Malaysia recovers RM158mil in public funds via follow-up audits
The achievement was highlighted in a statement issued today in conjunction with the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on Follow-up Audit (WGFA), a newly established body under the International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions (Intosai).
Malaysia is chairing the group, which aims to help countries strengthen their follow-up mechanisms to ensure audit findings lead to concrete action and resolution.
The two-day meeting, which began today in Penang, brought together 71 auditors from 43 countries, including officials from Bulgaria, Oman, South Africa, Thailand and Turkiye. The group includes heads of audit agencies and senior auditors.
Malaysia's Auditor General (AG) and Intosai WGFA chair Datuk Seri Wan Suraya Wan Mohd Radzi said the group's creation shows the global commitment to better accountability in public spending.
A key highlight from Malaysia was the introduction of the AG's Dashboard, a digital system that tracks every issue raised in the AG's report until it is fully resolved.
The meeting will also finalise the group's official framework and plan future projects, including a guideline that shares best practices for follow-up audits globally.
Delegates also discussed the need for more training and support to help countries improve their audit follow-up work, which is seen as a key part of public sector reform.
The event was supported by the Penang state government, along with other local agencies, to promote tourism and economic growth in the state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Invest Asean-Malaysia 2025 Conference to run from tomorrow to July 3
PETALING JAYA: The Invest Asean-Malaysia 2025 Conference expects to attract more than 1,500 delegates, including foreign fixed income, equity and private equity investors with a combined asset under management (AUM) of over US$13.6 trillion or RM57.7 trillion. The event, which will be held in Kuala Lumpur from tomorrow to July 3, will be jointly hosted by Bursa Malaysia in collaboration with Malayan Banking Bhd (Maybank). The conference comprises a plenary and two days of corporate access showcasing 71 corporates from Asean, including 30 from Malaysia, with a total market capitalisation of US$382.6bil or RM1.62 trillion. It is themed 'Driving Asean Integration through Malaysia's Economic Resilience – Capital, Collaboration, Connections', Bursa Malaysia and Maybank stated in a statement. The three-day conference will bring together corporate leaders, policymakers and institutional investors from across the region to chart the next chapter of Asean's economic ascent. 'The country's Asean Chairmanship this year presents a unique opportunity to champion deeper regional integration. 'Through this flagship conference, we reaffirm Malaysia's value proposition and leadership towards this regional ambition. 'As the national exchange, Bursa Malaysia is committed to cultivating a dynamic and competitive capital market – one that not only drives Malaysia's economic growth, but also reinforces Asean's continued progress,' Bursa Malaysia chief executive officer Datuk Fad'l Mohamed said. Delegates will also have the opportunity to join a series of curated thematic site visits, offering them first-hand look at Malaysia's investment ready growth corridors and key industries.
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Federal court rules in favour of LHDN over RM1.8bil tax appeal against TNB
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court on Wednesday (July 2) allowed the Inland Revenue Board's (LHDN) appeal to reinstate an additional tax assessment of RM1.8bil against Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) for the 2018 assessment year. A five-member panel chaired by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim unanimously overturned the earlier decisions of both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, which had ruled in favour of TNB and quashed the LHDN's tax assessment. The other members of the panel were Federal Court judges Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan, Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang, and Datuk Abu Bakar Jais. No order as to costs was made, with the court noting that the matter involved issues of public interest. Delivering the court's judgment, Justice Rhodzariah held that TNB's claim for reinvestment allowance (RA) under Schedule 7A of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA) was misconceived and not in accordance with the provisions of the Act. She added that TNB ought to have applied for an investment allowance under Schedule 7B of the ITA, rather than seeking RA under Schedule 7A. She explained that the legislative intent behind Schedule 7A was to incentivise manufacturing companies to reinvest in their existing operations in Malaysia. In contrast, Schedule 7B provides for investment allowance incentives specifically tailored to companies