logo
The US plans to begin breeding billions of flies to fight a pest. Here is how it will work

The US plans to begin breeding billions of flies to fight a pest. Here is how it will work

Mint2 days ago
TOPEKA, Kan. — The U.S. government is preparing to breed billions of flies and dump them out of airplanes over Mexico and southern Texas to fight a flesh-eating maggot.
That sounds like the plot of a horror movie, but it is part of the government's plans for protecting the U.S. from a bug that could devastate its beef industry, decimate wildlife and even kill household pets. This weird science has worked well before.
'It's an exceptionally good technology,' said Edwin Burgess, an assistant professor at the University of Florida who studies parasites in animals, particularly livestock. 'It's an all-time great in terms of translating science to solve some kind of large problem.'
The targeted pest is the flesh-eating larva of the New World Screwworm fly. The U.S. Department of Agriculture plans to ramp up the breeding and distribution of adult male flies — sterilizing them with radiation before releasing them — so they can mate ineffectively with females and over time cause the population to die out.
It is more effective and environmentally friendly than spraying the pest into oblivion, and it is how the U.S. and other nations north of Panama eradicated the same pest decades ago. Sterile flies from a factory in Panama kept the flies contained there for years, but the pest appeared in southern Mexico late last year.
The USDA expects a new screwworm fly factory to be up and running in southern Mexico by July 2026. It plans to open a fly distribution center in southern Texas by the end of the year so that it can import and distribute flies from Panama if necessary.
Most fly larvae feed on dead flesh, making the New World screwworm fly and its Old World counterpart in Asia and Africa outliers — and for the American beef industry, a serious threat. Females lay their eggs in wounds and, sometimes, exposed mucus.
'A thousand-pound bovine can be dead from this in two weeks,' said Michael Bailey, president elect of the American Veterinary Medicine Association.
Veterinarians have effective treatments for infested animals, but an infestation can still be unpleasant — and cripple an animal with pain.
Don Hineman, a retired western Kansas rancher, recalled infected cattle as a youngster on his family's farm.
'It smelled nasty,' he said. 'Like rotting meat.'
The New World screwworm fly is a tropical species, unable to survive Midwestern or Great Plains winters, so it was a seasonal scourge. Still, the U.S. and Mexico bred and released more than 94 billion sterile flies from 1962 through 1975 to eradicate the pest, according to the USDA.
The numbers need to be large enough that females in the wild can't help but hook up with sterile males for mating.
One biological trait gives fly fighters a crucial wing up: Females mate only once in their weekslong adult lives.
Alarmed about the fly's migration north, the U.S. temporarily closed its southern border in May to imports of live cattle, horses and bison and it won't be fully open again at least until mid-September.
But female flies can lay their eggs in wounds on any warm-blooded animal, and that includes humans.
Decades ago, the U.S. had fly factories in Florida and Texas, but they closed as the pest was eradicated.
The Panama fly factory can breed up to 117 million a week, but the USDA wants the capacity to breed at least 400 million a week. It plans to spend $8.5 million on the Texas site and $21 million to convert a facility in southern Mexico for breeding sterile fruit flies into one for screwworm flies.
In one sense, raising a large colony of flies is relatively easy, said Cassandra Olds, an assistant professor of entomology at Kansas State University.
But, she added, 'You've got to give the female the cues that she needs to lay her eggs, and then the larvae have to have enough nutrients."
Fly factories once fed larvae horse meat and honey and then moved to a mix of dried eggs and either honey or molasses, according to past USDA research. Later, the Panama factory used a mix that included egg powder and red blood cells and plasma from cattle.
In the wild, larvae ready for the equivalent of a butterfly's cocoon stage drop off their hosts and onto the ground, burrow just below the surface and grow to adulthood inside a protective casing making them resemble a dark brown Tic Tac mint. In the Panama factory, workers drop them into trays of sawdust.
Security is an issue. Sonja Swiger, an entomologist with Texas A&M University's Extension Service, said a breeding facility must prevent any fertile adults kept for breeding stock from escaping.
Dropping flies from the air can be dangerous. Last month, a plane freeing sterile flies crashed near Mexico's border with Guatemala, killing three people.
In test runs in the 1950s, according to the USDA, scientists put the flies in paper cups and then dropped the cups out of planes using special chutes. Later, they loaded them into boxes with a machine known as a 'Whiz Packer.'
The method is still much the same: Light planes with crates of flies drop those crates.
Burgess called the development of sterile fly breeding and distribution in the 1950s and 1960s one of the USDA's 'crowning achievements.'
Some agriculture officials argue now that new factories shouldn't be shuttered after another successful fight.
'Something we think we have complete control over — and we have declared a triumph and victory over — can always rear its ugly head again,' Burgess said.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Back in the flesh: ‘Jurassic Park' and the Dinosaur Renaissance
Back in the flesh: ‘Jurassic Park' and the Dinosaur Renaissance

The Hindu

time11 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Back in the flesh: ‘Jurassic Park' and the Dinosaur Renaissance

