Gavin Newsom Says Trump 'Caved' in Fight Over National Guard Troops
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom says President Donald Trump has "caved" in the legal wrangling over deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles during last month's protests of raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Newsweek reached out to the White House via email Tuesday for comment.
Why It Matters
Trump has prioritized immigration control as a key pillar during his second administration. The president campaigned in 2024 on the promise of mass deportations and appointed Tom Homan as his administration's border czar to execute his agenda.
Protests in June broke out in Los Angeles after several ICE raids throughout the city. The president sent National Guard troops and Marines to the City of Angels, deeming they were necessary to help control the unrest, against Newsom's wishes.
The political standoff over the Guard deployments also highlighted national tensions between federal immigration enforcement and state emergency management priorities during California's peak fire season.
Newsom and state officials have repeatedly insisted that the deployment leaves wildfire response teams critically shorthanded, with California National Guard fire crews reportedly operating at just 40 percent capacity.
National Guard troops are pictured in front of the Metro Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles on June 12. (Photo by BENJAMIN HANSON/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)
National Guard troops are pictured in front of the Metro Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles on June 12. (Photo by BENJAMIN HANSON/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)
What To Know
In a post to X, formerly Twitter, the U.S. Northern Command announced the move on Tuesday to release approximately 150 firefighters from the "Federal Protection" pursuit in Los Angeles.
"At the recommendation of Gen. Gregory M. Guillot, Commander, U.S. Northern Command, and approved by the Secretary of Defense, Task Force 51 will release approximately 150 members of the California National Guard from the Federal Protection mission today," a press release from U.S. Northern Command read.
The release continued: "USNORTHCOM and Task Force 51 are still appropriately sourced to conduct our Federal Protection Mission. For more information on the disposition of the released soldiers, please contact the California National Guard. Task Force 51 is U.S. Army North's Contingency Command Post under the command of Maj. Gen. Scott M. Sherman. The mission of TF 51 is protecting federal personnel conducting federal functions, as well as federal property."
Reacting to the post, Newsom took a swipe at Trump, saying, ".@realDonaldTrump caved. Our firefighters are finally returning to fight wildfires. Better late than never. Now — send the rest home. Nearly 5,000 soldiers — including police, paramedics, and first responders — are still sitting idle in L.A. for nothing."
The announcement from Northern Command comes a day after General Guillot requested 200 National Guard troops be shifted back to the wildfire unit known as Task Force Rattlesnake.
The Associated Press reports that Trump first sent 4,000 California National Guard troops along with 800 active-duty Marines to Los Angeles amid the unfolding riots.
The protests against ICE raids in the city started June 6 and escalated into the following weeks. Protesters took to downtown, mainly outside the federal courthouse, where police declared an unlawful assembly.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass then implemented a curfew for portions of downtown. On June 17, she lifted it for the affected area, while saying in part, "I'm prepared to reinstate it if necessary."
Newsom's concern amid peak fire season comes after simultaneous deadly fires in Los Angeles County in January that engulfed thousands of structures, triggered widespread evacuations and leveled neighborhoods.
The Trump administration also filed a lawsuit against Los Angeles on Monday, accusing the city of obstructing immigration law enforcement and allowing the sanctuary city laws in place to create a "lawless environment."
Armed National Guard troops can be seen outside the Edward Roybal Federal Building, with graffiti visible after protests against immigration raids, in Los Angeles on June 23. (Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images)
Armed National Guard troops can be seen outside the Edward Roybal Federal Building, with graffiti visible after protests against immigration raids, in Los Angeles on June 23. (Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images)
What People Are Saying
Newsom, in a release forwarded by his office to Newsweek on Tuesday: "These men and women signed up to serve — not to be Trump's political props. Letting a few of them return to fight fires is a step in the right direction, but thousands of soldiers are still being blocked from their real work as police officers, paramedics, summer school teachers, and public servants. It's time to send them all home."
What Happens Next
As Newsom continues to demand the return of all federally controlled Guard members, his office and the White House remain at odds.
