Five yellow food safety alerts posted in Champaign-Urbana this week
LAST WEEK: Three yellow food safety alerts posted in Champaign Co. this week
On March 13, the Champaign Country Club, located at 1211 S. Prospect Ave. in Champaign, received a yellow food safety alert. An inspector found two risk factor/intervention violations and one repeat risk factor/intervention violation.
For the third time in a row, the country club struggled to keep foods at a cold enough temperature. Corned beef was found at 53.6°F and coleslaw was held at 50.1°F inside a two-door cooler. Diced tomatoes, shredded cheese, cut romaine lettuce, ranch, cut melons and a half and half were also found at a higher temperature than is safe. All items were brought to a walk-in cooler for rapid cooling.
The inspector also found that ricotta cheese, lamb sauce, hummus, shallot butter, Caesar dressing and bom bom sauce were held past seven days. All of these items were discarded.
A follow-up inspection was scheduled to be completed within 5-7 business days to make sure that the long-term corrections were completed.
$57M going toward Illinois clean energy businesses through Climate & Equitable Jobs Act
On March 18, Szechuan Taste, located at 707 S. Sixth St. in Champaign received a yellow food safety alert. An inspector found six risk factor/intervention violations and four repeat risk factor/intervention violations.
For the third time in a row, the restaurant had surfaces/utensils that were not clean to 'sight and touch.' In this inspection, there were two knives which had dried meat on their blades from the previous day. The cooks had begun food preparation, and the knives had not been sent back to the dish area. The inspector also noted a knife near the sushi area which had food debris on its blade from the previous day.
For the second time in a row, there was an issue with how the restaurant cooled the cooked foods. In this inspection, there was a rack of 12 cooked ducks, sitting between 72°F to 74°F. They had been left to cool in the kitchen instead of a walk-in cooler. The inspector also found two containers of cooked pig feet, sitting at 68°F in the walk-in cooler. It was from the previous day but had not cooled down to 41°F. All of these items were thrown away.
Urbana and Champaign Sanitary District project underway
Other issues the inspector noted included an industrial sprayer with oven cleaner stored next to clean dishes in the dish area, an open can of 'Sterno' ethanol chafing fuel stored next to clean dishes, scoops stored in 72°F stagnant water and boxes and containers of food stored on the floor in the walk-in freezer.
A follow-up inspection will be done in 5-7 business days to make sure the corrections have been completed.
On March 18, Pho Noodle Station, located at 601 S. Sixth St. in Champaign, received a yellow food safety alert. An inspector found five risk factor/intervention violations and one repeat risk factor/intervention violation.
For the third inspection in a row, Pho Noodle Station struggled to keep their food cold enough. Raw shrimp was held at 50.5°F and raw meat was held between 43.7°F and 44.6°F in the reach-in cooler. There were also cooked and cooled noodles sitting out at 45°F. The noodles were marked with a sticker stating that they should be thrown out at 2 p.m. But the restaurant is not approved to use time as a 'Public Health Control.'
Other issues the inspector noted included cases of food stored on the floor of the walk-in freezer, and the fried egg in the 'topping' side of the menu did not have an asterisk leading to a footnote at the bottom of the menu, as is required with FDA food code. The restaurant is required to provide corrected menus by April 1.
Hunters Feeding Illinois bringing 97K meals to local families
A follow-up inspection will be done in 5-7 business days to ensure the corrections have been made.
On March 18, Bap Plus Korean Restaurant, located at 700 S. Gregory St. in Urbana, received a yellow food safety alert. An inspector found five risk factor/intervention violations and one repeat risk factor/intervention violation.
For the third time in a row, the inspector found that poisonous or toxic materials were stored incorrectly. In this inspection, two spray bottles of cleaner were stored next to opened plastic wrap, aluminum foil, and a bag of crushed pepper powder on a cart.
And, for the second time in a row, the restaurant did not use proper cooling methods. There were two pans of raw, breaded fish sitting between 45.5° to 48.4°F in the walk-in cooler. The fish were in containers that were deeper than four inches and tightly lidded. The health department said that this is an ineffective cooling method and threw the fish away.
