Victorian MP Anne Webster's cultural heritage speech triggers walkout
Dr Webster's speech as shadow local government minister at the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) general assembly in Canberra last week led to heckling from the audience and dozens of people, including ALGA board members, leaving the room, attendees told the ABC.
During the 20-minute address, attendees said Dr Webster repeatedly raised examples of native title and cultural heritage disputes in her electorate.
She questioned a cultural heritage declaration that paused the progress of a proposal to develop a caravan park and cabins on private land on the edge of Lake Tyrrell, near Sea Lake.
"It remains frozen to this day, but with no cultural artefacts found by their expert archaeologists," Dr Webster told the crowd.
She also said two-thirds of rock-climbing routes at Mount Arapiles were shut for "disputed" cultural heritage reasons "at the behest of the local Indigenous corporation" after sacred Indigenous rock art was rediscovered.
Dr Webster told the crowd some of the rock art "can't even be seen with the naked eye anymore".
Three mayors at the event told the ABC the rhetoric of the speech, which Dr Webster gave in front of several Indigenous mayors, councillors and chief executives, was "tone deaf", "appalling", "truly disgraceful", "really offensive" and "hugely inappropriate".
Berrigan Shire Mayor Julia Cornwell McKean, a Wiradjuri woman, said it was not the time for Dr Webster to claim native title was restricting councils from doing their job.
"It was just truly disgraceful for someone who has been a shadow minister for two seconds," Cr Cornwell McKean said.
"Quite frankly, I was stunned.
"I was just sitting there in disbelief that someone would use this valuable platform at this critical point in their career as a shadow minister to make points of this nature.
"It wasn't a topic for the National General Assembly, and a whole number of Indigenous people and people in the audience decided to leave the assembly at that time."
Byron Shire Mayor Sarah Ndiaye was among those who walked out.
She said when Dr Webster started to question how land where no artefacts were found was culturally significant, the speech moved into "really offensive territory" and identity politics.
"As if that's the only measure of cultural significance," Cr Ndiaye said.
"Anyone who knows anything about native title and cultural significance knows that's not the case at all.
Mildura Mayor Helen Healy, whose council is in Ms Webster's electorate, said the role of local government leaders was to bring people together, not divide them.
"It deeply troubles me that one of our most vulnerable communities is being used, and I'll refer to the words of the mayor of Palm Island speaking to delegates after the incident, as a 'political football to kick around'," Cr Healy said.
"Furthermore, with Indigenous Australian culture being a major driver of international tourism, what is it going to mean to the economies of our communities when a federal leader dismisses the cultural significance of Mallee places like Lake Tyrrell at Sea Lake?"
Wotjobaluk Wergaia Jaardwa Jardwadjali man Gary Murray said Lake Tyrrell, known as Direl, was a well-documented culturally significant place featuring burial sites and discovered objects that confirmed First Nations people, their ancestors and clans belonged to this country for millennia.
"Our unique cultural heritage is shared with all Australians, and this significant cultural heritage should never disappear from our country at the whim of a development or the need for a pollie's vote," Mr Murray said.
"After all, there is no other Direl place in the world with such documented significant cultural heritage linked to the astronomy, people, waters and landscape."
Archaeologist and Njeri Njeri and Wergaia man Mark Grist said Lake Tyrrell and its surrounds was a sensitive landscape and a special place with a rare sky story.
"It has a lot of archaeology history to it, and it also has a lot of oral history and it has the sky story, which is significant to the wider area of Lake Tyrrell," Mr Grist said.
"Whatever does happen at Lake Tyrrell has got to be done in a way that respects Lake Tyrrell, as a landscape and the people that use it as well, including my people, and we used it all the time."
Dr Webster told news.com.au a conversation about cultural heritage bans was worth having, and those who chose to walk out during her speech were known to cause "difficulty" to other councillors.
She told the ABC the comments she made on cultural heritage were consistent with statements she had publicly made before.
"I have been grateful for the significant number of ALGA delegates who have subsequently contacted me from all over Australia, wholeheartedly supporting my comments," Dr Webster said.
The shadow minister for Indigenous Australians and social services, Kerrynne Liddle, said Dr Webster's speech was about the impact the Native Title Act 1993 and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 had on constituents and stakeholders.