in the services sector, as approved by the Minister of Finance. Justice Rhodzariah further noted that TNB is authorised to impose a service charge under the Service Tax Act 2018, which reinforces its status as a service provider. As such, the court found that TNB falls within the ambit of the services sector and is therefore subject to Schedule 7B, not Schedule 7A. The LHDN argued that TNB, as a utility provider, does not qualify as a manufacturer and is thus not entitled to the RA granted to entities engaged in manufacturing activities. On July 21, 2020, TNB filed a judicial review application seeking, among others, to quash the LHDN's decision dated July 13, 2020, which had disallowed its RA claim amounting to RM1,812,506,384.64. The company also sought a declaration that it was entitled to claim the RA under Schedule 7A of the ITA. TNB had included its RA claim for the year of assessment 2018 in its tax return. However, the LHDN informed the company that the claim had been disallowed in a letter dated July 3, 2020. Subsequently, on July 13, 2020, the LHDN issued a notice of additional assessment against TNB for RM1,812,506,384.64 in tax. TNB then initiated judicial review proceedings to challenge the assessment. In February 2022, the High Court allowed the application and set aside the LHDN's additional assessment for the year 2018. The Court of Appeal, in a decision delivered in May 2023, affirmed the High Court's ruling. Despite the dispute, TNB has already paid the assessed sum. At Wednesday's hearing, the LHDN was represented by Datuk Dr Cyrus Das and senior revenue counsel Ashrina Ramzan Ali, while counsels Datuk D. P. Naban and S. Saravana Kumar appeared for TNB. - Bernama
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Federal Court rules in favour of IRB over RM1.8bil tax appeal against TNB
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court today allowed the Inland Revenue Board's (IRB) appeal to reinstate an additional tax assessment of RM1.8 billion against Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) for the 2018 assessment year. A five-member panel chaired by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim unanimously overturned the earlier decisions of both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, which had ruled in favour of TNB and quashed the IRB's tax assessment. The other members of the panel were Federal Court judges Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan, Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang and Datuk Abu Bakar Jais. No order as to costs was made, with the court noting that the matter involved issues of public interest. Delivering the court's judgment, Justice Rhodzariah held that TNB's claim for reinvestment allowance (RA) under Schedule 7A of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA) was misconceived and not in accordance with the provisions of the Act. She added that TNB ought to have applied for an investment allowance under Schedule 7B of the ITA, rather than seeking RA under Schedule 7A. She explained that the legislative intent behind Schedule 7A was to incentivise manufacturing companies to reinvest in their existing operations in Malaysia. In contrast, Schedule 7B provides for investment allowance incentives specifically tailored to companies in the services sector, as approved by the Minister of Finance. Justice Rhodzariah further noted that TNB is authorised to impose a service charge under the Service Tax Act 2018, which reinforces its status as a service provider. As such, the court found that TNB falls within the ambit of the services sector and is therefore subject to Schedule 7B, not Schedule 7A. The IRB argued that TNB, as a utility provider, does not qualify as a manufacturer and is thus not entitled to the RA granted to entities engaged in manufacturing activities. On July 21, 2020, TNB filed a judicial review application seeking, among others, to quash the IRB's decision dated July 13, 2020, which had disallowed its RA claim amounting to RM1,812,506,384.64. The company also sought a declaration that it was entitled to claim the RA under Schedule 7A of the ITA. TNB had included its RA claim for the year of assessment 2018 in its tax return. However, the IRB informed the company that the claim had been disallowed in a letter dated July 3, 2020. Subsequently, on July 13, 2020, the IRB issued a notice of additional assessment against TNB for RM1,812,506,384.64 in tax. TNB then initiated judicial review proceedings to challenge the assessment. In February 2022, the High Court allowed the application and set aside the IRB's additional assessment for the year 2018. The Court of Appeal, in a decision delivered in May 2023, affirmed the High Court's ruling. Despite the dispute, TNB has already paid the assessed sum. At today's hearing, the IRB was represented by Datuk Dr Cyrus Das and senior revenue counsel Ashrina Ramzan Ali, while counsels Datuk D. P. Naban and S. Saravana Kumar appeared for TNB. — BERNAMA