Other issues the inspector noted included raw chicken stored over uncovered containers of noodles and raw onion, raw fish containers stacked on top of a container of pickled radish, and two spray bottles were not labeled with the 'common name' of the chemical they contained.
A follow-up inspection will be done in 5-7 business days to ensure the corrections have been made.
Illinois lawmakers plan new strategy to combat human trafficking, help identify victims
On March 19, Signature Grill, located at 505 E Green St. in Champaign, received a yellow food safety alert. An inspector found five risk factor/intervention violations and one repeat risk factor/intervention violation.
For the third time in a row, Signature Grill had an issue with keeping some of their food items at cold enough temperatures. An inspector found a pan of rice sitting at 45°F, an open container of half-n-half at 60°F, and a potato dish at 48°F.
Other issues the inspector noted included employees putting on gloves before washing their hands or not washing their hands before removing old gloves and putting on new ones, the hand sink near the food prep area was not stocked with soap, and dead insects on the sticky insect traps above the mop sink.
A follow-up inspection will be done in 5-7 business days to ensure the corrections have been made.
To see other restaurant inspections in Champaign County, click here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
3Degrees Welcomes Matt Rogers to Board of Directors, Expresses Gratitude to April Salas For Four Years of Board Leadership
SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug 4, 2025-- 3Degrees, a leading global climate solutions provider, is pleased to announce the appointment of Matt Rogers to its Board of Directors, effective August 1, 2025. Rogers brings 35 years of expertise serving clients globally in energy, sustainability, and innovation. 3Degrees also extends its deepest gratitude to outgoing board member April Salas, who is stepping down after more than four years of dedicated service. 'We are thrilled to welcome Matt to the 3Degrees Board of Directors,' said Philippe Vedrenne, CEO, 3Degrees. 'His track record of guiding companies through decarbonization and systems transformation makes him an exceptional partner as we support our clients in navigating their global climate action journey. We are looking forward to a fruitful collaboration, and know that Matt's insight and experience will be a tremendous asset to our team.' Over his more than 20 year career at McKinsey & Company, Rogers advised Fortune 500 companies, leading technology innovators, and energy providers worldwide. He also served in the U.S. Department of Energy, where he was responsible for implementing the energy investments of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. A widely recognized voice in the sector, Rogers has written and spoken extensively on topics including energy transitions, sustainability, power, and liquid fuels to boards, investors, and major global forums. He is a co-author of the book ' Resource Revolution: How to Capture the Biggest Business Opportunity in a Century ' and currently lectures at the Stanford Graduate School of Business and the Doerr School of Sustainability, as well as the UC Berkeley Haas School of Business. Rogers also serves on the Board of Directors of Exelon (NASDAQ: EXC) and is an Operating Partner at Ajax Strategies, a venture capital firm focused on climate innovation. In this capacity, he serves on the board of Natel Energy (fish-safe hydropower) and previously served on the boards of Ojjo (solar infrastructure) and Upstream Tech (AI for water and weather). 'The market and customers across the globe need 3Degrees more than ever right now,' said Rogers. 'I am looking forward to working with the full 3Degrees Board of Directors and management team to deliver increasing growth and impact.' In addition to welcoming Rogers, 3Degrees is also honoring the significant contributions of April Salas as she completes her tenure on the Board, which she joined in 2021. Salas brought a rare combination of cross-sectoral energy expertise, influenced by her leadership in federal energy policy, innovation, and academia. 'April's Board leadership helped shape a tremendous period of growth for 3Degrees,' said Dan Kalafatas, Chair of the Board, 3Degrees. 'She elevated our global, multi-sectoral, climate and energy expertise, and was an important partner during the company's strategic evolution as we deepened our decarbonization advisory capabilities, expanded internationally, launched new products and solutions, and sharpened our focus on measurable climate outcomes. We are grateful for her lasting contributions.' View source version on CONTACT: Rachel Fagan [email protected] +1 512-791-2083 KEYWORD: UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA CALIFORNIA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: SUSTAINABILITY GREEN TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT CLIMATE CHANGE SOURCE: 3Degrees Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 08/04/2025 12:00 PM/DISC: 08/04/2025 12:00 PM


Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