"The issues raised by Dr Webster are not new and are often raised by traditional owners, constituents and developers in relation to the native title and cultural heritage acts across Australia," Senator Liddle said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Daily Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Daily Telegraph
Amazon's robotics, AI push not eliminating jobs, company says
Don't miss out on the headlines from Technology. Followed categories will be added to My News. Amazon warehouses are still a viable job option for unskilled and entry-level workers, executives of the e-commerce giant say, despite massive robotics and AI investments. Speaking to NewsWire in Japan this week, Amazon's global head of PR for robotics and AI, Xavier Chao, compared AI robots and sorting machines to offices having a coffee machine and snacks close to the desks. 'Retention is very, vitally important for us if we want to continue to manage and sustain our business and grow; we have to retain our workforce,' Mr Chao said. 'And so we think that innovation is part of the solution of creating a nice workplace that attracts people, and retains staff.' A worker in front of an item-by-item timer at their station inside Amazon's Chiba Minato warehouse in Tokyo. Picture: NewsWire / Blair Jackson Australia has eight Amazon 'fulfilment centre' warehouses; seven of these do not have Amazon's robots. The custom designed and built robots operate using AI, moving stacks of products for humans to pick and put into boxes. Australia's robotised Amazon warehouse is at Kemps Creek in Sydney, and employs about 2500 workers. With Australia's comparatively low-tech Amazon facilities - compared to warehouses in comparable countries - retraining Australian workers to fix and maintain Amazon's robots has stalled. In June, Amazon announced it would be investing $20bn in data centres in Australia, reiterating concerns about the e-commerce company's entrenchment in the Australian economy. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joined Amazon Web Services chief executive Matt Garman in Seattle in June as AWS announced a $20bn investment into data centre infrastructure in Australia. Picture: NewsWire / PMO Anthony Albanese faces internal pressure from high-ranking Labor MPs, The Australian reports, over accusations Amazon undermines labour laws and employs tax avoidance tactics. These criticisms are echoed by unions - the ACTU, TWU and the SDA - who claim Amazon Australia's workplace practices are unethical. Asked if operating in countries with relatively strong workplace protections was tough for Amazon, Mr Chao said 'Right now, what we're really hyper-focused on is can these systems actually benefit our frontline workers, and getting feedback from them'. He argues wide-scale automation is good for workers. 'If we can create the most innovative workplace that we possibly can, we want to try to do three things. 'Safety … Ease - all of us want to have an easier job. 'And then three, it's exposure. So a lot of people who come and work at an Amazon facility, you know, there are people from all walks of life.' *Amazon paid for NewsWire's travel and accommodation in Japan Originally published as Amazon's robotics, AI push not eliminating jobs as tech giant continues automation wave


SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
'More can be done': The knowledge gap Australians have with their retirement nest egg
The final increase to the superannuation guarantee has taken effect, meaning employers are now required to pay a minimum contribution of 12 per cent into their employees' super funds. But around a third of people are unaware where their retirement funds are invested — a similar proportion don't know their super balance, and one in 10 have never checked. These were the findings of a survey of 3,146 Australians conducted by the Commonwealth Bank, which suggested the knowledge gap about how super is invested was higher among gen Z and women, at 43 per cent. Jessica Irvine, the bank's personal finance expert, said people have more confidence in managing their day-to-day finances, but need more assistance to understand retirement options. Echoing her views, Wayne Swan, the former federal treasurer who oversaw the legislation guaranteeing the increase from nine to 12 per cent, told SBS News that more needed to be done to engage Australians with their retirement planning. Swan, now chair of Cbus, an industry super fund, said: "I think that all superannuation funds acknowledge and do their best to achieve [that], and there's always more that can be done." What is happening with superannuation? Thirty-four years ago, former prime minister Paul Keating shared his vision of an Australian future that included a 12 per cent target for compulsory super contributions. Now, he said, that system "finally matures". The superannuation guarantee has risen since 2012 to reach 12 per cent. In a statement to mark the 1 July increase to 12 per cent, Keating said it "will guarantee personal super accumulations in excess of $3 million at retirement" for someone entering the workforce today. "Superannuation, like Medicare, is now an Australian community standard, binding the whole population as a national economic family, with each person having a place," he said. How did we get here? Superannuation in Australia stretches back to the early 20th century, but there were no attempts to institutionalise universal compulsory contributions before the mid-1980s. In 1985, the Australian Council of Trade Unions, with the support of the then-Hawke government, presented a National Wage Case to the Conciliation and Arbitration Commission about a 3 per cent compulsory contribution for all Australian workers. The tribunal sided with the union in 1986 but ruled it as optional — subject to agreement between employers and employees. Five years later, in Keating's final federal budget as treasurer, the 3 per cent superannuation guarantee levy was made