
Mainers call on lawmakers to protect renters, boost housing production
Proposals before lawmakers range from eviction-prevention programs to easing regulations to encourage more home construction.
"We are in crisis and we need action that works," said Rep. Ambureen Rana, D-Bangor.
In a daylong hearing, the Legislature's Housing and Economic Development Committee heard testimony Friday on eight bills designed to boost housing construction by reducing barriers, while also protecting housing access for the state's lowest-income residents.
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
Last fall, Emily Barney was struggling. She had gotten behind on rent and tanked her credit score by using her credit card to pay bills.
She had to pick and choose which payments to make "almost like financial triage," the Frankfort resident told lawmakers.
Then she found the eviction-prevention program, a statewide pilot program that has provided funding to keep more than 800 families in their homes.
The program "came through in a big way," Barney said.
She and her daughter are once again housing secure.
"I have been able to pay off my credit cards and pay my bills and slowly work on my credit score," she said in written testimony. "I have been able to save money to pay on future rent and I am able to sleep better at night, not worrying that I will wake up to my car being repossessed. I am able to keep our situation stable for us both."
Barney testified in support of a bill presented by Rana, LD 1522, that would set up a $25 million fund to keep the program going. Rana called it one of the "most immediate and effective tools we have to stabilize Maine families."
By helping people who are facing eviction, the program reduces the strain on shelters, health care systems, schools and the courts, and has already shown success, she said.
When the program launched in November, more than 1,400 families signed up within the first month. Administrators quickly had to set up a waitlist. In total, more than 2,200 people have applied for assistance. Of those, 841 have received the subsidy, according to data from MaineHousing.
Statewide, families on average have received $746 per month on top of an additional payment of $4,695 in back rent.
A similar bill, LD 1287, proposed by Senate President Mattie Daughtry, D-Brunswick, would provide rental assistance as a way to bolster the state's workforce amid an ongoing labor shortage. The $1.9 million housing stability fund would provide up to $300 per month in rental assistance, again paid to the landlord, for people making 30% or less of the area's median income. Families would be limited to $3,000 in assistance in total.
Sen. Jill Duson, D-Portland, who presented the bill on Daughtry's behalf, said the two issues — the workforce and housing — are deeply intertwined.
"If folks don't have stable housing, it's difficult for them to maintain stable employment," she said.
Both bills were widely supported by affordable housing advocates, as well as low-income and immigrant families.
Heather Cameron, director of programs at ProsperityME, a nonprofit offering financial education for immigrant and refugee families, said in written testimony that stable housing allows families to continue contributing to their communities.
"We must endeavor to change our perception of short-term support as a burden and view it as an investment in the future of Maine," she said.
SAVING COSTS OR DISCOURAGING DEVELOPMENT?
One bill designed to tackle one side of the problem — housing affordability — was instead criticized for discouraging development.
Proposed by Sen. Donna Bailey, D-Saco, An Act Enabling Municipalities to Protect Tenants and Stabilize Rents provides a template for municipalities that choose to enact a rent control ordinance.
For towns that adopt an ordinance meeting the criteria in the bill, a violation of the ordinance would be classified as an "unfair trade practice," a designation that would allow the municipality to ask the Office of the Maine Attorney General for help with enforcement.
But the bill received near-unanimous disapproval during the hearing, largely from landlords who criticized what they said was an unreasonably strict model of rent control.
Daniel Bernier, representing a handful of landlord associations across the state, said the proposal, which also would eliminate no-cause evictions or lease renewal refusals, would deter people from investing in or even building new rental properties in cities that choose to adopt the ordinance.
Additionally, it would trigger a rush of rent increases as landlords hurry to raise rents before the new rules go into effect, he said. The bill would limit annual rent increases to 5% or the annual change in the consumer price index, whichever is less.
HOUSING PRODUCTION
Several bills were based on recommendations in a January report by HR&A Advisors, which included more than 40 suggestions for how Maine can tackle its housing crisis. The report, the third in a series, was intended to serve as a roadmap for lawmakers as they draft and consider new housing bills.
A bill proposed by Sen. Rick Bennett, R-Oxford, would establish a working group to study "factory-made housing."
Multiunit modular housing — an assembly-line, factory-style of construction — is becoming an increasingly attractive method of building for some developers thanks to lower building costs and faster turnaround times.
"It's essential that we both lower the cost of housing and boost its production," Bennett said.
Another proposal taken from the HR&A report would create a working group to study the regulatory barriers to construction.
Similarly, a bill proposed by Rep. Traci Gere, D-Kennebunkport, would reduce municipal lot size minimums to 5,000 square feet in designated growth areas connected to public water and sewer service. Many communities have 1-acre lot minimums, so reducing the size would allow for denser development. The bill, LD 1247, would also limit local ordinances relating to lot coverage, road frontage and setbacks.