Electric Vehicle Charging Networks Are Growing Fast–For Now
Current Climate brings you the latest news about the business of sustainability every Monday. Sign up to get it in your inbox. MediaNews Group via Getty Images M uch of news around renewables and climate has grown downbeat as the Trump Administration kills federal incentives for most forms of clean energy, seeks to accelerate fossil fuel production and prepares to jettison the basis for the EPA's regulatory efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions since 2009. But there are still some bright spots. One of is the continued rapid expansion of the EV charging network in the U.S. In the year's second quarter, the pace of installation of new charging ports and stations grew at a record pace. By the end of the year, about 16,700 fast-charge ports will likely be built, which is 2.4 times the level across the country in 2022, according to EV industry researcher Paren. If the current rate of growth continues, the number of U.S. fast-charging ports could top 100,000 in 2027, up from 59,694 ports at the end of June. The total number of EV charging stations rose to 11,687 at the end of the quarter from 10,761 in Q1. Even with the pullback in federal support for EV charging, Paren estimates a 20% annual increase in new ports this year. Charging costs have also dipped a bit, to 48 cents/kWh from 50 cents/kWh a year ago, the result of both increased competition and new pricing systems, such as those offering discounts at off-peak times. Even Tesla, which operates the biggest U.S. charging network, is upping its game. In July, the Elon Musk-led company opened its first Tesla Diner in Hollywood that features, along with cheeseburgers, fries and drive-in movie screens, 80 Supercharger stations—the biggest urban charging station in the country. Boston Globe via Getty Images Waymo, the leading U.S. robotaxi operator, plans to launch the autonomous ride service in Dallas next year, its second market in Texas, where it's partnering with Avis to keep its growing fleet of electric vehicles in service. The Alphabet Inc. unit's steady expansion pace draws a sharp contrast with Tesla, which remains in test mode despite CEO Elon Musk's continued claims of its autonomous tech prowess. Mountain View, California-based Waymo said in a blog post it's launching commercial rides in Dallas in 2026, where it's also been testing, without specifying exactly when. It already operates in Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Austin and Atlanta, and previously said it would launch service in Miami and Washington, DC, next year as well. The company said Dallas is of interest as it thinks it can help road safety in a city with the highest traffic fatality rate among U.S. cities with populations above 1 million people. The news comes a week after Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said Waymo could soon triple the number of cities it's operating in. 'The Waymo driver has now autonomously driven over 100 million miles on public roads, and the team is testing across more than ten cities this year, including New York and Philadelphia,' he said on Alphabet's July 23 results calls. 'We hope to serve riders in all ten in the future.' Along with Dallas, New York and Philadelphia, Waymo has confirmed that it's testing electric robotaxis in Houston, San Antonio, Miami, San Diego, Nashville, Washington, Boston and Tokyo. Currently, it's providing over 250,000 paid rides a week in the five cities where the service is available. That could be worth at least $5.1 million a week, based on an average fare of $20.43 per ride, an estimate by Obi, an app that aggregates real-time ride-hail prices. Read more here Hot Topic Courtesy of Costa Samaras Costa Samaras, director of Carnegie Mellon University's Scott Institute for Energy Innovation, on upgrading infrastructure for a rapidly changing climate After a year of natural disasters, including massive Canadian wildfires, the hurricane that devastated Asheville, North Carolina, L.A. fires in January and Texas flooding this summer, are extreme weather events the new normal? Yes. A lot of times we fall back on this: 'Nobody could have foreseen this.' That's just not how it works. We're foreseeing it right now. It's been foreseen. That thing of saying 'oh, this is a once in a generation' or a 'once in a thousand years' kind of thing, that's not how we think about risk anymore. It's not just about assuming the worst all the time. It's more about not being unaware of what could happen, so that you don't say that you're surprised when we're telling you not to be surprised. It's virtually certain that it's going to be hotter. So we should be planning for our social systems, our health system, our infrastructure systems, our energy systems to be able to withstand more intense and prolonged heatwaves. These are things that we might not think about, the way that it affects our electricity grid or our water system or our transportation system or even our rail system. More intense heat stresses our systems in ways that they weren't designed for. The most important thing that we should be worried about is that heat is deadly, and