Elon Musk's proposed new political party could focus on a few pivotal congressional seats
Tesla and SpaceX's multibillionaire CEO mused about that approach on Friday in a post on X, the social media platform which he owns, as he continued feuding with Donald Trump over the spending bill that the president has signed into law.
'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' wrote Musk, who is the world's richest person and oversaw brutal cuts to the federal government after Trump's second presidency began in January. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring they serve the true will of the people.'
In another post on Friday, when the US celebrated the 249th anniversary of its declaration of independence from the UK, Musk published a poll asking his X followers whether he should advance on his previously stated idea of creating the so-called America party to challenge both Republicans and Democrats. More than 65% of about 1.25m responses indicated 'yes' as of Saturday morning.
'Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system!' Musk also wrote in text accompanying the poll, which he promoted several times throughout Friday.
Musk's posts on Friday came after he spent $277m of his fortune supporting Trump's victorious 2024 presidential campaign. The Republican president rewarded Musk by appointing him to lead the so-called 'department of government efficiency', or Doge, which abruptly and chaotically slashed various government jobs and programs while claiming it saved $190bn.
But Doge's actions may also have cost taxpayers $135bn, according to an analysis by the Partnership for Public Service, a nonpartisan non-profit dedicated to studying the federal workforce.
Musk left Doge at the end of May and more recently became incensed at Trump's support for a budget bill that would increase the US debt by $3.3tn. He threatened to financially support primary challenges against every member of Congress who supported Trump's spending bill – along with promising to 'form the America Party' if it passed.
The House voted 218 to 214 in favor of the spending bill, with just two Republicans joining every Democrat in the chamber in unsuccessfully opposing it. In the Senate, the vice-president, JD Vance, broke a 50-50 deadlock in favor of the bill, which Trump signed on Friday hours after Musk posted his America party-related poll.
The Trump spending bill's voting breakdown illustrated how narrowly the winning side in Congress carries some of the most controversial matters.
Trump has warned Musk – a native of South Africa and naturalized US citizen since 2002 – that directly opposing his agenda would be personally costly. The president, who has pursued mass deportations of immigrants recently, publicly discussed deporting Musk from the US as well as cutting government contracts for some of his companies.
'Without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head to South Africa,' Trump posted on his own Truth Social platform.
The president also told a group of reporters in Florida: 'We might have to put Doge on Elon. Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Florida town sees orange groves turned into big box stores
A Florida town that was once home to sprawling orange groves, scenic views, and abundant small-town charm has seen an influx of residents and new developments but is struggling to keep up. Over the past decade Clermont - that is 25 miles east of Orlando - has seen a population explosion and developers have moved to trade rows of trees for rows of cookie cutter houses and chain franchises. Clermont is now home to just over 50,000 residents according to latest census statistics from July 2024. This has shot up from just over 43,000 residents in April 2020 and from just under 29,000 in April 2010. As development has accelerated, locals have grown concerned over whether the city has the infrastructure to handle such robust change. Residents believe that the biggest issue is over-building. 'It used to be a nice town, now it's wall to wall houses,' local Eva Dole told News 6. 'It used to be you could look up where the Publix is on U.S. 27 and it was all orange groves,' she explained. 'Now it's just a whole bunch of stores.' She said locals initially advocated for stores but she wasn't expecting chains to move in practically overnight. The once rolling groves that Florida and Clermont especially was known for now sit at an all time low - production in the state's orange groves has tanked 92 percent since 2003–2004 season, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Citrus Tower, built in 1956 to allow visitors to observe the miles of surrounding orange groves, sits in the middle of the city and serves as a reminder about the once flourishing industry with new homes and businesses having sprung up around it. Realtor Bent Danholm who has been working in the area since 2016 has found that families are flocking to Clermont to take advantage of spacious homes at lower prices than the surrounding areas. 'It's cheaper than Winter Garden and Horizon West area but it's still close to jobs in the Orlando area and the price range is a little bit lower,' he told Daily Mail. He said that families are also taking advantage of the influx of jobs in the area, and despite their complaints, locals don't seem to be moving out. 'What I gather from what people tell me there's still quite a good sense of community,' he said. 