compulsory. It came into effect the following year, when Keating was prime minister, with the introduction of a superannuation guarantee charge to penalise employers who don't meet their contribution obligations. The mandatory rate then gradually increased to 9 per cent by 2002. It was supposed to reach 12 per cent by 2000, but, under the Howard government, there were no further increases until 1 July 2013. In 2010, two years after the Global Financial Crisis and in response to the findings of the Henry Tax Review, then-treasurer Swan unveiled a plan to incrementally lift the superannuation guarantee levy to 12 per cent. He said it would increase by 0.5 per cent each year between 2013 and 2019. In 2010, then-treasurer Wayne Swan (pictured right) announced a plan to gradually increase the superannuation guarantee levy from 9 per cent to 12 per cent. Source: AAP / Alan Porritt But two months after it rose to 9.25 per cent in 2013, Tony Abbott stormed to a landslide election victory — and followed through on an election promise to delay increases to the guarantee due to cost pressures on small businesses. The government failed to legislate the delay the following year, and the rate was lifted to 9.5 per cent — a level it remained at for seven years. It wasn't until Australia was in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic that the incremental increases began. Starting in 2021, it rose by 0.5 per cent each year. LISTEN TO SBS News 30/06/2025 08:22 English The 12 per cent milestone Australia's superannuation system now manages over $4 trillion in assets, ranking as the fourth-largest pension market in the world. The 12 per cent milestone is expected to propel Australia to second place within a decade — just behind the United States — despite its relatively small population. Swan said the superannuation guarantee levy not only delivers a secure retirement for all Australians, but "fundamentally alters the distribution of wealth in our community". "It gives access to growth assets to everyone in the community. From a building worker through to a professional in the office tower, everyone in Australia gets to own a piece of the wealth of this great country in a way that's never before been possible," he said. Swan said he's "absolutely proud to have been part of this story". "I always think of those pioneers, particularly the unionists, who fought to establish this scheme 40 years ago. What it really shows is that ordinary working people can effect change in a society like ours," he said. "What visionaries they were, and what they have done to make our country not only a bigger and more successful economy, but a fairer one as well." What is a 'comfortable retirement'? Swan said while the six-year delay in achieving a 12 per cent increase came at a cost to Australian superannuation balances, the benefits are greater from having finally reached that milestone. "For someone who's, say, 30 years old now, it's going to mean an extra $130,000 in their retirement," he said. That follows recent modelling by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA). The super peak body's retirement standard for June 2025 projects a 30-year-old today on the median wage of $75,000 and a $30,000 super balance would witness that figure rise to $610,000 by the retirement age of 67. This amount exceeds ASFA's estimate of the $595,000 needed to afford a comfortable retirement for singles and $690,000 for couples. ASFA defines a 'comfortable' retirement as someone who owns their home outright, is in good health, can afford top-level private health insurance, has a good car, and engages in a range of leisure and recreational activities, including taking one domestic trip a year and one international trip every seven years. Business concerns There are concerns that a string of 1 July changes , including the increase to the superannuation guarantee levy, could hit businesses and place further pressure on cash flow. Luke Achterstraat, CEO, Council of Small Business Organisations Australia, said: "The increase of the superannuation guarantee comes at a time when award rates have also increased 3.5 per cent, national productivity is in decline, and payroll tax and workers' compensation insurance will also increase." There are concerns that an increase to the superannuation guarantee levy and other changes that took effect on 1 July could negatively impact small businesses and further pressure their cash flow. Source: AAP "This puts small businesses between a rock and a hard place, needing to either absorb or pass on these costs to consumers," Achterstraat said. Beyond 12 per cent: Where to from here? The 0.5 per cent increase to 12 per cent is the last one legislated by the Australian government. However, with life expectancy improving, would we need more in our nest egg, and is there a case for raising the superannuation guarantee even further? "I think there's going to be a debate about whether we need to go above 12 per cent," Swan said. "I think 12 per cent can certainly guarantee quite a dignified retirement for all Australians, but that will be a discussion that will be had in the years ahead."

Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Achieved nothing': TV host mocks Australia-US alliance
Sky News host James Macpherson mocks the Australia-US alliance, claiming the phone calls Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had with US President Donald Trump 'achieved nothing'. 'Foreign Minister Penny Wong says there's no problem with the US alliance – none whatsoever,' Mr Macpherson said. 'Penny Wong says Albanese has had three very constructive conversations with the President – otherwise known as phone calls, phone calls that achieved nothing, resolved nothing, and didn't even result in a dinner invitation. 'Penny Wong heard from Marco Rubio that Donald Trump is keen to meet Anthony Albanese, and so Penny Wong will pass on to Anthony Albanese what Marco Rubio told her that he had heard from Donald Trump.'