Harrods revises compensation payouts for al Fayed abuse victims
Sky News has learnt that lawyers for Harrods have increased the maximum potential payout for survivors of Mr al Fayed from roughly £330,000 to a sum closer to £400,000, following consultation with claimants' legal representatives.
Sources said final proposals for the compensation scheme would be published on Monday - although some victims may still face a lengthy wait to receive their payouts.
Harrods, which is owned by a Qatari sovereign wealth fund controlled by the Gulf state's ruling family, said last year that it was "utterly appalled" by the disclosure that Mr al Fayed had sexually abused numerous female employees during his 25-year ownership of the Knightsbridge store.
People close to the talks about the compensation scheme said the final proposals included general damages lump sums of up to £110,000 or £200,000 - with the higher figure available to claimants willing to submit to psychiatric assessments arranged by the company.
These figures are unchanged from draft proposals which were subject to consultation in recent weeks, although other elements of the proposed compensation payments have been revised upwards, with the effect of increasing the potential maximum sums that could be paid out, the people added.
The redress scheme is being coordinated by MPL Legal, an Essex-based law firm.
Last weekend, Sky News reported the contents of a document produced by MPL Legal which said that victims of Mr al Fayed who chose a "non-medical pathway" - which would not require any form of medical assessment - would be eligible for "general damages limited to compensation for sexual assault of up to £110,000", with "aggravated damages [of] up to £15,000", and "wrongful testing fixed payment(s) up to £7,500".
Claimants who agreed to an assessment by a scheme consultant psychiatrist - referred to in the document as the "medical pathway" - would be eligible for general damages of up to £200,000, further payments equivalent to those potentially awarded to non-medical claimants, as well as treatment costs "past and future supported by the medical report" and a "work impact payment capped at £110,000".
The "wrongful testing" payments refer to women who were forced to undergo unnecessary and intrusive medical examinations demanded by Mr al Fayed, while the "work impact payments" relate to loss of earnings triggered by, for example, the unjustified termination of victims' employment at Harrods.
One source said the revised maximum compensation sum to be disclosed on Monday was now expected to be between £350,000 and £400,000.
The requirement to undergo a psychiatric assessment by a medical practitioner selected by Harrods in order to access the largest payouts risks angering claimants who have endured years of psychological trauma after being abused by Mr al Fayed.
A person close to the store said this was a necessary legal step.
External law firms which have been organising separate cases against Harrods are likely to argue that the terms being published on Monday are not sufficiently generous, and impose too many legal restrictions and disclosure obligations on victims of the store's former owner.
Depending upon how many women submit compensation claims either through the MPL Legal scheme or via another law firm, Harrods' compensation bill is ultimately expected to run to tens of millions of pounds.
A Harrods spokesperson reissued a statement previously given to Sky News, saying: "It would be premature for us to comment on the nature and details of a scheme that is currently under consultation.
"We are actively inviting the valuable input from Survivors and their legal representatives to establish the final scheme that aims to be survivor-first, trauma-informed, and fair in its approach to compensation.
"Further updates will be provided once the consultation period is complete."
According to a website set up by MPL Legal for the purposes of administering the scheme, "Harrods and MPL Legal are undertaking a period of consultation regarding the compensation scheme in which we will receive detailed feedback from interested parties, including several legal firms representing survivors, leading Counsel and Dame Jasvinder [Sanghera], the Independent Survivor Advocate".
"It is anticipated the final compensation scheme will be published and survivors will be able to access application forms from 31 March 2025."
Mr al Fayed, who died in 2023, owned Harrods for a quarter of a century, selling it in 2010 to Qatar Holding for £1.5bn.
His is thought to have involved hundreds of predominantly young female victims, with by the billionaire Egyptian.
Mr al Fayed also owned Fulham Football Club, as well as the Ritz Hotel in Paris, for a number of years.
The MPL Legal document previously reported by Sky News said the redress scheme would "provide options for survivors - an alternative route to the court process", and that it would "hopefully avoid an adversarial approach which also risks retraumatising survivors".
It added that the scheme would be "as inclusive as possible - we want the scheme to work for as many survivors as we can".
Under the heading "Scheme principles", MPL said it represented "an alternative to litigation, but a survivor can leave the scheme at any time and pursue the claim through the court system".
It said it hoped that law firms engaging with the scheme "will ensure survivors receive 100% of the compensation".
"The level of compensation available through the scheme has been designed to mirror the court's approach," it added.
