Man who put Grab driver in a chokehold after argument about vomit in car given jail
Ashton Jude Joseph, 34, was handed five weeks' jail on Thursday (Jun 26) after he pleaded guilty to one count of causing hurt to the driver, 46-year-old Lee Chee Wei.
Joseph, a Singaporean, was a regular serviceman in the Singapore Armed Forces holding the rank of Captain at the time of the offences.
His lawyer told the court that he intends to appeal the sentence.
According to court documents, Joseph met a group of friends at a bar near Serangoon Road at about 7pm on Aug 30 last year. He drank about six or seven pints of beer through the night.
At about 3am the next day, a Grab booking was made to send Joseph home, and Mr Lee was the assigned driver. Mr Lee noticed that Joseph, who sat in the backseat, was drunk.
While on the way home, Joseph felt nauseated and asked Mr Lee for a plastic bag. Mr Lee handed over a plastic bag, which Joseph then vomited into.
The driver offered to stop the car at the roadside for Joseph to finish vomiting, but the latter declined the suggestion.
At about 3.30am, the car arrived at the destination and Joseph alighted.
Mr Lee also alighted to check if there was vomit in his car and noticed traces on the seats and carpets.
Upset, Mr Lee removed the carpets and started to scold Joseph, triggering an argument over the next few minutes.
As Mr Lee returned to his car and reached for the backseat, Joseph grabbed the back of his neck, prompting the victim to shout for help.
Joseph then put Mr Lee in a chokehold. He stopped as a van arrived at the scene a while later, and walked away.
Two witnesses who alighted from the van chased Joseph, who started to run but tripped and fell, injuring his nose. Both witnesses and Joseph then returned to the car.
The altercation was captured by two PolCams near the scene.
Mr Lee felt pain in his neck due to the incident and called the police at about 3.40am.
The authorities arrived a short while later and arrested Joseph. His blood sample was found to contain 124 milligrams of ethanol in 100ml of blood.
Joseph has since offered S$500 (US$392) as compensation and a written apology to Mr Lee.
The prosecution sought five to six weeks' jail. Deputy Public Prosecutor Nicole Tay said Joseph's reaction, although not entirely unprovoked, was disproportionate.
Ms Tay pointed out that Joseph had been convicted on one count of drink driving in 2016, among other charges.
District Judge Kamala Ponnampalam found that a jail term was warranted in this case and sentenced Joseph accordingly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
13 minutes ago
- CNA
Fine for cabby who shone laser at bus near Changi Airport, blurring driver's vision
SINGAPORE: A taxi driver shone a laser pointer towards a shuttle bus ferrying passengers between terminals at Changi Airport, blurring the bus driver's vision. Huzairi Hamzah, 51, was fined S$2,500 by a court on Monday (Jul 28) for one count of a rash act endangering the personal safety of others. The court heard that the bus driver, a 32-year-old Singaporean man, was plying his route on Aug 28, 2024. He was driving along Airport Boulevard at about 9.50pm that night with about 30 passengers on his bus. He signalled his intention to filter into the extreme left lane of Airport Boulevard at about 9.55pm. He saw a taxi, driven by the accused, along the extreme left lane, some distance behind the bus. The bus driver changed lanes to the extreme left lane. Huzairi then drove to the rear right side of the bus. As he followed the vehicle, Huzairi shone a laser pointer towards the right side of the bus for about two to three seconds. Closed-circuit television footage captured Huzairi shining the laser light at the bus. The laser beam struck the right mirror and reflected into the bus driver's eyes, causing him to experience blurry vision. As there were passengers on board the bus, the bus driver ignored Huzairi and continued driving towards Terminal 4. Huzairi left the area, and the bus driver later told his supervisors what happened and was advised to lodge a police report. No injuries were sustained in the incident. The prosecutor sought a fine of S$2,500, saying Huzairi had intentionally shone the light, knowing fully that there was a real risk that the laser beam may distract the victim. Huzairi almost qualified his plea, with his lawyer saying Huzairi had never intended to point the laser to shine into the bus driver's eye. He also said that Huzairi's position has always been that his action would not cause a risk to the driver. However, he later accepted the statement of facts and pleaded guilty.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
SMRT reports unauthorised post on its X account, says investigation under way
Find out what's new on ST website and app. At 11.08pm on July 27, a photo of a woman in traditional attire was posted on SMRT's official X account, accompanied by the caption 'R'. SINGAPORE – SMRT has reported an unauthorised post to X that appeared on the train operator's official social media account late on July 27. At 1 1.08pm on July 27, a photo of a South Asian woman in traditional attire was posted on the account, accompanied by the caption 'R'. Checks by The Straits Times showed that the post remained online for about 10 minutes before it was removed. During that brief window, it garnered over 2,000 views and was reposted more than 20 times , a figure that is higher than the account's usual engagement rate. SMRT's official X account SMRT Corporation has over 471,000 followers. The page typically posts announcements and update s on disruptions to train services . In response to queries from ST, SMRT on July 28 sa id it was looking into the matter. 'We are aware of an unauthorised post that appeared on our official X account late Sunday night. We have reported the incident to X and are currently investigating this matter,' said Ms Margaret Teo , its group chief communications officer. The post sparked confusion online, with users of online platforms Reddit and HardwareZone sharing screenshots and speculating that SMRT's X account might have been hacked, or that a page administrator had accidentally posted a personal photo. Others questioned if the account had been spoofed. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole backfilled; road to be repaved after LTA tests Singapore MRT platform screen doors at 15 underground stations to undergo renewal Singapore 'Medium risk' of severe haze as higher agricultural prices drive deforestation: S'pore researchers Singapore Jail for former pre-school teacher who tripped toddler repeatedly, causing child to bleed from nose Singapore Police statements by doctor in fake vaccine case involving Iris Koh allowed in court: Judge Singapore Authorities say access to Changi intertidal areas unaffected by reclamation, in response to petition Singapore No change to SIA flights between S'pore and Cambodia, S'pore and Thailand, amid border dispute Singapore Not feasible for S'pore to avoid net‑zero; all options to cut energy emissions on table: Tan See Leng ST has sent further queries to SMRT.
