Taiwanese lawmakers approve higher military pay
Taiwan's opposition-controlled parliament approved Tuesday a pay increase for military service members, in a bid to address a manpower shortage and retain soldiers in the face of Chinese military pressure.
China claims Taiwan is part of its territory and has not ruled out using force to bring the self-ruled island under its control.
The main opposition Kuomintang (KMT) party and Taiwan People's Party passed amendments to an armed forces pay act granting volunteer service members an additional monthly allowance of NT$30,000 (US$1,000).
The law previously did not specify the exact amount for allowances.
It is on top of increases announced by President Lai Ching-te in March.
"The armed forces are facing new types of operational needs... allowances should be increased to reflect the sharp rise in unit duties and training frequency," the KMT said in the document outlining the proposed changes.
"By significantly raising allowances and adding an adjustment mechanism, the aim is to improve recruitment incentives and retain outstanding talent."
Other changes passed by lawmakers Tuesday were for conscripts to receive no less than the minimum wage, additional pay for combat units and overtime.
Premier Cho Jung-tai, who belongs to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party, said the government would challenge the amendments after the cabinet was not consulted as required by the budget act.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
Friday fury ahead? India's tariff clock is ticking
As the August 1st deadline looms, India faces potential US tariffs due to unresolved trade negotiations. The US team's visit on August 25th signals a missed deadline, increasing the risk of punitive measures. Trump's administration may use tariffs to pressure India, impacting key export sectors and straining bilateral relations despite mixed signals. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads As the clock ticks toward Friday, August 1, the weight of an unresolved trade deal with the United States is beginning to feel increasingly burdensome for US team will visit India on August 25 -- well after the looming deadline -- for the sixth round of negotiations for the proposed bilateral trade agreement between the two countries, an official told PTI on Tuesday. India faces the strong possibility of punitive tariffs from the US, a development that could send ripples through its export economy and broader diplomatic ties with trajectory of US-India trade negotiations has become emblematic of a broader pattern in Washington's trade posture under President Donald Trump . What began as a bilateral discussion aimed at resolving market access issues and addressing tariff asymmetries has evolved into a high-pressure bargaining exercise marked by missed deadlines and implicit slated for July 9, the deadline for concluding the interim trade deal was extended to August 1 by Trump, ostensibly to give negotiations more room. However, the scheduling of a sixth round of talks for August 25 strongly signals that no agreement will be reached in time to meet the new deadline. This delay, while perhaps reflecting the complexity of the deal, is unlikely to be viewed sympathetically by a White House that has increasingly framed trade as a high-stakes, zero-sum has already shown a willingness to use tariffs as a tool of leverage in trade negotiations, not just with strategic competitors like China, but with allies and partners alike. India, though spared from a tariff notification letter after the July 9 deadline passed, remains very much in the crosshairs. The administration's hesitation to act then may have been strategic: a calculated move to keep India at the table without escalating tensions the upcoming August 1 deadline carries more urgency. Trump could reassert his trademark coercive tactics, using tariffs to pressure India into faster concessions. The risk is amplified by the current political tone in Washington, where trade deals are increasingly judged by their speed and assertiveness rather than the nuances of this context, recent remarks made by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stand out as a rare, moderating voice. His assertion that 'quality matters more than timing' suggests a recognition of the complexity involved in crafting a sustainable and equitable trade deal. "We're not going to rush for the sake of doing deals," Bessent told CNBC in an interview nearly a week ago. However, he said that tariffs might re-enter the negotiation toolkit if progress stalls, effectively undermining the very caution he advocates. "We'll see what the President wants to do," he said. "But again, if we somehow boomerang back to the August 1 tariff, I would think that a higher tariff level will put more pressure on those countries to come up with better agreements."This duality -- between a push for quality and a readiness to use tariffs -- mirrors the broader contradictions in the Trump administration's trade approach. While the US claims to be seeking mutual benefit, the reliance on deadlines, threats and unilateral pressure points to a strategy of deal-making by domination rather than now finds itself in a delicate position. With little time left before the August 1 deadline, and no further negotiations scheduled until August 25, it must brace for the economic and diplomatic fallout of potential US tariffs. Key export sectors such as pharmaceuticals and textiles could be hit hard by sudden trade barriers. Moreover, the imposition of tariffs would inject fresh tension into an already complex bilateral relationship, one that spans not just trade but also defense, regional security and technology cooperation. If Washington proceeds with punitive measures, it risks alienating one of its key strategic partners in Asia at a time when counterbalancing China is high on both nations' August 1 approaches, India faces an unenviable situation: a deadline without a deal, and a partner unwilling to wait. The scheduling of the next round of talks for August 25 makes it all but certain that the two sides will miss the current window for an interim agreement. What remains to be seen is whether Trump will act on his threats or hold off once more in the hope of securing a better, more stable outcome of the immediate outcome, the broader takeaway is clear: India must prepare for a more transactional and turbulent trade relationship with the US, where pressure and pace increasingly trump patience and process.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
India-US trade deal: American delegates to visit New Delhi to hold sixth round in August. Details here