it's especially deadly for vulnerable households, elderly people with weakened immune systems and very young children. For example, air conditioning is an adaptive technology that we don't think about as a technology for resilience, but it absolutely is. If people can't use air conditioning or can't afford to use air conditioning or don't have air conditioning and it's really hot, they can die. And on a super hot day, the grid and power plants become a little bit less efficient. Transmission lines become a little less efficient. The distribution system, the transformers and the wires that come to our homes, every little bit of power that moves from the power plant to our homes, on a very hot day gets eroded a little bit. And that coincides with days of the year when we need extra power. It's everybody turning their air conditioning on as the grid is becoming a little less efficient. And sometimes power plants can't operate when it's really hot. For example, ones that may use a river for water cooling, but the rivers are too hot to be effective. We have a power system that has been designed for the weather of the 20th century. That's not the weather that we have anymore. What kinds of changes should we be making to the power transmission system to adjust to a hotter climate or just more severe weather? We should be making changes to our supply system, our transmission system, and the way that we use electricity for a warming world. On the supply side, we should be adding more clean energy, solar and wind and geothermal, so that we stop the emissions that are making things worse. On the transmission side, there are new technologies that are called grid-enhancing technologies. There are opportunities to make power lines out of different materials that you can put more electricity through on hot days, but that also don't sag as much when it's hot. The materials used in conventional power lines expand. If you think about holding a string between two points, when it's hot it expands and starts to go closer toward the ground. That's dangerous because if it starts to sag too much, it gets close to a tree, it hits a tree and can spark a wildfire. That part of our electricity system is very susceptible to very high heat, so you should be thinking about new technologies to both reduce the sag but also enable us to put more electricity through the same infrastructure on very hot days. In the distribution system, depending on where we are in the country, we might want to put more of those lines underground because even though it's more expensive, so that they're less susceptible to getting knocked down in an extreme storm or iced over in many parts of the country when there's a lot of ice. And then finally at home, we need more distributed generation like solar and batteries, more intelligence to manage electricity loads with virtual power plants and so that if there's a problem with the transmission line or there's problem with power plants that are further away, we have some opportunity for resilience to still generate electricity when we need it close to where we are. One last thing is we definitely can't give up on energy efficiency. The more that we make our homes and businesses efficient, the less energy we'll need to draw from the grid on those super-hot days. What's not acceptable is that we assume people are going to have to go without air conditioning, especially low-income folks. That's just not an equitable, resilient solution. People should not be in danger because of high heat. What about coastal regions that are at ever greater risk for more intense storms, such as Florida or the Gulf region? What should we be doing there? We know in addition to heat, we're going to be facing increased intensity of storms, increased sea level rise and storm surge on the coasts, challenges in different parts of the water system and water availability and wildfire risk. In places like Florida, you're facing high heat, storm surge, sea level rise and extreme storms like hurricanes. There are opportunities–very low, no-regret opportunities–where we should be building our homes and infrastructure in places that are exposed to hurricanes to withstand high winds, heavy storms and the types of storm surge that push water onto land. Those are things we should be doing as a matter of standard, but we're not doing it in a systematic way to ensure that the infrastructure we have and the infrastructure we're building is going to be able to perform under increasingly intense climate-induced weather events. Lots of parts of Florida are heavily exposed to current and future climate risks, but it's important to understand that climate risks affect every part of the country. You don't have to be on the coast to be exposed to the dangers of climate change. A lot of people thought North Carolina was safe or different parts of the upper Midwest or different parts of inland California were safe. There are always ways we can improve our communities to be more resilient toward climate impacts. What's clear is climate change is causing damage right now, and the more emissions we generate, the worse it's going to be in the future. So it's on us to get