'I've seen more people wanting to buy there than wanting to move away.' Danholm said - on average - families come in looking to spend around $400,000 on their new home. He added that thanks to the ever-developing landscape there are lots of places to choose from. He said that on-the-market homes in the area have increased from 579 in January to 739 in June. He told Daily Mail: 'Overall, the Clermont market is very well-balanced, slightly favoring the sellers.' Many of his Clermont listings contain four or more bedrooms, backyard pools, and spacious yards. The average listing currently costs just under $600,000 and contains 3.5 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms within 2,000 square feet, per Danholm's website. Another local realtor Matt Wheatley said that families aren't the only ones coming in swarms to Clermont. 'A lot of pro wakeboarders and now wake surfers choose the Clermont chain of lakes due to its depth and ease of use for training daily,' he told Daily Mail. Their preferred listings include high-end lake front living. However the rush for real estate has also brought with it other issues like traffic. Dole said: 'When you're driving and all you see are buildings and it's bumper-to-bumper traffic, it's very difficult to feel like you're in a small town.' Local Eddy Judson commented on a social media post about the town's development saying: 'We're basically Orlando now.' At the forefront of the changes going forward is Wellness Way, which is using tens of thousands of acres of land to build 15,000 homes, office buildings and shops. The plan, which has been in the works for over a decade, aims to bring high-tech, high-paying jobs to the city. It's also intended to incorporate fitness centers, sports facilities and health and wellness spaces into the community. It's aimed at 'creating a community devoted to health and wellness,' according to First Capitol Group. Lake County Commissioner Sean Parks said: 'I think the growth has brought some good things, but definitely there's a lot of concern right now. 'I tell people, "Look, I live here too. I'm a Central Florida native." I'm shocked at what I see. I get it.' Parks is advocating for growth management, rather than the end of it altogether, which seems to be what many locals want.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Elon Musk to form new political party after fallout with Donald Trump
Billionaire Elon Musk has said that he is forming a third political party in the US after a falling out with President Donald Trump. Making the announcement on X, he said he would be forming the America Party in response to Trump's sweeping tax cuts law. Musk, the former ever-present ally of Trump, who headed up the Department of Government Efficiency, broke with the President over his signature legislation, which was signed into law on Friday. As the bill made its way through Congress, Musk threatened to form the 'America Party' if 'this insane spending bill passes.' 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk said Saturday on X, the social media company he owns. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' The formation of new political parties is not uncommon, but they typically struggle to pull any significant support away from the Republican and Democratic parties. But Musk, the world's richest man, who spent at least $250 million supporting Trump in the 2024 election, could impact the 2026 elections, determining control of Congress if he is willing to spend significant amounts of money. His reignited feud with the president could also be costly for Musk, whose businesses rely on billions of dollars in government contracts and the publicly traded company Tesla has taken a hit in the market. It wasn't clear whether Musk had taken steps to formally create the new political party. Spokespeople for Musk and his political action committee, America PAC, didn't immediately comment on Sunday. As of Sunday morning, there were multiple political parties listed in the Federal Election Commission database that had been formed in the the hours since Musk's Saturday X post with versions of 'America Party' of 'DOGE' or 'X' in the name, or Musk listed among people affiliated with the entity. But none appeared to be authentic, listing contacts for the organisation as email addresses such as ' wentsnowboarding@ ″ or untraceable Protonmail addresses. Musk on Sunday spent the morning on X taking feedback from users about the party and indicated he'd use the party to get involved in the 2026 midterm elections. Last month, he threatened to try to oust every member of Congress who voted for Trump's bill. Musk had called the tax breaks and spending cuts package a 'disgusting abomination," warning it would increase the federal deficit, among other critiques. 'The Republican Party has a clean sweep of the executive, legislative and judicial branches and STILL had the nerve to massively increase the size of government, expanding the national debt by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS,' Musk said Sunday on X. His critiques of the bill and move to form a political party mark a reversal from May, when his time in the White House was winding down and the head of rocket company SpaceX and electric vehicle maker Tesla said he would spend 'a lot less' on politics in the future. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who clashed with Musk while he ran DOGE, said on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday that DOGE's 'principles' were popular, but 'if you look at the polling, Elon was not.' 'I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities,' he said.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Inside Trump's 20-hour play to win over stubborn Republicans on Big Beautiful Bill including signed MAGA swag
