logo
Revealed: How the Democrats' age problem goes far beyond Biden

Revealed: How the Democrats' age problem goes far beyond Biden

Telegraph11-07-2025
When Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez set her sights on becoming the top Democrat on the House oversight committee, the old guard quickly coalesced around her opponent.
Gerry Connolly, a then 74-year-old eight-term Virginia congressman who had recently been diagnosed with cancer, had powerful allies. Among them was former speaker Nancy Pelosi, 85, who reportedly made calls on his behalf.
The old guard prevailed. Mr Connolly beat his 35-year-old challenger with 131 votes to 84. Speaking after his victory he said his colleagues had been looking for 'somebody capable, irrespective of how old they are'.
Five months later he stepped down from the role, saying his oesophageal cancer had returned.
He passed away just weeks later, aged 75. He was the third sitting Democrat to die this year.
David Cohen, political science professor at the University of Akron said the oversight committee race was a 'beautiful example of the Democratic party House leadership being completely out of touch'.
' Ocasio Cortez is an excellent spokesperson and somebody that's young, energetic... she seemed like the perfect person to pick to chair that committee, and yet they went with the person that was very sick and who later died,' he said.
Had the Democrats gained a narrow House majority in 2024, they would have lost it anyway through their politicians dying within the first few months of the congressional term.
While the issue of ageing political leaders is not unique to the Democrats – Donald Trump is the oldest president elected in US history – it is one that is causing increased tensions.
Joe Biden's public decline saw the octogenarian drop out of the presidential race following his devastating debate performance. In May, it was revealed that he was suffering from prostate cancer.
The diagnosis, which coincided with a tell-all book detailing an alleged cover-up at the White House of the ailing president's cognitive decline, sparked a flurry of conspiracy theories that Mr Biden may have been seriously unwell during his presidency.
The public fiasco has left the Democrats, already grappling with a ' gerontocracy ' showing no signs of stepping aside to make way for younger talent, smarting over its handling of its ageing heavyweights.
Of the 20 oldest House members elected in 2024, 16 were Democrats. Nine of the 14 Senators aged 75 or over at the start of Congress were also Democrats.
More than half of the House Democrats who are 75 or older told Axios they planned to run again in 2026, including Maxine Waters, 86, and Rosa DeLauro, who is 82.
Politico recounted multiple reports of Eleanor Holmes Norton, 87, the oldest House member, and a Democrat telling journalists she will be running for another term in 2026, only for her office to say that is not the case.
Of the 41 sitting Congress members who have died of natural causes since 2000, two thirds were Democrats.
The votes of the three Democrats who died this year, Mr Connolly, Sylvester Turner, 70, and Raúl Grijalva, 77, could have stopped Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' scraping through its first vote in May at 214 to 215.
'It's complete and total political malpractice of the Democratic Party to essentially support and allow these folks to run for re-election when they were so old and infirm and in some cases, terminally ill, knowing... that the numbers were so close between the two parties,' Mr Cohen told The Telegraph.
'I think the Republicans have done a better job at embracing some of their younger members, whereas Democrats seem to have a very seniority based view of how things should proceed,' he said.
Republicans are no strangers to the ageing politician, however. In 2023, concerns were raised about Mitch McConnell's fitness to serve after he appeared to freeze twice in front of reporters within several weeks.
The then 81-year-old stared blankly in silence after reporters asked him questions at separate press conferences. He later resigned.
Last year it was revealed Kay Granger, 82, a Republican congresswoman from Texas, had been struggling with memory issues and living in a senior-living facility towards the end of her tenure in office.
But there are several underlying issues at play that make age more of an issue for Democrats.
If an incumbent decides to run for re-election, especially in safe Democrat seats, their chances being defeated are low.
