
Centre To Launch Public Outreach On Indus Waters Treaty Suspension, Highlight Gains For India
In a significant policy move, the central government is set to launch a comprehensive public outreach campaign to explain the rationale behind putting the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in abeyance. This initiative aims to increase public awareness of the strategic and developmental benefits India stands to gain from suspending the decades-old agreement.
Sources indicate that the government intends to communicate directly with citizens, particularly in northern Indian states, where the potential for increased use of river water is being explored. The outreach will focus on how the suspension of the treaty could enable India to exercise its rightful control over water resources and rechannel them for domestic agricultural and developmental use.
The campaign will be spearheaded by senior Union ministers, including Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil, and Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav. These ministers will travel to key regions and engage with local communities in simple, accessible language to explain the government's stance, the reasoning behind the treaty's suspension, and the future roadmap.
The larger objective, officials say, is to develop a long-term water management strategy that allows for optimal use of Indus river waters within India. Plans are underway to facilitate the movement of water from Jammu & Kashmir to Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan – states that are poised to benefit significantly from improved irrigation and water availability.
As part of this effort, an extensive public awareness and engagement campaign will be rolled out in Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan. Ministers are expected to personally visit multiple districts and hold interactions with stakeholders, including farmers, local officials, and civil society groups, to ensure the message is effectively conveyed.
This move reflects the government's intent to align national water security with geopolitical strategy, while also addressing growing domestic water demands.
In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had reiterated that 'trade and terror, water and blood, bullets and dialogue cannot go together."
India has since accelerated work on strategic water infrastructure linked to the Indus river system. Among the key initiatives is a 130-kilometre canal designed to link the Beas River to the Ganga Canal, with a proposed extension to the Yamuna River. The project spans nearly 200 kilometres and includes a 12-kilometre tunnel, potentially enabling Yamuna water to reach Gangasagar.
States such as Delhi, Haryana, Punjab, and Rajasthan are projected to benefit from the initiative. The government has stated that the work is advancing rapidly and is expected to be completed within two to three years. A Detailed Project Report (DPR) is also in preparation.
Sources suggest the suspension of the treaty could significantly affect Pakistan's rabi crops, with the kharif season remaining relatively unaffected. Beyond agriculture, the disruption could impact daily life, potentially leading to a water availability crisis.
Pakistan has reportedly approached the World Bank to mediate in the matter. However, the World Bank has thus far declined to intervene in India's internal decision to suspend the treaty.
India has emphasised the need to revisit and renegotiate the treaty to reflect 21st-century realities. The original treaty, crafted in the 1950s and 60s, is increasingly seen as outdated due to changing hydrological patterns, glacial melt, population growth, and the need for sustainable energy and water management.
Despite India's push for modernisation, Pakistan has continued to resist renegotiation – a stance that, according to Indian officials, itself contravenes the treaty's provisions.
Following the Pahalgam terror attack, India had announced a range of diplomatic and strategic responses, including placing the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance.
First Published:
June 30, 2025, 14:13 IST

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
US bill proposes 500% tariff on India, China over Russia business ties
A proposed US Senate bill, backed by President Donald Trump, could impose 500% tariffs on countries, including India and China, that continue trading with Russia, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said in an interview with ABC to ABC News, Graham stated, "If you're buying products from Russia, and you're not helping Ukraine, then there's a 500% tariff on your products coming into the United States. India and China buy 70% of Putin's oil. They keep his war machine going."advertisementThe bill is reportedly expected to be introduced in August, marking a significant escalation in US efforts to isolate Russia economically. If enacted, the bill could severely impact India and China, the largest buyers of discounted Russian crude. For India, the move also risks tariffs on exports like pharmaceuticals, textiles, and IT is a major buyer of Russian oil, and imported EUR 49 billion worth of crude oil in the third year of the Ukraine invasion. Traditionally, India sourced its oil from the Middle East, but began importing a large volume of oil from Russia soon after the invasion of Ukraine in February development also comes on the heels of the much-expected India-US bilateral trade agreement. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated on Tuesday that the trade deal is "very close", even as an Indian delegation continued discussions with US officials in Washington after trade talks hit a deadlock over key agricultural demands, sources told India proposed bill, co-sponsored by Graham and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, reportedly has 84 co-sponsors and aims to pressure nations into halting Russian oil purchases, weakening "Moscow's war economy" and pushing it toward peace negotiations in told ABC News that Trump gave the green light during a golf game. "For the first time yesterday, the President told me I was playing golf with him. He says, 'It's time to move your bill.'"Originally proposed in March, the legislation faced delays after the White House signalled Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump administration had 'quietly pressured' the Senate to soften the bill by changing mandatory language ("shall") to discretionary ("may").Graham later reportedly proposed a carve-out for countries supporting Ukraine, likely to ease concerns among the US's European allies. "We are going to give President Trump a tool in the toolbox," Graham this bill becomes law, it may alter US's trade relationships with both China and India. Given that the US is India's primary export market, the policy could also trigger substantial economic repercussions and diplomatic tensions.- EndsTune InMust Watch