In the summer of 1993, the world watched spellbound as a towering Brachiosaurus gracefully reared up to nibble treetops, while John Williams' score swelled like God breathing. Steven Spielberg's genre-defining blockbuster rewrote the cultural DNA of dinosaurs forever, transforming them from textbook curiosities into Hollywood royalty. An entire generation developed an unshakable obsession with creatures that had been extinct for 65 million years. All because of a movie. For a film that opens with a mosquito trapped in amber, Jurassic Park has aged with surprising elasticity. It had the makings of a pulpy B-movie, but the magician in Spielberg spun it into something timeless. Ever since, it's been re-spun, rebooted, and rebranded across three decades. The science, even then, was flimsy. Toxorhynchites rutilus, the species of mosquito shown, doesn't even suck blood. And DNA degrades far too quickly to survive millions of years. But that shaky premise has since evolved from science fiction, to 'science eventuality,' to literal modern-day science. While extracting dinosaur DNA from fossilised insects remains a fantasy, the real world has been inching closer to that cinematic magic. Iconic special effects Of course, the magic wasn't all Spielberg. Stan Winston built animatronics with blinking eyes, breathing chests, and skin stretched over robotic bones. Industrial Light and Magic's (ILM) groundbreaking CGI handled the weight and gait of creatures that had never been seen before, using a special 'Dinosaur Input Device' to puppeteer their movements digitally. Just 15 minutes of dinosaur screen time was enough to reshape how a generation imagined prehistoric life. The irony is that while Jurassic Park was hailed for its scientific fidelity, it also got a fair amount of things wrong. The Velociraptors were scaled up to nearly double their actual size. The T. Rex's vision, contrary to Dr. Grant's famous whisper, was not based on movement; it likely had binocular depth perception and could smell you coming a mile away. Most egregiously for modern palaeontologists, the dinosaurs were featherless, greyish reptiles, missing the colourful, bird-like traits we now know many had. But Jack Horner, the real-life palaeontologist who inspired Alan Grant, saw the bigger picture. In his words, the movie wasn't a documentary, but a doorway to suspend all disbelief. Yet, over time, the franchise leaned deeper into American military-industrial fantasies. The recent entries have given us weaponised Velociraptors, genetically-engineered hybrid killing machines, and a Mosasaur the size of a battleship. Behind the scenes, consultants still fought to keep the science honest. Some succeeded (the Pyroraptor from Jurassic World Dominion finally had feathers) but the overarching 'scary sells' mandate remained. Pink-plumed, birdlike dinosaurs, no matter how accurate, just didn't test well. The palaeontological re-awakening In the years following the film's release, palaeontology experienced a renaissance. The so-called 'Jurassic Park Effect' turned casual curiosity into career paths. Children who once saw dinosaurs as static images began imagining them as dynamic, intelligent, and even graceful creatures. Universities saw a spike in students declaring interest in prehistoric life. Museums were packed again. Dinosaurs were, suddenly, the coolest things ever. The once unassuming field relegated to academia now had a face, a soundtrack, and perhaps most importantly, funding. Governments and institutions began investing more seriously in palaeontological research, emboldened by a public that was suddenly into dinosaurs. Before Jurassic Park, new dinosaur species were discovered at a rate of maybe three or four per year. Today, that number hovers around 50. Whether digging in the deserts of Mongolia or scanning fossils with particle accelerators, researchers rode the wave of public fascination the film helped ignite. Which is exactly why the Jurassic World sequels sting a little. They're fine as popcorn films, but they could've done more. The original reimagined how the world saw dinosaurs. The new films played it safe, recycling familiar nostalgic images rather than reflecting what science had since uncovered. Sure, they'll still get some kid to Google 'Indominus Rex vs Spinosaurus', but it's hard not to feel a little let down by what could've been. On the ethics of de-extinction Jurassic Park did something more speculative and slippery by introducing the world to the concept of 'de-extinction.' Today, we live in a time where resurrecting lost species no longer sounds entirely impossible. Ben Lamm, founder of Colossal Biosciences, believes the woolly mammoth will walk again by 2028. His labs are working with ancient DNA, comparative genomics, and somatic cell nuclear transfer — the same science that cloned Dolly the sheep, now turbocharged with robotics and AI. The ostensible goal has been to resurrect extinct species to seed ecosystems with keystone animals. His team is also simultaneously attempting to revive the dodo, the thylacine (the Tasmanian Devil, or Taz from Looney Tunes), and potentially use artificial wombs for reproduction. It's the closest thing we have to a real-life InGen, though unsurprisingly, not everyone is optimistic. Some question the ethics of creating a single living animal just to prove it can be done. Others worry about the unintended consequences of gene editing, including evolutionary whiplash, cellular chaos, and the specter of designer organisms being commodified. There's a certain poetry in how Jurassic Park warned us about the dangers of turning nature into a spectacle while itself becoming the most breathtaking spectacle ever made. A movie that staged a cautionary tale about playing God with prehistoric DNA ended up inspiring decades of scientific fascination, funding, and, ironically, real-world attempts. The franchise that once asked whether we should resurrect extinct animals is now part of a cultural machine that increasingly seems to whisper, 'Why not?' It captured, maybe accidentally, the exact shape of our cultural neurosis: the maniacal desire to control nature, a belief in technological omnipotence, and a tendency to moralise after the fact. Perhaps the cruelest cosmic twist is that the plastic toy dinosaurs clutched by children today — those mass-produced echoes of Spielberg's creations — are, in a very real sense, made of dinosaurs. Fossil fuels, derived from ancient organic matter liquefied over millennia, have been moulded into choking hazards and Happy Meal replicas of the creatures. These great beasts who once walked the Earth now circle in a perfect closed loop of commercial mythmaking. Capitalism, like life, finds a way.

