‘We're not always what we claim to be': Ramaphosa takes dig at SA's politicians during Mabuza's funeral
President Cyril Ramaphosa delivers the eulogy during the funeral of former deputy president David Mabuza at Hoërskool Bergvlam, Mbombela, Mpumalanga, on 12 July 2025. Picture: GCIS
President Cyril Ramaphosa told South Africa's politicians to use former deputy president David Mabuza's funeral as an opportunity to reflect on their roles.
Ramaphosa delivered a eulogy at Mabuza's funeral in Mbombela, Mpumalanga, on Saturday.
'The sad and untimely passing of our fellow comrade is a time for the leaders of this country to reflect,' he said.
ALSO READ: Mabuza funeral: It was his dream to see the ANC united – Ramaphosa
'Personal ambition prioritised over collective progress' – Ramaphosa
The president said South Africa's leaders are 'not always what we claim to be'.
'Too many of us often say 'yes, we are honest in what we say', but in the end become less honest in what we do,' he said.
'Too often, personal ambition takes precedence over collective progress. Too often, our words sow division.
'If we are serious about building something greater than ourselves, be it a movement, be it a community, or be it a nation, we must begin with humility.'
ALSO READ: Mbalula defends the way he announced Mabuza's death [VIDEO]
Ramaphosa said South Africa's leaders must have commitment and be prepared to sacrifice.
'We must ask not just what we are fighting against, but we must ask what we are building towards.'
He seemed to take a dig at politicians prioritising their own interests.
'We need to let our selflessness be more than just sentiment. It should be action.'
Mabuza 'wanted unity' in ANC
He said Mabuza sought to unite the ANC.
'At the time when there was disunity in the African National Congress, DD Mabuza sought to unite the ANC.
'So, with this passing, we have lost a great leader. DD Mabuza has left a void.'
After his passing, Mabuza was remembered as playing a pivotal role in getting Ramaphosa elected as president in 2017. He has been credited with potentially saving the country by switching his allegiance from the RET faction backing Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma to Ramaphosa's Thuma Mina campaign.
Ramaphosa said ANC members need to honour Mabuza by emulating him.
'We need to honour him, but honour him correctly by emulating him, by doing what he did to be Mr Unity.'
NOW READ: SACP official claims Mabuza backed unity to prevent Zuma's 'rule from the grave'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Watch: Ramaphosa hails Mabuza as ‘unifier' at state funeral service
Guests and mourners gathered for the state funeral of former deputy president David Dabede Mabuza at Hoërskool Bergvlam yesterday. Thousands attended the service. According to Mpumalanga News, President Cyril Ramaphosa delivered the eulogy, describing Mabuza as a revered leader not only in his home province of Mpumalanga but across the country. 'He was a man of sharp intellect, deep pragmatism and quiet resolve. To some, he was the 'cat with nine lives', resilient in the face of political storms. 'But to many in his home province and beyond, he was a source of support, a provider of opportunities, and a champion for rural development and education,' said Ramaphosa, adding that Mabuza would be remembered as a unifier. 'As premier he was committed to unifying the different people of the Land of the Rising Sun. In death, he has once again brought us all together, across many nations and continents, to mourn, pay homage, remember and fondly reminisce. 'In his eternal sleep, he is demonstrating that our many differences along political party and racial lines, and the numerous disputes we may have, are eclipsed by our shared desire to follow his lead in building a just, equitable and caring society,' he added. In a message from Mabuza's wife, Nonhlanhla Mabuza, read by Nomsa Mnisi, she reflected on their first meeting and how she came to terms with his dedication to public service. 'Serving the people of South Africa was your first love. Like any young wife, I struggled with that at first. But when I saw the joy and impact you brought to the people of Mpumalanga, I embraced my place beside you as your partner, with love and pride. The love you had for your children was tough but empowering.' She said Mabuza touched many lives profoundly and recalled how she never worried when he left for his regular medical check-ups because he always returned home. She remembered their last phone call and being informed an hour later that he was being taken to hospital. She vowed to carry the rest of her journey with the strength he left behind. After the state funeral, the family held a private service in Barberton. Watch the funeral service here: Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
The National Dialogue must not be derailed by political gaslighting
AN ANC supporter with an election manifesto poster a election campaign meeting in Promosa, Potchefstroom on January 30, 1994. The democratic breakthrough of 1994 was not just a political event. It delivered the keys of the Republic to those long locked outside the gates of history, says the writer. Image: AFP Zamikhaya Maseti The 15th of August 2025 has been etched into the political calendar as a historic moment, the National Dialogue. At its most aspirational, it is meant to be a nation-defining platform, a civic summit for collective introspection, healing, and democratic recommitment. But even before its formal commencement, this national project risks being engulfed by the shallow political theatrics and elite tantrums that have paralysed genuine nation-building for far too long. Chief among the culprits is the Democratic Alliance (DA), which is now using the recent dismissal of Deputy Minister Andrew Whitfield, a figure occupying neither Cabinet status nor National Executive prominence, as a spark to fuel political hysteria. Let it be clear: this is not statesmanship. It is a political gaslighting strategy, a sophisticated act of