"Our regulations prevent the creation of livable, walkable, affordable starter home neighborhoods," Gere said, calling the bill a commonsense step.
"We must change the rules so that builders and developers can build the housing we need," she said.
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
8 hours ago
- Politico
California's answer to ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
DETENTION PREVENTION: While Donald Trump was in Florida touting the opening of 'Alligator Alcatraz,' Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a budget-related bill in California containing a little-known provision meant to deter the president's administration from using closed state prisons as immigrant detention facilities. A portion of AB 137 makes it easier for the state to repurpose closed prison facilities, and — significantly — prohibits those that are leased, sold or demolished through this process from being used for detention in the future. Lawmakers and the governor enacted the legislation this week as Trump toured the Florida detention center Gov. Ron DeSantis created on a county-owned airstrip he commandeered in the Everglades. Democrats and their allies want to avoid a similar scene in California, where ICE plans to house migrants at a privately-owned prison east of Bakersfield — and where activists fear the state's growing number of vacant prisons could become targets for federal immigration officials seeking new places to house migrants. 'We absolutely applaud the governor and the Legislature for taking these really decisive steps, but we have to do more, because this is an emergency,' said Brian Kaneda of Californians United for a Responsible Budget, an organization devoted to reducing prison spending. Newsom's administration has closed three state-owned facilities and ended its lease at the private prison near Bakersfield, which was staffed by the state's Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The governor in May announced he wants to shut down another prison by October 2026, but he did not specify which one. Newsom has shuttered facilities amid a dip in California's prison population. The Supreme Court in 2011 upheld a ruling from a panel of federal judges ordering the state to reduce severe prison overcrowding, which led to a series of ballot measures and legislation changing stringent sentencing laws. Kaneda's group, CURB, wants to see Newsom's administration move quickly to declare California's three closed prisons 'excess' property and begin the process of getting rid of them. Officials typically keep deactivated facilities in a 'warm shutdown' mode, meaning prisoners are not housed there, but the state pays to maintain the properties. Advocates believe this makes them especially vulnerable for use as federal detention centers, particularly the recently-closed Chuckawalla Valley State Prison east of Palm Springs near the California-Arizona border. The governor's office told Playbook an executive order taking immediate action on the prisons isn't necessary because the Legislature would need to approve sales, with state agencies taking the lead on transactions. And then there is the backstop language included in the budget Newsom signed. Oakland Assemblymember Mia Bonta, who has worked on prison-related issues, said Assembly Democrats 'prioritized this issue because we absolutely should not be using these former CDCR facilities for immigration detention.' 'These are facilities that we have chosen to close to save money to support evidence-based rehabilitation programs,' Bonta said in a statement. 'Not to enable this federal administration to detain our neighbors, who we know are repeatedly not being afforded due process.' IT'S WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@ WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY MEGABILL SMACKDOWN: Newsom told reporters Central Valley Rep. David Valadao 'might as well resign early and I can call a special election' if he votes for Trump's megabill, which is awaiting House approval. 'If he votes for the bill, he should be voted out — period, full stop,' the governor said, calling the legislation 'one of the most calamitous and devastating bills of our lifetime.' Newsom slammed Valadao — one of the state's most vulnerable Republicans — at a Los Angeles news conference touting new film tax credits in the freshly-signed state budget. The governor said that any vote for the federal megabill would be 'the ultimate betrayal,' noting more than 60 percent of Valadao's constituents rely on Medi-Cal, the state's version of the federal Medicaid health insurance that covers the poorest Americans. The legislation would boot millions of Californians off the program to help Republicans fund tax cuts. — with help from Melanie Mason MORE MEGABILL DEADLINE LOOMS: House Speaker Mike Johnson is working to rally megabill votes after the Senate narrowly approved the legislation yesterday. Republicans are trying to meet Trump's July 4 deadline, although they're struggling to meet demands from both wings of their party. Reporters this morning saw Valadao and other moderates heading into the West Wing for a meeting with Trump. The Californian voted in favor of the bill in May, although he and other battleground Republicans signed on to a June letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune criticizing deeper Medicaid cuts in the upper house's version. Our Meredith Lee Hill reports Mehmet Oz, Trump's administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, was on hand during this morning's meetings to help assuage members' worries about reductions. Valadao and Washington Rep. Dan Newhouse declined to respond to reporter questions this morning as they drove away from the Capitol. AI REGS REMAIN: Allies of Trump have fallen short in an effort to prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence — the tech industry's first major defeat under his administration, our Chase DiFeliciantonio reports. After months of intense lobbying on both sides, the Senate voted in the pre-dawn hours Tuesday to defeat a provision in the Republican megabill to bar states from regulating AI over the next 10 years. The main driver of the measure, Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, has threatened to bring the measure back, suggesting the fight is far from over. 