House Republicans also have term limits for top committee posts, which forces them to move into new roles every six years.
'That's the best time for them to go into the lobby, if that's what they're going to do. Otherwise, maybe go be with their grandkids, but they can't just stay forever as a leader of a committee until they literally die in office,' Gregory Koger, political science professor at the University of Miami, told The Telegraph.
Democrats don't have limits. This means they can stay in plum roles as long as they continue to win elections.
After facing calls to resign from fellow Democrats, in 2023 Dianne Feinstein, a California senator, temporarily stepped down from her role as the ranking member of the judiciary committee. She died five months later, aged 90.
After the Republicans were beaten in the 2008 election, the party 'melted down' and the anti-incumbency Tea Party movement ascended, Mr Koger said.
The Democratic party could now see their own version of this rebellion, he added, but they may not have the strengths the Republican movement capitalised on in 2010.
'We could definitely see candidates rising up, challenging incumbents, but it's not clear if there will be organisational backing, if they'll have enough funding, if they'll get professional consultants to help them out,' Mr Koger said.
The wheels appear to already be in motion, with a raft of next-generation Democrats launching campaigns to challenge ageing incumbents.
Saikat Chakrabarti, 39, a former chief of staff for Ms Ocasio-Cortez, has already said he will challenge Ms Pelosi in the primary, although the California Democrat has not confirmed whether she will seek re-election in 2026.
Zohran Mamdani, 33, is also being hailed as a potential saviour for the party after winning the Democratic nomination for the New York mayoral election last month.
'I think everyone's running their own race for different reasons, but they're all kind of running against those long term incumbents who aren't serving the district anymore, and that's kind of the single thread', said Jake Rakov, who has launched a campaign to unseat his former boss Brad Sherman, a 70-year-old California congressman.
'He just does not have, to me, the credentials to say 'I've been here 30 years, keep sending me back', because what can you show for it?', Mr Rakov told The Telegraph.
Mr Rakov has pledged to cap his service at five terms, 10 years in Congress, saying he does not believe in 'lifelong appointment'. The cap 'keeps a lid on our talent bench,' he argues.
'We've had three [congressmen] die since January... We've lost votes in the House... Obviously, if we had people who could stay in office and not pass away, we would have possibly changed that calculus a lot,' he said.
He added: 'Our party has had such a problem, I think with that by default incumbency protection, that if you're the incumbent no one else should be allowed to challenge you and I think Republicans did a better job of understanding and supporting primary challenges.'
Mr Rakov's campaign came after David Hogg, 25, the former vice-chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) vowed to unseat 'asleep-at-the-wheel' Democrats.
Mr Hogg was ousted from his position after pledging to spend $20 million (£15 million) in Democratic primaries to topple 'asleep at the wheel' incumbents.
A source close to Leaders We Deserve told The Telegraph: 'The tactics that make you successful right now in 2025 are quite different from the tactics that would make you successful in the early 90s.'
Noting that the Democrats had lost critical votes owing to people dying in office, he added: 'It's just we very much can see what happens when people keep hanging on and refuse to recognise when it's their time to step aside totally.'
Michael Binder, a political science professor at the University of North Florida said 'every single race matters' when the House margins are so thin.
There are only a couple of dozen competitive races and older politicians tend to already be in a safe Democrat seat.
'But if somebody dies at the last minute and that leaves an open seat where somebody doesn't have the name recognition to and the incumbency advantage, it could cost them [the Democrats] a seat they don't expect it could be really meaningful,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Number of Democratic voters who are ‘extremely motivated' to vote in next election skyrockets
Number of Democratic voters who are ‘extremely motivated' to vote in next election skyrockets