deflection designed to distract South Africans from the essential questions we ought to be confronting. This political fracas, if anything, is a sobering reminder. It compels us, the ordinary and long-suffering South Africans, the real stakeholders in the future of this nation, to seize the agenda of the National Dialogue. We dare not allow it to be captured by those who wish to reduce this opportunity into a partisan tug-of-war. It must speak with bold honesty to the crises that are tearing our country limb from limb. South Africa, make no mistake, stands on the precipice of an abyss. What we are facing is not merely policy failure; it is the slow, corrosive disintegration of the national soul. Crime is no longer a statistic; it is a mode of life. Corruption is no longer a scandal; it is an ecosystem. Social cohesion, once the backbone of our fragile reconciliation, is unravelling under the weight of poverty, lawlessness, and deepening racial resentment. The rainbow has dimmed to a monochrome of despair and distrust. We are not yet a failed State. But with each passing day, with each institution that crumbles and each promise betrayed, we edge closer to that dreaded status. What once made South Africa the miracle of the world has now been bludgeoned by mediocrity, political cannibalism, and the fossilisation of revolutionary ideals. The May 29, 2024, General Elections offered perhaps the clearest mirror to our political malaise. Voter apathy was not apolitical. It was a mass indictment, a statement of no confidence in a political system that feels increasingly like an exclusive game played above the heads of the governed. People's faith in democracy is no longer low; it is at the ankles, dragging itself in the dust of betrayal. Therefore, it is not negotiable: the very first item on the agenda of the National Dialogue must be governance. Not in the abstract, but the brutally honest question: How have we been governed since 1994? When did the wheels fall off? At which exact moment did the promise of liberation give way to elite accumulation, State capture, and rudderless bureaucracy? Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The democratic breakthrough of 1994 was not just a political event; it was a civilizational rupture. It delivered the keys of the Republic to those long locked outside the gates of history. The masses, the historically despised Third Estate, took to the streets in euphoric celebration, believing that their day under the sun had finally arrived. And it did, briefly. But somewhere between Kliptown and the Union Buildings, between The People Shall Govern and parliamentary privilege, the democratic vehicle began to wobble. The tyres of accountability deflated. The engine of ethical leadership began to cough and stall. The Dialogue must, therefore, perform a thorough diagnostic inspection of this vehicle, note every point of mechanical failure, and commit to firm, unapologetic, and irreversible repairs. Among the most urgent repairs is the deconstruction of the neo-patrimonial political culture that has infected our post-1994 polity. This culture, rooted in patronage, personality cults, and informal networks of loyalty, has turned public office into private inheritance and governance into transactional loyalty schemes. It must be dislodged root and branch if democracy is to breathe again. But systemic repair is not merely the work of the elite. A return to grassroots democracy is indispensable. The people, the ones who queued in '94 with trembling hope, must be brought back to the centre of governance, not as passive spectators but as active architects. Civil society, social movements, religious bodies, worker organisations, youth formations, these are not side actors; they are the real Parliament of the People. We must then reimagine citizenship, not as periodic voting, but as perpetual participation. The strengthening of civic institutions and the rebirth of an active citizenry is the only credible antidote to elite capture and democratic decay. Ultimately, the National Dialogue must restore the central promise uttered boldly 70 years ago in Kliptown: 'The People Shall Govern.' That is not a slogan. It is a covenant. And covenants, once broken, demand not just apologies but repair, repentance, and recommitment. Let us, therefore, put back the wheels that fell off the democratic vehicle. Let us take the Dialogue back from political actors playing hide-and-seek with our future. Let us, the people, write the next chapter of our nation, not with ink, but with intention. For if we do not steer the vehicle back onto the road, history will not be kind. And we will have no one to blame but ourselves. * Zamikhaya Maseti is a Political Economy Analyst with a Magister Philosophiae (M. PHIL) in South African Politics and Political Economy from the University of Port Elizabeth (UPE), now known as the Nelson Mandela University (NMU). ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
SAPS turmoil another test for a dithering Commander-in-Chief
Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi (left), President Cyril Ramaphosa and Police Minister Senzo Mchunu at the inaugural Policing Summit held at the Emperors Palace Convention Centre in Gauteng April 08, 2025. Recent revelations made by General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi are damning. While these allegations are yet to be tested, verified and authenticated, they paint a dark picture about the top brass at SAPS, says the writer. Image: GCIS Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu When President Ramaphosa ascended to power in 2018, he punched above his weight by making huge promises that would propel South Africa to stardom. He promised to correct what he called 'nine wasted years' under President Jacob Zuma, whom he deputised in the ANC and government. He also promised to deliver 'The New Dawn.' Once the wheels started rolling, they quickly fell off and sent the car in all directions. One of the areas where challenges have been witnessed is the security