'We have the idea of the federal preemption sort of hanging over our heads,' said California state Sen. Jerry McNerney, who has authored numerous AI bills in Sacramento and was vocal about regulating the technology during his years in Congress. 'I don't think that's going to go away.' IN OTHER NEWS SPECIAL DELIVERY: Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre coasted to an easy victory in a special election for an open seat on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors. Votes are still being tabulated, but Chula Vista Mayor John McCann, down by about 6 points, conceded the race today and said in a statement that he had called Aguirre to congratulate her on her win. Both Aguirre, a Democrat, and McCann, a Republican, issued statements that included pledges to address the sewage from Mexico that contaminates the Tijuana River and befouls south county beaches. That's undoubtedly one of the most pressing issues in the district — one that has also attracted the attention of the Trump administration. Most of the attention outside the district, however, has been on how the results will break a partisan divide on the powerful Board of Supervisors. Aguirre's win means the board will again have a 3-2 Democratic majority, which will matter as the county wrestles with changes to Medicaid in the Republican megabill and other looming challenges. — Ben Fox WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY — The Interior Department rescinded a 13-year agreement with California that guided state and federal oversight of oil fields. (E&E News) — Press freedom groups and First Amendment advocates slammed Paramount's $16 million settlement with Trump, saying it emboldened the president's attacks against an already-battered news industry. (POLITICO) — The jury in the trial for Sean 'Diddy' Combs acquitted the music mogul of the most serious charges against him and found him guilty on two other charges. (Los Angeles Times) AROUND THE STATE — City officials in San Diego plan to start charging credit card transaction fees at parking meters in the city as a result of a budget deal last month between the City Council and Mayor Todd Gloria. (San Diego Union-Tribune) — The chief spokesperson for Fresno Unified School District resigned following a scandal involving artificial intelligence. (Fresno Bee) — Improved tracking methods have caused Kern County to see a 10 percent jump last year in its homeless student population, reflecting a statewide trend. (CalMatters) — compiled by Juliann Ventura


CBS News
14 hours ago
- CBS News
Gender identity no longer among Iowa's civil rights protections as new law takes effect
Iowa became the first state to remove gender identity from its civil rights code under a law that took effect Tuesday, meaning transgender and nonbinary residents are no longer protected from discrimination in their job, housing and other aspects of life. The law also explicitly defines female and male based on reproductive organs at birth and removes the ability for people to change the sex designation on their birth certificate. An unprecedented take-back of legal rights after nearly two decades in Iowa code leaves transgender, nonbinary and potentially even intersex Iowans more vulnerable now than they were before. It's a governing doctrine now widely adopted by President Donald Trump and Republican-led states despite the mainstream medical view that sex and gender are better understood as a spectrum than as an either-or definition. When Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed Iowa's new law, she said the state's previous civil rights code "blurred the biological line between the sexes." "It's common sense to acknowledge the obvious biological differences between men and women. In fact, it's necessary to secure genuine equal protection for women and girls," she said in a video statement. Also taking effect Tuesday are provisions in the state's health and human services budget that say Medicaid recipients are no longer covered for gender-affirming surgery or hormone therapy. Iowa's state Capitol filled with protesters as the law went through the Republican-controlled Legislature and to Reynolds' desk in just one week in February. Iowa Republicans said laws passed in recent years to restrict transgender students' use of bathrooms and locker rooms, and their participation on sports teams, could not coexist with a civil rights code that includes gender identity protections. About two dozen other states and the Trump administration have advanced restrictions on transgender people. Republicans say such laws and executive actions protect spaces for women, rejecting the idea that people can transition to another gender. Many face court challenges. About two-thirds of U.S. adults believe that whether a person is a man or woman is determined by biological characteristics at birth, an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted in May found. But there's less consensus on policies that target transgender and nonbinary people. Transgender people say those kinds of policies deny their existence and capitalize on prejudice for political gain. In a major setback for transgender rights nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court last month upheld Tennessee's ban on puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender minors. The court's conservative majority said it doesn't violate the Constitution's equal protection clause, which requires the government to treat similarly situated people the same. Not every state includes gender identity in their civil rights code, but Iowa was the first to remove nondiscrimination protections based on gender identity, according to the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ+ rights think tank. Iowans will still have time to file a complaint with the state Office of Civil Rights about discrimination based on gender identity that occurred before the law took effect. State law requires a complaint to be submitted within 300 days after the most recent incident of alleged discrimination. That means people have until April 27 to