defendant in one of the lawsuits, said in a statement that his client had done 'absolutely nothing wrong.' Mr. Maddrey's lawyer, Lambros Lambrou, said he had not seen the lawsuit yet. Mr. Maddrey resigned in December after he was accused by a lieutenant of coercing her into sex in exchange for overtime opportunities. Mr. Maddrey, who has denied the allegations, is also under federal investigation. Last November, Mayor Adams appointed Jessica Tisch as police commissioner and she has since overhauled the executive staff, replacing the head of internal affairs and other key positions as she works to bring stability back to the department. Ms. Tisch has also restored the department's longstanding promotion system, in which candidates are recommended and vetted by supervisors, according to several people familiar with the changes. Since then, Mr. Adams has stood alongside Ms. Tisch at news conferences where he has touted the drop in crime. However, the complaints filed on Monday threaten to cast a shadow on those achievements, recalling the scandals that forced out Mr. Caban and Mr. Maddrey, who were allies of the mayor. Mr. Adams promoted Mr. Caban to commissioner in July 2023, following the abrupt resignation of Keechant Sewell, who had left after only 18 months, frustrated over her inability to run the department as she saw fit. She felt stymied by members of the Adams administration and could not make discretionary promotions even at the lower levels of the agency without getting clearance from City Hall, according to people close to her. Mr. Caban himself resigned in September 2024 after federal agents seized his phone as part of a criminal investigation into the administration. Federal authorities were investigating Mr. Caban and his twin brother, a former police officer who was fired from the department in 2001 and had been working in nightclub security. The investigation involved possible payments made in exchange for favors to nightclubs. The authorities also sought records of promotions and transfers. The other former officers suing the city and the Police Department include: Christopher McCormack, who was the assistant chief of the Criminal Task Force Division; Matthew Pontillo, the chief of professional standards; and Joseph Veneziano, who was once second in command at the Internal Affairs Bureau. Each had a rank of either two or three stars and had spent 30 to 40 years in the department. The lawyer representing all the officers, Sarena Townsend, described them as 'high-level, integrity-driven professionals' who had been replaced with friends of the mayor or his allies in the department. In his lawsuit, Mr. Pontillo said he had been forced out after he criticized Mr. Maddrey for his support of 'unrestricted' high-speed pursuits and after he issued an audit that said officers from the Community Response Team, a unit created by John Chell, then the chief of patrol, had been turning off their body-worn cameras during stops. Their behavior 'indicated a pattern of unconstitutional stops and searches that the C.R.T. officers were attempting to hide,' according to Mr. Pontillo's complaint. Chief Chell, whom Commissioner Tisch promoted to chief of department, is named in Mr. Pontillo's lawsuit. He did not respond to a message for comment. In his complaint, Mr. Veneziano said that Mr. Maddrey and Mr. Caban had retaliated after Mr. Veneziano disciplined an inspector who was friends with Mr. Maddrey. The inspector, who was not named, had claimed to be working when he was not, according to the suit. In 2021, the inspector lost 60 vacation days and was forced to retire, but when Mr. Maddrey was promoted to chief of the department a year later, he reinstated the inspector and later promoted him to deputy chief in his office. Mr. Veneziano said he was later transferred to the 'inferior' Transit Bureau, where he was given an office far from other executives in the unit and ostracized from high-level meetings. He resigned in November 2023. In his complaint, Mr. McCormack said that as commander of the Criminal Task Force Division he was supposed to act as a 'gatekeeper' for personnel. But when he rejected candidates pushed by Mr. Maddrey, he was given a humiliating choice: resign or face demotion to captain. After Mr. McCormack left, Mr. Maddrey appointed more than 30 unqualified or incompetent people to the division, according to the suit. One officer who remained in an elite unit was a candidate pushed by Mr. Banks. The officer had wanted to join a division charged with investigating money laundering, known as the El Dorado unit. The officer had no experience in accounting or finances, like other members of the unit, and also had a criminal history. According to the suit, the candidate wanted to be part of the unit because the name 'sounded cool.' Maia Coleman contributed reporting.