Representatives from the United States are set to visit India on 25 August 2025 for the next round of negotiations for the proposed India-US trade deal, news agency PTI reported on Tuesday, 29 July 2025, citing officials aware of the development. 'The US team is visiting for the sixth round of talks,' the official told the news agency. He also mentioned that the two nations will continue to negotiate an interim trade deal as US President Donald Trump's 1 August tariff deadline nears. Trump's tariffs on world nations will be imposed on 1 August 2025 after the end of the suspension period, which means exports from India to the United States will witness the effect of a 26 per cent tariff rate on top of the existing 10 per cent baseline duty. Indian and US delegations finished their fifth round of trade talks last week in Washington. India's chief negotiator and special secretary of the Department of Commerce, Rajesh Agrawal, and Assistant US Trade Representative for South and Central Asia, Brendan Lynch, discussed the trade deal ahead of the tariff deadline. According to the report, both nations are looking to finalise an interim trade deal before the August tariff deadline. The reciprocal tariffs were imposed on 2 April 2025 and were supposed to take effect from 9 July 2025. However, the deadline for the imposition of the import duties was later extended to 1 August 2025. India, in its trade negotiations with the US, has hardened its position on the US's demand for import duty cuts on agriculture and dairy products. However, the country has not given any import duty cuts on these products to any of its trading partners, as per the agency report. Farmer associations across India have also requested the government not to include any issues related to agriculture in the trade deal. India aims to remove the additional 26 per cent tariffs, along with the 50 per cent rates on steel and aluminium and 25 per cent tariffs on automobiles. The nation has also reserved its rights under the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to impose retaliatory tariffs on the Western nation. India also wants tariff cuts on textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, garments, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, oil seeds, grapes, and bananas. In exchange, the United States is seeking tariff cuts on industrial goods, automobiles, especially electric vehicles, wines, petrochemical products, agri goods, dairy products, apples, tree nuts, and genetically modified crops.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Sri Lanka will have to navigate geo-political tides as it pivots from tourism to maritime trade
With its natural beauty, wildlife and culture, Sri Lanka is known as the ' pearl of the Indian Ocean ', and attracts millions of tourists every year. But my research suggests that the country might not be so reliant on tourism in the future, as it looks to become a major player in global maritime trade. The island's numerous harbours and enviable location along international sea routes have led to major investment from China and the US, as they seek to extend their strategic influence in the region. That investment is being welcomed after years of economic and political turmoil in Sri Lanka. The Easter bombings of 2019 targeted Catholic churches and hotels, killing 269 people and devastating tourism. The same year, significant tax cuts slashed government revenue before Covid did serious damage to the economy. In 2021, a ban on chemical fertilisers led to nationwide agricultural failure, while excessive borrowing and money printing triggered soaring inflation, which peaked at 70% in August 2022. The country ended up failing to pay its foreign debts. Following huge protests in 2022 and the resignation of the president, Sri Lanka began a major political and economic shift. It secured a bailout from the International Monetary Fund and implemented reforms aimed at stabilising the economy. So far, some of the effects have been positive. Inflation has eased, investor confidence has improved and more tea, clothing and rubber products are being exported up. Key to this has been improved logistics and port infrastructure. Business at the port of Colombo, the country's largest, is booming, aided in part by global shipping disruptions, including the Red Sea crisis, which rerouted vessels through the Indian Ocean. But international maritime ambitions can be a complex affair, and Sri Lanka needs to be wary of becoming just a well-positioned commodity for the world's economic superpowers. China for example, has secured a controversial 99-year lease of Hambantota port. India, wary of Chinese encroachment, has ramped up its own investments, including the development of a container terminal in Colombo. In 2023, the US announced a US$500 million plan to develop a deep-water shipping container terminal at the port of Colombo. And the potential US tariffs of 30% on imports from Sri Lanka have been interpreted by some as a pressure tactic to get greater access to its waters. Balancing these interests is a delicate act. While foreign investment is crucial for infrastructure development, Sri Lanka needs to protect its sovereignty and ensure that port operations serve national, not just international, interests. My research suggests that one way of building a resilient and diverse Sri Lankan economy would be to focus on its surrounding waters. Sri Lanka's vast 'exclusive economic zone', an area of sea where it controls marine resources, holds massive untapped potential. Blue economy This potential lies in traditional sectors like fisheries and tourism, but also emerging industries such as marine biotechnology. This growing field offers opportunities in things like bioengineering and marine-based pharmaceuticals. With other countries rapidly advancing in these sectors, Sri Lanka is well-positioned to follow suit and become a regional leader in the blue economy (economic activities associated with the sustainable use of ocean resources). But there is still a complex web of geopolitical interests and economic pressures to navigate, as well as environmental challenges. At the moment for example, the Sri Lankan government is making plans for the deep natural port at Trincomalee to become a major marine repair and refuelling centre between Dubai and Singapore. Other proposed projects include offshore wind farms and oil rig facilities. The country also needs to compete with the likes of Malaysia, which is investing heavily in AI-driven port operations. To stay competitive, Sri Lanka must modernise infrastructure and streamline processes. And despite the progress, challenges persist. Poverty in Sri Lanka has doubled since 2021, while youth unemployment remains high. Sri Lanka faces rising maritime threats like piracy and illegal fishing, requiring stronger maritime surveillance. Simultaneously, port expansion risks damaging marine ecosystems. Green technologies and stricter environmental regulations are essential for long-term security and sustainability. Sri Lanka's strategic location and maritime heritage offer a foundation for economic renewal. With wise governance, sustainability, and balanced geopolitics, its ports could once again become vital gateways to regional prosperity and global trade.