the world's emissions to zero as fast as possible, while also building infrastructure, human and social systems, to be able to withstand the types of climate impacts that we see now and are going to see in the future. What Else We're Reading The Vatican will be the world's first carbon-neutral state, powered by a 430-hectare solar farm ( Associated Press ) Motherf***ing wind farms. Samuel L. Jackson joins a wind power campaign after Trump criticism ( Bloomberg ) Tesla signs a $4.3 billion deal with South Korea's LGES for lithium-iron phosphate battery cells made in Michigan, reducing its China reliance ( Reuters ) EPA climate rollbacks: When politics buries science, the public pays ( Forbes ) The National Science Foundation plans an abrupt end to the lone U.S. Antarctic research icebreaker. The termination of the RV Nathaniel B. Palmer shocks polar scientists ( Science ) How Ben & Jerry's is recycling food waste into energy ( PBS News Hour ) History & Hydrology: What you don't understand about China's new dam ( Forbes ) More From Forbes Forbes As America Backslides On Clean Energy, States Will Fill The Leadership Void By Mindy Lubber Forbes One Big Beautiful Bill – The Cost Of Climate Inaction By Elena Bou Forbes DOE Wooing U.S. Firms To Create Nuclear Fuel Production Lines By Noël Fletcher
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump bids to scrap almost all pollution regulations – can anything stop this?
The Trump administration is attempting to unmake virtually all climate US regulations in one fell swoop. At an Indiana truck dealership on Tuesday, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) unveiled a proposal to rescind the 16-year-old landmark legal finding which allows the agency to limit planet-heating pollution from cars and trucks, power plants and other industrial sources. Related: The renewable energy revolution is a feat of technology | Rebecca Solnit 'The proposal would, if finalized, amount to the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States,' said the EPA administrator, Lee Zeldin. The agency's primary argument for reversing the so-called 'endangerment finding' claims the Clean Air Act gives the EPA the authority to regulate only emissions that locally threaten health. Department of Energy officials also laid out another justification for the move, which experts say relies heavily on climate denialism. Once the proposal is published in the Federal Register, the EPA will open a public comment period. Once it finalizes the rule, it will face an array of legal challenges. But if the rollback prevails, it would leave the EPA without any authority to regulate greenhouse gas pollution amid ever-compounding evidence that a swift reduction in these emissions is needed to avert catastrophic global warming. 'The importance of the endangerment finding can't be overstated,' said the renowned climate scientist Michael Mann. 'It's been the primary tool that we have had to actually regulate carbon emissions and meet our obligations under various global agreements to address the climate crisis.' What is the administration doing? The endangerment finding, enshrined in 2009, found that greenhouse gases pose a threat to human health. It followed a 2007 supreme court ruling which found such gases were pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act. The finding has long been a target for elimination by climate deniers. Democratic administrations used it and 'twisted the law, ignored precedent, and warped science to achieve their preferred ends and stick American families with hundreds of billions of dollars in hidden taxes every single year', according to Zeldin. The proposed undoing of the finding followed Trump's January executive order on 'Unleashing American Energy', which directed the agency to submit a report 'on the legality and continuing applicability' of the endangerment finding. It comes as part of Trump's 'drill, baby, drill' agenda, which aims to boost already booming fossil-fuel production. Along with the scrapping of the endangerment finding, the EPA said it will kill off regulations limiting pollution coming from cars and will stymie a rule that curbs the amount of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, spewing from oil and gas drilling operations. Officials have laid out an array of legal justifications for the rollback. The main one rests on the idea that the Clean Air Act provides authority to regulate 'air pollution that endangers public health or welfare through local or regional exposure' – but not emissions that warm the planet. Zealan Hoover, former senior adviser to the EPA administrator, said that argument does not pass muster. 'The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to regulate any air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare,' he said. 'The Trump administration is staking out the extreme position that climate pollution does not harm the physical or financial health of Americans. That flies in the face of decades of scientific research and the firsthand experience of millions facing sea level rise, extreme heat, floods and fires.' The EPA is also using the so-called 'major questions doctrine' as an argument for the rollback, said Michael Gerrard, a professor of environmental and energy law at Columbia Law School and faculty chair of Columbia's Earth Institute. Embraced by conservative justices, it says congressional authorization is needed for action on issues of broad importance and societal impact. 