India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
Officers, not Tom, Dick and Harry: Karnataka High Court to X on Railway's notice
The Karnataka High Court backed the Union government after it told the court that its officers are 'not Tom, Dick and Harry.' This came as X Corp India, the Indian arm of Elon Musk-owned X (formerly Twitter), challenged a Ministry of Railways notice asking the platform to take down a video of a woman driving a car on railway tracks in Advocate KG Raghavan, appearing for X, questioned the legality of the notice. 'What if every Tom, Dick and Harry officer sends notice to me? See how this is being misused,' he argued. He also asked whether posting such videos amounts to unlawful content, adding, 'Dog biting man is not news, but man biting dog is,' as reported by Live General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Union of India, objected to the remarks. 'They are officers, not Tom, Dick and Harry. International bodies should not have this arrogance,' he said. He added that no social media company can expect unregulated functioning in India.'They are bound by regulations in all other countries but in India they want this luxury,' he M Nagaprasanna backed the objection and said, 'These are officers of the Union of India. I take objection to this.'advertisementX Corp has sought a declaration that Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act does not empower authorities to block content directly, and that such orders must follow the procedure under Section 69A and its Advocate Aditya Sondhi, appearing for a digital media association, said content creators are affected by takedown orders. But the bench questioned how the association is aggrieved when the dispute is between X and the government. Mehta objected to the intervention, saying, 'Twitter is competent. It does not require external support.'The court posted the matter for final hearing on July 8. It allowed X Corp to amend its petition and include various ministries as parties. The Union government was directed to file its objections.- EndsTune InTrending Reel IN THIS STORY#Karnataka


India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
It's a shame: Vivek Ramaswamy slams troll targeting Zohran Mamdani, Usha Vance
Republican leader Vivek Ramaswamy has condemned what he called the 'race-obsessed fringe of the right' after being lumped into a xenophobic tirade alongside fellow Indian-origin leaders New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and US Second Lady Usha comments came in response to a post by white supremacist influencer Nick Fuentes, who called on conservatives attacking Mamdani to apply the same scrutiny to Ramaswamy and Usha wrote on X, 'When conservatives attack Zohran Mamdani for being a foreigner, I just want them to keep the same energy with Vivek Ramaswamy and Usha Vance. Let's be consistent.' Vivek Ramaswamy hits back at influencer Ramaswamy, retweeting the post, fired back, 'It's a shame to watch the race-obsessed fringe of the right try to outdo the race-obsessed woke left.'The exchange comes amid a broader controversy surrounding Zohran Mamdani after a viral video showing him eating rice and dal with his hands during an interview triggered a heated culture war online. The video, captioned 'Zohran says his worldview is inspired by the 3rd world while eating rice with his hands,' quickly became a Congressman Brandon Gill joined the backlash, tweeting, 'Civilised people in America don't eat like this. If you refuse to adopt Western customs, go back to the Third World.'The remarks drew immediate criticism, with many accusing Gill and others of racial intolerance and cultural ignorance. While some accused Mamdani of using cultural traditions for 'performative politics,' others argued the criticism reflected deep-seated controversy has escalated into calls from some Republican-aligned groups for a federal investigation into Mamdani's citizenship status. Former ICE director Tom Homan even threatened tougher enforcement on 'sanctuary cities,' implicitly targeting Mamdani, 33, is an Indian-American Muslim and the son of renowned filmmaker Mira Nair. This week, he made history as the first Muslim nominee for the Democratic Party in the New York City mayoral race, following the withdrawal of former Governor Andrew pop culture with progressive politics—frequently through Bollywood-inspired campaign videos—Mamdani has cultivated a strong online following. But his groundbreaking candidacy now faces intense scrutiny amid a deepening cultural and political backlash.- Ends