Government proposes axing NCEA, introducing new qualifications
The pair made the announcement in Auckland this morning, saying the current system "doesn't always deliver what students and employers need".
"We want every New Zealander to reach their full potential and contribute to a thriving economy — and that starts with our students," Luxon said.
"The evidence shows NCEA is not consistent and can be hard to navigate."
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. (Source: 1News)
ADVERTISEMENT
The proposal includes:
Removing NCEA Level 1, requiring students to take English and Mathematics at Year 11, and sit a foundation award (test) in numeracy and literacy.
Replacing NCEA Levels 2 and 3 with two new qualifications (The New Zealand Certificate of Education at Year 12 and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education at Year 13).
Requiring students to take five subjects and pass at least four to attain each certificate.
Marking clearly out of 100 with grades that make sense to parents like A, B, C, D, E.
Working with industry to develop better vocational pathways so students are getting the skills relevant to certain career pathways.
The new qualification would be underpinned by a new national curriculum for Years 9-13 that outlines what students need to learn in each subject and when, in a bid to provide more consistency.
"While NCEA was designed to be flexible, for many students that flexibility has encouraged a focus on simply attaining the qualification. This has come at the cost of developing the critical skills and knowledge they need for clear pathways into future study, training or employment," Stanford said.
Education Minister Erica Stanford. (Source: 1News)
"This is about making sure our national qualification opens doors for every young person, whether they're heading into a trade, university, or straight into work. Parents can be assured their kids will get the best possible opportunity to thrive."
Luxon said "New Zealand's future depends on our young people having the skills to succeed in the modern global economy".
ADVERTISEMENT
"We're backing Kiwi kids with a new internationally benchmarked national qualification designed to do exactly that.
Stanford said the Government's major education reforms were already "well underway in primary and intermediate".
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including toddler found in suitcase on bus, Russian volcano erupts, and Liam Lawson pips former world champion. (Source: 1News)
"Every student is already taught at least an hour a day of reading, writing, and maths, we've banned cell phones in classrooms, we've introduced a world-leading Maths and English curriculum, mandated structured literacy and maths programmes, equipped teachers and students with high-quality resources, made huge investments into learning support and stopped building open-plan classrooms," Stanford says.
Consultation on the proposal will be open until September 15, with final decisions to be make before the year's end.
The proposed changes are to be phased in, with the new national curriculum coming in next year.
The Foundational Skills Award will start in 2028, and the Certificates of Education in 2029 and 2030 for Year 12 and 13.
ADVERTISEMENT
During the transition period, students will be assessed either through the current NCEA system, or the new one.
'NCEA is basically not a rigorous curriculum'
With the Government considering the future of NCEA, co-founder of billion-dollar company Crimson Education Jamie Beaton is urging massive changes to NZ's secondary school qualification. (Source: Q and A)
Yesterday, Crimson Education co-founder Jamie Beaton told Q+A that NCEA wasn't setting students up well for future success, and lacks international recognition.
"To be honest, it's rough. NCEA is basically not a rigorous curriculum at all, and students graduating with it are often two years behind in core subjects like maths, science as well," said Beaton.
Labour respond
Labour education spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime said the proposed abolishment of NCEA left unanswered questions and said the last thing students need was "more confusion".
ADVERTISEMENT
"Previous rushed overhauls have led to students being the guinea pigs for failed change – like national standards – so we must get this right. Any change must be done with proper sector consultation and be based on evidence that it will lead to better outcomes for all students," she said.
"I am worried that teachers, parents and whānau have such a short window to share their voices after being excluded in the months leading up to this announcement.
"The Government must ensure any change is evidence-based, has students' futures in mind and allow time for proper consultation so that we can get this right for all young people and children."
ACT respond
ACT Leader David Seymour said the party "wholeheartedly supports this move", saying students deserve a system that is "universally good".
"Over the time that the NCEA has been in place, New Zealand high school students have fallen badly in the OECD's PISA study. The study of 15-year-olds in reading, maths, and science is done once every three years.
"In the early 2000s when NCEA was introduced, New Zealand was often in the top five. Today we are 23rd for maths, and in each subject today's students are about a year behind where the same aged students were at the start of the century.
ADVERTISEMENT
Seymour said replacing the NCEA with a rich body of real knowledge being richly assessed was "the right direction".
"If New Zealand is going to be a high income country through the twenty-first century, it must have the policies in place to pass useful knowledge from one generation to the next."
Greens respond
Greens education spokesperson Lawrence Xu-Nan said the proposal risked "turning back the clock on decades of progress toward a student-centred system".
"Today's announcement is another classic case of the Government favouring one-size-fits-all approaches. Our education system is too important to be reduced to a single, rigid framework that will leave many behind.
"Our rangatahi are so much more than just workers-in-training. Education should not be designed simply as an add on to the labour market or to conform to narrow economic thinking, but to grow the whole person."