'They're saying that, regardless of what the text of the Clean Air Act may say, the endangerment finding is so economically and politically significant that the EPA can't issue it without explicit congressional authorization,' said Gerrard. In a 150-page report also published on Tuesday, the Department of Energy (DoE) also laid out a separate argument for the move, which attempts to undercut the scientific consensus on the climate crisis. Experts say it relies on misleading scientific claims, such as the idea that carbon is beneficial for agriculture, which downplays research suggesting climate-driven extreme weather damages crop yields, and the debunked idea that extreme cold is more dangerous than extreme heat. Reached for comment, a Department of Energy spokesperson, Ben Dietderich, said: 'This report critically assesses many areas of ongoing scientific inquiry that are frequently assigned high levels of confidence – not by the scientists themselves but by the political bodies involved, such as the United Nations or previous presidential administrations.' The UN and the US have regularly convened top scientists to produce scientific climate reports, which warn that urgent action to curb emissions is needed. Last week, the secretary general of the UN, António Guterres, gave a speech in which he said the world is on the brink of a breakthrough in the climate fight and fossil fuels are running out of road. What could the impact of the Trump administration's move be? In its proposal, the EPA claimed eliminating US carbon pollution 'would not have a scientifically measurable impact' on the global climate or on public health. But by warming the planet and increasing the likelihood of extreme weather events like wildfires and floods, greenhouse gas emissions pose grave threats to society, said Mann. 'It isn't remotely credible to argue that carbon pollution isn't a major, if not the greatest, threat now to human health,' he said. With the proposed change, 'the EPA is telling us in no uncertain terms that US efforts to address climate change are over', said Abigail Dillen, president of the environmental legal non-profit Earthjustice. 'For the industries that contribute most to climate change, the message is: pollute more,' she said. 'For everyone feeling the pain of climate disasters, the message is: you're on your own.' Though the rollback aims to create a regulatory environment friendly to fossil fuels, it could, ironically, also threaten oil companies' attempts to fend off lawsuits aiming to hold them accountable for the climate crisis. To fight some challenges by cities and states, companies have argued that because the EPA regulates greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, those suits should be void. Throwing out EPA's ability to regulate those emissions could leave energy companies open to further challenges. 'I know that industry groups have been asking the Trump folks not to reverse the endangerment finding,' Jeff Holmstead, of the oil and gas law firm Bracewell, told E&E News in February. What happens next? Zeldin's proposed rulemaking on the endangerment finding initiated a 45-day comment period, when the public will be able to weigh in on the proposed change. 'EPA will then have to respond to the comments, make any necessary changes, and issue the rule in final form,' said Gerrard, of Columbia. The final rule is expected to be met with an onslaught of lawsuits, which will go to the DC federal appeals court. The losers of those cases – either the government or the challengers – are expected to take them to the supreme court. Shaun Goho, legal director at the pollution-focused nonprofit Clean Air Task Force, said the proposal was 'unlawful'. 'Greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and the climate, and the Clean Air Act mandates that EPA regulates harmful air pollution,' he said. Some experts are confident the challenges will be successful. But Gerrard says he is not so sure. 'The US supreme court, with its 6-3 conservative majority, has issued a series of decisions in the past three years cutting back on federal environmental regulations,' he said. 'So I'm concerned.' Asked about experts concerns about the health-harming impacts of greenhouse gases, the EPA said its proposal 'is primarily legal and procedural'. 'The endangerment finding is the legal prerequisite used by the Obama and Biden administrations to regulate emissions from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines,' a spokesperson said. 'Absent this finding, EPA would lack statutory authority under [the Clean Air Act] to prescribe standards for greenhouse gas emissions.' The spokesperson said 'many of the predictions made and assumptions used' for the endangerment finding 'did not materialize'. However, scientists have in recent decades produced many new findings showing greenhouse gases are dangerous.