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Number of Democratic voters who are ‘extremely motivated' to vote in next election skyrockets

Nearly three-quarters of Democratic voters say they are 'extremely motivated' to cast their ballots in the 2026 midterm elections, a dramatic uptick from four years ago, polling shows. Just six months after Republicans took control of the White House and Congress, 72 percent of Democrats and Democratic-aligned voters say they are 'extremely motivated' to vote in the next election, a CNN poll conducted by SSRS this month found. By contrast, only 50 percent of Republicans say the same. Democrats are now looking to enter midterm elections in 2026 under similar circumstances as 2018 in an attempt to break up the GOP's control of both chambers of Congress and the White House. During the 2018 elections, voters dealt a massive blow to President Donald Trump's first-term agenda, with House Democrats gaining 23 seats to take control of the House. In October 2022, two years into President Joe Biden's term when Democrats narrowly controlled the trifecta, just 44 percent of Democratic voters expressed the same motivation to vote in the midterm. That figure was just slightly higher for Republicans, with 48 percent saying they were eager to vote. In that election, Republicans clinched the House of Representatives while Democrats retained control of the Senate. Still, the poll shows Democrats could have some work cut out for them. Just 28 percent of respondents said they view the Democratic Party favorably. Meanwhile, 33 percent expressed a favorable view of the Republican Party. 'I think that the Democratic Party, we have a lot of work to do to make sure we are meeting voters where they are, listening to what they have to say, and talking to them about issues that they want us to take action on,' Virginia Democratic Congresswoman Jennifer McClellan told CNN in response to the poll. "What's going to matter is what we're doing on the ground in these districts.' Recovering from Kamala Harris' defeat to Trump in 2024, Democrats are looking to harness an electorate that they lost in the last election. A separate poll by Lake Research Partners and Way to Win analyzed 'Biden skippers,' those living in battleground states who voted for Biden in 2020 but sat out of the 2024 presidential election. The survey poked holes in the idea that Harris was 'too far left.' Progressive lawmaker Vermont Independent Senator Bernie Sanders and New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez topped the list of public figures respondents viewed positively, with 78 percent having a favorable view of Sanders and 67 percent having a favorable view of Ocasio-Cortez. Republicans are also making moves ahead of the 2026 midterms. The White House is already strategizing to ensure the GOP retains the trifecta. The plan reportedly includes Trump returning to the campaign trail as well as him having a hand in advising which candidates run and which 'stay put' in the upcoming election, sources told Politico.

Trump and von der Leyen announce US-EU trade deal
Trump and von der Leyen announce US-EU trade deal

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump and von der Leyen announce US-EU trade deal