President Donald Trump wasn't on the House floor for Thursday's vote on his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' – but he was there in spirit, including on the right hand of one South Carolina lawmaker voting his way. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, was sporting a custom ring on the big day with a golden image of the president's face as he cast his vote for the mega-bill that extended Trump's 2017 tax cuts. With Wilson's help, the massive bill passed 218-214 after a pressure campaign by Trump and congressional leaders kept lawmakers working overnight. 'It's gold Donald Trump on silver. You don't see it every day,' Wilson told the Daily Mail about the special jewelry he wore for the occasion. 'One of my staff was kind enough to get it for me,' he explained. Wilson's vote wasn't considered up for grabs, which may be why his staff came up with its own special Trump swag. For the about a dozen of other lawmakers who were wavering, the president applied his famous fear tactics – as well as a charm and even an array of signed swag – to get Republicans to push the mammoth bill across the finish line. That came despite polls showing the underwater and even some people who voted for it warning about steep cuts to Medicaid or fretting about the estimated $3 trillion it's estimated to tack onto the national debt. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) testified to Trump's salesmanship in a video he posted of himself leaving the White House after conservative House Freedom Caucus members who were wavering met with the president. 'The president was wonderful, as always,' Burchett gushed. 'Informative, funny, he told me he likes seeing me on TV, which was kind of cool.' Then Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, a Trump loyalist who was walking with him, asked: 'Did you show them what he signed for you?' 'Yeah, he signed a bunch of stuff,' Burchett responded, downplaying it. 'It's cool.' Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins also poured on the charm when she ran into Burchett outside the White House, offering a hug and asking: 'Are we getting it done?' 'Yes m'am,' he replied, before adding, 'I'm a happily married man.' The video also shows Burchett gripping a gold challenge coins of the kind Trump doles out, as he did to an African reporter he called 'beautiful.' 'Donald Trump absolutely was our closer, and Donald Trump never stopped,' said House Majority Whip Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), whose own role is to line up support for legislation on the Floor. 'Every day [he] was there in the fight [asking] "Who do I need to call? What do I need to do?"' Scalise said no president was 'more directly engaged.' 'President Trump was in the Oval Office making phone calls to just about everybody in the House,' said Trump's economic advisor Kevin Hassett. There were also threats, including some delivered in public. 'For Republicans, this should be an easy yes vote. Ridiculous!!!' Trump wrote in all-caps on his Truth Social site. 'MAGA is not happy, and it's costing you votes!!!' he wrote in another. Not all of his persuasive tactics resulted in votes. Trump golfed this past weekend with ally Sen. Lindsey Graham but also Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, one of three Senate Republicans who voted against the bill. (Victory came in the Senate after leaders offered a series of concessions to Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who nevertheless wrote that 'This bill needs more work' and 'this has been an awful process' with a 'frantic rush to meet an artificial deadline.') Trump has notably avoided railing against Paul, even while vowing to primary Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who Trump rips as a 'grandstander' and who also opposed the bill. Just two House Republicans, Massie and Pennsylvania Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, voted against the bill. That comes even as fellow Republicans who had wavered ultimately got behind it. That includes New Jersey GOP Rep. Jeff Van Drew, who had raised concerns that limits on health care provider taxes in his state could and up sapping critical resources for Medicaid. 'I couldn't vote for it that way,' he said, because it would have devastated how the state operates. He said he worked with President Trump directly and got a change incorporated in a final 'wrap-around' amendment. He said he was trying to persuade some of his own colleagues with the misguided view that 'Medicaid was for lazy people.' 'We addressed that, okay? But the bottom line is it's working people, it's disabled people, it's nursing homes, senior citizens, a whole array of people.' Now that the bill is through Congress, Van Drew acknowledged that the fight now becomes a PR battle – with pre-vote polls showing support for Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is underwater, and a potential risk for Republicans in the 2026 elections. A nonpartisan Congressional Budget estimate said the bill would cut Medicaid by $1 trillion and could cause nearly 12 million people to lose health insurance coverage. 'So the bottom line is, yes, so now this changes from the bureaucratic public policy process into a policy of who's going to be a better mouthpiece? Who's going to articulate the political sense of the ramifications of this bill better? Are you going to be able to emphasize the tax cuts .. So if we articulate that well, if we sell it well, if we talk about we're still maintaining the safety net, then I think we'll be okay.'