.JPG%3Fitok%3D7Tyct7WM&w=3840&q=100)
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Jail for preschool teacher who deliberately tripped toddler four times
SINGAPORE: A former preschool teacher who repeatedly tripped a toddler at a childcare centre was sentenced to nine months and two weeks' jail on Monday (Jul 28). Saiidah Kamarudin, 34, earlier pleaded guilty to one of two counts of ill-treating the girl, who suffered bruises to her face and bled from her nose. The other charge was taken into consideration for her sentencing. The victim and the childcare centre cannot be named to protect the girl's identity. Saiidah began working for the childcare centre in end-September 2023, but she submitted her resignation the following month. Her employment lasted until mid-November. On the day of the incident in November, Saiidah had taken the 20-month-old girl to the toilet slightly after noon to clean her up. As the girl stood before her, Saiidah, who was seated, swept her leg outwards to catch the toddler's foot, causing the girl to stumble. After this, Saiidah swept her leg inwards, causing the toddler to fall backwards onto the floor. The teacher then lifted the girl to her feet and cleaned her face with a tissue. As the two were headed out of the toilet area, Saiidah repeated the sweeping motion twice. The latter incident caught the toddler on both legs and caused her to fall on her face. Saiidah's actions were captured by a closed-circuit television camera (CCTV). The footage was played in court. SENTENCING ARGUMENTS The prosecution urged the court to sentence Saiidah to a jail term of between 15 and 16 months. Deputy Public Prosecutor Cheah Wenjie said the case represented a "disturbing breach of trust by a childcare professional who deliberately and repeatedly tripped a 20-month-old toddler in her care". "Such calculated violence against a defenceless toddler who was entrusted to the care of the accused strikes at the heart of public confidence in Singapore's early childhood sector," said Mr Cheah. The prosecution pointed out that the victim had bled from her nose and suffered bruises and swelling on her face. He also described the offence as "deliberate and calculated" in nature. "The accused had committed the offences in the private toilet area of the school premises, which was separated by a wall from the rest of the school, making detection particularly difficult. The victim, being unable to speak, could not inform anyone of the offences," Mr Cheah told the court. Saiidah's lawyer, Deepak Natverlal from Crown Juris Law, argued that a jail term was not warranted. He sought the maximum fine of S$8,000 (US$6,250), and for the court to order that she execute a bond of good behaviour for a period. Alternatively, Mr Natverlal argued for a jail term of no more than three months, and a fine of S$5,000. He said that Saiidah, a mother of two, started working at the childcare centre with a view to enrolling her children there. However, she found the curriculum unsuitable and tendered her resignation. Mr Natverlal laid out the circumstances behind Saiidah's resignation, saying these "showed that the accused felt that there were matters in the school that were not child-centric". He said Saiidah had attempted to highlight these matters to the management to ensure that the children's interests and welfare were not compromised. Instead, she felt "quietly aggrieved" when her words went unheeded. "The accused felt unwelcome at this place. The present staff had their own cliques. The accused felt like an outcast from the beginning ... she felt the staff did not take her seriously and made her feel that she was not good enough to do the lesson plans for the children, which, on the contrary, she was capable of doing as she had worked ... before as a pre-school teacher," said Mr Natverlal. The lawyer also cited a defective water heater, poor quality meals for the children, poor hygiene practices and extensive TV exposure as a few other problems she experienced while working at the childcare centre. His client also felt that there was a lack of welfare for teachers like her, who had two young children. Despite these challenges, Saiidah still "endeavoured to do her best" as a teacher, the defence lawyer said. "As a mother of two very young children, the accused feels aggrieved that her actions had led to the child being injured in the manner that she suffered. "The accused acknowledges that she could have behaved better and that it was a solitary incident wherein she had lost her sense of judgment," Mr Natverlal said, adding that Saiidah was remorseful.