The timing and scale of any potential redeployments or court-mandated changes in command of the Guard remain uncertain.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
24 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Announces Preliminary Trade Pact With Vietnam
President Trump said on Wednesday that the United States had reached a trade deal with Vietnam, one that would roll back some of the punishing tariffs he had issued on Vietnamese products in return for that nation agreeing to open its market to American goods. The preliminary deal will also indirectly affect China, an important trading partner of Vietnam. 'It will be a Great Deal of Cooperation between our two Countries,' Mr. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social announcing the deal. According to Mr. Trump, the deal imposes a 20 percent tariff on all imports from Vietnam and a 40 percent tariff on any 'transshipping.' That provision is aimed at addressing Trump administration criticisms that countries like Vietnam have become a channel for Chinese manufacturers to bypass U.S. tariffs and funnel goods into the United States. Which products would fall under the higher tariff rate is unclear. It could refer to goods imported to the United States from Vietnam that actually originated in China. But it could also apply to Vietnamese products that use a certain amount of Chinese parts. The deal could include a lower tariff on goods that are made in Vietnam with fewer Chinese parts and materials, and a higher tariff rate for Vietnamese goods that contain many Chinese components. Vietnam was soon scheduled to face a 46 percent tariff rate as part of the 'reciprocal' tariffs that the Trump administration unveiled on April 2. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Visits $450 Million 'Alligator Alcatraz,' Suggests Taxpayers Should Fund More of Them
Only eight days after construction began, and 12 days after Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier released a video on X announcing plans for an immigration detention center in the Everglades, "Alligator Alcatraz" will officially open this week. The site, which was visited by President Donald Trump and Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday, puts Florida at the forefront of the federal government's mass deportation campaign. The state-run immigration detention facility is planned to eventually hold up to 5,000 detainees and will be capable of processing and deporting migrants to speed up deportations amid the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. The 30-square-mile parcel of land was chosen in part for its unused airstrip—and for its alligator- and python-laden surroundings serving as cheap security and deterrence. "They ain't going anywhere once they are there…because good luck getting to civilization," DeSantis said during a news conference on Monday. "The security is amazing. Natural and otherwise." During the tour of the facility, DeSantis added that Florida should not be the only state but should serve as a model. "We need other states to step up," he said. Trump called out California Gov. Gavin Newsom specifically, saying the Democratic governor could "learn something" about curbing illegal immigration. DeSantis pointed out that California is home to the original Alcatraz, implying that it, too, could be outfitted as an immigration detention center. Although both the president and DeSantis were quick to say Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem would be able to find funding for additional immigration detention centers, the cost and source of funding for these facilities merit further scrutiny, particularly since ultimately taxpayers are footing the bill. While touted as an "efficient, low-cost opportunity to build a temporary detention facility" in Uthmeier's original video about the facility, Florida's new facility is expected to cost $450 million to operate for a single year. A DHS official told CNN that Florida will fund the operation of the facility and then "submit reimbursement requests" through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and DHS. Secretary Noem said that Alligator Alcatraz and other approved detention facilities in the state will be funded "in large part" by $625 million set aside by the FEMA Shelter and Services Program. The project has faced objections from local residents and government officials, including Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava, who opposed using county-owned land for the project. After Levine Cava requested an environmental impact report and updated land appraisal, DeSantis seized the land under emergency powers in place since 2023. The post Trump Visits $450 Million 'Alligator Alcatraz,' Suggests Taxpayers Should Fund More of Them appeared first on
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban
The Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority struck down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban on Wednesday, ruling 4-3 that it was superseded by a newer state law that criminalizes abortions only after a fetus can survive outside the womb. State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other than the mother 'intentionally destroys the life of an unborn child.' It was in effect until 1973, when the US Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nullified it. Legislators never officially repealed the ban, however, and conservatives argued that the US Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe reactivated it. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, filed a lawsuit that year arguing that the ban was trumped by abortion restrictions legislators enacted during the nearly half-century that Roe was in effect. Kaul specifically cited a 1985 law that essentially permits abortions until viability. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation. Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, defended the ban in court, arguing that the 1849 ban could coexist with the newer abortion restrictions, just as different penalties for the same crime coexist. Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide – which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother's consent – but not consensual abortions. Abortions have been available in the state since that ruling but the state Supreme Court decision gives providers and patients more certainty that abortions will remain legal in Wisconsin. Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court to overturn Schlipper's ruling without waiting for a decision from a lower appellate court. It was expected as soon as the justices took the case that they would overturn the ban. Liberals hold a 4-3 majority on the court and one of them, Janet Protasiewicz, openly stated on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights. Democratic-backed Susan Crawford defeated conservative Brad Schimel for an open seat on the court in April, ensuring liberals will maintain their 4-3 edge until at least 2028. Crawford has not been sworn in yet and was not part of Wednesday's ruling. She'll play pivotal role, though, in a separate Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban's constitutionality. The high court decided last year to take that case. It's still pending.