He said students deserved a system which equipped them "to achieve their unique potential, not one that measures them against a single standard".
ADVERTISEMENT
PPTA respond
PPTA president Chris Abercrombie said Chris Abercrombie said there were many positive aspects of NCEA with "undoubted benefits for students" that should be retained and built on.
"As a standards-based assessment system that is based on the principle that all students should have opportunities to succeed, be rewarded for what they know, and can demonstrate and fulfil their potential, the NCEA has clear advantages over the previous qualification system, which had a built-in failure rate.
'Of course, no system is perfect, and in recent years there has been widespread agreement on improvements to NCEA, including fewer and larger standards, clearer vocational pathways, and a simpler structure.
"However, to the great frustration of teachers these changes either failed to be implemented or resourced adequately. The lack of adequate support for, and political flip flopping on, NCEA means teachers are left trying to fill the gaps. We need stability and certainty," he said.
Hospitality, business sectors encouraged
Hospitality NZ chief executive Steve Armitage said he was pleased to see the Government considering changes with the potential to "improve vocational pathways, and support hospitality becoming an industry of choice".
ADVERTISEMENT
"We're particularly encouraged by the Government's commitment to working with industry to design coherent vocational learning packages. This could ensure that hospitality standards reflect the skills and professionalism our sector requires, while giving students a clear pathway from school into hospo careers."
BusinessNZ chief executive Katherine Rich said the current system was not delivering what students, parents, teachers, or employers needed.
"Whether a school-leaver is heading on to university, an apprenticeship, or directly into work, the education system must offer transparent, reliable guidance to build confidence and inform whatever choice they're making."
"This is an opportunity to strengthen the connection between schools, training providers, and industry. By working closer together, we can better support learners with real-world pathways, ensure relevant skills are being learned, and deliver long-term benefits for communities and the economy alike."
Universities NZ respond
Universities New Zealand said it broadly supported the direction of proposed changes to the NCEA qualification system, but reserved full judgement until more detail was released.
Universities NZ chief executive Chris Whelan said the proposals appeared to address long-standing concerns about the current system.
ADVERTISEMENT
"We have previously raised concerns that the flexibility of NCEA has led to a focus on simply gaining credits rather than developing deep knowledge and critical thinking needed for students to succeed at a university level," he said. "This proposal appears to address those concerns."
"University Entrance is a robust indicator of a student's readiness for degree-level standards, and we would expect that to continue under a new system."
He welcomed the Government's decision to phase in the changes over a longer period, saying it would allow time for careful planning and consultation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Aaron Smale: Why politicians don't take the Māori vote seriously
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Christopher Luxon's indifference reflects the larger issue of the major parties ignoring Māori as a voting bloc. Photo / Getty Images Whoever the press secretary is for Christopher Luxon these days, they might want to have a weekend bootcamp teaching him how to keep his foot out of his mouth. Apart from when he uses corporate gibberish to masquarade as an answer, on the rare occasion Luxon says something pithy, it often turns out to be an absolute clanger. Luxon tossed off one such clanger when he questioned whether the September 6 by-election for the Māori electorate seat of Tāmaki Makaurau would be a real fight or 'a pillow fight'. (Kind of ironic given the real pillow fight is in the Epsom seat, which National hands to Act every three years.) A by-election will be held in Tāmaki Makaurau because the person who held the seat, Takutai Tarsh Kemp, recently died. And she held the seat because the voters of that electorate put her there, unlike some party list mediocrity like, well, take your pick. Luxon's comment was flippant at best and disrespectful to both the late MP and her constituents. So, no, it's not a pillow fight, it's a vote in the largest Polynesian city in the world. But Luxon's indifference to Māori voters in the coming by-election reflects the larger issue of the major parties mostly ignoring Māori as a voting bloc. One of the underlying reasons for this was first pointed out to me by my sixth form history teacher at Edgecumbe College, Gerry Rowlands, an American originally from Florida, a southern state with all the history that entails. Mr Rowlands posed a hypothetical idea that Māori would be better off all going on the general roll and getting rid of the Māori seats altogether. His rationale was that the electorate we were in was often held by National because of the high number of Pākehā farmers. But if Māori all went on the general roll, then National – and Labour, for that matter – would actually have to compete for the Māori vote to win. The then-named Eastern Māori seat went from the Bay of Plenty all the way around the East Coast and down to Wairarapa and Wellington. This area has one of the highest Māori populations in the country and the election campaigns in the general electorate seats would look completely different if all Māori went on the general roll. Mr Rowlands didn't say this but I don't think he'd disagree – the Māori seats are acting as a passive version of what Americans call gerrymandering. That is, Māori are being electorally contained – or at least split – and thereby robbed of their actual voting power by the Māori seats. The Māori vote has been ghettoised; every Māori who goes on the Māori roll is a Māori the candidates and the elected MPs in the general seats can ignore. And they do. Back to Auckland and the present day. One of Luxon's long catalogue of gaffes since taking up National's