Donald Trump has announced a tariff deal with the EU to end four months of difficult negotiations between Washington and Brussels and avert a damaging transatlantic trade war. The European Commission chief, Ursula von der Leyen, said 'we have a deal' after a 40-minute meeting with Trump at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland where the US president is on holiday for the weekend. She described it as 'a big deal, a huge deal' that would bring 'stability' and 'predictability' to both sides.. 'The two biggest economies should have a good trade flow,' she said. 'It solves a lot of stuff and was a great decision,' said Trump, describing the agreement, which also involved the EU agreeing to spend tens of billions of dollars more on US energy products, as 'a powerful deal' and an 'important' partnership. 'This is this is really the biggest trading partnership in the world, so we should give it a shot,' he had said before the private meeting started. Keeping the EU delegation, who had flown in on Sunday for the meeting, on tenterhooks to the end, the US president had repeated less than an hour earlier that the chances of a deal were only a '50-50', and that 'three or four sticking points' remained. Von der Leyen said the meeting was 'tough' and 'very difficult'. Referring to a pre-meeting with Trump in front of the cameras, she later told reporters at Glasgow airport: 'You saw the tension at the beginning. So we had to work hard to come to a common position.' Under the agreement, the US will levy a 15% baseline tariff for most EU exports to the US, limiting a higher tariff. However, the rate is higher than before Trump came to power, and a 50% tariff remains on steel exports – a setback for that industry. There was initial confusion over pharmaceuticals after Trump said the sector would not be included. Speaking to reporters at Prestwick airport in Glasgow a short time later, von der Leyen said they were included but there were no guarantees of later increases in import duties. 'It is agreed that we have 15% for pharmaceuticals. Whatever the decisions later on is of the president of the United States: how to deal with pharmaceuticals in general? Globally, that's on a different sheet of paper,' she said. She also revealed zero tariffs will apply to a range of other sectors including 'all aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, certain generics, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, natural resources and critical raw materials'. Under the terms of the deal, Brussels will agree to buy, over three years, $750bn (£560bn) worth of oil, gas, nuclear fuel and semi-conductors, including liquified gas, while at the same time agreeing to invest $600bn (£446bn) in the US, a deal that includes purchases of military equipment. The deal stabilises the €1.4tn trade between the EU and the US and avoids a 30% tariff rate Trump threatened to impose on 1 August if talks had collapsed. Speaking on a plane back to Brussels, the EU trade commissioner, Maroš Šefčovič, said Trump was 'a very tough negotiator' and the 'atmosphere was very intense'. He conceded that 15% was a worse position for the EU than before Trump, when tariff rates were at an average of 4.8% marking a significant victory for Trump's tariff threat tactics. 'I think that what was most important for us was to make sure we would have this predictability and we would have stability for our businesses,' said Šefčovič. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The deal also creates a division on the island of Ireland as traders in Northern Ireland can sell into the US on a 10% tariff rate, setting the scene for difficult diplomatic conversations over guarantees to maintain stability on the entire island in the Good Friday agreement. Ireland's deputy prime minister, Simon Harris, said he 'regretted' the 15% tariff rate but said 'certainty' was important. 'There is still a lot of detail on the agreement which will need to be brought forward including in relation to pharma, aviation and other sectors. Over the coming days, we will be examining what has been agreed and the full implications for Irish business and the economy, including any implications for the All-Island economy,' he said. There was also confusion over the tariff rate applying to steel. While Trump indicated his punitive 50% rate would continue to apply as part of 'a worldwide thing that stays the way it is, von der Leyen told reporters there would be a quota system in place. The UK steel industry is still faced with 50% tariffs despite Trump's initial promise they would be brought to zero, with hopes that there could be further concessions when Trump meets Keir Starmer, the British prime minister, in Scotland on Monday. The agreement struck in Scotland is likely to be greeted with relief by financial markets when they open on Monday, after a turbulent few months with jittery investors spooked by the prospect that Trump's tariff wars could pummel the world economy. Trump also signalled progress could be made in trade talks with China, with the US president saying 'we're very close'. Reports by the South China Morning Post on Sunday suggested Washington and Beijing were preparing to announce a 90-day extension to a pause in tariffs to allow for continuing negotiations, before a 12 August deadline. Markets rallied sharply last week after Trump reached a trade deal with Japan, the world's fourth-largest economy, amid investor hopes that the measures announced by Washington in the president's 2 April 'liberation day' plan could be avoided. Facing von der Leyen in the eponymously named DJT ballroom at his Turnberry golf resort, Trump said he was 'very honoured' to have done the deal, telling the European Commission president her staff had been 'fantastic'. The two sides shook hands and congratulated each other in front of a bilateral delegation that included the US commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, and the trade representative, Jamieson Greer. Looking relieved and flanking von der Leyen were Šefčovič; Björn Seibert, her head of cabinet; Sabine Weyand, a key player in the Brexit negotiations and now the director general of the EU's trade commission; and Tomas Baert, a member of von der Leyen's cabinet who has taken a lead role in talks.

Skip Bayless makes bizarre 'arrogant white person' claim as he weighs in on Trump's NFL Redskins controversy
Skip Bayless makes bizarre 'arrogant white person' claim as he weighs in on Trump's NFL Redskins controversy

Daily Mail​

time41 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Skip Bayless makes bizarre 'arrogant white person' claim as he weighs in on Trump's NFL Redskins controversy