From Ice Sheets To Oceans: The Climate Tipping Points That Worry Scientists
From Ice Sheets To Oceans: The Climate Tipping Points That Worry Scientists

NDTV

time11 hours ago

  • NDTV

From Ice Sheets To Oceans: The Climate Tipping Points That Worry Scientists

Scientists are worried about Earth's changing weather patterns. Multiple studies have warned that our blue planet may be edging closer to climate tipping point, a threshold that, when crossed, can lead to significant and irreversible changes in the climate. Understanding these points has become critical to our planet's future, especially since the temperature is increasing - primarily by human activities that release greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. What is climate tipping point? A climate tipping point is a critical threshold where a small environmental change can lead to dramatic and often irreversible shifts. Think of it like pushing a glass just over the edge of a table - once it falls, it can't go back. This means that after a drastic climatic event, if the Earth cools down later, the system might not return to its original state. Examples of climate tipping point Some of the major examples include melting of the Greenland ice sheet. The autonomous territory is losing 2.5 million litres of fresh water every second, according to a UN report, contributing significantly to global sea rise level. Another concerning manifestation of climate tipping point is the Amazon rainforest dieback - a phenomenon that has transformed the world's biggest "natural lungs" to savanna-like ecosystem due to factors like deforestation, drought and climate change. Similarly, rising temperature of Earth has also caused the thawing of permafrost, a process where frozen ground in the polar and high-altitude regions thaws during rising temperature. The changes in Earth's climate are also threatening Atlantic Ocean Circulation or AMOC, a large system of ocean currents that redistributes heat and nutrients globally. Its collapse can lead to abrupt and severe climate shifts with global consequences. A study published in 2024 reports that the AMOC has gone through a "noticeable reduction in strength" in the last couple of decades, and recent estimates of when shutdown might happen are getting ever closer to our time. A 2023 study forecast sometime between 2025 and 2095, with a central estimate of 2050. Another analysis, revealed in August last year, points to collapse sometime between 2037 and 2064. Why scientists are alarmed now Recent studies show signs that some tipping points-like ice sheet instability-are closer than previously thought. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns that exceeding 1.5 degrees Celsius of warming increases the risk significantly. Combining data from climate models, satellite data and paleoclimate records, American space agency NASA and Columbia University explained in a research that human-made greenhouse gases have brought the Earth's climate close to critical tipping point point, with potential dangerous consequences for the planet. Climate scientists are sounding the alarm button now because many of these tipping points are projected to be reached with relatively small increases in global temperature. They want global decision-makers to take decisions keeping in mind the need to avoid crossing the crucial threshold and limit the impacts of climate change.

All about China's new missile that can be launched from space, technology is based on....
All about China's new missile that can be launched from space, technology is based on....

India.com

time14 hours ago

  • India.com

All about China's new missile that can be launched from space, technology is based on....

All about China's new missile that can be launched from space, technology is based on.... China new missile: In what could be a major concern for India and US, China has achieved a technological breakthrough pertaining to capability to launch missiles directly from space. The report in the South China Morning Post claims that China has developed hypersonic missiles capable of reaching speeds up to Mach 20, 20 times the speed of sound. With this technology, China can now launch missiles from space, including from existing or small space stations. China's might has been so upgraded that The design of these space-launched missiles is so advanced that conventional air defence systems may not be able to detect or intercept them in time. By the time conventional systems identify the trajectory of the missile, it is already very close to its target. It wont be wrong to say that China has got its Brahmastra. How does this technology work? The technology behind these missiles is based on hypersonic glide vehicles (HGVs), which operate in two stages. If China installs such missiles in any of its space stations, they can be controlled by command centres on Earth. These command centres can remotely launch hypersonic glide vehicles from space stations. The glide vehicles, traveling at extremely high speeds, will first re-enter Earth's atmosphere and then head toward their targets, making their trajectory unpredictable and difficult to intercept. China launched its hypersonic missile program in 2010. By 2017, it had conducted the first successful test and soon after began working on technology to launch missiles and rockets from space. According to an American scientific report, China tested its hypersonic missile program again in 2021, and now, in just 15 years, China's hypersonic missile capability has moved from theoretical calculations to operational reality in space. Can this threat be countered? There are some ways to counter such threats from Chinese space-launched missiles. For example, it is possible to destroy the satellite or orbital platform from which the missile was launched. Along with the United States, China, and Russia, India has also acquired technology known as anti-satellite weapons to destroy satellites in space.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store