China's Xi to meet Putin, 'sign bilateral documents' during visit to Moscow for Victory Day celebrations
"The bilateral talks to be held during the visit will focus on the core aspects of further advancement of Russia-China relations of comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation, as well as pressing matters on the international and regional agendas," a statement from the Kremlin read.
Pro-Kremlin media Interfax reported on Feb. 10 that Xi plans to visit Moscow on May 9.
China has strengthened ties with Russia since the Kremlin launched its full-scale war against Ukraine, becoming Moscow's leading supplier of dual-use goods that bolster Russia's defense industry.
While China has positioned itself as a potential mediator in the war, it has simultaneously criticized the U.S. and its allies for "exacerbating" the war by supplying weapons to Ukraine. NATO has labeled China a "decisive enabler" of Russia's aggression.
Despite the criticism, President Volodymyr Zelensky announced on April 17 that China is supplying weapons to the Russian military. His statement marks Kyiv's first confirmation that Beijing supports Russia's war effort by providing weapons.
Kyiv also presented Beijing with evidence that Chinese citizens and companies have participated in Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine, the Foreign Ministry reported on April 22.
The Kremlin uses Victory Day celebrations for propaganda purposes, showcasing its military might and drawing on the Soviet victory in World War II to justify its aggression against Ukraine.
On May 3, Zelensky said Ukraine cannot guarantee the safety of foreign officials planning to attend Russia's Victory Day parade in Moscow, warning that any incidents on Russian territory fall solely under the Kremlin's control.
'Our position is very simple for all countries traveling to Russia on May 9: We cannot be held responsible for what happens on the territory of the Russian Federation,' Zelensky said during a briefing with journalists.
Zelensky cautioned that Russia could orchestrate provocations, including 'arsons, explosions, or other actions,' and then attempt to blame Ukraine. He said Kyiv has advised visiting delegations accordingly.
Read also: Ukraine shares evidence of Chinese citizens, companies involved in Russia's warWe've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘Buy 3, Not 30' Comment Is Actually Smart Budgeting Advice — Here's Why
In May of this year, as President Donald Trump was rolling out his controversial tariff policies against America's trade partners, he received a great deal of criticism from economists and consumers alike over fears his tariffs would drastically increase prices of goods (especially those imported from China). Critics of Trump's trade policy even noted that children's toys and dolls would increase in price. The president's response was, to put it fairly, typically blunt. Check Out: For You: 'I don't think that a beautiful baby girl needs — that's 11 years old — needs to have 30 dolls,' Trump declared on the May 4 episode of NBC's Meet the Press, noting that if dolls become more expensive, simply buy less dolls. 'I think they can have three dolls or four dolls because what we were doing with China was just unbelievable. We had a trade deficit of hundreds of billions of dollars with China…I'm just saying they don't need to have 30 dolls. They can have three. They don't need to have 250 pencils. They can have five.' While there is an irony to a billionaire — one famous for his lavish wealth and a penchant for 24-carat gold decor — suggesting working-class Americans should refrain from buying multiple toys for their children, and should instead purchase such things in moderation, there is a sound objective truth to Trump's statement. Americans Spend Nearly $6,000 on Children's Toys Over a Lifetime Per The Guardian, the average American family spends $600 yearly on toys; that's approximately $6,000 over the course of a decade of childhood. That's $6,000 not being spent on medical care, college savings or family bills. That's a staggering amount of money for toys, and likely far too many for a child to focus upon and totally enjoy. That isn't a political stance, either — whether one loves or hates President Trump, the assertion that a child can enjoy three dolls rather than 30 is not only likely true, it's sound financial advice. I Asked ChatGPT To Explain TRUMP Crypto to Me Like I'm 12: As self-made millionaire and CEO of Crush Your Money Goals Bernadette Joy wrote for CNBC, when she was previously $300,000 in debt, her problem was not that she didn't make enough money — it was that she overspent on things that were not needed. She specifically called out children's toys as one of the six things she spent far too much on. 'I've seen parents spend hundreds, sometimes thousands, on toys that their kids lose interest in within weeks,' she noted. 'Less is more. Rotate toys instead of buying new ones, and prioritize experiences over stuff.' While, yes, Trump is a deeply divisive figure, and his advice for moderation with regards to spending should be taken with a grain of salt, his advice in this case actually does align with the recommendations of money experts such as Joy. Further, at a time when inflation is high, and America's economic stability is uncertain, spending in moderation is always good advice. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Says Trump's Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a 'Real Shot' -- Here's Why This article originally appeared on Trump's 'Buy 3, Not 30' Comment Is Actually Smart Budgeting Advice — Here's Why
Wall Street Journal
25 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘Our Dear Friends in Moscow' Review: Propaganda and the Press
In September 2020 Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan, two of Russia's leading investigative journalists, fled to the West. For years they had been watched and harassed by their country's security services, and by that spring Mr. Soldatov's life was in danger. Neither of them could have imagined this would be their fate when they started out as young reporters in 2000. Having come of age in the 1990s, they had believed that they belonged to a new generation of Russians who were committed to democracy and human rights, only to see their friends reject these ideals in favor of authoritarianism and anti-Westernism. 'Our Dear Friends in Moscow' is a searing and sobering book that captures the profound cynicism and xenophobic nationalism that define contemporary Russia. 'Our Dear Friends in Moscow' tells two interconnected stories. One is intensely personal and recounts the relationships among Mr. Soldatov, Ms. Borogan and several fellow journalists: Evgeny Krutikov, the scion of a once-elite Soviet family; Petya Akopov, an intellectual with a fascination for repressive regimes; Zhenya Baranov, a war correspondent; and Olga Lyubimova, a TV host with connections to the reactionary film director Nikita Mikhalkov. In the early days, their differences seemed unimportant. They worked and socialized together. They partied, drank, smoked and debated the 'accursed questions' about Russia's troubled past and murky future. Things changed once Russian president Vladimir Putin began to suffocate the independent media and civil society in the early 2000s. For a while it seemed that the regime would allow liberal journalists some space in which to work. 'Many believed that this coexistence could last for years and that one day Putin would just be gone,' the authors write. Then, they add, 'things would go back to 'normal'—whatever that meant.' But Mr. Putin did not go away, and the repression intensified. Mr. Soldatov, Ms. Borogan and their friends had to decide whether to resist and join the opposition or to surrender and join the Putin propaganda machine.
Epoch Times
25 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
China's Pro-Russia Remark Aimed at Repairing Ties After Intelligence Breach: Insider
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi recently told the EU's top diplomat that China does not want Russia to fail in Ukraine because Beijing wants to keep the United States distracted—emphasizing that a Russian collapse would allow the United States to redirect its strategic focus toward Beijing. This statement, to EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, raised eyebrows internationally, as it departs from China's long-standing claims of neutrality regarding the war.