Sports analyst Skip Bayless has performed a U-turn over Washington's NFL name change after Donald Trump 's demand to the franchise. Known as the Commanders since 2022, Washington's football team dropped the controversial 'Redskins' moniker five years ago amid uproar over the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police. However, the president last week called for the franchise to return to its former divisive name in a baffling Truth Social rant. And Bayless, despite previously branding the 'Redskins' name 'racist', suggested he would embrace Trump's name change on one condition. 'If someone can conclusively demonstrate that a majority of tribal leaders across America are all for the return of Redskins and Indians as team nicknames, then I would be all for it,' Bayless said in a video shared to his X platform. 'We went through this a number of years ago back in my First Take days. Some tribal leaders would speak out pro and some would speak out con. I just don't know. But if you showed me that a consensus were now pro, you know, I'm just hoping this will at least spark a new wave of debate.' 'I'm hoping tribal leaders everywhere will just stand up and speak out on this starting now. Whatever their consensus opinion is, if there is a consensus, and maybe there isn't, but I'll stand behind the majority. Maybe I'm just being just another naively arrogant white person, but I must admit I do miss Washington DC's NFL team being called the Redskins,' he concluded. Bayless added earlier in his podcast that the 'Commanders' nickname 'sounds dumber than ever,' especially after quarterback Jayden Daniels led Washington to the NFC Championship game. The former Fox Sports host's argument was a major change in tune from his past opinions on the old moniker. However, he did still maintain that he believed the 'Redskins' name stirred controversy. 'To me, Redskins remains a racist nickname,' Bayless also said in the 12-minute clip. 'What if an NFL team had been nicknamed the "Blackskins"?' Bayless's remarks come after Trump claimed that there was a 'clamoring' for the 'Redskins' nickname to make a return. 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team,' Trump wrote on social media. 'There is a big clamoring for this.' While Trump may be slightly off about the team name (they were the 'Washington Redskins' and then the 'Washington Football Team' but never the 'Washington Redskins Football Team'), he is right about uproar over the changes. The president took to social media last week to claimed there was a 'clamoring' for the change Fans and even some Native American groups have voiced support for the team's new ownership group to revert to 'Redskins.' Several public opinion polls of self-identified Native Americans have found most were not offended by the term, while critics have pointed to academic research by the University of Michigan and UC Berkeley that found the opposite was true. Trump appeared to reference the public polling in favor of a name change last weekend. 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,' he claimed. 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' He also demanded the same from MLB's Cleveland Guardians, née: 'Indians.' 'Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past,' he wrote. It's unclear where Trump is getting 'six original baseball teams' from. The NHL famously has six original teams and MLB's National League was once limited to a half dozen clubs. However, the Guardians franchise is in the American League, where it has been known as the Broncos, Naps and Indians before adopting its current moniker in 2022. Of course, 'Indians' is not quite the same as 'Redskins' – a traditionally pejorative term detested by some Native Americans and tolerated by others. Trump later underlined his demands on social media, writing in a second post: 'My statement on the Washington Redskins has totally blown up, but only in a very positive way. 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington. 'The Team would be much more valuable, and the Deal would be more exciting for everyone. Cleveland should do the same with the Cleveland Indians. The Owner of the Cleveland Baseball Team, Matt Dolan, who is very political, has lost three Elections in a row because of that ridiculous name change. 'What he doesn't understand is that if he changed the name back to the Cleveland Indians, he might actually win an Election. Indians are being treated very unfairly. MAKE INDIANS GREAT AGAIN (MIGA)!' NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Commanders owner Joshua Harris met Trump at the Oval Office in May to announce plans to bring the league's draft to the National Mall in 2027. Washington was selected as draft hosts just days after DC mayor Muriel Bowser announced a plan to bring the team back to the city with a new field on the site of the old RFK Stadium, where the team then known as the Redskins played until 1996. Currently, RFK Stadium stands on the site on the banks of the Anacostia River in the eastern part of the city. The building has been in the process of a prolonged demolition that has been delayed multiple times. The building was closed back in September 2019, but structural demolition has only begun this year. It hasn't just been the name that led to division among Native Americans. A year ago, the family of the man depicted in the former Redskins logo urged the team to bring his image back to the helmet after years of controversy over the image. A football and a jersey sit on top the Resolute desk in the office of President Donald Trump as he announces a plan to bring the NFL Draft to the National Mall in the spring of 2027 'The fans want him back and we want him back,' Thomas White Calf, a great nephew of late Blackfeet Nation chief John Two Guns White Calf, told Fox News after meeting with Senator Steve Daines (Republican, Montana ). Thomas' pleas came four years after the team began its rebranding, first becoming the Washington Football Team on a temporary basis before adopting 'Commanders' and dropping the feathered John Two Guns White Calf emblem. 'Our ancestor was the most famous and most photographed native in history,' Thomas told Fox alongside his mother, Delphine White Calf, a niece of the late Blackfeet chief. 'Two Guns was also the face on the Indian head nickel. I'm proud of him. The Blackfeet are proud of him.' The club began as the Boston Braves in 1932 before changing its name to 'Redskins' a year later and moving to the US Capital in 1937. But it wasn't until 1971 that Blackfeet leader Blackie Wetzel created a portrait of John Two Guns White Calf that ultimately became the team's logo.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store