file a complaint about discrimination based on gender identity, according to Kristen Stiffler, the office's executive director. Sixty-five such complaints were filed and accepted for investigation from July 2023 through the end of June 2024, according to Stiffler. Forty-three were filed and accepted from July 1, 2024, through June 19 of this year. Iowa state Rep. Aime Wichtendahl, a Democrat and the state's first openly transgender lawmaker, fears the law will lead to an increase in discrimination for transgender Iowans. "Anytime someone has to check your ID and they see that the gender marker doesn't match the appearance, then that opens up hostility, discrimination as possibilities," Wichtendahl said, naming examples such as applying for a job, going through the airport, buying beer or getting pulled over in a traffic stop. "That instantly outs you. That instantly puts you on the spot." About half of U.S. states include gender identity in their civil rights code to protect against discrimination in housing and public places, such as stores or restaurants, according to the Movement Advancement Project. Some additional states do not explicitly protect against such discrimination, but it is included in legal interpretations of statutes. Five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled LGBTQ people are protected by a landmark federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in the workplace. But Iowa's Supreme Court has expressly rejected the argument that discrimination based on sex includes discrimination based on gender identity. The months between when the bill was signed into law and when it took effect gave transgender Iowans time to pursue amended birth certificates before that option was eliminated. Keenan Crow, with LGBTQ+ advocacy group One Iowa, said the group has long cosponsored legal clinics to assist with that process. "The last one that we had was by far the biggest," Crow said. Iowa's Department of Transportation still has a process by which people can change the gender designation on their license or identification card but has proposed administrative rules to eliminate that option. Wichtendahl also said she has talked to some families who are looking to move out of state as a result of the new law. "It's heartbreaking because this is people's lives we're talking about," Wichtendahl added. "These are families that have trans loved ones and it's keeping their loved ones away, it's putting their loved ones into uncertain future, putting their health and safety at risk."


Newsweek
16 hours ago
- Newsweek
Ohio Plans To Spend $600 Million of Funds Residents Haven't Claimed
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The state of Ohio will spend $600 million of funds residents haven't claimed for a sports stadium, per a newly signed budget measure. Governor Mike DeWine signed the state budget on Monday night. Among other measures, the budget approved a $600 million grant to move the Cleveland Browns to a new Brook Park stadium, with the money to come from the state's pot of unclaimed funds. Why It Matters Unclaimed funds is money that has remained in inactive checking and savings accounts. It could be uncashed checks, paychecks, deposits, bonds and more that residents have lost or forgotten. There is roughly $5 billion in unclaimed funds in Ohio and business and banks report them to the Ohio Department of Commerce's Division of Unclaimed Funds, triggering the state to try to return them to their owners. There were 43,000 claims for unclaimed funds in Ohio in 2023, resulting in more than $139 million being returned to residents. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine gives the State of the State address in the House chambers at the Ohio Statehouse on March 12, 2025, in Columbus. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine gives the State of the State address in the House chambers at the Ohio Statehouse on March 12, 2025, in Columbus. Samantha Madar/The Columbus Dispatch via AP, Pool What To Know The budget gives Ohio control of $1.7 billion in unclaimed funds, including abandoned paychecks and security deposits that have remained in inactive accounts for more than 10 years. As well as the $600 million to be used for the Browns, $400 million will be used for other stadium projects. What the remaining $700 million will be used for has not been specified. How To Claim Your Unclaimed Funds Ohio residents can check the website to see if they have any unclaimed funds and to submit a claim. They can also use an Ohio Department of Commerce portal. There also are ads in local newspapers providing information about how to claim unclaimed funds. Claims can take up to 120 days before they are reviewed. What People Are Saying David Niven, American politics professor at the University of Cincinnati, told Newsweek: "Republicans in the Ohio Legislature wanted to hand the Browns more than half a billion dollars for a new stadium, but did not want to be accused of giving away tax money. They came up with the gimmick of raiding unclaimed funds. This is budgetary sleight of hand. Ultimately this money needs to be paid back and the net effect for taxpayers is the same as spending from any other taxpayer source. "Ohio courts are tremendously deferential to the Legislature. A county common pleas court could potentially object, but the state Supreme Court [6 Republicans, one Democrat] will ultimately rubber-stamp any decision the Legislature makes. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, in a June letter: "The statutory taking of public funds without clear public benefit is poor policy. "I remain concerned that many Ohioans—some still unaware they are entitled to their monies—will lose out due to this change." Ohio Governor Mike DeWine told reporters: "To me, the biggest objectives were no taxpayers' dollars used for this, in the sense of nothing coming out of general fund—nothing competing against education, and it couldn't just be about the Browns, it had to be universal." What Happens Next Two former Ohio Democratic lawmakers—former Attorney General Marc Dann and former state Representative Jeff Crossman—have indicated they will file a class-action lawsuit against the measure.