Last October, lawyers acting for victims of Mr al Fayed said they had received more than 420 enquiries about potential claims, although it is unclear how many more have come forward in the six months since.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
On This Day: Southend United creates 'Rose West' stand in renaming blunder
On this day in 2022, Southend United found themselves in an unfortunate situation after a deal with one of their sponsors meant their stadium now had a "Gilbert & Rose West Stand". The stand at Roots Hall had been sponsored by local estate agent Gilbert & Rose, but an unfortunate juxtaposition meant its name now inadvertently included that of notorious serial killer Rose West. The news sparked considerable activity on social media, prompting the club to address the unintended reference. At the time, a spokesman for the club revealed they were likely to hold talks with Gilbert & Rose to "come up with different arrangement of words". They added: "They are a fantastic local estate agent, and we look forward to working with them during this partnership, which will include a number of community projects." Rose West was sentenced to life imprisonment in November 1995 for the murders of ten young women and girls. At the time, reactions from fans varied, with Gary Jackets, 52, expressing disbelief at the oversight. He said: "In 45 years of trials and tribulations I thought I had seen and heard of everything from the home of football. "Sadly not, this is the best one yet. Either a bit of PR or a massive error of judgment." [From the Essex Echo of August 3, 2022]
CNBC
7 hours ago
- CNBC
Delta Air assures US lawmakers it will not personalize fares using AI
Delta Air Lines said on Friday it will not use artificial intelligence to set personalized ticket prices for passengers after facing sharp criticism from U.S. lawmakers and broad public concern. Last week, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would "likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point.'" Delta said it has not used AI to set personalized prices but previously said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20% of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. "There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data," Delta told the senators in a letter on Friday, seen by Reuters. "Our ticket pricing never takes into account personal data." Senators praised Delta's commitment not to use AI for personal pricing but expressed many questions and want more details about what data Delta is collecting to set prices. "Delta is telling their investors one thing, and then turning around and telling the public another," Gallego said. "If Delta is in fact using aggregated instead of individualized data, that is welcome news." Delta declined comment on Gallego's statement. The senators cited a comment in December by Delta President Glen Hauenstein that the carrier's AI price-setting technology is capable of setting fares based on a prediction of "the amount people are willing to pay for the premium products related to the base fares." Last week, American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. "This is not about bait and switch. This is not about tricking," Isom said on an earnings call, adding "talk about using AI in that way, I don't think it's appropriate. And certainly from American, it's not something we will do." Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib last week introduced legislation to bar companies from using AI to set prices or wages based on Americans' personal data and would specifically ban airlines raising individual prices after seeing a search for a family obituary. They cited a Federal Trade Commission staff report in January that found "retailers frequently use people's personal information to set targeted, tailored prices for goods and services -- from a person's location and demographics, down to their mouse movements on a webpage." The FTC cited a hypothetical example of a consumer profiled as a new parent who could intentionally be shown higher-priced baby thermometers and collect behavioral details to forecast a customer's state of mind. Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition, but not a specific consumer's personal information. "Given the tens of millions of fares and hundreds of thousands of routes for sale at any given time, the use of new technology like AI promises to streamline the process by which we analyze existing data and the speed and scale at which we can respond to changing market dynamics," Delta's letter said.
NBC News
9 hours ago
- NBC News
Delta Air Lines assures U.S. lawmakers it will not personalize fares using AI
WASHINGTON - Delta Air Lines said on Friday it will not use artificial intelligence to set personalized ticket prices for passengers after facing sharp criticism from U.S. lawmakers and broad public concern. Last week, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would 'likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point.'' Delta said it has not used AI to set personalized prices but previously said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20% of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. 'There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data,' Delta told the senators in a letter on Friday, seen by Reuters. 'Our ticket pricing never takes into account personal data.' Senators praised Delta's commitment not to use AI for personal pricing but expressed many questions and want more details about what data Delta is collecting to set prices. 'Delta is telling their investors one thing, and then turning around and telling the public another,' Gallego said. 'If Delta is in fact using aggregated instead of individualized data, that is welcome news.' Delta declined comment on Gallego's statement. The senators cited a comment in December by Delta President Glen Hauenstein that the carrier's AI price-setting technology is capable of setting fares based on a prediction of 'the amount people are willing to pay for the premium products related to the base fares.' Last week, American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. 'This is not about bait and switch. This is not about tricking,' Isom said on an earnings call, adding 'talk about using AI in that way, I don't think it's appropriate. And certainly from American, it's not something we will do.' Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib last week introduced legislation to bar companies from using AI to set prices or wages based on Americans' personal data and would specifically ban airlines raising individual prices after seeing a search for a family obituary. They cited a Federal Trade Commission staff report in January that found 'retailers frequently use people's personal information to set targeted, tailored prices for goods and services -- from a person's location and demographics, down to their mouse movements on a webpage.' The FTC cited a hypothetical example of a consumer profiled as a new parent who could intentionally be shown higher-priced baby thermometers and collect behavioral details to forecast a customer's state of mind. Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition, but not a specific consumer's personal information. 'Given the tens of millions of fares and hundreds of thousands of routes for sale at any given time, the use of new technology like AI promises to streamline the process by which we analyze existing data and the speed and scale at which we can respond to changing market dynamics,' Delta's letter said.