leadership was encouraging women to have babies to boost the flagging population. He quickly backtracked. Women have fought long and hard to have control over their fertility and some male politician telling them to start banging out babies for the national cause wasn't landing well. But what Luxon dimly recognised was that Pākehā numbers are in the early stages of decline, and this decline will only accelerate as the 34% of the Pākehā population that is over the age of 55 falls off the perch at an increasing rate. Luxon doesn't seem to recognise, even dimly, that Māori and Polynesian populations are rising steadily. Listen to Luxon's political messaging and it's as if Māori don't exist in his calculations. Labour's Chris Hipkins isn't any better, and in some respects he's worse. When Māori became a political target, he, like Helen Clark before him, dropped them like a hot hāngī rock so he could appear non-threatening to old, white people. The coalition government has had a free run in its attack on Māori because Hipkins does little to stand up for them, or articulate in any coherent way why what's good for Māori is good for everyone. He'd rather let Te Pāti Māori take the flak. Te Pāti Māori has become a convenient – and, it must be said, easy – political target. But those who bear the brunt of the political attack are actually their voters. Their interests get drowned out in all the posturing from across the political spectrum. The merits of the Tāmaki Makaurau candidates – Peeni Henare for Labour, Oriini Kaipara for Te Pāti Māori and Hannah Tamaki for Vision New Zealand – are open to serious question. But National, NZ First, Act, and even the Greens, have disqualified themselves from any part in the conversation, because they haven't bothered to put up candidates. Māori are at the pointy end of issues that concern everyone, particularly those of a younger generation: the cost of housing, the cost of living, the environment and the future of employment. The economic and social direction of South Auckland and other regions of the country with high Māori populations is the direction of the country as a whole. It's a bare-knuckle fight for the future of the nation. Mr Luxon is just too scared to even get in the ring.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Gisborne District Council welcomes benchmarking but says context is key
Gisborne District Council has welcomed the release of the Government's new Council Performance Profiles while urging the public to look beyond the numbers. 'These profiles give the public easier access to financial data – and that's a good thing,' Mayor Rehette Stoltz said in a media release. Metrics in the
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mixed reaction to NCEA replacement plan
A pair of Dunedin principals say the proposed replacement for NCEA will be an improvement, but a teacher's union representative is concerned there will be a loss in flexibility for students. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and the Minister for Education Erica Stanford have announced a proposal to replace the entire NCEA programme with new national qualifications. Year 11 students would be required to sit a foundation test in numeracy and literacy and year 12 and 13 students would receive two new qualifications — the New Zealand Certificate of Education and Advanced Certificate of Education. Students would be required to take five subjects and pass at least four of them to receive a certificate being awarded a mark out of 100 and grades "that make sense to parents like A, B, C, D, E". Otago Secondary Principals' Association chairwoman Jackie Barron, who is a principal at St Hilda's Collegiate School, said her initial thoughts were the curriculum change would give teachers some certainty and schools some clarity around what was expected of them. Despite being positive about the changes, she said the information was new and would take time to process. There was previously some anxiety around what the NCEA was going to look like with recent changes to the qualification made in an attempt to put a stronger focus on literacy and numeracy. "This gives us a really clear timeline," Ms Barron said. There was enough time for teachers to adjust to the new curriculum as major changes to year 12 and 13 courses were not expected until 2028. Ms Barron thought it was the right call to replace NCEA if the new curriculum was inclusive and engaged all students. She said one of NCEA's strengths was its flexibility and it was important not to go back to a narrow form of assessment that only tested certain types of learning. "We need to maintain the openness to valuing all different types of learning." Otago Boys' High School rector Richard Hall said the proposed new curriculum appeared to be an improvement on NCEA. He said the existing NCEA framework faced challenges posed by an "attitude that can favour mediocrity". There were issues with it including excessive credit counting and an over-reliance on internal assessment at the expense of robust external examination opportunities. Otago Boys' had maintained a strong expectation for its students to sit exams even if they had already received all the credits they needed to pass. "We believe that a shift towards a potentially 50/50 model of internal and external assessment [exams] would represent a beneficial step forward," Mr Hall said. PPTA Otago regional chairman Kussi Hurtado-Stuart was concerned the new qualification would lose some of the flexibility NCEA had. He said the loss of flexibility would affect neurodiverse learners the most, especially if exams were heavily weighted. He was worried teachers would not be given enough resource support to transition into the new curriculum. "I think that there was a moment of solidarity and eye rolls this morning across the country both at the change that was proposed and the support they said we were going to get." Teachers' expectations were reasonably low there would be any support. Ms Stanford said the NCEA change programme was already funded and some proposals like the expansion of Vocational Education and Training pathways would require additional funding that would be considered in future budgets. The flexibility NCEA offered in externals and internals would be maintained with the new qualification and special assessment conditions would be, too.