cluster, which was accused of dropping the ball in the Nkandla matter. The expectation was that the security cluster would install security features at Zuma's private home in line with its mandate. Later, it was discovered that many things went wrong. Zuma was accused of squandering public funds instead of blaming the security cluster for failing to execute its mandate. Under Ramaphosa, in July 2021, KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng went ablaze as public protests engulfed these provinces following Justice Sisi Khampepe's emotional ruling that Zuma must be incarcerated for 15 months at the Estcourt prison. The security cluster could have prevented the riots, which had devastating effects from which people have not fully recovered. Many lives were lost, people lost jobs, and several businesses closed. This led to a trust deficit between the public and the security cluster. Worried about potential public backlash and determined to redeem the image of the cluster, Ramaphosa made some changes in the security cluster. Among them was the removal of Minister Ayanda Dlodlo from her position, while others were left untouched. Ramaphosa was indeed hailed by some for taking action to address the embarrassment. But others blamed him for not being decisive and doing enough to curtail future occurrences of something similar. Continuing challenges in the South African Police Service (SAPS) have been a cause for concern. Some police members are arrested for criminal activities, accused of contaminating crime scenes, not treating complainants properly, raping some of the complainants, opting to ridicule those who come to open cases, accused of making dockets disappear and either protecting or working with criminals. Such stories have been in the public domain. While the incidents do not involve all SAPS members since others are honest and professional, they do tarnish the image of the service. The country's defence force has also been in the media for the wrong reasons. Reports of defence force members killing their colleagues or being implicated in other wrongdoings, either individually or collectively, are concerning. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Immigration is another sector where problems have occurred. Apart from complaints about long queues, which could be avoided, there are other serious matters. Reports about bribery have been in the media. The miraculous exit of Shepherd Bushiri back to Malawi while he was facing charges, together with his wife, raised eyebrows. The increasing number of illegal immigrants raises concerns. This has in the past triggered Afrophobia, which was wrongly dubbed xenophobia. In a nutshell, the security cluster has been receiving bad publicity. This is not to say that there are no honest and professional South Africans in these units. Sadly, their good work is overshadowed by the wrongs of their colleagues. As the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, the president (whoever it may be) is inevitably drawn in. Ramaphosa is the incumbent. Therefore, the buck stops with him. What has he done to protect the image of the security cluster? If he has not done enough, why is that the case? Importantly, how does his inaction breathe life into the 'New Dawn' promise? Recent revelations made by General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi are damning. While these allegations are yet to be tested, verified and authenticated, they paint a dark picture about the top brass at SAPS. What makes these allegations plausible is that they speak to some of the concerns the public has expressed in the past. Since assuming his current position, Mkhwanazi has been accused of leading gun crazy police officers. Some human rights groups even confronted him, arguing that the suspects have rights. Interestingly, they were silent about the police officers who were assassinated while on duty defending innocent South Africans. Putting SAPS protocol aside, Mkhwanazi has given the nation a taste of what could be happening behind the scenes. Given the seriousness of the allegations he made during the media briefing, the onus is on Ramaphosa to show astute and decisive leadership. The call is not for him to summarily dismiss those implicated in Mkhwanazi's public statements. What is expected from the president is to suspend those individuals pending the investigations. If it is true that people who are not members of SAPS have a say in what happens there, this would make a mockery of the accusations levelled against the Gupta family. What happened to the recommendations of the Sydney Mufamadi Report? Did Ramaphosa implement those? If nothing was done, what difference would it make to set up another investigation to verify the statements made by Mkhwanazi? In other words, has Ramaphosa demonstrated astute and decisive leadership in the past? If not, is this not an opportune moment for him to do so to regain public trust, both for his political image and that of the country? To what extent does his action and/or inaction impact the ANC's performance in the polls? These are very critical questions. Considering the above, if the security cluster is not performing at the expected level, where does that leave the DA's proposal about the devolution of powers to provincial governments? More importantly, what does that say about South Africa's status of being a unitary state as opposed to being a federal state? Should the country embark on a constitutional amendment to address weaknesses in the security cluster? In a nutshell, General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's revelations have tacitly invoked important discussions about the state of our country's security. Implicitly, it implores the president to self-reflect on how he has performed his function as Commander-in-Chief. * Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu is Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Non-Racialism and Democracy at Nelson Mandela University. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
