MP CM Yadav calls on Speaker of Arab Parliament, invites him to attend upcoming Energy Summit
On the occasion, he shared information about Madhya Pradesh's industry-friendly, simple, and accessible policies and facilities that promote investment and invited Al Yammahi to attend the upcoming Energy Summit in Madhya Pradesh.
In a post on X, he said, 'During the Dubai visit, I had a courtesy meeting with Mr. Mohammad Al Yamahi, the Speaker of the Arab Parliament. On this occasion, I shared information about Madhya Pradesh's industry-friendly, simple, and accessible policies and the facilities that promote investment. I also extended an invitation to Mr. Mohammad Al Yamahi to participate in the upcoming Energy Summit to be held in Madhya Pradesh. In the context of the growing strategic relations with the United Arab Emirates, I highlighted Madhya Pradesh's active and constructive role and reiterated the intent for cooperation in the fields of energy, minerals, logistics, food processing, and green investment. I also expressed hope that Madhya Pradesh will become an active and significant partner in these bilateral partnerships.'
https://x.com/DrMohanYadav51/status/1944398300029018344
Yadav congratulated Indians working in Dubai for strengthening the relations between both countries.
He is in the UAE to meet investors, entrepreneurs, and experts and to introduce them to the possibilities of Madhya Pradesh, under the 'Global Dialogue 2025'. The Indian diaspora in Dubai welcomed Yadav on Sunday upon his arrival at Dubai.
In a post on X, he said, 'Indians in Dubai have carved a unique identity through their hard work, culture, and values. Today, during my UAE visit, meeting Indian brothers, sisters, and youth at the Taj Hotel in Dubai has filled my heart with joy. Heartfelt gratitude for all your warmth!'
https://x.com/DrMohanYadav51/status/1944364281929019800
As part of MP Global Dialogue 2025, Yadav received a warm welcome in Dubai from the Indian diaspora, including Jitendra Vaidya, President IPF UAE and was greeted by Satish Kumar Sivan, Consul General of India to Dubai marking the beginning of his UAE visit to promote investment in Madhya Pradesh.
https://x.com/CMMadhyaPradesh/status/1944372775688483085
https://x.com/Industryminist1/status/1944368513851789452
https://x.com/CMMadhyaPradesh/status/1944340910520864806
CM Yadav is in Dubai for Global Dialogue 2025. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Secretly recorded calls admissible in marital disputes: SC
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a spouse may rely on secretly recorded telephonic conversations with the other partner in matrimonial disputes, including divorce proceedings, because such communications are not barred under the law and do not amount to a breach of privacy. The bench asserted that while the right to privacy exists between spouses, it is not absolute (ANI) In a significant ruling that reshapes the contours of privacy and evidence within marriage, a bench of justices BV Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma set aside a 2021 judgment of the Punjab and Haryana high court, which had barred a husband from using a compact disc (CD) or a memory card containing conversations with his estranged wife, recorded without her knowledge. The court relied on section 122 of the Indian Evidence Act, which bars disclosure of marital communications by one spouse without the other's consent. However, the same provision contains an exception when such communication is brought forth during legal proceedings between the spouses. To be sure, section 122 of the Evidence Act has been replaced by section 121 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. The bench asserted that while the right to privacy exists between spouses, it is not absolute. The exception under section 122, it said, must be read in conjunction with the constitutional right to a fair trial, which is also protected under Article 21 of the Constitution. 'We have also referred to the 2017 KS Puttaswamy judgment,' said the court, referring to the landmark ruling that affirmed privacy as a fundamental right. 'However, such rights cannot be applied horizontally in all contexts. Section 122 does not touch upon the right to privacy as envisaged under Article 21 because it is based on the right to a fair trial.' Noting that a conversation between spouses secretly recorded by one of them can be admitted in evidence, the bench emphasised that allowing such evidence in matrimonial cases upholds procedural fairness, particularly where issues such as mental cruelty or marital discord are being litigated. 'Privacy of communication exists, but it is not absolute,' the bench said, pointing out that statutory exceptions such as those in the Evidence Act reflect a balance between privacy and justice. Dealing with the issue of protected nature of conversation between spouses, the bench maintained that if spouses are snooping on each other, the marriage seems to have already broken down. 'Snooping is not the result of pending proceedings but rather a symptom of a broken-down marriage,' said the court, adding that such conversations can be validly produced and proved in legal proceedings between them. The apex court restored the earlier order of the Bathinda family court (2020), which had allowed the husband to prove the contents of the CD in support of his plea for divorce, provided its authenticity was established. The case arose from a 2017 divorce petition filed by a man against his wife, with whom he shared a daughter. In support of his case, the husband submitted a CD of telephonic conversations purportedly between him and his wife, recorded without her knowledge. The Bathinda family court had allowed him to prove the contents of the CD subject to verification of its correctness. However, in 2021, the Punjab and Haryana high court reversed this decision, calling the act of recording a 'clear-cut infringement' of the wife's privacy. It also raised concerns over the manner and context in which such conversations were recorded, calling the evidence inadmissible. The husband then approached the Supreme Court, which began examining the interplay between privacy rights and evidentiary rules. During the hearings, the court appointed advocate Vrinda Grover as amicus curiae, who argued that laws such as section 122, framed in a pre-digital era, must be reinterpreted in light of evolving technology and gender dynamics. In its final ruling, the court, however, maintained a statutory interpretation approach, stating that the exceptions under section 122 must be construed harmoniously with constitutional guarantees, especially the right to a fair trial. The bench concluded that no breach of privacy occurred in the instant case and that such evidence could be tested under appropriate legal standards. 'In view of the aforesaid, we set aside the impugned order and restore the 2020 family court order. The family court is allowed to retrieve the recorded conversations and test it under the pertinent legal provisions,' the court ordered.
Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Rahul Gandhi to appear before MP/MLA court in Lucknow today
: Congress MP from Rae Bareli and leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi will appear before the MP/MLA court in Lucknow on Tuesday in a case related to disparaging remarks allegedly made by him about a face-off between Indian and Chinese soldiers. The comments were allegedly made during the Bharat Jodo Yatra on December 16, 2022. Congress MP from Rae Bareli and leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi (File photo) Advocate Vivek Tewari had filed the complaint against Rahul Gandhi on behalf of Uday Shankar Srivastava, a former director of the Border Roads Organisation with a rank equivalent to an Army colonel, in January 2023. Rahul Gandhi's alleged statement was derogatory towards the Army and hurt the sentiments of the armed forces, according to the complainant. Additional chief judicial magistrate Alok Verma, Lucknow, had earlier directed Rahul Gandhi to appear before the court on March 24, 2025, in the defamation case filed against him. Gandhi had challenged the additional CJM's order, passed on February 11, 2025, in the high court but did not get relief. Dismissing Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's petition, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court held that the right to freedom of speech and expression does not extend to making defamatory statements against the Indian Army. Gandhi had challenged the summons by a local court in connection with a case related to his alleged remarks on the Indian Army. A single-judge bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi on June 2, 2025, passed the order, rejecting Rahul Gandhi's petition challenging the additional CJM's order. 'No doubt, Article 19(1) of the Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech and expression, this freedom is subject to the reasonable restrictions and it does not include the freedom to make statements which are defamatory to any person or defamatory to the Indian Army,' the high court observed. The high court dismissal of his petition paved the way for Rahul Gandhi to face trial in the lower court.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
22 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Q1 results today: HDFC Life, ICICI Lombard among 23 companies on July 15
Q1 FY26 company results: ICICI Prudential Life Insurance, HDB Financial Services, Bank of Maharashtra, Network 18 Media, set to release their earnings report for the April-June quarter Apexa Rai New Delhi HDFC Life Insurance, ICICI Lombard General Insurance, and ICICI Prudential Life Insurance are scheduled to announce their earnings reports for the first quarter (Q1) of the financial year 2025-26 (FY26) on Tuesday. HDB Financial Services, Bank of Maharashtra, AWL Agri Business, Himadri Speciality Chemical, Network 18 Media, and Just Dial are among the other 23 companies expected to declare their Q1 results today. Q1 preview for the insurance firms HDFC Life Insurance: Its margin is expected to be 25.5 per cent, compared with 25 per cent a year ago. In Q4FY25, the insurer's margin stood at 26.53 per cent. ICICI Prudential Life Insurance: Analysts forecast the company's margin to be 24.2 per cent, up from 24 per cent in Q1FY25. The margin in Q4FY25 was 22.7 per cent. ICICI Lombard General Insurance: Analysts polled by Business Standard estimate the firm's combined ratio at 101.2 per cent, compared with 102.3 per cent in Q1FY25. Market overview for July 15 Domestic benchmark indices are likely to take cues from a confluence of global and local triggers today, July 15, including India's retail inflation for June, second-quarter GDP figures from China, US inflation data, and political developments such as US President Donald Trump's tariff measures. Investor sentiment remains cautious amid the ongoing Q1 earnings season and recent global equity volatility. Following a volatile session, Indian equity benchmark indices settled lower on Monday, July 14, amid global cues as Trump imposed a 30 per cent tariff on imports from the European Union and Mexico, effective from August 1. That apart, nervousness amid the June quarter (Q1FY26) earnings season also kept sentiment in check. On Monday, the BSE Sensex fell 247.01 or 0.3 per cent to close at 82,253.46, while the Nifty50 settled lower by 67.55 points or 0.27 per cent at 25,082.3 levels. In the broader markets, Nifty Midcap 100 and Smallcap indices were up 0.71 per cent and 1.04 per cent, respectively. Around 7:30 am on July 15, GIFT Nifty futures were trading 19 points higher at 25,186, indicating a flat to higher start for the equities. Follow the latest market updates here: Stock Market LIVE Updates List of firms releasing Q1 FY26 results on July 15 AWL Agri Business Ltd Geojit Financial Services Ltd GM Breweries Ltd Hathway Cable & Datacom Ltd HDB Financial Services Ltd HDFC Life Insurance Company Ltd Himadri Speciality Chemical Ltd ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Ltd Just Dial Ltd Kamadgiri Fashion Ltd Key Corporation Ltd Kretto Syscon Ltd Bank of Maharashtra Network 18 Media & Investments Ltd Neueon Towers Ltd Nureca Ltd Plastiblends India Ltd RR Financial Consultants Ltd Swaraj Engines Ltd Tokyo Finance Ltd Vijay Textiles Ltd VK Global Industries Ltd
